When asked about his contrarian business style, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) CEO Sheldon Adelson, who was once one of the world's 10 richest people, smiled and said, "Everyone has always told me I'm nuts when making investment decisions, but when you can look at something differently than other people, you can find opportunity."

No matter how well a company manages its business, it's bound to encounter bumps in the road. Some of the world's greatest investors, including Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, Eddie Lampert, and Mohnish Pabrai, have made incredible sums of money by investing in good companies that run into short-term problems. Investors who have the courage to swim against the current when good companies encounter scandals, lawsuits, and other gut-wrenching events can make out quite well, once the storm passes and the company returns to business as usual.

Making investment decisions seems pretty easy when everyone agrees with you. Getting a vote of confidence from high-profile analysts, top fund managers, and overconfident CNBC guests can give you a feeling of investment invincibility. But this comes at a price.

The problem with making those easy decisions? Everyone else is making them, too. It's unlikely you'll find much opportunity when stocks have a rosy consensus; the premium prices you'll pay can already reflect any positive developments, leaving investors wondering what happened to their road to riches.

Digging for gold where others see fear
Thankfully, just as quickly as investors pile into popular stocks, they can run for the exits en masse when news tarnishing the profile of their once-beloved company develops. That gives Foolish investors opportunity when others see only fear. Achieving stellar investment results doesn't come from following the herd: It requires investors to stick their necks out once in a while, and accept that the crowd isn't always right.

Now, don't get me wrong -- a lot of news truly is bad, and should scare you. Enron and WorldCom are good examples of once-popular stocks that bit the dust because of jaw-dropping corporate greed and management fraud.

Thus, just because a stock falls on negative news doesn't automatically make it an attractive investment candidate. It's important to realize when a company is undergoing an event that will fundamentally change its business model, or cause it to shut down altogether. For instance, even if Citigroup (NYSE:C) continues to recover, it's unlikely to go back to making the highly leveraged bets that caused its problems in the first place.

The types of events that can hurt stocks and lead to profitable opportunities are those frightening -- even profit-losing -- developments that will have a short-term impact, but won't affect a company's long-term prospects.

Company

Year

Event Causing Short-Term Pessimism

Estimated Change in Stock From Event

Subsequent Five-Year Return

Tyco International (NYSE:TYC)

2002

CEO misappropriating funds

(80%)

227%

USG (NYSE:USG)

2002

Asbestos lawsuits

(57%)

691%

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK-A) (NYSE:BRK-B)

2000

Refusal to invest in technology stocks during the Nasdaq boom

(40%)

98%

Washington Post (NYSE:WPO)

1973

Government challenges after Watergate coverage

(38%)

308%

This, too, shall pass
As we've seen, there is a serious nearsightedness problem in the market when it comes to making investment decisions. Even if they know a company's troubles are temporary, many investors often sell anyway, in hopes of buying it back once the future becomes more certain. Investors who are patient and ignore the short-term pessimistic views Mr. Market serves up can be rewarded handsomely in the face of others' fear.

Warren Buffett has achieved incredible investing success buying good companies at bargain prices when they encountered short-term negative events. When describing his 1974 investment in Washington Post, Buffett said, "… The whole of the company was selling for $80 million. Most analysts would have agreed that the intrinsic value of the assets was around $400 to $500 million. But you could buy little pieces of the business for much less."

Buffett was able to profit because the rest of the market wanted to wait until short-term events had panned out before buying back into the company. When it did, the stock price returned to more reasonable valuations, producing great returns on Buffett's original $10 million investment.

The market is here to serve you, not to guide you
Looking at the big picture, while maintaining a reasonable indication of a company's true worth, is the first step toward developing a successful investing mind-set. Don't get too wound up over events that may plague a company now, but will likely pass in due time.

When good companies encounter painful events, ask yourself some basic questions: Will this hurt the company this year? Probably. Will it affect it next year? Probably not. Is the stock price reflecting next year's potential? Or the next five years? If the answer is no, you might have an opportunity to bypass short-term pessimism and invest in good companies at bargain prices.

Learn more about successful value investing from our Motley Fool Inside Value newsletter. A 30-day trial is free and gives you a sneak peek at everything Inside Value has to offer. Berkshire Hathaway and USG are just two of its many stock recommendations.

This article, written by Morgan Housel, was originally published on Oct. 8, 2007. It has been updated by Dan Caplinger, who owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, which is also a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool's disclosure policy is there for all to see.