Here we go again -- an old, familiar subject: stock splits. I've been writing about them for more than a decade now, generally concluding that they're mostly meaningless. Still, it seems that there's always something new to say about them. And in fact, I recently stumbled upon some interesting perspectives. I'll share them with you shortly, but first let me recap some split basics:

  • One reason stock splits aren't too meaningful is mathematical: If your 100 shares of Meteorite Insurance (ticker: HEDSUP) are trading at $40 each, they're worth $4,000. If the company splits it stock 2-for-1, you'll have 200 shares trading at $20 each, worth ... $4,000. Big whoop. If the dividend before was $1.20 per share, giving a yield of 3%, the dividend post-split will be $0.60 per share, giving a yield of ... 3%. Yawn.
  • Why do companies split their stocks? For several reasons. Sometimes they want more outstanding shares to increase the stock's liquidity (reduce bid-ask spreads), or perhaps to meet some listing requirements for the exchange on which they trade. Sometimes they may want their price to be lower to attract more investors who think that low prices are better bargains. (They're not. A $500 stock can be undervalued, while many $1 stocks are overvalued.)
  • One positive argument for splits is that they signal management optimism. That is, if a company were expecting trouble, its bigwigs probably wouldn't split its stock, as it would then fall into even lower territory, looking more pathetic. Another argument is that a company will probably have done something good to reach a point where it splits. So it stands a good chance of continuing to do well.

Seeking out splitters
You may have gathered that I don't go out of my way to find splitting stocks. Still, perhaps you and I should -- a recent article excerpted from Dow Theory Forecasts suggests so. In it, Richard Moroney makes a case for seeking out serial splitters. He notes that, "In two studies by researcher David Ikenberry that covered more than 20 years of stock returns, stocks that split outperformed the market by an average of 8% in the year after the split and at least 12% over the next three years."

Moroney then lists several "quality companies that are up sharply since their last split," noting that, "All seven stocks are worthy of purchase on their own merits, and the possibility of a stock split represents an extra kicker." The firms included FedEx (NYSE:FDX) (last split 2-for-1 in May 1999 and up 108% since then), ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) (last split 2-for-1 in July 2001 and up some 122% since then), and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) (last split 2-for-1 in May 1996 and up about 160% over 11 years).

Who knows when, or if, these companies will split again, though. If you want some verified splitters, check out Yahoo! Finance's stock-split calendar. I found these recent splits listed there:

Split date


Split ratio

June 14



June 15

Buffalo Wild Wings (NASDAQ:BWLD)


June 22

Gilead Sciences


June 22

Express Scripts


But wait!
Before you rush off to seek out stock splitters, here's another point of view:

Scott Rothbort of LakeView Asset Management has noted that there seem to be fewer stocks splitting these days, and he thinks the trend might continue. As evidence, he points to a longer-than-usual collection of companies with prices above $100 per share, such as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS). He notes that high prices might keep more speculators away, and he also offered a reasoning that I hadn't thought of before: That a high stock price can be valued by a company as a sign of success, and therefore prestige. It can attract certain investors, just as a low price can attract other kinds of investors.

Now come on, really ...
If you're now flummoxed as to what to do about splits, let me offer a modest proposal: nothing. Let's face it -- if you're chasing big gains from splits, what you're really after are companies growing rapidly. And those are often smaller, younger companies. Why not just zero in on them directly?

You can do so yourself via stock screening and extensive reading and studying. Or you can let us help. I invite you to test-drive, for free, our Motley Fool Hidden Gems newsletter, which has a rather spectacular track record in its young life, more than doubling the S&P 500's return, 63% to 27% since July 2003.

During your free 30 days, you'll have full access to all past issues, so you can read about every recommendation in detail.

So let's split the difference on stock splits, shall we? Let's simply focus instead on small companies growing rapidly.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of PepsiCo. She recently learned that the eyes of goats and octopuses have rectangular pupils. For more about Selena, viewher bio and her profile. Buffalo Wild Wings is a Hidden Gems recommendation. FedEx is a Stock Advisor recommendation. The Motley Fool isFools writing for Fools.