The Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ +0.42%) stands out for its ultra-low fees and marginally higher yield, while the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT +0.50%) dominates in assets under management.
Both SCHQ and TLT target long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, appealing to investors seeking interest rate sensitivity and government-backed security. This comparison unpacks differences in cost, performance, risk, and structure to help clarify which fund may better align with different investment priorities.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | TLT | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| 1-yr return (as of Apr. 15, 2026) | 2.15% | 3.02% |
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.53 |
| AUM | $42.3 billion | $893.0 million |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
SCHQ looks more affordable with its lower expense ratio and offers a slightly higher yield, providing a small income edge over TLT for cost-conscious investors.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | TLT | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -43.70% | -40.95% |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $735 | $774 |
NYSEMKT: SCHQ
Key Data Points
What's inside
SCHQ tracks long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, holding 98 securities. SCHQ is a pure Treasury ETF that tracks the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index; its holdings are 100% U.S. government debt. The fund is relatively young at 6.5 years but already boasts over $893 million in assets under management.
TLT, by comparison, is a much larger and longer-tenured fund holding 47 U.S. Treasury bonds. Both ETFs avoid sector tilts and credit risk, but TLT’s scale and liquidity may appeal to those trading in larger volumes or seeking the reassurance of a flagship fund.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
NASDAQ: TLT
Key Data Points
What this means for investors
Long-term Treasury bond funds like these carry zero credit risk because every bond is backed by the U.S. government. But they do carry significant interest rate risk. When rates rise, long-term bond prices fall sharply, and vice versa. That sensitivity cuts both ways: These funds can be powerful portfolio diversifiers when stocks tumble, but they can lose substantial value when rates climb, as investors learned painfully from 2022 through 2024.
SCHQ and TLT are both pure Treasury funds but differ in two important ways. SCHQ holds Treasuries maturing in 10 or more years, while TLT holds only bonds with 20 or more years remaining, making it more sensitive to rate moves in both directions. TLT also charges five times more than SCHQ — a gap that compounds meaningfully for long-term holders.
What TLT offers in return is scale and liquidity. With roughly $42 billion in assets compared to SCHQ's $893 million, TLT is one of the most widely followed bond funds in existence. It’s a benchmark that financial advisors, institutions, and individual investors alike use to gauge the long-term Treasury market. For those who simply want to own it and hold it, SCHQ delivers nearly identical exposure at a fraction of the cost.
