Image source: The Motley Fool.
DATE
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET
CALL PARTICIPANTS
- Chairman & CEO — David Gladstone
- President — William Reiman
- Chief Financial Officer — Lewis Parrish
TAKEAWAYS
- Portfolio Composition -- 144 farms spanning about 99,000 acres, with water assets totaling about 56,000 acre-feet, all California-based.
- Acquisitions & Dispositions -- No property acquisitions or sales completed during the quarter; management is contemplating the sale of 2 to 5 farms in upcoming quarters.
- Lease Structure Changes -- Select permanent crop leases, especially for nuts and wine grapes, converted to higher crop share participation to allow more variable income exposure and align with market risks.
- Vacancy & Leasing -- 8 farms are wholly or partially vacant, with leasing solutions in negotiation; 5 leases, representing approximately 4% of lease revenue year-to-date, are set to expire in the next 6 months.
- Nonaccrual & Cash Basis Tenancy -- Revenue for 4 tenant leases recognized on a cash basis due to payment delinquencies; 2 tenants added to nonaccrual status during the quarter, 1 resolved.
- Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO) -- $3.1 million, or $0.08 per share, compared to $2.0 million, or $0.06 per share, in the prior-year period, driven mainly by a pistachio crop bonus.
- Net Loss -- Net loss to common shareholders was $10 million, or $0.24 per share, for the quarter.
- Cash Rents -- Fixed base cash rents declined by $2.4 million, offset by a $4.4 million gain in participation rents, reflecting an early pistachio bonus payment.
- Crop Sales -- Direct-operated farm crop sales contributed $1.9 million in net income, primarily from pistachio-related bonus revenue.
- Operating Expenses -- Recurring cash operating expenses rose by $750,000, while property operating and G&A costs increased mostly due to water and professional fee outlays.
- Liquidity -- Immediately available liquidity increased by $50 million, totaling $150 million, with over $110 million of unpledged properties available for collateral.
- Financing Activity -- No new borrowings or loan repayments occurred; $6 million of Preferred Stock was repurchased at an average yield of 7.4%, generating a gain of nearly $700,000.
- Interest Rate Structure -- Over 99% of borrowings are fixed at a 3.41% weighted average rate, locked for 2.5 years; $155 million in loans set for rate resets next year, including $133 million under the MetLife facility scheduled to reprice in January 2027.
- Dividend Declaration -- Declared monthly common dividend of $0.0467 per share for the upcoming quarter; at a $9.44 share price, this equates to a 5.9% annualized yield.
- Water Assets & Market Conditions -- Following a "very meager" Western U.S. snowpack, Gladstone Land noted above-normal rainfall in many of its farm areas with positive effects on soil moisture and crop potential.
- Pistachio Crop Bonus -- An early pistachio crop bonus yielded $0.50 per pound, with expectations of the total bonus exceeding last year's $0.90 per pound, though final amounts are uncertain and will be recognized later in the year.
Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]
RISKS
- Persistent vacancies, with management reporting 8 farms wholly or partially vacant and ongoing uncertainty regarding timing and terms of re-leasing or alternative use.
- Exposure to tenant credit risk, highlighted by two new tenants added to nonaccrual status for rent arrears and four leases currently on cash basis accounting.
- Management and President Reiman both indicated delayed transition back to fixed base lease structures, acknowledging tenant working capital constraints may prolong use of participation-based leasing through at least the 2027 crop year.
- The "very weak snowpack" in Western U.S. watersheds raises possible future water expense increases, though these are currently projected to remain within budget for most ranches.
SUMMARY
Gladstone Land (LAND 0.42%) reported improved AFFO, primarily from an early pistachio crop bonus, despite ongoing net losses and persistent challenges with tenant performance. Management's liquidity actions, including $50 million in new immediately available capital and continued preferred stock repurchases at favorable yields, point to a focus on balance sheet flexibility rather than short-term expansion. The company confirmed that leasing and property market activity remain subdued but shows tactical maneuvering in exploring alternative lease streams and managing through sector-specific volatility, particularly in permanent crops. Executives cited tenant financial fragility and prolonged use of crop participation leases for nuts and wine grapes as a response to limited grower capital, while short-term occupancy and revenue remain pressured by vacancies requiring creative re-leasing strategies.
- President Reiman explained, "that pricing outweighs the crop loss," suggesting that market supply constraints may support revenue even in a down production year.
- CFO Parrish emphasized, "the common that we raised was at about 5.5%, 5.6%. That's a spread we'll take any day," in reference to deploying equity for preferred buybacks yielding 7.4%.
- Management indicated that a return to fixed base rent lease structures is unlikely for the 2026 and 2027 crop years, citing industry-wide grower liquidity issues and risk allocation preferences.
- The current dividend yield stands above the sector average, supported by fixed-rate debt and modest annual amortization requirements.
INDUSTRY GLOSSARY
- AFFO (Adjusted Funds from Operations): Non-GAAP operating performance metric for REITs, adjusting FFO for non-cash and certain recurring items to better reflect sustainable cash flow.
- Participation Rents: Lease payments linked to a share of farm production or revenues, exposing the landlord to crop yield and price variability.
- Nonaccrual Status: Accounting treatment for leases/loans where tenant payments are delinquent and revenue is recognized only upon actual cash receipt.
- Alternate Bearing: Crop characteristic where yields fluctuate significantly annually, common in pistachio trees, causing "up" and "down" production years.
Full Conference Call Transcript
Today, we'll discuss FFO, which is funds from operations, a non-GAAP accounting term defined as net income, excluding gains or losses from the sale of real estate and any impairment losses on property plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets. We may also discuss core FFO, which we generally define as FFO adjusted for certain nonrecurring revenues and expenses and adjusted FFO, which further adjusts core FFO for certain noncash items, such as converting GAAP rents to normalized cash rents. We believe these metrics can be a better indication of our operating results and allow better comparability of our period-over-period performance. Now I'll turn it back to David Gladstone.
David Gladstone: Well, thank you, Catherine. And just to remind you all, we still own about 99,000 acres across 144 farms. About 56,000 acres of -- acre-feet of water, which is more than 18 billion gallons. Our farms are in 14 different states and our water assets, well, they're all in California. That's where it's the driest. We didn't have any acquisition or sales activity during the quarter, but we may consider selling some additional farms during the next few quarters. If we're able to complete some of those, we'd like to use most of the proceeds to pay down debt and buy back preferred stock. We've been doing a lot of that.
We continue to take a disciplined approach as we always do to these acquisitions and active -- there's some activity in the market now, but not much, still kind of slow. When conditions improve, it may make sense to start growing again. So we're watching all the numbers and trying to determine where we're going to go from here. Let me talk about a couple of leases. Prior to the call, due to market conditions affecting certain of our permanent crops, particularly the nuts and the wine grapes, we modified the lease structures -- lease structures so that we can handle a couple of different things.
Fixed costs were allowed to participate more in the upside because we're in the higher crop share participation. We've modified our leases so that we're taking a lot more risk in terms of growing, and we continue to operate 2 properties with the help of third-party growers. Overall, 2025 harvest came in very strong. We were all wrong, including the U.S. government. Imagine that they projected things wrong. Particularly on the almond side and pistachio side, the yields were generally meeting or exceeding our own projections. And the 2025 crop just continues paying. We keep getting money in. We signed up most of these same farms under the similar agreement that we had in '26.
So we expect to see some similar earning patterns this year. I think it would be very hard to meet or exceed those things that we did last year. That was quite a year of 2025. And I also want to remind everyone that the crop insurance continues to play a very important role to all of us. It helps us limit the downside risk on the farms that is if something happens, which sometimes does, we can call on the insurance to give us some money back. Our goal is to eventually transition all of our farms back to more traditional lease structures with fixed-based rents.
But the timing of that will depend on several factors that are out there today. Most importantly, we've got to get some lower interest rates. I don't know what's going on over at the Federal Reserve, but they just aren't playing the game they need to play. Looking ahead, we have 5 leases scheduled to expire over the next 6 months. In total, these leases represent about 4% of our total lease revenue for the year-to-date in 2026. We're currently in discussion with both of the existing tenants that are in these -- that 2 of these properties are in and the prospects of new tenants about leasing any of these farms.
I think we'll have them all back in shape. And now I'll give a quick update to some of the ongoing tenancy matters that we're working through. Currently have 8 farms that are wholly or partially vacant, and we're actively working towards solutions to get these farms back into a stable. We think we're getting close to a few of these, and I think we'll be in good shape before the year ends. We're also currently recognizing revenue in a cash basis for leases with 4 tenants. We were able to resolve one of those situations during the quarter, but we're adding 2 new tenants to the list after they fell behind on their rent payments.
I'm going to stop here, and we'll call in the guy who's really in touch with the world of farming. That's Bill Reiman. He's been reporting much of our current management focus. And Bill, do you want to come on board?
William Reiman: Yes. Thanks, David. Good morning, everybody. As we've been reporting, much of our current management focus is on these properties being operated under the modified lease agreements or farmed directly utilizing third-party farm operators. with the marketing season for almonds and pistachios for the 2025 crop about half done, we're seeing prices firming up, especially with pistachios. Couple that with our crop yields being larger than forecasted, our final crop revenue and profit numbers for 2025 should beat our expectations. Looking forward to the 2026 season, we are through winter, which ended with a very meager snowpack in most Western U.S. watersheds, although many areas where our farms are located received above normal rainfall, especially in the early spring.
This means spring soil water content is high, and it should get crops off to a potentially strong start. As of April 1, our almond bloom was complete. And while across California, bloom was mixed, our locations are pretty darn good with initial crop sets stronger than last year's. March had an unusual hot spell right in the middle of pistachio bloom, and this weather event caused quite a few issues around the state. Specifically, some trees have aborted a significant percentage of their crop. It's difficult to tell the impact to our orchards at this time, mainly because the 2026 crop year is considered what we call a down year for pistachios.
Pistachios are what we call alternate bearing, meaning that crop yields on a year-to-year basis can vary from very high to very low and can be very dramatic. Since this is a low production year or a down year, as we say, some of our pistachio blocks didn't have as much crop -- didn't have much crop on there before the heat spell. So it's possible that impact we feel will be minimal. Another reason it's hard to predict is just how the remaining fruit set develops. There's a long way to go in the growing season, and we just don't know how it will shape up.
So -- and also another factor this impact is with a major reduction in supply, it's definitely going to continue putting upward pressure on pricing. There's a chance that pricing outweighs the crop loss. So we'll just have to wait and see. Currently, all of our properties where we have invested capital in the crops are tracking according to budget. And we may have an increase in water expense on a couple of ranches, we should end up right in line with budget targets. Talk about markets a little bit. We think most ag real estate markets in the Western U.S. have bottomed out, and we're starting to see a little more activity with transactions.
In particular, we've seen several pistachio acquisitions completed in the last 6 months at prices we haven't seen in a few years. We don't believe valuations are necessarily making a comeback just yet, but there are some strategic buyers willing to pay a higher price for orchards with good cash flow potential. Coastal California values remain flat with higher-than-normal inventory and the Pacific Northwest is stable. When really good properties come on the market up there, they sell very quickly. Medium, lower-quality properties sit and wait. I'd say values and rents in the Pacific Northwest are stable.
And then last note on real estate markets, particularly in California, but really all over the West, we're seeing a divergence of values between properties with really good water and those without. Due to regulations and policy, we expect that to really be a permanent situation. The war in Iran, continued tariff drama, trade tensions are all still in the headlines. The crop markets seem to have settled in and kind of accepted this uncertainty to a large degree. Net crop markets continue to show notable resilience and strength, particularly for pistachios, see tremendous growth in demand for all things pistachio in global markets. Growth prices are continuing to move upward.
We expect our minimum pricing for 2026 to be significantly higher than 2025. So that's good news. I would say the general sentiment in the pistachio industry is even with a large number of nonbearing acres, it's underplanted. So this is really good news for growers and the value of their crop going forward. And for us, it's really important. It's the largest crop in our portfolio. Almonds have been pretty steady, some minor ups and downs due in large part to the drama in the Strait of Hormuz, but prices have lately been trending upward after recent crop size projections were released, showing a similar crop to last year.
It appears the market was expecting a larger crop and therefore, lower prices. We've reported in the past that we believe the market is underbought. So these lower-than-expected predictions are driving buyers to fulfill their needs. Wine grape markets continue to underperform, although we're beginning to see some varietals, particularly some white grape varietals, become short in supply. At the moment, this isn't causing any increase in prices or providing any incentive for wineries to contract for supply, but it is the first encouraging sign we've seen in a couple of years. Vineyard removals continue at a rapid pace in California and around the world.
So we're hopeful that this pullback in supply will soon bring the market back into balance. There's been a lot said about fertilizer fuel prices jumping up due to the war. While this is true, our exposure is somewhat limited. Overall fertilizer cost as a percentage of total cultural cost for most of the crops growing on our farms is relatively small. In the case of our operated farms, there were many purchases made pre-war. So that limits the impact in those particular cases. Finally, water. We initially had a strong start to the winter in terms of snow and rain.
However, once we got past early January, we only had a few storms come through, and they came in late winter and early spring. The result was a very weak snowpack, but reservoirs above normal and good spring moisture set the season off on a good note. We're in the market looking for good opportunities to acquire water for this year and beyond. We're still experiencing the positive effects of this recent wet year trend that's resulted in availability of water at economical prices.
Our team continues to evaluate these opportunities with the goal of strengthening the overall water security of the portfolio through both long and short-term strategic water purchases, continuing to invest in water delivery, storage infrastructure and identifying opportunities to create synergies across our farm assets. Now I'll turn it over to our CFO, Lewis Parrish.
Lewis Parrish: Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with a brief update on our recent financing activity. We did not incur any new borrowings or repay any loans during the quarter, but we did add some unencumbered properties to certain existing and new credit facilities that increased our immediately available liquidity by about $50 million. In January, we redeemed all of our Series D Term Preferred Stock to avoid a step-up in the coupon from 5% to 8% -- that redemption was funded through a combination of common stock issued under our ATM program and a draw on our line of credit, which has since been repaid. So far in 2026, we've raised about $50 million through our ATM program.
And along with the majority -- along with the proceeds from the recent property sales, the majority of this capital has been used to reduce leverage on the balance sheet, including the redemption of the Series D Term Preferred Stock, repaying the line of credit and buying back Preferred Stock through our repurchase program. And speaking of that last point, we've bought back over $6 million of Preferred Stock so far in 2026 at an average repurchase yield of 7.4%, resulting in a total gain of nearly $700,000. Turning to our operating results. For the first quarter, we recorded a net loss of about $4.3 million and net loss to common shareholders of $10 million or $0.24 per share.
Adjusted FFO for the first quarter was $3.1 million or $0.08 per share compared to $2 million or $0.06 per share in the same quarter last year. The increase in AFFO was primarily driven by an early pistachio crop bonus payment we received, partially offset by ongoing tenant-related issues we continue to work through. Year-over-year fixed base cash rents decreased by about $2.4 million for the quarter, primarily due to lost revenues from 1 property that was transitioned to direct operations last year and 2 tenants that were placed on nonaccrual status this quarter. The prior year quarter also included a $2.4 million termination fee from an outgoing tenant.
This decrease was largely offset by an increase in participation rents of about $4.4 million, primarily due to receipt of an early partial bonus payment on the 2025 pistachio crop. Typically, this bonus is paid in either late 2026 or early 2027, but one of our processors paid a portion of it early, which allowed us to recognize that revenue earlier than normal. The remaining portion of the bonus is still expected to be recognized on the normal schedule and recognized in the fourth quarter. Net income generated from crop sales on our direct operated farms was about $1.9 million during the first quarter, and that was also primarily due to the early pistachio bonus payment.
And also similar to participation rents, we expect to recognize the remaining portion of this marketing bonus later in 2026. On the expense side, our recurring cash operating expenses increased by about $750,000. Total related party fees declined slightly, primarily due to a lower base management fee resulting from recent farm sales. Property operating expenses increased, mainly driven by the cost of supplemental water we were required to provide on one of our properties pursuant to the lease as well as higher professional fees associated with protecting water rights on certain farms in California. G&A expenses increased primarily due to higher legal and accounting fees incurred during the current quarter.
And finally, cash flows from operations increased largely as a result of higher cash receipts from participation rents and crop sales, partially offset by the receipt of that termination fee in the prior year quarter. Turning to liquidity. We currently have about $150 million of immediately available capital and over $110 million of unpledged properties that could be used as additional collateral as needed. Currently, over 99% of our borrowings are at fixed rates with a weighted average interest rate of 3.41% locked in for another 2.5 years. This has helped shield us from the interest rate volatility we have seen over the past few years.
Looking ahead, we have about $17 million of scheduled principal amortization payments due over the next 12 months, which is less than 4% of our total debt outstanding. We also have about $155 million of loans with fixed rate terms that reset over the next year, though the loans themselves are not maturing. This includes about $133 million of loans under our MetLife facility that are scheduled to reprice in January 2027. Finally, regarding our common distributions. In April, we declared a monthly dividend of $0.0467 per share for the second quarter of 2026. At our current stock price of $9.44, this represents a 5.9% annualized yield, which is above the REIT sector average.
I'll turn it back over to you.
David Gladstone: Okay. Thank you, Lewis. Overall, demand for prime farmland growing berries and vegetables is very stable right now in our regions, particularly along the coast where we are. We're also starting to see some signs of improving in certain permanent crops, both in the pricing and the broader economies for those crops. So we're hopeful that this is the worst that all the things that happened to us in the last couple of years are behind us. But it's too early to say that. You don't know what's going to go with the crop, and that makes it difficult. We're just like many other REITs that is different.
It belongs to the fact that -- our manufacturing facilities are outside, and they're also alive and growing. So it's a different world that we're in, obviously, and it's very hard to predict. In closing, over the long run, we expect inflation, particularly for the food sector to continue to move higher. There doesn't seem to be any slowdown there. We expect the values of the underlying farmland to increase as well. And over time, as a result, we should be in good shape in terms of collateral for all of our loans. We expect this especially to be true of healthy foods such as the ones we grow.
These are fresh fruits and vegetables and nuts and long-term trends toward healthier eating continue to push these products. Now we'll open it up for some questions. So Victoria, if you'll come on and guide us through that.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Craig Kucera with Lucid Capital.
Craig Kucera: I think last quarter, you had thought you were going to get the marketing bonus in early April. Clearly, a lot of it was recognized here in the first quarter. Is there any left that you will expect to recognize in the second quarter? Or will we expect all of it kind of in the back half of the year?
Lewis Parrish: So as far as cash -- well, speaking for the bonus specifically, we do expect to record -- to be able to recognize the remaining part in Q4. As for the amount, I'll just give you -- we don't know yet, of course. But if we had to guess, and I'm going to let Bill Reiman chime in on this, too. But last year, the marketing bonus was -- when I say last year, I mean for the '24 crop, it was $0.90 a pound. And we don't know the full bonus yet, but the early bonus payment equated to about $0.50 a pound.
So right now, I think we expect the total bonus to be higher than last year, but we don't know that for sure. But I think if we had to guess at a range, it'd be somewhere between that $0.40 per pound coming in Q4 or it could be much higher than that. I'll let Bill chime in with any more insight to that bonus amount or what we're seeing prices doing.
William Reiman: Yes, Lewis, you nailed it. We're -- it's supposed to be higher than last year, and nobody is really revealing their cards yet. But yes, $0.90 a pound last year. We've got $0.50 so far. It could just be $0.40. It could be a full $0.90. We just -- nobody is really hinting at anything at this point, except that it's going to be larger than last year.
Craig Kucera: Got it. So roughly 50% plus or minus sounds probably pretty reasonable with maybe some upside.
William Reiman: Yes.
Craig Kucera: Okay. Great. In the 10-Q, you referenced that less than 5% of California was in sort of a drought designation, and you had some commentary on that. But I'm curious to hear your thoughts on how your Florida farms are performing thus far in 2026.
Lewis Parrish: So I think this is the first time since I've been here where California was not in a drought and Florida was. So definitely a reversal of importance there. We've had some -- we haven't heard of any news on our farms being short on water to the extent where it's impacting the operations on the farms. And it is in a drought, and there are regulations coming through for certain farmers having to be called on to cover losses of wells going dry. But we haven't heard of any issues with our farmers having -- being short on water and covering their crops. Bill, if you have anything more to add on that?
William Reiman: Yes. No, that's true. There hasn't been any restrictions, any -- there hasn't been any crop losses due to lack of irrigation water. We did have in the wintertime for frost control, we had some issues, but that's using water for frost control, uses a large amount of water, but -- and we had a few issues with neighbors there. But other than that, there haven't been any crop impacts whatsoever.
Craig Kucera: Okay. That's helpful.
David Gladstone: And there's one footnote here that you should know about. We have a water farm in Florida. and it's got plenty of water. So we're not seeing any severe drought situations down there. I think we're going to be fine in Florida forever because you pretty much put a stick in the ground and it's water down there. So it's a situation which the wind blows one day and it's cold and then all of a sudden, everything is bright and shiny as it is most days. Keep going, Craig, any more questions?
Craig Kucera: I do. I've got a handful more. David, you mentioned you're going to sell -- might sell a few farms in the next couple of quarters. Last year, I think you sold about $90 million, maybe $70 million the year before. Can you kind of bracket the dollar amount you think you might wind up selling? Or can you do that at this point?
David Gladstone: That's a difficult one. I don't know if you know it in farming, selling a farm is a big to do, and you never know when they're going to follow through. We have one now in which we have a letter saying they're going to buy it, and we'll see the lawyers are drafting. And I'm glad to get rid of that one because it gave us some problems in the past. But I don't really have a number. I'm hopeful that we can sell a couple of farms, but I don't think we need to sell more than that.
We're pretty well covered in tenants that are working farms and the ones where we don't have a strong tenant and we've taken them over, these are the ones in California. We've got some good growers. I've been surprised. I didn't think it would work out as well. But last year, it was just a boomer in terms of return on investment. So I guess we will do maybe what we're doing somewhere between 2 and 5 farms.
Lewis Parrish: It's a good range, yes.
Craig Kucera: Okay. That's helpful.
David Gladstone: He's gonna sell 2 to 5 farms. What you got, Craig?
Craig Kucera: Change gears. I'm curious about your leasing activity year-to-date. It looks like you moved one farm from fixed to participation rents. Can you give us some color on where that farm is located and what the crop type is?
Lewis Parrish: That's a potato farm in Colorado. The base rent was basically cut in half and -- but we are expecting the variable rent component of that farm to get us pretty much right to where we were with the prior lease. But that's another variable that won't be known until the second half of the year.
Craig Kucera: Okay. And just one more for me. I mean you've been pretty aggressive on issuing equity to take down the preferred. You got through the first round. You've got a couple of others at 6%. Are you anticipate continuing to do that throughout the year?
Lewis Parrish: The repurchase program on the Series B and C, we would like to continue being active in that repurchase program.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from John Massocca with B. Riley.
Maximilian Loyuk: This is Max stepping in for John. What is the outlook for re-leasing at truly vacant properties, either in terms of dispositions or re-leasing?
Lewis Parrish: So I think... Sorry. We have a few farms that we're working on right now are not producing income. They're vacant, as you mentioned, that we think we're pretty close to getting deals in place. Now it's not necessarily the traditional types of ag leases. We're working on alternative streams, for example, fallowing incentive programs, water leases, solar leases. We've got -- we're discussing terms with potential tenants on these. And hopefully, within the next 3 months or so, we can get some of these executed. But the ones -- the ones I'm specifically talking about, these are some of the larger farms in that vacant category.
So hopefully, for the next 3 to 6 months at most, we can get at least half of this acreage back to income producing.
Maximilian Loyuk: Great. And could you remind us why the cost of sales is so low relative to crop sales? Was that because you already booked costs associated with that revenue? Or was it something else?
Lewis Parrish: Yes, exactly. This is related to the '25 crop. All those expenses were recognized in Q4 of last year as the crops were sold. But with pistachios, at that time in Q4, we only had -- we were only able to recognize the minimum payment associated with that crop. This is the bonus payment that we were not able to measure at the end of last year. So that's just straight revenue straight to the bottom line for us as will be the remaining part of that crop, the bonus payment.
Maximilian Loyuk: Got it. And apologies if this was already discussed, but is there a time line for getting the participation-based farms back to fixed base rents?
Lewis Parrish: We wish we knew that answer as well. It's definitely not for the '26 crop year and '27 crop year is still in flux, but if I had to guess, I think we'd be in a similar situation for the '27 crop year as well. Bill, what's your outlook on this?
William Reiman: Yes. I mean it's really the tenant pool, it's really difficult. Capital is constrained -- working capital is constrained for a lot of growers. And so until that loosens up, I just don't see the number of growers willing to take on the risk on leasing. I just don't see that pool increasing in the near future. So hopefully, that turns around sooner rather than later. But as of right now, we're probably stuck in this for at least another season.
Maximilian Loyuk: Got it. And are there -- is there any new distress in the portfolio? Has the rebound in tree nut prices potentially mitigated credit risk somewhat?
William Reiman: A little bit, a little bit. But for a lot of growers, that downturn in almond pricing, they're still paying the price for that, right? It takes time. Prices have rebounded, obviously, for the last little over a year, 18 months, but it takes a couple of years of good prices to fill in the hole that we've done for ourselves. So it takes a little bit of time to fully recover.
Maximilian Loyuk: And then one more for me. On the Series B buyback, how are you thinking about that as a use of cash flow capital raising versus paying down amounts on the revolver?
Lewis Parrish: So the revolver now is fully repaid to the minimum balance. That was our -- with the ATM proceeds and also some proceeds we had from farm sales last -- at the end of last year. We used that to pay down the line of credit, which is, again, fully down to this minimum balance. And then most of the excess has been going into the preferred repurchase program. So Series B, Series C, we'd love to buy more of it back than we are right now, but these are 2 thinly traded securities. So we're limited with how much we can buy back on a daily basis. But we want to continue making the best use that we can.
We're buying back at a 7.4% yield right now. So the common that we raised was at about 5.5%, 5.6%. That's a spread we'll take any day.
David Gladstone: And just to remind Max, this is a situation that's ongoing day by day. If you could lob a few calls into the people who set interest rates and get them to push them back to 3.5% where we used to borrow, that would be nice because we could eliminate a lot of preferred stock, and that would help our earnings. Latoria (sic) [Victoria ] , would you come on now and close this up for us? That's the end of the day.
Operator: Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a great day.
