Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Free Article Join Over 1 Million Premium Members And Get More In-Depth Stock Guidance and Research

3 Product Flops That Led to Higher Profits

By Ted Cooper - Mar 15, 2014 at 2:00PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Coca-Cola, Starbucks, and PepsiCo have all introduced innovations that never caught on. However, some of their biggest flops eventually turned into big profits.

Doritos Locos Tacos recently crossed the $1 billion sales mark, just one year after they were introduced in U.S. Taco Bell locations. The creation was a collaboration between Yum! Brands and PepsiCo ( PEP 0.24% ) that showcased the latter's ability to use its products in innovative ways.

Despite PepsiCo's recent success, the road to successful innovation is paved with failure. For every successful product created by Starbucks ( SBUX -0.89% ), Coca-Cola ( KO -0.29% ), and PepsiCo, there are many more that did not turn out as planned. However, three of the many failed innovations at these companies offered crucial insights into their businesses and ultimately led to their future successes.

New Coke leads to new consumer insights
Back in the 1980s, Coca-Cola was in a fight to retain its leading market share against the insurgent PepsiCo. In an effort to trim its losses from the Pepsi challenge, Coca-Cola reformulated its Diet Coke formula to make a sweeter drink that it called "New Coke." The new beverage came replete with a redesigned can, a brand new slogan, and a bold new advertising campaign. Coca-Cola also removed the old formulation from the market.

Source: The Coca-Cola Company. 

It was this last move -- taking away the classic Coca-Cola beverage -- that angered consumers. As Bruce Greenwald described it in Competition Demystified, the move resulted in "an outpouring of protest from those customers committed to the original drink[, forcing] the company to reconsider its plans."

Soon, Coca-Cola realized its error and discovered its true competitive advantage. "Many loyal customers had a visceral attachment to the original, a drink they identified with their youth, their country, their very identity," writes Greenwald.

As it learned during the New Coke episode, Coca-Cola's durable competitive advantage is that its customers have an emotional attachment to the product, a nostalgia that is far more gripping than the product's taste. PepsiCo is often described as a timely brand -- one that changes to meet the tastes of the young and hip generation. Coca-Cola, on the other hand, is a timeless brand -- one that grows stronger in its customers' minds as time goes by.

Unfortunately, Coca-Cola may soon face another harsh reality: Its nostalgic customer base is growing old. Brand and marketing consultant Martin Lindstrom told The New York Times that the average Coke drinker is 56 years old. Coca-Cola still has incredible baby boomer mindshare, but it has struggled to bring the next generation on board. Innovation may be the solution to this problem; whether or not that innovation results in a hot new product, one thing is for sure: Coca-Cola will learn something new about its business.

Sorbetto reveals Starbucks' limits
Through the years, Starbucks has innovated on a number of fronts. Some of those efforts proved fruitful, others didn't. Best known as a coffee company, Starbucks has dabbled in a number of other businesses as well. For instance, it is now a successful player in the tea industry, with its Teavana and Tazo brands starting to gain traction among consumers.

However, not everything that Starbucks brews up comes out right. In the summer of 2008, the coffee chain rolled out the Sorbetto. The 10-ounce drink sold for $2.75 and was available in flavors like tropical tangy creme and berry pink citrus.

Unfortunately, the tart beverage was not a hit with consumers. According to Reuters, the Sorbetto introduction raised some analysts' eyebrows as they saw the limited amount of testing Starbucks did on its products before they hit stores. Moreover, the machines took 45 minutes to clean, which added significant work time for baristas while they tried to close the stores for the night.

The Sorbetto flop reveals two key things about Starbucks. First, the company cannot just slap "Starbucks" on a beverage and expect it to sell. Starbucks customers are more free-spending than the general population, but they are not going to forgo an opportunity to buy coffee or tea just to buy a new Starbucks beverage. This demonstrates the limits of the Starbucks brand.

Secondly, baristas' unpleasant experiences with the Sorbetto machine should have taught the company that new products should fit into the stores' existing workflows, or new rules should be enacted to smoothly change the stores' workflows. As Starbucks rolls out its La Boulange breakfast and bakery items, it is relearning the importance of optimizing efficiency. A Business Insider journalist discovered that La Boulange has created miscommunication issues between the food preparers and the beverage preparers, which have led to improperly filled orders, unhappy customers, and frustrated employees. Starbucks needs to revamp its workflow to accommodate the food preparation in order to rectify the situation. When the company implements what it learns, La Boulange could take off.

Crystal Pepsi paves way for healthy portfolio
More than a decade before Indra Nooyi took the helm of PepsiCo, the company was already trying to jump on the health trend. In 1992, PepsiCo introduced Crystal Pepsi as a means of courting the health-conscious consumer.

However, the product was a massive flop. It turned out that the clear and caffeine-free version of Pepsi was not attractive to, well, just about anyone. In its effort to build a product that seemed pure and healthy, PepsiCo apparently forgot to make it taste good.

Nevertheless, PepsiCo was better off for introducing Crystal Pepsi. The company learned that healthy products only succeed if they taste good. PepsiCo's current healthy portfolio consists of sweet-tasting products like Tropicana orange juice, Naked juice, and Izze sparkling juice. Each of these "Good-for-You" products is successful not because it is a nutritional superstar -- each contains a copious amount of sugar -- but because it is marginally nutritious and tastes good. That is the formula for mass-market health foods -- a lesson that the company learned from the Crystal Pepsi fiasco.

Foolish takeaway
Failed innovations rarely result in complete failures. New Coke, Sorbetto, and Crystal Pepsi offered critical insights that each company could learn from and improve upon. Coca-Cola, Starbucks, and PepsiCo will introduce similar flops in the future, but investors can rest assured that the companies will become better as a result.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis – even one of our own – helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

The Coca-Cola Company Stock Quote
The Coca-Cola Company
$52.30 (-0.29%) $0.15
Pepsico, Inc. Stock Quote
Pepsico, Inc.
$160.16 (0.24%) $0.38
Starbucks Corporation Stock Quote
Starbucks Corporation
$108.66 (-0.89%) $0.98

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 12/01/2021.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Our Most Popular Articles

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with the Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from the Motley Fool's premium services.