Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Is Jim Cramer Wrong on This One?

By Callum Turcan – Mar 28, 2014 at 12:30PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Jim Cramer recently issued out a bearish call on LINN Energy. Is this a buying opportunity?

Jim Cramer recently issued a bearish call on LINN Energy LLC (LINEQ) and its parent company LinnCo LLC (NASDAQ: LNCO). This could have opened up a perfect buying opportunity for investors as both investments took a hit on the announcement. While Cramer did say that he liked both as income plays considering that both LINN Energy and LinnCo offer yields of 10%, he said that investors should ditch those companies in favor of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners. Kinder Morgan is a great company, but that doesn't mean investors should be jumping ship just yet.

Major reserve bolstering
LINN Energy has been laying down the framework for future payouts, which will come from its proven reserve base. To do so, LINN Energy grew its proven reserves by 33% as it completed the Berry Petroleum acquisition last year. 

 Proved Reserves Table   (Bcfe)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2012  4,796
Revisions of previous estimates due to price 52
Revisions of previous estimates due to PUD SEC 5 year rule (109)
Performance revisions (100)
Purchase of minerals in place 1,610
Sales of minerals in place (73)
Extensions, discoveries and other additions 527
Production (300)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2013 6,403

Source: LINN Energy's Fourth Quarter Update and 2014 Outlook 

While most of LINN Energy's reserve growth came from its acquisitions, it still shouldn't be understated that its extensions and discoveries uncovered 527 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) of additional resources. This outpaces the rate that production took away from LINN Energy's reserve base, which is a sign that LINN Energy isn't totally dependent on additional acquisitions to fund future growth.

From 2012 to 2013, LINN Energy shifted its reserve mix from 46% liquids to 53% liquids, which should keep trending in that direction as 100% of LINN Energy's 2014 budget is focused on liquids plays. 

A love for liquids
LINN Energy is serious about tapping into liquids plays, which is why it's spending the largest portion of its budget this year on the Permian Basin. With 25% of LINN Energy's 2014 budget going toward the Permian, LINN Energy is trying to develop its 160 MMBoe of proven reserves in the region (which is 80% liquids.) By running an average of six rigs in the area this year, LINN Energy will be able to slowly add to its 25,000 bpd of output from the Permian and could potentially dig up additional resources. 

In the Uinta Basin, LINN Energy has posted some very strong numbers. By completing more wells than expected, production climbed 29% to 10,000 boe/d last quarter versus the same quarter in 2012. LINN Energy was able to bring more wells online than previously expected "due to better than expected drilling results from improved operational efficiencies, such as reduced drilling cycle times."

To add a cherry on top, management is seeking to "develop its marketing options through its initiative of shipping crude oil to markets outside of Utah via railcar," which means find markets that will pay LINN Energy more for its output. Its Uinta Basin assets offer LINN Energy one of its best chances at boosting liquids output after the Permian, which is why 13% of LINN Energy's budget is going toward the play. 

Follow the money
Last year, LINN Energy and Berry Petroleum spent a combined $1.8 billion on capex, but LINN Energy is going to cut that down to $1.6 billion this year while still growing output. Production averaged 889 MMcfe/d in the fourth quarter of 2013, which was an 11% increase over last year. LINN Energy is guiding for 2014 production to average between 1.07 Bfce/d-1.14 Bfce/d, which will come from 3%-4% organic growth and the full integration of Berry Petroleum's assets.

As LINN Energy spends less yet sees free cash flow rise from a better liquids production mix and higher levels of output, you can bet on a rising coverage ratio. This year, management is guiding for the distribution to be fully covered, which is justified in part by LINN Energy's rising levels of excess cash after distributions have been paid. In LINN Energy's latest quarter, its net cash provided by operating activities rose from $206.5 million to $225.7 million year over year. After factoring in other adjustments, LINN Energy's surplus cash after distribution payouts rose to $31.5 million from $6.6 million during that same time period.

Foolish conclusion
LINN Energy and LinnCo (which owns units of LINN Energy) have a perfect business plan to steadily grow over the next few years. With rising production levels being propelled by higher liquids output, LINN Energy is expanding both its revenue and margins. More revenue and larger margins leads to a bigger pool of distributable cash flow, which can be converted into a higher payout for unit holders of LINN Energy and shareholders of LinnCo.

This is why I don't understand Jim Cramer's bearish call on LINN Energy and LinnCo: everything is in place for the payout to either rise or at least become safer. While bears may point toward LINN Energy's $9.2 billion in net debt, shareholders don't need to be alarmed as almost all of that debt isn't due until 2019 or later. 

With LINN Energy's coverage ratio expected to be over one this year, both LINN Energy and LinnCo's payouts will be fully funded and secure. Even if there was no distribution or dividend increase, investors would rake in a safe 10% gain each year. On top of that, LINN Energy has $2.435 billion in liquidity from its credit facility just in case.

LINN Energy and LinnCo may not offer the highest levels of growth, but for investors looking for a ridiculous high yield that is sustainable to boot, look no further than these two investments. Jim Cramer is wrong to say investors should pile out of a 10% yield just to trade it with a 7.5% yield (Kinder Morgan's); instead, why not diversify and take both.

Callum Turcan has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.