In the history of business, few competitors have been more deadly than Microsoft
We've known for a while now that Google
Conspiracy theories abound, of course. The one I find most intriguing says that Microsoft wants AOL to cut off Google's air. (The search king received 12% of its 2004 revenue, or $382 million, from AOL.) Naturally, such speculation demands a response. And it came yesterday, when News.com cited a Merrill Lynch analyst in reporting that Google may make its own offer for AOL.
That makes sense to me. Google would get to keep prized real estate for ads and accelerate the creation of a portal comparable to MyYahoo! and MSN. (What else did you think Gmail, Froogle, and Google News were for, anyway?)
But I think there's something bigger going on. I think the spate of rumors suggests that Microsoft's campaign to damage Google has finally begun in earnest. Consider the series of recent events. Not even two months ago, CEO Steve Ballmer told financial analysts he was intent on seeing Microsoft be No. 1 in Internet services -- including search -- and Net advertising, according to Investor's Business Daily. That's as clear a sign as you'll get that Mr. Softy is getting hard-nosed.
There's been no formal response from Google that I've seen, but I'm hardly surprised to see the company raising $4.1 billion from new stock with Microsoft breathing down its neck. Wouldn't you want as much money in your war chest as you could muster if Microsoft and its $38 billion in cash came calling? I would.
Don't get me wrong: I don't think Microsoft is capable of killing Google. Not any longer. Google is too well-capitalized and too loaded with talent, and it boasts a very strong and well-defined market position. But a Microsoft-AOL deal would still be scary. That the mainstream press knows it marks the first time the so-called pundit set has admitted to -- let alone written about -- deep vulnerabilities in Google's thus-far impenetrable franchise. Shareholders beware.
You needn't search for related Foolishness. It's all right here:
- Fellow Fool Rick Munarriz was among the first to examine Google's soft underbelly.
- When did Google steal Leonard Nimoy's gig?
(NASDAQ:BIDU)wants to be Google for China. It's off to the right start: Many analysts believe that its shares are overpriced.
- Settle an argument for us, won't you? Is it better to be a Google bull or bear?
Do you loathe the thought of pricey tech stocks? Do you go to the mall and shop only in the bargain aisle? Do garage sales actually appeal to you? If so, Motley Fool Inside Value was made for you. Learn how Philip Durell and our Foolish band of value investing analysts buy stocks on sale; take a risk-free trial today. Your portfolio will thank you.
Time Warner is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation.
Fool contributor Tim Beyers thinks Mr. Softy is as hard-nosed and passionate as they come in the business world. Don't believe him? Check out this exhortation (a video file) to Microsoft loyalists by CEO Steve Ballmer. Tim didn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this story at the time of publication. You can find out what's in his portfolio by checking Tim's Fool profile, which is here. The Motley Fool has an ironclad disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
What to Do When You Make 1 of These 5 Common Interview Mistakes
You might not even have realized that you made one of these mistakes -- but this advice will help get you back on track to that dream job!
3 Things Costco Wants You to Know
Highlights from the warehouse giant's strong fiscal first-quarter report.
The Most Expensive Wearable Fitness Device of 2017
Is it an Apple or a Garmin?