What is a patent troll?
- An entity that misuses patents as a business strategy by positioning itself in a way to collect patent licensing revenue by doing just enough research to prove it had the idea first, or by purchasing patents for such purpose.
- A small green man hiding under a bridge demanding payment for passage as first depicted in "The Patents Video" in 1994.
As much as I enjoy the imagery of Microsoft
Of course, the company disagrees with that characterization. Microsoft Corporate Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Horacio Gutierrez has defended the recent slew of suits against Google
Most industry watchers, myself included, consider the current web of software-related patent suits a problem -- a roughly $83-billion-per-year problem. Rather, Gutierrez actually considers licensing the solution, and companies like Google "standing on the shoulders" of companies like Microsoft the problem.
The interviewer even asks Gutierrez about dubious patents, such as one in its case against Barnes & Noble
Microsoft has also been on the receiving end, and Gutierrez does acknowledge that non-practicing entities, or NPEs, abuse the current system. He mentions that there is currently a debate beginning over whether or not NPEs like InterDigital
Gutierrez's stance is unsurprising, as his job includes leading Microsoft's worldwide intellectual property and licensing group. Regardless of how you define "patent troll," Mr. Softy's onslaught of Android suits falls within the realm in some form or fashion. No one can argue that Microsoft is a non-practicing entity, but I'll argue that buying patents to attack competitors still makes you a patent troll.