Image source: The Motley Fool.
Date
Jan. 20, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. ET
Call participants
- Chief Financial Officer — Paul Brody
- Chief Executive Officer — Milan Galik
- Chairman — Thomas Peterffy
- Managing Director — Nancy Stuebe
Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]
Takeaways
- Net new accounts -- Over 1,000,000 net new accounts were added in 2025, setting a new annual record.
- Client equity -- Client equity reached $780 billion, up 37%, marking the first year-end above three-quarters of a trillion dollars.
- Quarterly adjusted pretax income -- Adjusted pretax income exceeded $1 billion for the fifth consecutive quarter, even with lower interest rates.
- Full-year net revenues -- Net revenues surpassed $6 billion for the first time in company history.
- Client performance vs. S&P 500 -- Individual investors gained 19.2% on average, financial advisers 20.57%, and hedge funds 28.91%, all outperforming the S&P 500's 17.9%.
- Commission revenue -- Quarterly commissions were $582 million; full-year commissions hit $2.1 billion, up 27%.
- Net interest income -- Net interest income was $966 million for the quarter and $3.6 billion for the year, with a 20% yearly increase in quarterly net interest income.
- Options volume -- Options contract volume grew 27% in the quarter and 26% for the year, consistent with industry growth rates.
- Futures volume -- Quarterly futures contract volume rose 22%, with a 12% full-year increase, surpassing industry averages.
- Stock share volume -- Stock share volume increased 16% for the quarter and 38% for the year.
- Daily average revenue trades (DARTs) -- DARTs reached 4 million per day, up 30%.
- Execution, clearing, and distribution costs -- These costs fell to $91 million, down 21%, primarily due to an SEC fee rate at zero and higher exchange rebates.
- Pretax margin -- Quarterly pretax margin was 79%, matching the prior quarter record; the annual pretax margin reached 77%.
- Headcount -- Employee headcount rose 6% to 3,182 as of Dec. 31.
- General and administrative expense -- G&A expense for the quarter was $62 million, up 5%, with full-year G&A down versus prior year due to previous one-time items.
- Securities lending revenue -- Securities lending net revenue estimated at $290 million for the quarter, up 58%.
- Technology and platform deployment -- Launched Global Trader 2.0, introduced a desktop Linux beta installer, and added AI-powered features including investment themes and Ask IBKR.
- Geographical and product expansion -- Expanded market access to Brazil, Taiwan, UAE, and Slovenia, and added new tax-advantaged account types in additional countries.
- ForecastX trading growth -- ForecastX traded 286 million pairs in the fourth quarter, compared to 15 million in the third quarter, with more than 10,000 instruments now listed.
- FDIC program enhancement -- Maximum cash eligible for the FDIC suite doubled to $5 million (individual) and $10 million (joint).
- Crypto offering update -- Cryptocurrency revenues remain small, with expansion into Europe expected soon, and no incremental demand from introducing brokers.
Summary
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR +4.80%) delivered record-breaking performance in key financial and operating metrics for the year, highlighting the scalability of its automated global platform. Strategic focus on international growth and client diversification produced significant client asset inflows and robust trading activity across asset classes. Executive commentary indicated continued investment in technology and AI, alongside strengthened product capabilities and expanded geographic presence. Recent platform and product enhancements, including the rollout of the Carta Visa Infinite card and expanded stablecoin funding, support further client engagement and asset growth. Management signaled ongoing confidence in high account growth, with no reliance on short-term incentives, and discussed the pending OCC National Trust Bank charter and future possibilities for a European banking license.
- Institutional and retail client outperformance relative to the S&P 500 was explicitly attributed to Interactive Brokers' low-cost structure, execution quality, and advanced analytics.
- Liquidity strategies remain focused on short-term yields, with average investment portfolio duration under 30 days, despite lower benchmark rates across major developed markets.
- Quarterly trading volume during overnight hours increased 76% sequentially and more than 130% year over year, supporting the company's global-active client focus.
- Adjusted net interest income and pretax margins achieved new records, even as both US and major international central banks cut rates during the quarter.
- Management anticipates being operational under the OCC National Trust Charter Bank by year-end, pending regulatory approval, which would allow custody of mutual funds and ETFs.
- There is currently no company interest in acquiring sports betting platforms; the firm prefers to expand ForecastX organically, emphasizing prediction markets' potential outside of sports.
- Compensation and G&A expenses increased mainly in line with controlled headcount expansion and planned hikes in advertising, supporting continued organic growth.
- Management confirmed ongoing AI initiatives may affect future expense growth, although recent trends remain consistent and disciplined.
- Efforts to attract new institutional clients to prediction markets are underway, focusing initially on utilities trading temperature-linked contracts.
Industry glossary
- DARTs (Daily Average Revenue Trades): The average number of revenue-generating trades executed per day by clients on the broker's platform.
- FDIC suite program: Program providing increased Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protection on qualifying client cash through partner banks.
- ForecastX: A CFTC-regulated exchange developed by Interactive Brokers for trading contracts on real-world predictive outcomes.
- NIM presentation: Adjustment of net interest income to include certain income sources considered interest for margin analysis, but classified differently under GAAP.
- SEC fee rate: The rate charged by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on certain transactions, which was zero for the full reported quarter.
- Stablecoin: A type of cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, enabling easier and continuous cross-border account funding.
Full Conference Call Transcript
In the fourth quarter, we continue to demonstrate the power and leverage of our diversified, fully automated global platform, which serves the full spectrum of investors from those new to the markets buying their first fractional share of a magnificent seven stock in a cash account, through sophisticated traders benefiting from low cost and geographical reach, to professionals using our APIs and algorithms to execute advanced quantitative strategies in portfolio margin accounts. Many clients start gradually and evolve into active sophisticated traders, and our platforms are designed to support that entire journey, supporting their growth with us along the way at every stage.
We continue to see strong international interest in the global securities markets on a secular basis as people around the world seek higher returns on their assets as interest rates decline, and as other financial institutions pay them less. In 2025, we added more than 1,000,000 net new accounts, an annual record for the firm. Client equity rose 37% to $780 billion, an increase of more than $200 billion year over year and the first time we have ended a year with over three-quarters of a trillion dollars in client assets. Cyclically, rising markets and expectations for lower interest rates drive increased client engagement.
Clients traded actively, grew more comfortable taking on risk, increased their market exposure, and made greater use of leverage through margin loans. They also expanded beyond equities into other asset classes, including options and futures.
Our client-centric focus, by which we mean delivering global market access at extremely competitive pricing on state-of-the-art platforms, is best reflected in one simple measure: our client's performance. In 2025, the S&P 500 rose 17.9%. By comparison, our clients outperformed. Individual investors here were up on average 19.2%, or 130 basis points above the S&P 500. Financial advisers were up 20.57% on average, or 267 basis points above the market. Hedge fund clients were up 28.91% on average, a full 11 percentage points ahead of the S&P.
This performance is the direct result of our focus on empowering clients through low trade and margin pricing and less drag from costs, superior trade execution, advanced order types and algorithms, the advantage of attractive interest rates on cash and short proceeds, as well as the many advantages of our platforms, from AI and research tools to comprehensive educational offerings. It is why clients come to us. No gimmicks. No games. Just the best prices and the most comprehensive platforms. It is why the best-informed investors choose Interactive Brokers.
That client focus, combined with strong global demand for investing, translated into exceptional financial results. Quarterly adjusted pretax income reached a record level of more than $1 billion for the fifth consecutive quarter, despite lower interest rates. For the full year, we generated more than $6 billion in net revenues for the first time. We continually invest in improving our platform from front to back end, supported by a global team of programmers who deliver new functionality, ongoing enhancements, and client-driven improvements, while also meeting the diverse regulatory requirements across the many market centers and currencies we support.
Throughout 2025, we introduced a wide range of new products and enhancements worldwide, guided by deep engagement with a strong understanding of the needs of our diverse client base. This year, we expanded market access to Brazil, Taiwan, the UAE, and Slovenia, with additional countries planned for 2026. We continue to add to our ever-growing list of country-specific tax-advantaged funds. We offer traditional and Roth IRAs in the US, as well as Canadian RRSPs and TFSAs, UK ISAs, French PEAs, and Hungarian TBSCs. This year, we added Swedish ISKs, Japan's NISAs, and Canadian FHSAs. We now have several billion dollars of client assets in these accounts and are able to support individual investors at all stages of their investment journey.
From a funding perspective, clients can now fund their accounts using Stablecoin, making cross-border account funding easier and available 24/7. We doubled the amount of cash eligible for our FDIC suite program from $2.5 million to $5 million for individual accounts and from $5 million to $10 million for joint accounts. In October, we teamed with Carta to introduce our premium charge card globally. The Carta Visa Infinite card allows eligible clients to link their accounts and access their cash instantly anywhere in the world with no foreign transaction fees, an especially compelling benefit for our global client base. And it comes with premium cardholder benefits.
Platform-wise, our Global Trader 2.0 mobile platform was launched with a comprehensive UI/UX revamp and an all-new look and feel. Quick access trading tools accessible via a swipe or long press were added. Watch list management was streamlined, and AI news summaries incorporated. Our leading-edge IBKR desktop platform delivered several highly requested enhancements this year, including multi-monitor support with independent windows for charts, option chains, and more, multiple new screener filters, a named strategy selector for clients to quickly access popular combo strategy types, and a new Linux beta installer, extending IBKR desktop into the Linux ecosystem and addressing another long-standing client request.
We introduced connections where clients can enter a company's ticker and explore its broader investment ecosystem, including options, ETFs that hold the stock, forecast contracts, related economic indicators, competitors, and more. This feature is already seeing strong engagement.
We have embedded artificial intelligence throughout our organization, benefiting both clients and employees. We launched AI-powered investment themes, allowing clients to enter a concept such as nuclear energy or quantum computing and instantly receive a list of actionable investment ideas, significantly streamlining the research process. We also launched AI-generated news summaries, receiving FINRA approval midyear. These summaries deliver timely, relevant news directly tied to clients' portfolios, helping them stay informed more easily. Across our platforms, we launched the first version of Ask IBKR, an innovative AI-powered tool that lets our clients interact with and ask questions in plain English about their portfolios. Clients can ask about performance and allocation analysis, track their activity, and get performance attribution. They can ask to compare their performance versus various benchmarks, find their top dividend payers, calculate their capital gains and losses, and analyze sector exposure. Performance can be analyzed across flexible time frames: one year, one month, period to date, etc. Staying on top of an active portfolio with rapid access to a wide breadth of data is critical for successful investors.
Beyond these highlights, we have delivered a wide range of enhancements and new features. I encourage you to explore our platforms on our website. Or better yet, request a demo. Seeing our offerings firsthand across a broad range of client types and experience levels is the best way to appreciate what we have accomplished. In other areas of our business, to further enhance execution quality, we expanded our network of liquidity providers across bonds, options, overnight trading, international stocks, and ETFs and ADRs. And to further support our non-US client base, we translate our investor education courses and webcasts into multiple languages, making it easier for clients around the world to get started on investing on our platform.
Trading volume during our overnight hours continues to grow rapidly, up 76% from last quarter and more than 130% from the fourth quarter of last year. Providing deep liquid markets that are not constrained by US regular trading hours is critical to meeting the needs of a globally active client base.
And finally, a note on ForecastX. We created this exchange, which is regulated by the CFTC, to support trading on consequential predictions that have measurable third-party verified outcomes. ForecastX traded 286 million pairs this quarter, up from 15 million pairs in the third quarter, and now has four members quoting into the exchange, which has over 10,000 listed instruments. Our pipeline of new business, new initiatives, and enhancements remains as strong as ever, and our platforms resonate with people around the globe. We are not stopping here to rest on our achievements. We have many projects to work on, which we will look forward to sharing with you once they become a reality.
With that, I will turn the call over to our CFO, Paul Brody. Paul?
Paul Brody: Thank you, Nancy. Welcome, everyone, to the call. We will start with our revenue items on page three of the release. We are pleased with our financial results this quarter as we produced near-record net revenues and pretax income for the quarter and record results in all the major financial categories for the year. Commission revenues rose to a record $582 million this quarter. For the full year, commissions were $2.1 billion, up 27% from last year, driven by higher trading volumes across the major product categories. Net interest income reached $966 million for the quarter, and a yearly record of $3.6 billion despite multiple rate cuts in nearly all major currencies.
The continued risk-on environment during most of the year led to a significant increase in margin borrowing, while strong net customer deposits led to higher segregated funds balances. These revenues were partially offset by the interest we paid to our customers on their cash balances. We saw fewer hard-to-borrow names in securities lending than in the third quarter, but their presence across the second half drove full-year results well over the prior year.
Other fees and services generated $85 million for the quarter, and $291 million for the year, both up modestly versus the prior year period. This is primarily driven by higher payments for order flow from options exchange mandated programs and higher FDIC suite fees, despite reductions in risk exposure fees. Other income includes gains and losses on investments, our currency diversification strategy, and principal transactions. Note that many of these non-core items are excluded in our adjusted earnings. Other income was $10 million as reported, and $37 million as adjusted, primarily driven by a loss in our currency diversification program.
Turning to expenses, execution, clearing, and distribution costs were $91 million in the quarter, down 21% from the year-ago quarter, primarily due to two factors. First, we had a full quarter of an SEC fee rate at zero. In 2024, SEC fees were $22 million. And second, higher volumes meant we earned higher rebates at exchanges as a result of our smart order routing optimization, particularly for options. These costs and rebates are largely passed through to customers, so these reductions do not have much impact on our profitability. But they are components of our clients' profitability, and this execution quality is one of the reasons they choose to execute with us to maximize their returns.
As a percent of commission revenues, execution and clearing costs were 11% in the fourth quarter for a gross transaction profit margin of 89%. We calculate this by excluding from execution clearing and distribution dollars $23 million of non-transaction-based costs, predominantly market data fees, which do not have a direct commission revenue component.
Compensation and benefits expense was $153 million for the quarter, for a ratio of compensation expense to adjusted net revenues of 9%, versus 10% of the prior year quarter. As always, we remain focused on expense discipline as reflected in our moderate staff increase of 6% over the prior year. For the full year, this ratio was 10%, down from 11% in 2024. Our headcount at December 31 was 3,182. G&A expenses were $62 million, up 5% from the year-ago quarter, primarily from increasing spending on advertising. For the full year, G&A was $247 million, down from last year, which included a legal settlement that added $78 million and a one-time charge of $12 million to consolidate our European operations.
Excluding those items, G&A for the year was up 10%, predominantly on higher advertising expense.
Our pretax margin matched the third quarter record of 79%, and achieved a new record of 77% for the year, both as reported and as adjusted. Income taxes of $99 million reflect the sum of the public company's $39 million and the operating company's $60 million. The public company's effective tax rate was 12%, below its typical range, primarily due to tax benefits we were able to capture in 2025.
Moving to our balance sheet on page five of the release, our total assets ended the year 35% higher than the prior year at $23 billion, with growth driven by higher margin lending and segregated cash balances. New account growth also helped drive our record customer credit balances. We continue to have no long-term debt, and profit growth drove our firm equity up 23% for the year, to exceed $20 billion for the first time. We maintain a balance sheet geared towards supporting growth in our existing business and helping us win new business by demonstrating our strength to prospective clients and partners while also considering overall capital allocation.
In our operating data on pages six and seven, we have record customer activity in options, with our contract volumes up 27% over the prior year quarter, and up 26% for the full year, in line with industry volumes. Futures contract volumes rose 22% for the quarter to a near record and were up 12% for the full year, well above industry volumes. Stock share volumes rose 16% for the quarter, and 38% for the full year. Stock share volume generally increased versus last year, as clients gravitated to larger, higher quality names, and traded relatively less in pink sheet and some other very low-priced stocks.
Growth in the notional dollar value of shares traded in the quarter was significantly higher than the growth in share volumes, combined with the rise in major equity indices worldwide.
On page seven, you can see that total customer DARTs were 4 million trades per day in the quarter, up 30% from the prior year. Commission per cleared commissionable order of $2.64 is down from last year, primarily due to a mix of smaller average order sizes in stocks and futures and slightly higher in options, and the previously mentioned SEC fee rate moving to zero, which lowered commissions as well as execution and clearing expense.
Page eight shows our net interest margin numbers. Total GAAP net interest income was up 20% from the year-ago quarter to $966 million, just $1 million shy of the third quarter's record, despite benchmark rate cuts in multiple countries. Adjusted for NIM presentation, net interest income was just over $1 billion for the first time. We include, for NIM purposes, certain income that is more appropriately considered interest, but that for GAAP purposes, is classified as other fees and services or as other income. Our net interest income reflects strength in margin loan interest and securities lending, partially offset by a modest increase in interest expense on customer cash balances despite lower benchmark interest rates.
Many central banks, including the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, and the US, reduced rates this quarter, while others, including Australia, Europe, and Switzerland, held steady. Year on year, the average US Fed funds rate fell 75 basis points, or by 16%. Despite this decline, our margin loan interest was up 17% and our segregated cash interest was down only 3%, both bolstered by higher balances. The average duration of our investment portfolio remained at less than thirty days. During this quarter, the US Dollar yield curve remained flat to inverted from the short to medium term.
So we continue to maximize what we earn by focusing on short-term yields, rather than accepting the lower yields and higher duration risk of longer maturities. This strategy also allows us to maintain a relatively tight maturity match between our assets and liabilities.
Securities lending net interest was higher than last year, and we did not see as much activity in hard-to-borrow names as in the third quarter. Contributors to annual growth included several factors: our growing account base, which increases our inventory of attractive stocks to lend, including international securities; the interest we pay on short cash balances, which makes us attractive to investors who utilize short selling; our fully paid lending program, which shares proceeds with clients generally on a fifty-fifty basis, appealing to investors looking to maximize the return on their portfolios; and finally, activity has picked up in some of the typical drivers of securities lending, including IPOs and merger and acquisition activity. As most benchmark interest rates are now sufficiently above zero, a portion of what we earn from securities lending is classified as interest on segregated cash.
We estimate that if the additional interest earned and paid on cash collateral were included under securities borrowed and loaned, total net revenue related to securities lending would have been $290 million this quarter, up 58% over the prior year quarter. Fully rate-sensitive customer balances ended the current quarter at $24.7 billion versus $19.1 billion in the year-ago quarter.
Now, for the estimates of the impact of changes in rates, we estimate the effect of a 25 basis point decrease in the benchmark fed funds rate to be a $77 million reduction in annual net interest income. Note that our starting point for this estimate is December 31, with the fed funds effective rate at 3.64% and balances as of that date. Any growth in our balance sheet and interest-earning assets would reduce this impact. About 29% of our customer interest-sensitive balances is not in US dollars, so estimates of the US rate change exclude those currencies.
We estimate the effect of a 25 basis point decrease in all the relevant non-USD benchmark rates would reduce annual net interest income by $31 million.
In conclusion, we posted another financially strong quarter in net revenues and pretax margin, leading to a record year. This reflects our continued ability to grow our customer base and deliver on our core value proposition to customers while simultaneously scaling the business. Our business strategy continues to be effective: automating as much of the brokerage business as possible, continuously improving and expanding what we offer, while minimizing what we charge. And with that, we will turn it over to the moderator and open up for questions.
Operator: We will now open for questions. You will need to press 11 on your telephone. To remove yourself from the queue, you may press 11 again. First question comes from the line of Brennan Hawken of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open, Brennan.
Brennan Hawken: Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I was curious about the pull on the customer credit balances. It seemed as though the decline in the amount paid, the yield did not come down quite as much as we were looking for. Just some color around some of those dynamics, and what might have caused the lower rates not to flow through and whether or not there might just be some more on the come here in the next quarter or two?
Paul Brody: Yes, sure. So obviously, the net interest income and the major segments there being segregated cash, and margin loans and because of our credit balances, all operate a little bit differently. So for SEG cash, when the rates come down, even though we have a relatively short duration, there is a little bit of tail out there. And we retain somewhat higher rates while we pay lower rates on our credit balances during that period because they are based on the overnight rates. The rest is balanced changes. So our very strong performance in the margin lending balances vastly overcame the drop in the general benchmark rates.
Brennan Hawken: Okay. Got it. So we got a, basically, a repricing lag on some of the asset side. That makes sense. And for my follow-up, I believe the comment period for your bank charter application ended today. Could you maybe update us on that process, what you have heard back from the regulators, and what kind of impact we should expect if the bank charter is approved and you go forward with the bank?
Paul Brody: So we have been in contact with the OCC for a while. The way this process works is you are in contact with them. You talk to them. You present the business plan. They point out what they do not like or what you would like to receive more information on. Once you get through this stage, they give you the go-ahead to officially file the application, which we did. And they acknowledge that, then there is a several months long time period that they have to actually approve your request. There are others applying for the National Trust Charter Bank. I do not know exactly where we are in the queue.
But my expectation would be to be operational by the end of this year. Now exactly what that means for us is as a broker-dealer, the regulations do not permit us to custody assets of mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. A trust charter bank will allow us to do that. So that is the rationale behind our application.
Brennan Hawken: Thank you for taking my questions.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Moley of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead, Patrick.
Patrick Moley: Yes. Good afternoon, and thanks for taking the question. I had one on prediction markets. There has been a lot of speculation recently about whether regulators or the US courts will allow prediction market platforms to continue offering sports contracts. I was just hoping to get an update from you on how you maybe see this all playing out between the platforms and the sports books.
And then with ForecastX launching NFL contracts in the fourth quarter, just wondering, you know, if there what you would need to see from regulators or the courts that would make you comfortable offering contracts like that to IBKR customers or if this is an aspect of prediction markets that you just think is, you know, will never make sense to commingle with your existing customer base? Thanks.
Paul Brody: So, I do not know if you are aware that Massachusetts just came out with a ruling against Kashi. So the judge ruled against Kashi, and that probably means that Kashi will no longer take customers from Massachusetts. But, you know, this is certainly not the final word, so we, you know, your guess is as good as ours as to what will happen here. And so, luckily, you know, we Interactive Brokers does not rely on sports. We do believe that these contracts will have enormous applicability to many, many things about the future, and they will be very, very successful. And it does not really have to depend on sports.
Patrick Moley: Okay. Great. And then just as a follow-up, you are sitting on a healthy pile of excess cash. Any updated thoughts on the appetite for M&A and capital return priorities? And then on M&A specifically, I know in the past, you have said that with traditional brokerage models, it has been difficult to make the deal map work with your pricing model. But in an emerging asset class like prediction markets, I am just wondering if M&A could make sense here for you. Thanks.
Paul Brody: Anything is possible, but we are not going to buy a firm that is doing sports betting. And there is nothing else out there at the moment. Right?
Thomas Peterffy: It is not only that. We have our own platform for aspect. It is growing nicely. Mid-December of last year, we had rolled out forecast specs on a 24/7 trading schedule. We added liquidity providers. ForecastX now lists over 10,000 different instruments, and the trading volumes have increased significantly. So no reason for us to look for an acquisition in this space.
Patrick Moley: Alright. Thanks so much for the answer. That is it for me.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of James Yaro of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead, James.
James Yaro: Thanks for taking the question. So you touched a little bit on the OCC, National Trust Bank Charter. I was hoping you might be able to touch a little bit on the aspirations for a European banking license. And if so, where you are in the process of looking to get one of those?
Paul Brody: We have not started the process. Having a bank license in Europe would come with some benefits.
Milan Galik: It is not urgent for us to have one. We will eventually have a license in Europe. The most likely place for us to acquire it would be in Ireland, where our broker operations are already regulated by a banking regulator with whom we have a very good relationship.
James Yaro: Okay. Excellent. I just wanted to ask a follow-up on prediction markets. I was hoping, Thomas, you might be able to just update us on the institutional adoption of prediction markets so far. How you plan to cater to this client set specifically, versus on the retail side? And over what period, in your view, will institutional prediction markets fully develop?
Thomas Peterffy: So our most frequently traded contracts are temperature contracts. We are currently working on tying up these temperature contracts with the electricity contracts and the natural gas contracts. And as you know, it is basically the utilities that have to every day make a judgment about the next day's use of electricity. So we are working on approaching those, and I think that sometime in the course of the year, you will see them onboarding.
James Yaro: Okay. Thank you so much.
Thomas Peterffy: Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Craig Siegenthaler of Bank of America. Your line is open, Craig.
Craig Siegenthaler: Good evening, everyone. Hope you are all doing well. My first one is on your expanding crypto offering. How should we think about the appetite for adoption across your base? And I am especially interested in the individual investors in the direct and the iBroker channel. You know, do they want crypto trading, and do they want it from IBKR?
Milan Galik: Please tell the revenues are at the moment small relative to the overall company's revenues. Most clients who actively trade cryptocurrencies were already doing so before we entered the space. So we are not yet a major brand in the cryptocurrency space. You asked about the iBrokers. The answer is no. They have not been asking for access to crypto. I am not sure why that is. Our pricing is, we explained, over a number of earnings calls, is superior to our competitors in the United States and outside. We added crypto to our offering to round it up, particularly targeting investment advisers and multi-asset clients who wanted limited exposure to the assets.
Our offering is competitive, we continue to add capabilities. New geographies, namely Europe, is currently the focus. I would expect us to go live with our offering in this quarter. And then I am hopeful that after transfers, once we support after transfers, some crypto assets will migrate to our platform and take advantage of our superior pricing.
Craig Siegenthaler: Thanks, Milan. And just for my follow-up, it is one I have asked, I think, two quarters in a row now about account growth. Still very strong, worth at 30%. Thomas, any specifics on how long you can keep this up? Because your comments at that May conference, as long as I am alive.
Thomas Peterffy: No. That is my answer. No. I do not see any reason why our account growth would slow down. It will continue at the rate that we have been going. You see, the benefit that we have is our platform is attractive to many people.
Craig Siegenthaler: Okay. I will stop you. Thanks for taking my questions.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dan Fannon of Jefferies. Please go ahead, Dan.
Dan Fannon: Thanks. So just another question on growth, but more just in terms of investment and spend. As you think about all the initiatives you have entering this year, do you think the level of spend is growing? Is it consistent with the last couple of years? Or how should we think about, you know, overall expense growth?
Milan Galik: The overall expense growth, I think, has been consistent over the past many quarters over the last few years. We have been cautiously adding to our headcount as we needed. This past year, it was around 6% growth. Our compensation went up by 10% or so. I would expect for us to see similar growth in the future. Of course, we have a number of AI initiatives in process, and those initiatives may affect the rate at which our expenses will grow in the future.
Dan Fannon: Understood. And then just another one on account growth. In terms of the account growth today and where it has been coming from here in, you know, the latter part of '25 versus maybe where you think there is a growth going to change or other areas that could grow faster next year? Just trying to get a sense of what is different, in terms of where you are seeing more success or more markets are more mature versus less?
Milan Galik: We have been universally doing well. We have been attracting large accounts, small accounts. Very active accounts, less active accounts. Retail, professional, institutional. They all come to us for the same reason. The technology works. Pricing is fair. Access is global. No need to rely on promotions or incentives.
Dan Fannon: Understood. Okay. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Benjamin Budish of Barclays. Please go ahead, Benjamin.
Benjamin Budish: Hi, good evening, and thank you for taking the question. Maybe tying a couple of these previous questions together. I think, Thomas, in the press you made some comments about the US mid-elections later this year potentially juicing account growth. Can you maybe talk about the, and I think you have mentioned in the prepared remarks, the advertising spend is up a little bit. Even though I think a lot of your growth comes from word-of-mouth. Can you maybe talk about your plans to get or drive more engagement on Predictive Markets either through the Interactive Brokers platform onboarding more FCMs?
How are you thinking about that opportunity coming up later this year, to kind of boost account growth even more?
Thomas Peterffy: Advertising is certainly a key. We are getting better and better at advertising. And we are also increasing our advertising spending to some extent. So that is what it is.
Benjamin Budish: Okay. Understood. We will not let our account growth go lower.
Thomas Peterffy: Love the confidence. Maybe just one more question on prediction markets. You talked earlier about institutional interest. I am just curious, when we look at some of the institutional products offered at CME and ICE, we tend to see very, very large notional amounts and larger, you know, fees per contract, but less relative to the size to the notional amount of exposure. Just curious, onboarding insurance companies, electric utilities, these sorts of institutions, does that require any change to product design, or do you think it is more a matter of education, making sure the liquidity is there, and then it will, you know, be you will be able to onboard those kinds of customers.
Paul Brody: Thank you. It is not a product design question. It is a matter of selling it.
Benjamin Budish: Okay. Thank you very much. Fair enough.
Operator: Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference back to Nancy Stuebe for closing remarks. Madam?
Nancy Stuebe: Thank you, everyone, for participating today. As a reminder, this call will be available for replay on our website, and we will also be posting a clean version of our transcript on the site tomorrow. Thank you again, and we will talk to you next quarter-end.
Operator: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
