CEO compensation is a hot topic, especially now that the Dodd-Frank Act requires say-on-pay votes. With CEO pay and performance seemingly disconnected at the following company, the Fool invites you to judge for yourself whether this business's boss actually deserves such a hefty paycheck.
Few things are worse for investors than owning a piece of an "oh yeah" tech company. These are the Rodney Dangerfields of their industries. They've been around forever. They've even done impressive work in years past. But lately, whenever their names come up in conversation, it's almost always with the caveat, "oh yeah, I forgot about them." Adobe
More on that in a minute. First, let's cover the business. Adobe is best-known for a series of popular business software franchises. You know the names:
Taken together, these apps comprise one of the most-used software suites among creative professionals such as photographers, website builders, and graphic designers. Annually, they help Adobe bring in close to $4 billion in revenue and almost $900 million in profit.
Looking only at short-term performance, you'd have no choice but to conclude that Narayen is worth the reported $12.2 million in cash and stock compensation he received last year. Revenue rose better than 30% last year while normalized profit -- net income adjusted for one-time items and other unusual items -- zoomed more than 50%. Talk about impressive.
And better than peers in some cases. Symantec
So why would Governance Metrics name Adobe a company of "high concern"? The group sees a lack of correlation between executive pay and short- and long-term performance. That has to sting given the language of Adobe's proxy, which included a "say-on-pay" provision backed by the board of directors.
"We have structured our executive compensation program so that the compensation of our executive officers, including our [named executive officers], is substantially tied to the achievement of our key business objectives and the success of our stockholders," Adobe says in its proxy.
Great sentiment, right? Sure. Trouble is, Narayen has done exactly nothing for shareholders. Since December 2007, when he took the reins as CEO, Adobe's stock has slid 19% versus an 11% drop for the S&P 500. Both Intuit and Symantec have risen over the same period, with Intuit rallying sharply.
Financial performance isn't the problem; product design and decisions are. Consider its strained relationship with Apple
I don't know whether that's fair. But I do know that Adobe's products – Flash, especially -- have become a favorite of hackers. Last month, the company issued multiple patches for Flash Player, Reader, and Acrobat. Each found hole erodes trust a little more, lending credence to Jobs' withering assessment of Adobe.
Which brings us back to Narayen. CEOs are stewards in every sense of the word. They oversee operations. They manage the financials. They set strategy. And, most of all, they're responsible for returning capital to shareholders. Narayen has failed on this last point.
Not that any of this matters to him, mind you. He owns just 0.04% of the business and tends to sell shares when they're converted from option exercises, and although he usually hangs onto some of those shares, he made a big outright sale worth more than $2 million earlier this year. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but it means he doesn't hold onto much risk while having skin in the game.
My guess is investors would like to see Narayen share more of the risk. One way to accomplish that would be to base a portion of his cash pay on how well shareholders do. Call it the I-win-you-win compensation plan. Sound good? Tell Adobe's investor relations department about it.
Will the rise of cloud computing help or hinder Narayen's efforts to bring growth to Adobe? Take a minute to watch this free video right now, and you'll walk away with a richer understanding of the cloud model. It's 100% free.
Want to read more about Adobe? Add it to My Watchlist, which will find all of our Foolish analysis on this stock.