It's the age-old investing consideration: "To buy into the dip or not to buy." It is perhaps the most philosophically intriguing and debated question that has arisen in recent months.
"According to conventional wisdom, this simple question has an equally simple answer -- "of course" -- that is supported by the vast majority of historical cases," writes Mohamed A. El-Erian, CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO, and author of "When Markets Collide."
But is that the correct answer now? According to El-Erian that highly depends on where you think the market will go next. Over the past months, "so many unthinkables have turned into reality," creating a unique economic environment where conventional wisdom ceases to serve its purpose.
"Cheap stocks and corporate bonds can get a lot cheaper before regaining their footing. This is especially true when the combination of too much debt and too little income growth forces a system to deliver, as is increasingly the case these days ... These dynamics are particularly worrisome today as market after market falls victim to volatile and destabilizing feedback loops fueled by weak economic growth, high unemployment, debt overhangs, fragile banks and inept policymaking."
He likens buying stocks today to buying a house in a deteriorating neighborhood. Additional considerations include how bad that neighborhood may get, or if it will stabilize, or even if it will get better. And if so, is the possibility fully priced in?
According to El-Erian, to buy today is to buy into a high risk market that offers no guarantee of escape from "the grips of both bad macro and bad technicals." Surely, he concludes, there will be more opportunities to buy good companies at cheap prices down the road.
If you're interested in tracking El-Erian's projections, you can use the list below as a starting point for your own analysis.
All of these companies appear to be deeply undervalued, when comparing the PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Book and Price/FreeCashFlow ratios.
Furthermore, all of these companies have proven themselves to be more profitable than their competitors over the trailing 12 months (TTM).
Judging by their past profitability and current valuations, many value investors would like to take a closer look at these stocks. That said, if El-Erian is correct, there may be more downside to these names. What do you think? (Click here to access free, interactive tools to analyze these ideas.)
1. Esterline Technologies
2. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings
3. Symetra Financial
4. Protective Life
5. FBL Financial Group
Interactive Chart: Press Play to compare changes in analyst ratings over the last two years for the stocks mentioned above. Analyst ratings sourced from Zacks Investment Research.
Kapitall's Eben Esterhuizen and Rebecca Lipman do not own any of the shares mentioned above. Data sourced from Fidelity.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.