Johnson & Johnson's
As is typical with large pharma, Johnson & Johnson didn't give many details about the complete response letter, the agency's euphemism for a rejection. But we can hazard a guess based on the FDA advisory committee meeting.
That committee voted six to four, with one abstention, recommending that the drug not be given the expanded indication, in large part because a large fraction of data from the subjects in the clinical trials wasn't available because of a large numbers of dropouts.
Assuming that's the issue, solving that problem won't be easy. Running another large trial will take years and a lot of added expense. If it was easy to track down the dropouts and figure out what happened to them, you'd think that Johnson & Johnson would already have done that.
Xarelto is still approved to reduce the risk of blood clots after certain surgeries, and for atrial fibrillation, but it won't be able to compete with AstraZeneca's
Johnson & Johnson's investors eyes should now turn to Pfizer
Johnson & Johnson has lost the acute coronary syndrome battle for now. Unless the FDA comes to its rescue and turns down Eliquis, it looks like the health-care conglomerate might be losing the blood thinner war.
Fortunately, Johnson & Johnson is a diversified company, and can handle the hit. It's one of the nine companies featured in the Fool's free report, "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." Find out what the other eight are by following this link.