Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

No Patents on Thinking ... Yet

By Rich Duprey – Updated Apr 5, 2017 at 5:29PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

A court rejects a patent on thought processes; no patent yet on obvious business methods.

By defintion, a patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to a patentee for a fixed period in time for the disclosure of an invention. The invention must be new, innovative, useful, and cannot be obvious to the type of business. Yet I wonder whether some patents granted are really characterized by this description.

Back in 1952, the Supreme Court created a Patent Act that essentially made "everything made under the sun" patentable. And so the U.S. began a long streak of patenting that led to the protection of business methods and expanded the kinds of ideas that could be patented. Along the way, companies acquired patents that were extremely obvious ways of doing business.

For example, the "one-click checkout" method that Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) got a patent for and subsequently bludgeoned Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) with would qualify. And MercExchange wrangled $35 million out of eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY), after the company violated a MercExchange patent with its "Buy It Now" feature. Because of the nature of the businesses these companies run, these processes don't strike me as being particularly innovative.

The U.S. Patent Office and courts don't agree with me, however, since companies like the ones mentioned above have been able to slap a patent on processes that aren't out of the ordinary for a company's line of business. Yet maybe they're starting to come around; a recent ruling by a specialized patent court has put a small speed bump on the patent highway.

Stephen Comiskey is a lawyer who tried to patent the idea of mandatory arbitration for things like wills and contracts. His non-revolutionary idea was denied, as the system was simply a mental process and the court ruled that stand-alone mental processes are not patentable. Congress has recently been under pressure to tighten its standards on which business processes receive patents, and this is one step in the right direction.

Protecting ideas, processes, and inventions has been key to fostering innovation in this country. But, over the years, the U.S. Patent office has taken the idea to the extreme and patented a few too many ideas. Still, it seems like the Supreme Court is now spending more time deciding whether a company has really infringed on a patent, rather than automatically issuing an infringement. The eBay case is a great example, since the company is still allowed to use its "Buy It Now" feature after facing an injunction. And a recent ruling this past August involving Seagate Technology (NYSE:STX) redefined what is considered patent infringement.

To paraphrase Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, "I know an obvious business process when I see it." Issuing patents for apparent business processes hinders competition, so it's great that restrictions are finally being considered for patents on obvious processes.

Foster better understanding with these related Foolish articles:

Amazon.com and eBay are recommendations of Motley Fool Stock Advisor. There's no patent on the stock selections that are beating the market by more than 40 percentage points. Learn about them with a 30-day free trial subscription.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is patent pending.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Amazon Stock Quote
Amazon
AMZN
$92.42 (-1.63%) $-1.53
eBay Stock Quote
eBay
EBAY
$43.77 (-1.26%) $0.56
Seagate Technology Stock Quote
Seagate Technology
STX
Barnes & Noble Stock Quote
Barnes & Noble
BKS

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
351%
 
S&P 500 Returns
115%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 11/29/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.