Technology is changing the oil exploration and production picture, and one of the biggest impacts will be on Arctic drilling. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that 25% of the world's remaining undiscovered conventional oil and gas reserves are located in the Arctic, with most of it in offshore reservoirs. The U.S. lays claim to about a third of those reserves, an excellent position to be in as more high Arctic licenses are granted to exploration and production companies.
Though several nations will benefit from Arctic drilling, the U.S., Canada, and Russia stand to gain the most. Below is a snapshot of how Arctic drilling is shaping up in these three countries.
Royal Dutch Shell
Things began to change last August, when the company received conditional approval from the Department of the Interior to begin drilling exploratory wells. Last month, Shell received approval on its oil spill response plan, which means drilling may commence as early as this summer.
The details of Shell's plan highlight the risks facing all companies that intend to drill in icy Arctic waters. Specifically, the company had to demonstrate a plan for dealing with a spill at the end of the operations season. At that time, the region is dark and the water has iced over, rendering traditional oil spill cleanup plans useless.
Shell still needs a few final permits, but the company is hopeful that drilling will begin in early July.
Our neighbors to the north launched an Arctic Review in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico disaster in order to develop new filing requirements for companies applying for Arctic offshore drilling permits. As of right now, there are no companies actively drilling, or applying to drill, in Canada's Arctic waters, but Shell, BP
The new filing rules will also affect those applying for permits in the Beaufort Sea, located just south of the Arctic Ocean, and for all intents and purposes, home to the same conditions and drilling risks. Earlier this year, Chevron
Right now, Russian law prohibits any company that isn't state-owned from exploring its offshore waters. That's something that Vagit Alekperov, the CEO of Russia's Lukoil, sees changing in the near future.
Alekperov, speaking to the Financial Times last month, expressed frustration at the current policy, largely because the state-owned companies Gazprom and Rosneft have been sitting on their licenses. State-owned oil companies frequently lack the expertise of private companies, and this seems to be true in the case of Russia's arctic reserves. Alekperov claims Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin "understands that we have to resolve this issue. State companies take the licenses and do nothing with them."
Non-state-owned companies can only enter the region in partnership with state-owned companies, as ExxonMobil did last year, partnering with Rosneft to explore the South Kara Sea.
But Alekperov may well get his way sooner rather than later. Russia's major Siberian fields are in decline, and the country needs to open up new oil fields if it intends to maintain its 10-million-barrels-per-day production target until 2020.
The Arctic region could prove quite lucrative for the companies mentioned above, as they unlock billions of barrels of untouched oil. Oil-field service companies, like the one Fool analysts have dubbed "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need," will be in high demand as Big Oil pursues this complicated exploration and production opportunity.
Fool contributor Aimee Duffy owns shares of Statoil, but she holds no other position in any company mentioned. If you have the energy, check out what she's keeping an eye on by following her on Twitter@TMFDuffy.
Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Statoil, ExxonMobil, and Chevron. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.