This Wednesday at 12:45 Eastern/9:45 Pacific, The Motley Fool's top analysts will be hosting a live blog breaking down what Apple's iPad 3 press conference means for investors. The best part? They’ll also be taking any questions you have about the tablet and Apple as an investment as well. Make sure to set a reminder to come back to Fool.com this Wednesday for all your iPad 3 news and analysis!
I have personally never watched the film Not Another Teen Movie -- and somehow I consider myself lucky for that. However, that didn't prevent the commercial previews from being forever seared, unwillingly, into my brain.
"You better bring it!"
"Oh, it's already been broughten!"
That's sort of like what's going in right now between Apple
If you recall, on the day following Valentine's Day, Apple sought the permission of an N.Y. bankruptcy judge to sue the already bankrupt Kodak over what it deemed copyright infringement. Specifically, Apple is alleging that Kodak used its technology in its printers, digital cameras, and digital picture frames.
This lawsuit comes after Kodak's waterfall-like stream of lawsuits that it served on the technology sector over the past couple of years. In that time, Kodak has sued Research In Motion over preview-imaging patents, as well as HTC, Fujifilm, and Samsung over image-transmitting patents it feels are being infringed upon. Apple was also a party to both of these lawsuits.
Kodak recently announced that it would completely exit the digital camera market which it helped found, and it's hoping to get top dollar for its patent portfolio to aid in the company's reorganization from bankruptcy. This potential lawsuit from Apple isn't helping Kodak's effort to sell its patents one bit.
So with that being said, on Friday Kodak fired back at Apple and asked the N.Y. bankruptcy court for permission to examine "the basis" of Apple's claims against the company. Kodak is asking Apple to produce all documents and communications that would clearly establish it, and not Kodak, as the clear owner of the patents in question.
Oh, snap! Take that, Apple! But you didn't think the drama would end there, did you?
Apple has claimed that it developed a digital camera in the early 1990s. Apple's claim was that it then shared the camera with Kodak and that Kodak then sought to patent the technology. Kodak has denied the claim thus far.
In your face, Kodak!
This has all of the makings of a schoolyard brawl that needs to be broken up by an adult. All of this bickering appears to be nothing more than years of animosity building up on Apple's part from being sued by Kodak. With Kodak now in bankruptcy, Apple is ready to get in its final blow, which may not be a victory so much as a weakening in value of Kodak's patent portfolio.
It remains to be seen who the primary bidders might be on that portfolio, but I can assure you that Apple remains a possibility, along with the struggling Sony, which could use any form of guaranteed cash flow it can get right now. What I do know is this: It's going to take a lot more than the perhaps $50 million in royalties Kodak could earn by licensing some of its cinematic patents to IMAX
Who do you think will come out as the winner of this squabble? Share your opinion in the comments section below with your fellow Fools.
While Apple and Kodak are busy duking it out, I suggest you get your copy of your latest special report, "3 Hidden Winners of the iPhone, iPad, and Android Revolution." Find out which three companies our analysts think are flying under investors' radars. Best of all, you can do so right now for free!
