Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

The Worst of Both Worlds

By Dan Caplinger – Updated Apr 5, 2017 at 5:27PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Low returns and inflexible investments have made whole life insurance obsolete.

In the ever-changing world of finance, some old standards just don't cut the mustard anymore.

Take whole life insurance, for example. It wasn't that long ago that people flocked to whole life policies as simple ways to combine the protection of a death benefit with a method for saving a nest egg for themselves or their family. Now, though, with more sophisticated types of life insurance such as universal life and variable policies, plain-vanilla whole life is no longer the only game in town.

You can still buy whole life from many companies, including Metlife (NYSE:MET), Prudential (NYSE:PRU), and Allstate (NYSE:ALL). But for most people, whole life just doesn't make much sense. It's the worst of both worlds -- whole life ties you into a long-term investment, but its returns are generally lackluster at best.

Iffy returns
Many critics of whole life complain that it's expensive. Certainly, when you compare whole life with term insurance, you'll find that whole life premiums are quite a bit higher. But that's because whole life includes a savings component -- part of each payment you make goes toward building cash value.

The main problem with traditional whole life policies is that they're invested too conservatively. Permanent insurance is often marketed toward young families who'll pay into them for decades. However, with such a long time horizon, it makes sense to invest aggressively in higher-risk assets like stocks.

But whole life doesn't work like that. Instead, it usually offers modest guaranteed returns that usually track bond yields fairly closely. In the 1970s and 1980s, when interest rates were high, whole life was quite popular, as the returns were relatively high. As rates dropped, however, so did the pace at which savings accumulated within whole life policies. That meant that in many cases, illustrations based on those higher rates turned out not to be correct.

Buying term
It's because of the inflexibility of whole life that the maxim "buy term and invest the rest" is so powerful. As long as you have the discipline to invest the money you save by buying a cheaper term policy, you can choose whether to seek much higher returns by investing aggressively or settle for the more modest returns available from a mix of assets.

It's true that life insurance policies offer some special benefits. Earnings inside a policy are tax-deferred, while buying a term policy and investing the rest will likely leave you with a tax bill every year. But with the wide variety of tax-protected accounts available to most investors, including IRAs and 401(k) plans, you can usually lessen the impact of taxes on your investments.

Forcing yourself to save
Moreover, whole life isn't the best choice among so-called permanent insurance. If you don't trust yourself to invest your savings when you buy term, then you might want to take a closer look at permanent insurance. But in that case, variable insurance policies whose returns are tied to the stock market are a better bet for most people. For a long-term investment, bond-like yields are just too low to make sense.

Even though you can still find whole life policies, they're mostly a relic from a simpler time. Before you buy whole life, take a look at your other options -- odds are, you'll find one that's better for you.

Related articles:

To learn more about insurance of all kinds, take a look at the Fool's Insurance Center.

If you're looking for more ways to make your money go further, take advantage of our 30-day free trial offer on Motley Fool Green Light. Our personal-finance service comes up with ideas you can use to save hundreds of dollars every month.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger is a big believer in term insurance. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool's disclosure policy is insured to tell you what you need to know.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Prudential Financial, Inc. Stock Quote
Prudential Financial, Inc.
PRU
$87.34 (-1.51%) $-1.34
MetLife, Inc. Stock Quote
MetLife, Inc.
MET
$60.86 (-1.62%) $-1.00
The Allstate Corporation Stock Quote
The Allstate Corporation
ALL
$123.93 (-2.89%) $-3.69

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
329%
 
S&P 500 Returns
106%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/26/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.