Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Why Kinder Morgan Serves As a Warning to Dividend Investors

By Adam Galas - Apr 15, 2016 at 1:45PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Find out why Kinder Morgan's share price collapse can serve as a warning to dividend investors. More importantly, learn why you should avoid it and choose these superior alternatives.

Source: Kinder Morgan.

Dividend growth investing has been shown to be the best long-term strategy to grow wealth over time. However, thanks to the worst oil crash in over 50 years, many energy dividend stocks have ended up doing very poorly.

KMI Total Return Price Chart
KMI Total Return Price data by YCharts

Kinder Morgan (KMI 1.31%) has not only underperformed the overall market over the past five years, but even when dividend reinvestment is factored in (total returns) it's actually lost investors money. Yet competitors such as Enterprise Products Partners (EPD 1.07%), Spectra Energy Partners (SEP), and Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP 0.88%) have done much better.

The reason for Kinder's poor performance over the past half-decade can teach investors a vital lesson needed to avoid a similar fate. More importantly, it illustrates why Enterprise, Spectra, and Magellan will probably continue to be superior dividend growth investments over the coming years.

What went wrong at Kinder Morgan
There's nothing inherently wrong with Kinder Morgan's assets. In fact, they generated $4.7 billion in distributable cash flow in 2015 and are expected to generate $4.9 billion of DCF this year.

Kinder's problem was management's focus on excessive dividend growth at the expense of retaining enough cash flow to decrease reliance on external capital markets for growth.

While this worked fine when oil prices were high for years, as crude crashed and Wall Street abandoned all things oil- and gas-related, Kinder's share price plunged. This situation made equity capital increasingly expensive and raised capital costs high enough to make an increasing share of Kinder's expansion backlog less lucrative.

Until the end of 2015, Kinder was able to continue borrowing debt cheaply, but eventually its balance sheet became so overleveraged that rating agencies threatened to cut its rating to "junk." Doing so would've made future borrowing and refinancing costs for $43.2 billion in debt skyrocket.

Kinder was then forced to finally do what Enterprise, Spectra, and Magellan had been doing all along; become more conservative with its approach to debt, and rely more on its internally generated cash flow to fund growth. For investors this meant a brutal 80% dividend cut, which the market had been anticipating for months and caused the share price to collapse.

The most important lesson dividend investors need to learn

Company/MLPYield2015 Distribution Coverage Ratio (Excluding Asset Sales)Long-Term Projected Annual Payout Growth Rate
Kinder Morgan 11.4% 1.11 NA
Enterprise Products Partners 6.6% 1.3 5.2% in 2016
Spectra Energy Partners 5.4% 1.2 7.3% CAGR through 2018
Magellan Midstream Partners 4.8% 1.2 10% in 2016 "at least" 8% in 2017

Sources: 10-Ks, Yahoo! Finance, management guidance, Fastgraphs.

For a little comparison here, this table shows Kinder's yield and 2015 coverage ratio had it maintained its dividend.

Kinder's maximum $0.51-per-share quarterly dividend was simply not sustainable, given the low coverage and lack of ongoing access to sufficiently cheap capital markets. Had management chosen to maintain this payout in 2016, even this year's projected 4.3% increase in cash flow would have resulted in a DCR of 1.08 and probably a credit downgrade that could have permanently hurt future dividend growth.

While management made the right choice in terms of maximizing long-term investor value, Enterprise Products Partners', Spectra Energy Partners', and Magellan Midstream Partners' already were maintaining higher coverage ratios that allowed them to generate excess cash flow. This situation is expected to still allow payout growth even as oil prices remain at multi-year lows.

It was also a result of their more conservative managements, which, understanding the inherent cycle nature of energy prices, wisely chose to focus on two other vitally important metrics over the years that make up the cornerstone of long-term distribution sustainability.

Strong balance sheet and project profitability

Company/MLPDebt/EBITDA (Leverage Ratio)Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
Kinder Morgan 5.6 3.03% 1.87%
Enterprise Products Partners 4.5 6.87% 8.52%
Spectra Energy Partners 3.6 5.85% 7.36%
Magellan Midstream Partners 2.9 7.12% 18.64%

Sources: Morningstar, GuruFocus.

Kinder Morgan's years of reliance on external capital not only resulted in a highly leveraged balance sheet that was the primary reason for the dividend cut, but it also hurt the company's long-term ability to grow shareholder value.

That's because it reduced the company's return on invested capital below its cost of capital, meaning that while new projects coming online will increase cash flow, they might not generate capital long term.

In an industry that's continually raising outside capital, it can be hard to know whether a company or MLP is really growing profitably or just using new capital to grow cash flows at any price.

That's why net ROIC is one metric you should keep a close eye on. Understand that net ROIC isn't a perfect metric for judging profitability because it relies partly on share volatility, which doesn't directly affect the returns on projects. In addition net income doesn't show an asset's cash flow generating potential, which is something investors should care about since it's what funds the quarterly payouts. However, as a rule of thumb it's a good way to ensure that management's using investor money wisely.

Bottom line
Yield and dividend growth are often the first two things income investors focus on. Yet payout sustainability is the most important factor. That's the reason all dividend investors need to pay attention to the three pillars of long-term dividend sustainability: coverage ratio, a strong balance sheet, and returns on capital in excess of its cost of capital.

While Kinder Morgan is likely to eventually recover, Enterprise Products Partners, Spectra Energy Partners, and Magellan Midstream Partners continue offering investors superior payout sustainability profiles, which should result in better long-term total returns.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Kinder Morgan, Inc. Stock Quote
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$16.98 (1.31%) $0.22
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. Stock Quote
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
$24.63 (1.07%) $0.26
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. Stock Quote
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
$48.18 (0.88%) $0.42
Spectra Energy Partners Stock Quote
Spectra Energy Partners

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 07/02/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.