Motley Fool CTO Jeremy Phillips and tech analyst Eric Bleeker debate whether Ancestry.com or LinkedIn is a better buy now. Jeremy prefers Ancestry because of its fast-growing subscriber base, but Eric thinks LinkedIn is a more powerful, disruptive company in the long run. Both look like solid buys moving forward.
The amount of data we store every year is growing by a mind-boggling 60% annually! To make sense of this trend and pick out a winner, The Motley Fool has compiled a new report called "The Only Stock You Need to Profit From the NEW Technology Revolution." The report highlights a company that has gained 300% since first recommended by Fool analysts but still has plenty of room left to run. Thousands have requested access to this special free report, and now you can access it today at no cost. To get instant access to the names of this company transforming the IT industry, click here -- it's free.
Eric Bleeker owns shares of Ancestry.com. Jeremy Phillips has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Ancestry.com and LinkedIn. Motley Fool newsletter services recommend Ancestry.com and LinkedIn. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
You Won't Believe What LinkedIn, Inc. CEO Jeff Weiner Said About College Degrees
His analysis may be both controversial and self-serving, but it still makes a ton of sense in today's job search market.
LinkedIn Could Get Banned in Russia
Will the professional network comply with data localization requirements?
Better Buy: LinkedIn Corporation vs. Match Group
Each internet stock has plenty going in its favor, so which one offers investors more long-term upside?