Shares of Brinker International
How it got here
The name Brinker International may not ring a bell, but the owner of the Chili's and Maggiano's restaurant chains continues to buck sector weakness and truck higher.
Rival Ruby Tuesday
On the flip side, casual-dining chains Buffalo Wild Wings
How it stacks up
Let's see how Brinker International stacks up next to its peers.
As you can see, owning restaurant chains hasn't exactly been a profitable venture in most cases over the past five years.
5-Year Revenue CAGR
Source: Morningstar. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. *Three-year CAGR used due to merger in 2008.
I give these metrics a collective "Yuck!" These numbers put into perspective how difficult it has been for restaurants to get customers back through their doors. When the recession hit, consumers' discretionary spending all but dried up. Darden Restaurants has been one of the industry's few bright spots recently, managing to grow despite weakness in its Olive Garden franchise. Brinker actually looks worse on paper than Ruby Tuesday, but its traffic growth of 5.8% at Maggiano's and 3.8% at Chili's saves it from the shortfalls currently being felt by Ruby Tuesday. DineEquity's large debt load and struggling IHOP franchise make it possibly the worst of the bunch.
Now for the real question: What's next for Brinker International? The answer, as with all restaurants, depends on whether the company can keep customers coming back with a favorable mix of products and drive new business while also raising prices high enough to offset rising input costs. It sounds like a challenge, but it appears Brinker is finally getting its act together.
Our very own CAPS community gives the company a two-star rating (out of five), with just 65.7% of members expecting it to outperform. I have yet to make a CAPScall on Brinker for two particular reasons.
First, I can't say I'm a huge fan of the restaurant sector because of rapidly changing consumer spending habits and the ebb-and-flow nature of the industry. If I wanted a cyclical company, I'd rather own something that has high growth potential or pays a higher dividend. Secondly, Brinker has repurchased 47% of its outstanding shares in just the past 10 years, which has the effect of boosting EPS while masking a lack of organic growth. Don't get me wrong; I'm impressed with Brinker's ability to drive traffic to its stores in the latest quarter, and I do appreciate the 2.3% yield, but I'd rather see the company put that money to work in marketing or upping its dividend, rather than more share buybacks.
I consider myself close to being able to pull the trigger on an outperform call, but I need one or two quarters more of outperformance before I'll be ready to give Brinker a clean bill of health.
Craving more input on Brinker International? Start by adding it to your free and personalized watchlist. It's a free service from The Motley Fool to keep you up to date on the stocks you care about most. Click the links below to start today.
Fool contributor Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.
The Motley Fool owns shares of Buffalo Wild Wings and Darden Restaurants. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of, as well as writing covered calls on, Buffalo Wild Wings. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.