Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Wednesday, May 13, 2026 at 10 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • Chief Executive Officer — Zack Arnold
  • Chief Financial Officer — David Sproule

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]

TAKEAWAYS

  • Net Production -- Averaged 299 MMcfe per day, representing 88% year-over-year growth.
  • Oil Production -- Reached 9,600 barrels per day, up 16% year over year.
  • Natural Gas Production -- Averaged 195 MMcfe per day, a 169% year-over-year increase.
  • NGL Production -- Rose 25% year over year to 7,800 barrels per day.
  • Revenue -- Reported $155 million for the quarter.
  • Adjusted EBITDA -- Achieved $97 million with adjusted EBITDA margins of $3.61 per Mcfe.
  • Average Realized Natural Gas Price -- $4.86 per MMBtu, with regional differentials steady at $0.69 per MMBtu.
  • Oil Price Realizations -- $65.77 per barrel, with differentials narrowing to below $7 per barrel.
  • NGL Realizations -- Supported by improved composition, higher prices, and export-driven demand.
  • Controllable Cash Operating Costs -- Totaled $1.43 per Mcfe, down 18% year over year.
  • First Quarter Capital Expenditures -- $123 million incurred, including $112 million for development and $11 million for land activities.
  • Balance Sheet and Liquidity -- Net debt at quarter-end was $477 million, with $929 million total liquidity and pro forma net leverage at 1.3 turns.
  • 2026 Production Guidance -- Forecasting net production between 345 and 375 MMcfe per day, indicating approximately 70% growth.
  • 2026 Capital Expenditure Guidance -- Projected to range from $450 million to $500 million for development and midstream investments.
  • Major Acquisitions -- Closed Antero (Ohio Utica) and Chase (Pennsylvania) acquisitions, increasing operated well count from 154 to 395 and expanding midstream system to over 250 miles.
  • Midstream System Utilization -- Newly acquired midstream system operating below 25% of available capacity, now processing third-party volumes for the first time.
  • Operational Initiatives -- Added a second frac crew and rig, drilled a company-record 10 wells to TD, and turned to sales 4 wells with 53,000 total lateral feet.
  • Oil-Weighted Wells Schedule -- Pulled forward 4 oil-weighted wells into the second quarter, predominately unhedged, to capitalize on favorable pricing.
  • Upcoming Wells -- Intending to turn in line a 4-well, 55,000-foot pad and a 3-well, 53,000-foot pad acquired from Antero in the second quarter, totaling 109,000 lateral feet.
  • Midstream Strategic Value -- “we believe it is poised to become a meaningful contributor to future results,” noted CEO Arnold.
  • Development Shift -- Stimulation activities to transition toward natural gas in the back half of the year.

SUMMARY

Management characterized the first quarter as pivotal due to the closing of two major acquisitions, significantly increasing operational scale and midstream capacity. Integration efforts are underway, with increased personnel and asset optimization highlighted as immediate priorities. The company disclosed that its newly owned midstream system processed third-party volumes for the first time, creating additional revenue avenues beyond self-supplied throughput. Capital structure was enhanced through $550 million in senior notes and $350 million of preferred equity, eliminating revolving credit facility debt and expanding institutional investor participation. Projected quarterly production increases are supported by accelerated completions and extended lateral lengths, with full-year guidance reaffirmed for volume growth and disciplined capital deployment. Near-term operational focus is on maximizing oil-weighted returns, while ongoing efforts target higher systemic utilization and cost-efficiency as scale increases.

  • CEO Arnold said, “the scale and versatility of this unique system is vastly underappreciated,” signaling management’s intent to expand its contribution through internal and third-party volumes.
  • CFO Sproule stated that the first quarter will represent the lowest production total for the year, with sequential increases expected each subsequent quarter.
  • The company confirmed that “controllable cash operating costs declined approximately 18%” year over year, attributing the improvement to scale and midstream leverage benefits.
  • Sproule cited net leverage at 1.3 turns and communicated an expectation that leverage will decline toward target levels over the calendar year.
  • Plans for near-term free cash flow generation were described as ramping over five years, with capital intensity expected to decrease as a percentage of EBITDA.
  • Integration of the Antero assets is ongoing, with initial focus areas including optimization of legacy production, redeployment of field staff, and water reuse initiatives to enhance cost performance.
  • The company noted flexibility to pivot capital allocation between oil and gas development, contingent on market conditions and project returns.
  • Sproule affirmed a selective approach to future M&A, emphasizing integration of existing acquisitions as a current priority but remaining open to new opportunities that fit portfolio strategy.
  • Production cadence is expected to lead to the highest output in the fourth quarter, with a step-change in gas volumes as completion activity transitions later in the year.
  • Management declined to provide specifics regarding leasing costs per acre but confirmed focused efforts on acquiring “tight cycle” acreage that can be rapidly developed.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • MMcfe: Million cubic feet equivalent, a standardized measure that combines volumes of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids on an energy equivalency basis.
  • Lateral Feet: The length of horizontal drilling, significant for well productivity and economic returns in shale development.
  • Adjusted EBITDA Margin per Mcfe: Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization measured on a per-unit basis, allowing direct peer cost structure comparison.
  • Take-in-Kind NGL Volumes: Natural gas liquids taken and marketed directly by the producer rather than sold to a third party at the wellhead.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Zack Arnold: Thank you, Tom, and good morning. We appreciate everyone joining us today to review Infinity Natural Resources first quarter results. The first quarter was pivotal for Infinity. We successfully closed the Antero, Ohio Utica acquisition in late February, our largest transaction to date and added working interest in our Pennsylvania asset that's through the Chase acquisition. These acquisitions immediately increase our scale with our operated well count increasing from 154 to 395 and our midstream system expanding to over 250 miles of gathering and water pipelines, positioning Infinity for disciplined growth through the end of the decade.

Importantly, we did so while preserving the quality of our balance sheet through strategic financing, including the issuance of perpetual preferred securities and senior notes. Since closing these transactions, our teams have been focused on integrating the assets into our operational platform. This includes onboarding personnel evaluating the new inventory and identifying opportunities to optimize operations across the acreage and associated infrastructure. The more time we spend with the Antero assets, the more excited we become about the opportunity, especially at the midstream infrastructure, which we will discuss in more detail in a few minutes. Before that, let me review production and operating highlights from the first quarter.

Net production averaged 299 million cubic feet equivalent of gas per day, a year-over-year growth rate of 88%. We turned to sales 4 wells in the volatile oil window with 53,000 lateral feet 2 in early February and 2 in mid-March. On the operating front, we added a second frac crew and a second rig during the quarter, and we stimulated 11 wells and drilled 10 wells to TD, which is a company record. One of the frac crews was deployed to the assets we acquired from Antero approximately 30 days after closing near the end of 1Q and we expect to turn these first 3 wells from the acquisition to sales during the second quarter.

We've had 1 rig on legacy Infinity volatile oil window assets and 1 rig on legacy Infinity natural gas assets since January, and we intend to move a rig on to the newly acquired Antero asset that's later this quarter. As we have previously discussed, our plan for the balance of 2026 and is to run on dedicated rig on legacy Infinity assets, drilling both volatile oil and dry gas wells and 1 rig on the newly acquired assets. As of today, we have accelerated completion activity in our volatile oil window to capture stronger near-term returns, which includes pulling 4 oil-weighted wells into the second quarter from later with mostly unhedged barrels.

That said, we retain the flexibility as always, to quickly pivot between commodities and we'll lean harder into the natural gas market if conditions warrant the shift. We continue to focus on longer laterals. During the first quarter, the average lateral length turned in line was over 13,000 lateral feet. We benefit from efficient cycle times with multi-well projects continuing to reach first production within 6 to 7 months, supporting faster capital recycling and improved returns. As an example, we started drilling on 4 well 55,000 lateral foot oil-weighted pad in November, and we expect to turn in those wells in the coming days. Coming back to our newly acquired midstream infrastructure.

In our minds, the scale and versatility of this unique system is vastly underappreciated with 140 miles of gathering lines, 90 miles of water lines, 6 compressor stations compressors and nearly 80,000 horsepower. This is a turnkey system with no lead time or bottlenecks that would likely take years to replicate. We have retained nearly all the field employees associated with these assets and hired additional senior leadership for Midstream, including a VP of Midstream. The continuity and deep expertise of our midstream bench is truly invaluable. We are excited by the value that we can unlock from the system.

To put it bluntly, we believe it is poised to become a meaningful contributor to future results as we are 1 of the limited number of operators in the Appalachian Basin with owned midstream infrastructure. Currently, the system is underutilized, operating at less than 1/4 of its currently available capacity providing significant runway to support not only our own development but also third-party volumes. We received third-party volumes on the system for the first time during the first quarter, and we will be focused on increasing third-party volumes on the system. As we move through the year, we expect to drive a meaningful ramp in throughput that will contribute to our financial results.

This infrastructure also provides a significant structural cost advantage as we leverage existing pads and pipeline connections, significantly reducing or eliminating the need for incremental midstream capital on new development. As of today, approximately 75% of Infinity's natural gas volumes are flowing through our owned midstream system, and we expect that to increase as we ramp development. This system creates a strategic advantage for us that we expect to drive improved margins and lower breakevens over time. We'll share more over time as we continue to operate the asset sets. I will now spend a few minutes on the macro. We remain constructive on the longer-term outlook for both liquids and natural gas.

Oil and liquids markets in Appalachia remained strong with a combination of domestic and international demand from refining and chemicals driving a favorable pricing environment. Beginning in April, we have increased our take-in-kind NGL volumes which provides us greater control and optimization of the realized pricing specific to propane, butane and pentane. For natural gas, we see a clear cadence of demand growth with near-term strength driven by LNG exports, continued momentum from gas-fired power generation in-basin data centers and longer-term expansion tied to industrial development. As these demand drivers scale, we expect regional gas differentials to tighten alongside broader market growth.

Given our outlook for oil and liquids, we have leveraged the flexibility of our platform to adjust our completion schedule and accelerate facilities construction to pull forward oil-weighted wells into 2Q and to capture stronger price realizations. We will continue to evaluate our development plans across the portfolio with a focus on directing capital towards the highest return projects. Against this backdrop, here's where our plan stands for the second quarter. As I touched on earlier, we expect to turn in line a 4-well pad in the volatile oil window in the coming days, representing 55,000 lateral feet.

We also expect to bring to market our first barrels from the Antero acquisition later this quarter, a 3-well pad in our rich gas area with 53,000 lateral feet. That's a total of 7 wells turned in line and 109,000 lateral feet during the second quarter. With that, I will turn the call over to David to review our financial results and outlook.

David Sproule: Thank you, Zach, and good [indiscernible]. Our financial and operational results for the first quarter reflect continued execution by our team. We anticipate that our production will increase each quarter throughout the remainder of the year. During the first quarter, our net production averaged 299 MMcfe per day. We expect the first quarter to be our lowest production total for the calendar year. In terms of the components of production, oil production totaled approximately 9,600 barrels per day for the quarter, up 16% year-over-year. Natural gas production averaged 195 MMcfe per day, up 169% year-over-year. And NGL production increased 25% year-over-year to 7,800 barrels per day.

Natural gas represented 65% of our total production. -- with oil being 19% and NGLs being 16%. Turning to financial performance. We generated approximately $155 million in revenues for the quarter. and adjusted EBITDA of $97 million, representing adjusted EBITDA margins of approximately $3.61 per Mcfe, which we believe is best-in-class in the Appalachian Basin. The company saw improved natural gas prices during the period that averaged $4.86 per MMBtu. Our regional differentials remained steady at $0.69 on per MMBtu, reflecting a greater weighting towards a lower Btu content in our gas stream. Oil price realizations for the period were $65.77 per barrel. First quarter oil differentials tightened to slightly less than $7 per barrel during the period.

We anticipate our oil differentials to remain consistent, around $7 to $8 per barrel for the second quarter. NGL realizations were strong during the quarter, supported by better NGL composition, firm pricing and export-driven demand, contributing to the overall strength of our revenues and reinforcing the value of liquids weighted development across our portfolio. Turning to costs. Our controllable cash operating costs during the quarter totaled $1.43 per Mcfe. These costs reflected the impact of an extremely cold winter, which drove higher rental costs and snow removal as well as true-ups for annual compensation. On a year-over-year basis, controllable cash operating costs declined approximately 18% and a reflection of the benefits of scale and improved operating leverage.

As volumes grow across our Appalachian platform, and we increase the utilization of our owned midstream infrastructure. We expect our overall cost structure to improve further. During the first quarter, capital expenditures incurred were approximately $123 million, which included $112 million on development activities and $11 million on land activities. Our capital allocation strategy remains disciplined and focused on long-term value creation. During the quarter, we deployed completion crews to prioritize development in our volatile oil window to capture the strength of near-term oil markets. Our stimulation activities are expected to shift back toward natural gas towards the back half of this year.

We continue to prioritize high return opportunities across our Utica and Marcellus assets, selectively expand our inventory through accretive acquisitions and organic leasing, and maintain a strong balance sheet with ample financial flexibility. During the quarter, we raised $550 million in senior notes, $350 million of preferred equity. The transactions enabled us to pay down all outstanding debt under our revolving credit facility and increase our liquidity position while expanding our investor base with institutional credit investors and premier energy investors in Quam and Carnelian. We are well positioned with financial flexibility to execute to our business plan. At quarter end, we had net debt of approximately $477 million and total liquidity of approximately $929 million.

Our pro forma net leverage on an LTM basis was 1.3 turns during the period. We would anticipate our net leverage ratio to decline during the course of the calendar year towards our target leverage level. For 2026, we continue to expect net production to average between 345 and 375 MMcfe per day, representing growth of approximately 70% year-over-year. with gas production of approximately 235 to 255 MMcfe per day and oil flash liquids production of 18,000 to 20,000 barrels per day. Development capital expenditures, which are a combination of drilling and completions and midstream capital expenditures are expected to range between $450 million and $500 million. With that, I will turn the call back to Zach for closing remarks.

Zack Arnold: Thank you, David. As we move through 2026, we are advancing development across our assets with a continued focus on consistent operational execution strong financial returns and long-term shareholder value creation. Across the Ohio Utica and Pennsylvania, Marcellus and Utica, our portfolio offers a deep inventory of high-quality development opportunities supported by our owned midstream system. We are particularly excited about the opportunity within our midstream platform where increasing volumes flowing through the system are not only driving incremental efficiencies and margin benefits but also positioning midstream to become a more meaningful contributor to earnings and cash flow over time.

We will continue to evaluate complementary acquisitions that strengthen and expand our integrated Appalachian business while also assessing development timing and potential hedging opportunities to optimize returns in the current commodity price environment. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Scott Hanold with RBC Capital Markets.

Scott Hanold: Zack and team. Look, I mean, obviously, as your business strategy have been, you're very flexible to change your activity pace with the commodity and the macro and pulling forward some more oil stuff. Can you just give us a sense of what should we expect on some of the cadence on some of that oil production. Obviously, 1 or 2 wells can make a big difference from you all. But seems like should we see a bigger step-up in oil? And can you kind of talk about like how the base decline rate works right now with you all and what to expect in the next quarter 2.

Zack Arnold: Great question, Scott. This is Zach. I'll take the first part of that, and Dave can kind of chime in will tag team it. But I think, first and foremost, I'll address your decline question. And we continuously are pleased and proud of our PDP and our new well performance. I think we've had very nice results and we continue to demonstrate that. As we exited last year, we had a really big ramp into the end of the year. It was driven by a lot of terminal lines in late Q3 and early Q4. So that saw a big ramp there.

And the wells that we talked about turning in line in this quarter, they're really going to manifest more in second quarter production as they came in line late in the quarter and especially when you factor in effective contributing days at target rates. So I think you'll start to see the Q1 development really showing in Q2 as well as the Q2 wells beginning to come in line when we talked last time about what changes we wanted to make based on commodities, I think what we've really tried to do is not blow up the development schedule we put in place, but look for ways to suddenly pull barrels forward.

And we're really proud of what the team has done. We'll have some turn of mines coming online in June. June that weren't anticipated to be due. So that's meaningful as we bring those barrels in. That will put them at full rate in July ahead of when we had originally budgeted. And those -- because of that acceleration, that gives us a lot of exposure to unhedged barrels there. I'm sorry, if I missed anything else in your question, do you want to add back into.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Tim Rezvan with KeyBanc with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Timothy Rezvan: Scott sort of stole our first 1 on the oil. So I appreciate the outlook there. But I did notice you have a 10,000-foot Utica test base this quarter. I know there's been some -- it seems like it may be underway soon or it's finally going to happen here. There's no completion schedule looks time line this year, I guess, maybe it's more of an early 2027 event. But can you talk kind of about your predrill expectations for this well? Do you view this like a development well? Is it more like a science well?

Is there anything specific you're kind of looking to confirm here and just any idea on when you plan to turn it to sales would be helpful.

Zack Arnold: Yes. All good questions, Tim. And it's a question that we get quarter-to-quarter. I think what we can say right now is we continue to watch offset operations and are monitoring what our peers are doing. We do have a rig on that location, and it's going to be focused on the science portion of this project. We'll do some -- we'll drill a vertical pilot and collect some data there that we'll analyze. You are right in noticing that we don't intend to drill this well horizontally or completed in this calendar year. This is really step 1 of a valuation.

So we'll go collect some science and spend some time of observing it and measuring the things that we need to, so we can properly plan our development there. But as I think we've said before, it's an exciting well for everyone else to conclude it, but it's 1 out of the 40-plus we have this year. So we're really excited in focusing our capital predominantly on projects that have clearly defined returns and a long track record of success.

Timothy Rezvan: Okay. Great. We'll stay tuned, I guess, for updates on that. And just want to follow up. I know David gets this question every quarter, but just kind of big picture kind of M&A trends. We see the same thing you all see with leverage kind of going to or below 1 turn by the end of the year. And I know you're integrating Antero, but you're pretty clearly a growth-focused company. So just kind of curious what your capacity for incremental M&A, like larger pieces is at this point and what we're seeing in the market.

David Sproule: Yes. I think -- thanks for the question, Tim. This is Dave. I think for us, one of the things that we were very cognizant of is both integrating and positioning the company for continued opportunity sets. And so we are highly active in that environment. We are highly selective in that environment also. So we are very well positioned to capitalize on assets that we see that fit our portfolio. And so we will continue to evaluate those as they come to -- across our sort of desk, if you will, but we are very selective in that. Obviously, we've integrated a very big asset here.

That integration has gone extremely well and positions us to not just execute on our development plan that we have in front of us, but positions us to have the flexibility to evaluate other things as they come through.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Nicholas Pope with ROTH Capital.

Nicholas Pope: I would like to talk a little bit more about the integration of the Antero assets. Obviously, they haven't seen a lot of drilling in the past few years before you guys acquired them. And just as you kind of -- I think we're 3 months -- almost 3 months into owning the asset, curious kind of as you look maybe at the existing producing base like maybe what the opportunity set looks like low-hanging fruit to kind of optimize production on that asset?

And maybe how that might flow through LOE kind of in the near term as you kind of look at some of that opportunity set, if anything changes, maybe or kind of how you're looking at that asset as you kind of got in-house?

Zack Arnold: No, that's a great question. Thank you, [ Pasi. ] This is Zach. I'll take a first crack at it. I think, first and foremost, we are identifying some low-hanging fruit and things that our production engineering team can focus on. And it's kind of small ball stuff where you're working on bottom hole assemblies and plunger lifts and some things that are just really optimizing the existing legacy production there, but still it's worth that you should do, and we're excited about that, and our team is focused on that. When you think about LOE impacts, we're still completely getting our mind around the optimization of these wells that we can do.

I think owning our midstream is, first and foremost, critical, but 1 spot where we see some exciting near-term activity to help that is with reusing of water with the increased completion activities on these assets and the -- and our legacy assets in Wolf Run gives us a better capability to reuse water from the field, and that should have a net positive impact there on some of our.

Nicholas Pope: And I guess maybe stepping back a little further, like the broader LOE for the company. How do you anticipate that kind of shape over the remainder of 2026 as you kind of look at these assets?

David Sproule: Sure. So I think when you look at the first quarter, our LOE ticked up to about $0.33 in Mcfe. I think that's more of a reflection of the very, very harsh winter that we had in this part of the country. I think if you look at year-over-year, our costs have gone down significantly. We would anticipate those costs to continue to decline as they've had trend line wise and 25 I would continue to anticipate that to occur in 2026. With regards to the Antero integration and the impact they're in.

As that kind of mentioned with our ownership of the midstream assets, we start with a significant head start because our GP&T cost is raised with regards to our near gathering and compression charges are raised with regards to the development of those assets. So you should anticipate over the course of this year, our overall cost structure to continue to decline, both from an impact from volumetric growth as well as from just the cost structure integration where the Antero assets have a lower cost structure than our assets in Carroll County or in legacy Guernsey County.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Michael Scialla with Stephens.

Michael Scialla: You were able to add some acreage during the quarter. I just want to see what the opportunity set looks like there? Is it any different now with the Antero acquisition? And maybe how the cost of land have changed over the past year. Can you give any sense there and however you want to break down in terms of cost per new drilling location maybe difference between Ohio and Pennsylvania, if you could.

Zack Arnold: Yes, we've been really proud of what our team has done to continue to add acres, especially in a quarter that was overshadowed by closing of 2 deals. So the matting acres, I think, was a testament to their ability to execute 2 jobs at once. So very proud of that. We've seen nice opportunities to add acres both inside and outside of our units in both Ohio and in Pennsylvania to give them credit for being able to focus dollars effectively in areas that we're interested in.

I think with the new Antero acquisition, given our land department more units to focus in has helped us be thoughtful with cost allocation and making sure that we're spending our dollars into acres that will get developed and a cost that we're happy with. As a reminder, in Ohio, once you reach a threshold for statutory ununization, that puts you in a good position from a leasing perspective to execute on the development plan in front of you. So I like that opportunity. Might stay away from giving specific lease per acre numbers.

But I will say our team is always focused on getting the best value that they can understanding where APIs fall into our inventory and focused on being thoughtful with dedicating us dollars and really focused on leases that are tight cycle times for us, putting them in front of the drill bit, putting them in units that we plan to drill so that we can get the return on those lease sellers very quickly.

Michael Scialla: Appreciate that, Zack. I know you guys had talked about potentially pivoting at some point to generate positive free cash flow, maybe your latest thoughts there on what the timing of that might look like.

Zack Arnold: I mean, I think in terms of our overall development program and the guidance that we provided, obviously, this is a fairly capital-intensive years we've discussed sort of priming the pump with regards to the Antero acquisition that we've closed upon. But we would anticipate trending down over the next 5 years to be consistent with that of our offset peers while still having outsized growth. So we would anticipate our CapEx as a percent of EBITDA to be lower this year than last year. And we would anticipate that trend to continue into the coming years.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Paul Diamond with Citi.

Paul Diamond: Just wanted a quick one to touch on. You guys talked about shifting activity more towards dry gas in the latter half of the year. I guess from a production perspective, how should we think about that cadence-wise? Is that a pretty midyear progression? Or would we still expect to see those kind of step change moves?

Zack Arnold: In terms of step changes of the production, Paul?

Paul Diamond: Yes, the more chunky moves in production up on oil down on gas, that sort of thing.

Zack Arnold: Yes. I would expect that we will still exhibit heightened growth in every 1 of our hydrocarbons quarter -- each quarter going forward. I think the cadence of activity would lend itself to have a really heightened third quarter with regards to turn in lines relative to the overall year. I do think that adding natural gas towards the middle to end of the year does have an impact on our overall natural gas volumes. But again, it's sort of relative to the other components and the time frame of it being on.

So I wouldn't necessarily expect it to be -- it's a question of what is the degree of step change, but we would anticipate each quarter to be higher than the last as you kind of shape the development of the assets that we have. So I'm probably not going to give you the exact answer you want there, but I would tell you that we would anticipate our fourth quarter to be our highest production quarter for the year.

Paul Diamond: Got it. Understood. And then just 1 quick more strategy question. So obviously, you guys have been going to pretend clip, both organically and in thinking about how you see that growth rate in the 2017 and beyond? Is there kind of a point where you see that slowing usually leveling off the kind of target rate were like, okay, where you get to that next level where exit I guess the strategy perspective, Barishman should we expect that growth to remain.

Zack Arnold: Yes. I think, look, a small -- a lot of big numbers and small numbers of aspects is you can't continue to grow at a 70%, 80% kind of clip. For us, as we think about of 2027 and beyond. Obviously, we haven't provided guidance on that. I think it's fair to say that our production growth will still be relatively elevated compared to our peers, but we would start to expect to trend down as a percent of reinvestment rate over that time period.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Scott Hanold with RBC Capital Markets.

Scott Hanold: Sorry, myself on you before when I was have ask my question. But my follow-up was on the infrastructure and the infrastructure utilization. Obviously, you all talk about it, it's sort of being underutilized right now and an opportunity to kind of continue to grow that -- can you speak to like how much of the capacity do you think you'll reserve for third parties versus keeping on your -- for yourselves and your production growth? And what kind of third-party revenue growth could that generate here over the coming quarters?

Zack Arnold: Yes, I'll take the portion on the first part of that question and handle that. So I think first and foremost, when we look at these assets, we're incredibly impressed with how things have been positioned walking across some of these compressor stations and realizing just the infrastructure that's in place there and how little utilized it is today gives us a lot of excitement about ways that we can continue to grow the use of that system. So I think when we think about third-party volumes and we think about our own volumes, we're always going to prioritize our own volumes first.

I think as we begin to think about ways that third-party volumes materialize and most of those initially are going to materialize just through the units that we develop and having other operators inside of our units and other interests that we don't have lease inside of units that -- as you see that, that will come naturally with our own development profile. So I think we won't put ourselves in a position in which the infrastructure is bottlenecked because of other competing objectives that we have.

And I think our ability to lever the expertise of some of the field staff we brought in as well as some of the senior leadership that we're adding to the team really allow us to look closely from an engineering and a business perspective here, making sure that the system that we have today continues to be optimized for however we add volumes to it through our own drill bit or third-party volumes.

David Sproule: Yes. I would just add, Scott, that it's 600 million a day pipe. We're actively developing in that area, as Zack's highlighting but we are highly incentivized to fill that pipe. And so we will push to do so.

Scott Hanold: Okay. When you send up these contracts with these third parties, are they more like spot kind of month-to-month kind of volumes? Or do you -- are you locking in some longer-term contracts with them?

Zack Arnold: Yes. I think at this stage, we'll probably stay a little bit muted on that. I think for -- it's a case-by-case basis on a lot of the opportunity sets that we see. But we'll probably talk a little bit more about that tool during the course of the year as we ramp up things. And as you think about modeling, right now, it's really small numbers. So it's not that impactful it truly just opportunities that we're making sure that we're thoughtful with exploiting.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Zach for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Zack Arnold: Thank you very much for joining us for the call today. We appreciate your continued interest in the company, and we look forward to sharing additional results with you soon. Operator, back to you.

Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.