Like a monster in a horror movie, it's the debate that just won't die: Which is better, passive or active money management? Both sides have ardent supporters and passionate critics, and there are studies aplenty that seem to point the finger of truth in both directions. If you've got a stake in this discussion, a new report sheds more light on how the active vs. passive debate has fared in recent months.
Standard & Poor's recently released its updated S&P Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard, or SPIVA, for short. This rolling scorecard tracks how actively managed funds performed over the previous one-, three-, and five-year periods as compared to the relevant S&P benchmark. And as many might expect, the results weren't all that flattering for active funds.
According to the data, over the most recent five-year period, 57.6% of domestic equity funds underperformed the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Broken down by market cap, 61.8% of large-cap funds underperformed the S&P 500 Index, 78.2% of mid-cap funds missed the mark compared to the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index, and 63% of all small-cap funds trailed the S&P Small Cap 600 Index. That's not exactly a ringing endorsement for active managers!
The only category in which a majority of active funds beat their relevant benchmark in the past five years is large-cap value, in which nearly 65% of funds beat the S&P 500 Value Index. However, for all other equity asset classes, more than half of the actively managed funds trailed their index, including mid-cap growth funds, where a shocking 82.1% of funds lagged.
The high cost of failure
Five years is not a tremendously long period over which to examine results, but the evidence still speaks pretty clearly to a fact that many investors have known for a long time: The average mutual fund just can't beat the market on a long-term basis. While manager skill and plain old luck may account for much of the outcome here, one of the biggest challenges for active managers is overcoming the cost differential. Because active funds typically charge higher fees than plain old index funds or ETFs, in reality managers have to outperform the market to even give their fundholders a market return. Higher costs mean a higher performance hurdle to overcome.
That's why it's vital to pay attention to expenses when you're shopping for active funds. According to Morningstar data, the average domestic large-cap blend fund comes with a 1.28% price tag, while the average foreign large-cap blend fund charges 1.48% of assets every year. But there are some fund shops that don't charge obscene prices for their management skills. For example, take the Dodge & Cox lineup of funds. Dodge & Cox Stock
The few, the proud
But even after accounting for active funds' higher costs, the majority of managers still won't be able to beat the market. It's simply very difficult to outguess the millions of other investors out there and see opportunities before others do. However, there are some managers who do have the unique skills and talent to rise above the rest -- it's just a matter of finding who they are.
Looking again at the Dodge & Cox fund family, we can see how some managers and management teams do consistently outperform the market. Rather than rely on a superstar manager, Dodge & Cox employs the theory that nine great minds are better than one. A team of nine portfolio managers runs the show at both Dodge & Cox Stock and Dodge & Cox International Stock.
The Stock fund looks for names that are temporarily undervalued but have good long-term growth prospects. Despite some difficulties during the recent financial crisis, the fund ranks ahead of 98% of its peers in the past decade and a half. Right now, management is finding a lot to like in out-of-favor pharmaceutical firms such as Novartis
Likewise, Dodge & Cox International Stock boasts a 9.7% annualized return since its June 2001 inception, compared to a 5.4% showing for the MSCI EAFE Index. While this fund is just short of its 10-year anniversary, it has outperformed 91% of all foreign large-value funds in the past five years. The team finds the international telecom sector appealing and includes such names as the U.K.'s Vodafone Group
Ultimately, the evidence shows that beating the market is an uphill battle for the average mutual fund manager. However, there is a rare group of funds and managers that can outperform the market over a long-term basis. Those managers are few and far between, but identifying them is key to out-earning the market and helping your portfolio reach its goals sooner.
Amanda Kish is the Fool's resident fund advisor for the Rule Your Retirement investment newsletter. Amanda owns shares of Dodge & Cox International Stock. Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline are Motley Fool Global Gains selections. Vodafone Group is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. The Fool owns shares of GlaxoSmithKline. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Mutual Fund and ETF Fees: Know the True Cost of Investing
Make sure you understand how mutual fund fees are calculated, and the difference between funds.
Dodge and Cox Stock Fund: Is This Mutual Fund Worth Investing In?
Since its founding in 1965, the Dodge and Cox Stock Fund has consistently outperformed the market. Will that remain the case going forward, and should you invest in it?