Image source: The Motley Fool.
EnerSys Inc (ENS 1.03%)
Q2Â 2019 Earnings Conference Call
Nov. 08, 2018, 9:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good day ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Quarter Two 2019 EnerSys Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct the question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.
I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, President and CEO, David Shaffer. You may begin sir.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Dimitris. Good morning and thank you for joining us. On the call with me this morning is Mike Schmidtlein, our Chief Financial Officer. Last evening we posted slides on our website that we will be referencing during the call this morning. If you didn't get a chance to see this information, you can go to the Webcast tab in the Investors Section of our website at www.enersys.com. I'm going to ask Mike Schmidtlein to cover information regarding forward-looking statements.
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Dave, and good morning to everyone. As a reminder, we will be presenting certain forward-looking statements on this call that are based on management's current expectations and views regarding future events and operating performance, and are subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Our actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements for a number of reasons. Our forward-looking statements are applicable only as of the date of this presentation. For a list of factors which could affect our future results, including our earnings estimates, see forward-looking statements included in Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2018, which was filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
In addition, we will also be presenting certain non-GAAP financial measures. For an explanation of the differences between the comparable GAAP financial information and the non-GAAP information, please see our company's Form 8-K, which includes our press releases dated November 7, 2018, which is located on our website at www.enersys.com.
Now let me turn it back to you, Dave.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Mike. I'll begin on slide three. We are pleased to announce second quarter earnings of $1.17 per share, which is at the higher end of our guidance range of $1.14 to $1.18. Sales increased 7% year-over-year, driven by strong organic growth. Our motive power business continues to do well in all regions. In reserve power, the Americas was again very strong. The strength is coming from telecommunications, broadband, transportation, aerospace and defense, which have all continued to order significant quantities of our Thin Plate Pure Lead or TPPL products. EMEA reserve power sales are down year-over-year, in part because we have dedicated EMEA TPPL manufacturing capacity to supply strong demand in the United States. In Asia, sales are down year-over-year due to China Tower.
Year-over-year quarterly gross profit increased by approximately $1 million as a result of strong organic sales growth and selling price recovery, more than offsetting higher freight costs and a headwind related to higher commodity costs. In an effort to offset continued raw material cost pressure, our selling price recovery actions averaged approximately 85% of total commodity cost inflation during the most recent quarter. During our third quarter we will experience an inflection point where net commodity cost pressures become a tailwind instead of a headwind.
Please turn to slide four. I want to briefly review our global businesses. As mentioned, we experienced a strong 7% organic growth rate in our second fiscal quarter. Recent reserve power sales and order trends continued to be robust in the Americas, driven mainly by increased orders for our industry-leading Thin Plate Pure Lead batteries across all segments. The details of this growth are similar to the comments we provided during our quarterly call in August.
In the second quarter, the Americas motive power business continues to be strong and orders continued to be healthy in the current quarter. Sales of our NexSys pure TPPL maintenance-free batteries are are now comprising over 10% of their sales. We believe maintenance-free batteries are the preferred choice of motive power customers. EMEA continues to experience healthy motive power sales growth. Customers' acceptance of NexSys pure is a strong in EMEA as the Americas, and we believe sales will make up over 10% of their revenue in the near future. In both the Americas and EMEA, EnerSys is gaining market share from our competitors. Next month we will launch our initial motive power lithium maintenance-free battery, NexSys iON. It is a 5 kilowatt Class III lithium lift truck battery. The growing demand for lithium lift truck batteries prompted our accelerated development and spending on the remaining variance. We will have batteries for Class I, II and III electric fork trucks launched by mid calendar year 2019. Our customers who have shown significant interest in lithium-ion batteries want to buy from EnerSys, because we are a trusted suppliers -- supplier whose commitment, quality and global aftermarket service are unmatched.
Moving on to EMEA's reserve power business, year-over-year organic sales declined in the second quarter. We expect the vast majority of this reduced volume to be offset once we have additional TPPL manufacturing capacity, allowing EnerSys to expand sales in the long-haul truck transportation market, and increase our share of the Data Center UPS market.
Asia's motive power continued its double-digit organic growth during the second quarter. In addition to China, the Australian market was also strong as we also won business away from a competitor. Our Indian operations are fully up and running. This increase in global manufacturing capacity is timely since all of our regions are experiencing strong motive power demand, and we are currently developing plans for additional manufacturing capacity in India. Asia's reserve power organic sales in the second quarter experienced a second consecutive double-digit decline as China Tower followed the government mandated usage of used lithium batteries. Our Asia team continues to develop plans to repurpose this freed up manufacturing capacity. This strategy has been slowed by UF tariffs -- US tariffs on Chinese batteries. The strategy now is to replace this value with increased sales to telecommunications OEMs outside of the United States.
In the US aerospace and defense business, strong growth patterns continue. Our recent wins include orders for two major long-term lithium battery contracts for major defense OEMs, for missile defense systems and space batteries. We are progressing with the addition of a second shift at our Tampa, Florida facility to allow us to meet this increased demand. There are additional long-term contracts and opportunities in the United States aerospace and defense business that we are hopeful of securing in fiscal year 2019.
Please turn to slide five. We will continue to provide investors with metrics pertaining to key initiatives and cost assumptions that we addressed -- introduced at our Investor Day in February 2017. Since the end of February 2017, we had experienced consistent commodity cost increases which peaked in this year's first fiscal quarter. This commodity cost pressure has masked a significant underlying progress that we've made in cost reduction savings. But as I mentioned earlier, during our second half of this fiscal year and onward, we should experience year-over-year declines in commodity costs, which should lead to gross margin expansion and incremental earnings growth. The cost reductions have helped finance the increased costs associated with the company's transformation into lean initiatives, new modular product and system developments, and system enhancements such as SAP, Salesforce and SuccessFactors.
Now, please turn to slide six. I will now provide an update on the progress we have made on our strategic initiatives. As you know, on October 30th we announced our agreement to acquire the Alpha Technologies Group. This transformational acquisition is an integration of two leading businesses with complementary strengths. Alpha's mission is to keep the world working by delivering solutions that meet today's and future power challenges. Alpha provides business continuity and connectivity solutions in the cable broadband networks, telecom core networks, wireless networks, smart city infrastructure, security and surveillance, as well as renewable energy. Alpha enjoys an industry leading reputation, highly integrated solutions and services, a blue chip customer base, and finally consistent growth and cash flow generation. Alpha's strongest market today is with broadband multiple service operators or MSOs in North America. These MSOs have recently increased their spending on Alpha's power systems and services as part of their network upgrades to DOCSIS 3.1 compliance.
DOCSIS 3.1 is an industry standard for speed and latency allowing the MSOs to ultimately deliver in excess of 1 gigabyte per second to their broadband subscribers. All of the MSOs recognize the need to deliver higher bandwidth and speed to remain competitive against wireless alternatives. Upgrading their networks also allows the MSOs to compete for their fair share of the data backhaul markets, which will continue to grow as consumers continue to digitalize their lives. Batteries are an important part without this power systems sold to the MSOs. Currently, EnerSys is one of several battery suppliers to Alpha.
During the 4G build out, Alpha's strongest market was wireless and telecom. Alpha's telecom and wireless products include AC to DC rectifiers, enclosures and EF&I services. The wireless carriers typically buy their batteries directly to avoid an extra markup. But in every case, the buying group for DC rectifiers, enclosures and batteries are the same personnel at the end customers. EnerSys is excited about the opportunity to offer complete DC power systems including DC rectifiers, enclosures and batteries to end customers on a single purchase order with literally one throat to choke.
Overtime, EnerSys is confident that performance in cost can be optimized as to two engineering groups work more closely together. Finally, as 5G approaches, EnerSys recognizes the exciting small cell site powering solutions already in the market from Alpha. Their line powering solutions can power multiple 5G antennas from a single node. Our best estimate is that more than 5 million antennas will eventually be installed to provide complete 5G coverage. In addition, Alpha offers small IP addressable gateways that provide Internet access and power anywhere along 300,000 miles of existing coaxial strands. These gateways are fast and easy way to power and connect 5G, security, or any number of other Internet of Things or IoT devices.
I would also like to address Alpha's developments in renewable energy and their Energy Storage System -- Energy Storage Systems for residential and consumer customers -- excuse me -- commercial customers. Marketed under the OutBack brand, Alpha is a world leader in providing off-grid and grid hybrid solar power systems packaged with Energy Storage. Solar-plus-storage is a new and fast growing sector in the power world. Combining Alpha's expertise in these inverter based systems, along with our new lithium modules, will give EnerSys a completely integrated and optimized system for Energy Storage. Our CTO sees tremendous opportunities to drive our performance and drive down costs by fully integrating and streamlining the software and firmware of all of the system electronics.
Finally, on our call last week, we detailed $26 million in the synergies by combining EnerSys and Alpha. The plan is to achieve 50% within 12 months and 100% within 24 months. 75% of the synergies are cost based and 25% are revenue base. The cost base synergies are principally related to combining electronics and enclosures related purchases through contract manufacturers, manufacturing consolidations and SG&A streamlining. We are intentionally conservative on the revenue synergies as we assess the impact of this acquisition on our relationship with several of other Alpha's competitors. I remain optimistic though that the strength of EnerSys's global sales network should help Alpha's international sales. Our models did not rely on that potential upside. Finally, we maintain our total target for $30 million in non-related cost improvements after having achieved approximately $7 million in Q2 similar to last quarter.
In summary, I am pleased with our second quarter results, and look forward to a reprieve from commodity cost pressures during the second half of our fiscal year. Most of our businesses remain very strong, and there are significant buzz in the market about the much anticipated launch of NexSys iON or maintenance-free lithium-ion product, which personifies our focus on technology and innovation. And finally, we are excited about the addition of Alpha, providing EnerSys with the perfect platform to offer a full turnkey solution to so many current and potential customers and markets poised for growth. With our exceptional team, comprehensive product set and integrated service offering bolstered by the addition of an industry leader like Alpha, EnerSys is very well positioned to compete for the long term.
And now I'll ask Mike Schmidtlein to provide further information on our results and guidance.
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Dave. For those of you following along on our webcast, I'm starting on slide seven.
Our second quarter net sales increased 7% over the prior year to $660 million, due to a 7% increase in volume, a 2% increase from pricing, and a 2% decrease from currency. On a regional basis, our second quarter net sales in the Americas were up 14% to $389 million, and Europe's net sales were up 3% to $204 million, while Asia decreased 13% in the second quarter to $68 million compared to the prior year. The Americas enjoyed a 12% increase in volume and a 3% from pricing and 1% from currency. Europe had a 6% volume increase and 3% in negative currency. In Asia, volume decreased 14% while pricing increased 1%. On a product line basis, net sales for motive power were up 7% year-over-year at $347 million, and reserve power was also up 7% to $313 million. Both reserve and motive power at a 7% volume increase, a 2% increase in price and a 2% currency loss.
Please now refer to slide eight. On a sequential basis second quarter net sales were down 2% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2019, driven by a 1% currency decline and a 1% decrease in volume. The Americas region was down 1%, while Europe was down 3%, and Asia was flat. On a product line basis, motive power was even while reserve power was down 3%.
Now a few comments about our adjusted consolidated earnings performance. As you know, we utilized certain non-GAAP measures in analyzing our company's operating performance, specifically excluding highlighted items. Accordingly, my following comments concerning operating earnings and my later comments concerning diluted earnings per share exclude all highlighted items. Please refer to our company's Form 8-K, which includes our press release dated November 7, 2018 for details concerning these highlighted items.
Please now turn to slide nine. On a year-over-year basis, adjusted consolidated operating earnings in the second quarter decreased approximately $1 million to $67 million with the operating margin down 80 basis points due to the dilutive impact of rising commodity costs on margins and earnings. The 7% increase in organic volume from the prior year along with $12 million in pricing was not enough to offset the $14 million in higher commodity costs and increases in other operating costs. On a sequential basis, our second quarter operating earnings were also down nearly $2 million, primarily from higher commodity costs.
Operating expenses when excluding highlighted items were at 14.3% of sales for the second quarter compared to 15.1% in the prior year. We currently expect fiscal 2019 operating expenses to be in the 14.5% range. Excluded from operating expenses recorded on a GAAP basis, our net charges of 2.5 million primarily related to EMEA and Asia restructuring and professional fees for due diligence on M&A opportunities. Excluding those charges, our Americas' business segment achieved an operating earnings percentage of 13%, which was 10 basis points below the 13.1% second quarter of last year. Higher volume and pricing only partially offset the impact of higher lead cost on the margin percentage. On a sequential basis, Americas' second quarter increased 40 basis points from the 12.6% margin posted in the first quarter, due primarily to higher volume and pricing. Americas' OE dollars were up approximately $6 million from the prior year and were up $1 million from the prior quarter.
Europe's operating earnings percentage is 6.8%, was down from last year's 9.2%, and lower than last quarter's 8.2%. OE dollars decreased $4 million from the prior year and decreased $3 million from the prior quarter in EMEA, primarily from higher lead cost. The operating earnings percentage in our Asia business declined a 180 basis points in the second quarter of this year to 3.4% operating profit from a 5.5% income in the second quarter of last year, but was up from last quarter's 2.2%. Asia's OE dollars were down approximately $2 million from the prior year on lower volume, but up approximately $1 million sequentially, also due to volume.
Please move to slide 10. As previously reflected on slide nine, our second quarter adjusted consolidated operating earnings of $67 million was a decrease of 1% in comparison to the prior year. Our adjusted consolidated net earnings of $50 million was $5 million more than the prior year. The results reflect higher volume, pricing and cost savings and lower taxes and foreign currency losses, offset by approximately $14 million in higher commodity costs. Our adjusted effective income tax rate of 19% for the second quarter was slightly lower than last -- prior year's rates of approximately 22%, but comparable to the prior quarter. Discrete tax items caused most of these variations.
We continue to expect fiscal 2019 rates to be between 18% and 20%. EPS increased 12% to $1.17 on higher net earnings and lower shares outstanding. We expect our third fiscal quarter of 2019 to have approximately 42.75 million weighted average shares outstanding. As a reminder, we have not exercised the $100 million authorized by our Board of Directors last November.
Please now turn to slide 11 and 12. As usual, we have provided information on a year-to-date basis similar to that for a second quarter on prior pages. These two pages are for your reference, and I don't intend to cover year-to-date results.
Please now turn to slide 13, now some brief comments about our financial position and cash flow results. Our balance sheet remains very strong. We now have $545 million on hand in cash and short-term investments as of September 30, 2018, with over $530 million undrawn from our credit lines around the world. We generated $84 million in cash from operations for the first half of fiscal 2019, and our credit agreement leverage ratio was just above 0.7 times. Capital expenditures were $36 million in the first half of 2019. We expect full-year spending of approximately $80 million in fiscal 2019.
Please now turn to slide 14. The table provides additional details on our fiscal 2018 and 2019 impacts from the new Tax Act. As I previously mentioned, our fiscal Q2 effective tax rate was 19% as expected, and should remain around 18% to 20%. We expect to generate adjusted diluted net earnings per share between $1.23 and $1.27 in our third quarter of fiscal 2019, which excludes an expected net charge of $0.25 per share, primarily from Alpha's acquisition activities and continuing our various restructuring programs. We anticipate our gross profit rate in our third fiscal quarter 2019 to be between 25% and 26%. As many of you know, we defer the recognition of raw material purchase price variances on a two to three-month FIFO method to better align with our revenue. In addition, due to the impact of our lead hedges, our scrap battery purchases which supply us with cold lead and our lead suppliers one-month deferral of average monthly prices, the recent drop in spot rates for lead won't improve our results until mid-Q3. Consequently, our gross profit rate should improve by approximately 100 basis points sequentially in Q3 and again in Q4, which is consistent with our projections from last quarter. While we believe our global manufacturing footprint and supply chain gives us flexibility to adapt to changing economic tax and trade conditions, we currently anticipate no more than $5 million of impact to operating earnings in fiscal 2019 from recent tariff actions between the United States and China, with approximately $3 million impact in Q3. If these tariffs continue, we believe our adjustments in our products origin will largely mitigate their impact before the end of fiscal 2019. We are still assessing the impacts to Alpha of any mitigating options.
We issued an 8-K and press release and held the call similar to this last Tuesday announcing our acquisition of Alpha Technologies. We hope our investor presentation on our website and that call answered any questions that you -- concerning that transaction, but we are happy to cover those -- that acquisition now as well. However, I wish to point out that my comments concerning our leverage ratio currently at 0.7 times EBITDA doesn't reflect the Alpha transaction, and our adjusted leverage will rise after closing to approximately two times, which is still quite stable. Given our strong cash generation, we would expect to delever from this transaction quickly.
Now let me turn the call back to Dave.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Mike. Dimitris, we will now open up the line for questions. Dimitris?
Questions and Answers:
Operator
(Technical Difficulty) (Operator Instructions) And our first question comes from Michael Gallo with CL King. You may proceed.
Michael Gallo -- CL King -- Analyst
Hi, good morning.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Hi, Michael.
Michael Gallo -- CL King -- Analyst
Yeah. I just wanted to kind of delve into a little bit more on the third quarter outlook. Obviously you've had the lag on lead price recovery and you have some tariff impact in the third quarter. And I guess, and wondered (ph), just taking a step back and looking at the organic volume trends which were again sort of universally strong this quarter. Looking at lead price recovery that should be better in the third quarter than it was in the second quarter. It would seem that your guidance for kind of flat earnings on an adjusted basis year-over-year, it would seem like it should be able to do somewhat better than that given all of those factors. So how much is the specific impact related to tariffs and do you expect that will be zero in the fourth quarter? And then as we think about -- as we get to the fourth quarter -- and this is a question for Mike, I know you talked about the potential for a 100 basis points further improvement in gross margins. I assume that's for step-up accounting, assuming the transaction closes Alpha at the end of the year or how should we think about that 100 basis point is something that you can still generate assuming the acquisition closes or is that -- just the pre-acquisition comment. Thanks.
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Okay. So a lot of questions here. I guess the first one I'll try to talk about is with regard to our third quarter. So there are couple of items, I'd have to give you a little bit of flavor of just so you understand. For example, the hedges that we have for lead and we traditionally will place under forward contracts anywhere from 15 million to 20 million pounds (ph) of lead every month. And year-over-year, or I will say, if year-to-date this year that's created a $12 million headwind for us. And as you know when you place forwards when lead costs are rising, it's a benefit or a deferral. And when you place forwards in the spot rates subsequently declines, it's a -- it prolongs the reprieve from the commodity cost decline. So a year ago at this time we had about a $4 million benefit from our hedges, and this year we've got a $12 million headwind, so that's part of the dynamics that you're seeing there. So it has -- probably if you're just looking at spot rates that started to break in July, that's where we were trying a quarter ago to kind of tell you it's -- the benefits don't actually -- you don't actually see them until our fiscal this month, the month of fiscal November, we the first time, we're going to start seeing year-over-year benefits there. We do expect Q3 pricing. So we've gone -- for the last year we've been about 70% recovery on pricing. We got up to about 85% recovery in Q2, and my projection is for Q3 we should be at about a 100%, and then hopefully there on in Q4 et cetera we're able to hold pricing while we then finally see a real substantial decline in lead costs.
So, and I will also say my expectation for Alpha in the first quarter of their -- are a combination which will likely be only our fourth fiscal quarter. My comments with regard to gross profit did not include them, but I will tell you that their gross profit rates are in the 27% to 28%, which is about where -- they're going to be pretty close, and because of just where we will be in that transaction, I'm expecting that quarter -- we essentially at least currently are seeing that that's probably going to be fairly net neutral in the first quarter. We won't have any of the synergies in place really have some additional cost as we try to effectuate some change. So I'm not projecting a whole bunch of impact from Alpha. And my references to gross profit in Q4 were essentially EnerSys only. But I feel fairly confident if I were to include Alpha in that gross profit rate, it's probably not going to move the needle considerably.
Michael Gallo -- CL King -- Analyst
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Noah Kaye with Oppenheimer. You may proceed.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Thanks, and thanks for taking the questions. Dave, you touched on a number of things you're doing around the global manufacturing and supply chain, some of that seems like in response to just demand trends and some due to some of the changes in trade rates. Can you just kind of give us a high level view of what's really driving these changes and kind of what portion of it is really geared toward just being able to meet accelerating demand in some of your end markets?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure. So let's just take a few pieces at a time. From an operations supply chain standpoint, the job one, two and three right now is to increase our Thin Plate Pure Lead capacity. And the frustration with that for all of us, is that, the time it takes to add that machinery to the factories to build that, it just takes many, many quarters, it's frustrating, and it's very expensive, and so that's we've laid out a plan. We did that at Analyst Day, that we're going to need to run at a clip, this is obviously pre-Alpha, had around $80 million to $85 million a year in CapEx to create that Thin Plate Pure Lead growth. It's gone better than we had originally planned. The TPPL is -- it's just frankly we're ahead of schedule in converting our product mix and of the premium products, and so we have to expand that capacity. There is investments happening in our Warrensburg facility. We've got additional investments happening in France and in the UK, we're trying globally.
One of the particular challenge for the team is the size of the batteries that we're making and Thin Plate Pure Lead are getting bigger. So the bigger mix is putting strains on other parts of the manufacturing process. So those investments are not just in the assembly lines, we talked about the high-speed line in the past, but we have to make investments upstream of that as well, especially given the new bigger the mix size.
One thing that's been particularly frustrating, Noah, and it's a high-quality problem, but we had planned to build a stockpile of batteries, so that we could break into the production to start to install the new high-speed line. We can't seem to get ahead. Our, so far, stockpile inventory is zero. Hopefully my op guys are listening. And until we can get ahead, we really cannot disappoint our customers by shutting down the factory to install the new equipment. So it is putting pressure on all of us. We're having to forestall some of the growth until we can get that. So it's our number one issue right now on the -- on the lead side of the business is to expand our Thin Plate Pure Lead capacity.
Another operational focus for us right now is looking forward to the Alpha transaction to make sure that we combine the two respective supply chains and then optimize our manufacturing footprint for what we call light assembly businesses. So most of the lead battery factories are capital intensive, lot of robots, you go there. The light assembly places are more like our Spokane facility with per sale. We've got our ICS facility in Melbourne, Australia. Alpha brings new. And we need to make sure that we're using that footprint optimally. So job two after Thin Plate Pure Lead capacity is to make sure that we run those operations with the highest productivity, and part of that -- and this is part of the synergies Mike and I referenced earlier is, we do a significant amount of contract manufacturing purchases for enclosures, for electronics, Alpha does more, Alpha does more than we do. So a very realistic part of our synergies as -- when you're dealing with any contract manufacturer, it's all about volume. So as we can concentrate and consolidate those volumes, we can certainly drive better cost. And I think your credibility in some of the synergy numbers through that line (ph).
So those operationally supply chain-wise are the biggest challenges that are facing us right now. And we've recently added some additional talent to the team, and we're inheriting some good talent from the Alpha team. So collectively we hope to drive improvements in the coming quarters. Is that what you are looking for, Noah?
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
That's very helpful. And perhaps some of your team is scrolling away batteries off the line right now. But I guess just a sort of follow-up to that. As you think about NexSys iON coming to market, can you talk about sort of the CapEx profile that's going to be required there not so much as the spend you foresee to support that business but kind of the type of investments that you need to make? And now you've talked about modular manufacturing before. But as you get closer to actually commercializing this, can you maybe better understand what that entails?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. So the latter part of manufacturing -- so let's say after we've made the sales is the same between our NexSys pure and our NexSys iON. So let's just start after the batteries. And that would be light assembly type businesses, that's very similar to what Alpha does. It's taking cabinets, electronics, batteries and packaging these together. And so that part of the business is well understood, and it's very CapEx light. The CapEx numbers for Alpha are $3 million-ish is the number we use the other last week. So it's a CapEx-light model. It's very different than what we're accustomed to.
So now going back to the cell level, today we manufacture lead batteries ourselves, that's a very capital intensive endeavor. And as we said, we need to spend $80 million-plus over the next few years to expand our Thin Plate Pure Lead manufacturing capacity. In parallel to that, the manufacturing of the lithium-ion cells, we've assessed that make versus buy that we're going to find manufacturing partners, probably in Asia, that will make the cells that we require to the EnerSys specifications. So the capital risk will be with our manufacturing partner in that scenario, but obviously we surrender some of the profitability, and that situation is going to be a markup or a manufacturing fee that we have to give to that lithium provider. We recognize that and -- but our volume simply isn't high enough to substantiate us spending billions of dollars to build our own lithium-ion factory right now.
And what I think is important, and it's the message I deliver is, as we provide systems, complete DC power systems, then the impact of that manufacturing fee we're paying for those lithium cells will be diluted down in the overall impact we have and the value we deliver to the customer. So that's sort of the parallel. So it comes together after the sale is made. And after that point, whether it's lithium or whether it's TPPL, it's not a big difference.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Right. And to your last point, I mean the cell costs as part of the total solution for what you're going to be marketing is much smaller than, say, sales in the automotive battery pack, correct?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Absolutely, yes.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Okay. If I could just sneak one last one and just curious on initial reception from some of your Alpha's customers to the announcement last week.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
I would say, very positive.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Okay. Any elaboration?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
We've spoken to. Well, I don't want to say too, too much, but we've spoken to -- the feedback I've gotten from Drew and his team on particular conversations they've had with their customers; I spoken to our sale leaders around the world to see what feedback they've received from customers, you know, big wireless customers or telco customers, and there's been a very consistent message that what we -- what we plan on doing by delivering a complete DC power system on a single PO with one throat to choke and following that up with a very credible EF&I service capability is well received by the market today.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Okay. And thanks very much for the color. I'll jump back.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay.
Operator
And our next question comes from John Franzreb with Sidoti. You may proceed.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Good morning guys.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Hi, John.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
I'd like to shift the discussion maybe to the geographic mix here. In your comments you mentioned that you win share from competitors in the Americas, say one of the acres expand upon that. Also in Europe you mentioned that telecom spending soft, talks about timing of spending in Europe. And lastly in Asia, you had two consecutive weak quarters, thanks to the shifting China Telecom mandate spend on lithium recycling. When does that business bottom out and when do you get new sales, and then we addressed markets that you are kind of shifting to.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
All right. John, we had a very poor connection. So could you repeat the first part of your question?
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Sure. The first part was in the Americas. You're taking share from competitors. Can you elaborate on that?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. The -- because of our limitations on NexSys pure supply chain with our Thin Plate Pure Lead, we've asked our sales people to target competitors customers. So as most of what we've been selling incrementally has come at the expense of competition. So that would be the lion share. In addition to that, we do see -- one of our competitors has coughed up a little bit of blood lately in terms of their ability to take care of their customers and we've picked up some traditional business as well. So, and that's not just in the US. So those would be the two major reasons we've taken share in the US and elsewhere, frankly.
And as we mentioned prior -- on a prior call, just as a reminder, in the EMEA region, we've been benefiting from one of the competitors who had a very serious fire in their factory, that's helped us in the EMEA region as well. That competitor should be coming back online later this fiscal year. But motive power business is good. And then with regards to -- I did hear the last piece, the Asia piece, with regards to the China Tower mandates, we've heard today that the -- their endeavor to reuse lithium iron phosphate cells from buses has not gone well, and I believe that that customer is at crossroads, they have to decide what to do next, and frankly, I want to get us to the position where we find something else to do, and that's the message I've delivered to our folks, because even when we have the volume, it was fairly empty calories. And I spent a lot of time in China, and China is a magnificent place with a tremendous amount of opportunity, and it's not always easy for sales people especially to get their heads around doing something different. But it's my strong advice to that team over there that they continue to focus in other areas. Mike?
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
And John, I'd say on the Asia results, you know, we have made some progress. Our manufacturing site in India, which we've now dedicated rather than be reserve power/motive power where we have a much stronger demand in Asia. They've certainly turned around and having a steady demand for their product which is consumed by the EnerSys sales channel primarily in the Asian region has helped them. So we had a, what I'll call, a boat anchor that was costing us $4 million to $5 million a year that we think we're going to be and we are now for the last quarter or two getting to breakeven.
But as Dave pointed out, we've got two factories in China that have a capacity problem because of China Tower. And we've done a number of things including, as we've talked in our (inaudible) collaboration on cell manufacturers in Asia to find opportunities and perhaps to partner with them on lead acid initiatives as well. So as Dave said, we're trying to redirect to where the market is right now, it's not a telecom, you know, lead acid source. We got to find where it is, because China is a big enough place and they use those batteries and making progress there.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
John, as I said in my prepared remarks, all the best laid plans. So as we were attempting to repurpose that freed up capacity, that planning started before the tariffs before lead acid batteries were added to the harmonization codes. So now any plans that we had previously made to export batteries from China to satisfy the booming US market have to be retooled. So we endeavor, we move forward. But lest I be too harsh on the team over there. Certainly we have to recognize that we've seen some recent movement in the rail. China is building a lot of subways and rail stations right now. And we've had some pretty good wins there early stages. But indeed, whether China Tower comes or goes, we need to do something different, and that's the plan going forward.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Fair enough. And Mike in your comments I believe you mentioned 14.5% SG&A margin for the full year. Is that kind of an inclusive of Alpha or no?
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
No, that would exclude Alpha's operating expenses. So, the -- but again their profile is completely different from ours. And I think in light of -- if you were trying to look at one period, it's probably not going to change that number dramatically because of the relative size of their spend versus hours, and the fact that they're pretty close in the percentages to begin with. So most of my comments were without output. And just for the benefit of our analysts, we likely will have a 45 to 60-day executory period as we get through antitrust approvals in at least three countries. So we don't own the business right now. We don't have complete access to their employees, and we are quite frankly limited in our ability to be too proactive in the planning, which is consequently why we're not prepared at this point to give you an update on forecast with Alpha included. I think that that will happen in that late January, early February conversation. At that point, we will own them, we believe, and have a much better feeling for where we have opportunities and synergies, and we'll refine the synergy estimate that we provided to you last week.
So I'd probably ask for a little bit of patients there. But essentially they are running right now at about a 13% EBITDA rate. We're at about a 13% EBITDA rate. And so their gross profit 27, 28, 29 as you know when lead is not really beating us up, we're at 27 to 28 or so. And with cost savings, I think we are going to be -- it's a very complementary fit, and you're not going to see too much change. And I will say, we've got to spend a little bit more time. The purchase accounting rules for writing up inventory to market value. We got to figure out what that's going to do. We have to do the opening balance sheet to assess intangible assets between goodwill and trademarks and customer lists, and some of which you amortize and will hit your P&L, some of which you don't amortize. Currently we would expect that our future depreciation and amortization is probably going to be pretty close to our CapEx numbers, which is kind of our same situation. We're probably going to be throwing off DNA combined at about $80 million to $85 million, and that's probably going to be our CapEx spend for the foreseeable future too, but stay tuned for more specifics on our next call.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
And John, there's one point I want to make. I think it's relevant to the OpEx discussion pro forma going forward. Alpha, as we've gone through our process, we heard from their customers directly, Alpha delights their customers. They do a fantastic job. They've been committed to technology. They've committed to -- been committed to helping our customers (inaudible). It's my commitment to those customers, and I can speak for the whole Board of Directors. We will push technology, we will push waste elimination, we will push cost improvements every day in every way to maintain, and hopefully expand the delight that Alpha brings to their customer base. There is no way we're going to step backwards. It's only to push forward. We love what they do and we want them to do it more, and we want to move faster.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Perfect. And just on legacy analysis on slide five. The cost reduction savings of $7 million, with that in Q2 isolation? Or is that six months (inaudible) ahead or behind a year ago? And also --
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
(Multiple Speakers) Well, finish your question, then I'll respond. I'm sorry.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Okay. And also I was going to ask about the SAP systems. When does that expense kind of go away?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
All right. So, John, you noted earlier that the LME Lead Average of $1.12 is actually a year-to-date average, and our year-over-year increase is actually for the six months of $30 million. So just for clarity for the rest of the folks. However, the cost reduction savings of $7 million is a gross number. And it is the gross savings, and -- but we do spend a fair amount of costs, I'll call it, about $2 million with the resources both outside of the company and the nearly 30 employees that are part of that initiative internally, betting that would met debt back down. So it's -- we've identified and achieved $7 million of savings, but you got to pull to $2.5 million off of it to get the cost that it took to get there.
And then on your SAP question, SAP for us, what I sometimes call the valley of despair between starting and finishing that project, we got a little bit of a complication now with the Alpha transaction. They largely are, but not entirely an SAP user. So we have to incorporate that into our designs and execution. And as we look at how this business gets incorporated into our organization, hence start thinking about how we are going to think about ourselves in the future, and I will say, although the decision hasn't been made yet, is, whether we started thinking more in terms of lines of business rather than geographical regions, because truly things like the reserve power players are truly global in their footprints, and even motive power is similar. So still a lot of work there, but we still are quite pleased with the transaction.
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Okay guys, thanks for taking my questions. I appreciate it.
Operator
(Operator Instructions) And our next question comes from Brian Drab with William Blair. You may proceed.
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. And I wanted to make sure that I'm understanding something just from a high level. You talked about the third quarter guidance, and I know you're not giving fourth quarter guidance right now. But I'm going to ask question about the fourth quarter. Just directionally, it sounds like neutral impact from Alpha, the forward contracts, not as larger headwind, lower lead price rolling through, volume should increase with the typical seasonality. So earnings should step up pretty significantly, I would think, sequentially from third quarter to fourth quarter. Can you just tell me where I'm wrong there and make any comment?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
So, I guess a couple of comments on -- so we've already given you our guidance for Q3. I know, compared to the consensus, that's a little bit lower. It's a timing issue. We believe in terms of how some of these lead cost pass-through. So that's why we gave you a little more specificity with a 100 basis point step up in Q3 and another 100 basis points in Q4. The -- you would expect Q4 would have a gross margin pickup that's even higher. But you need to keep in mind that some of our business, primarily in Europe where we do pass through mechanisms, because of the spot rates started to decline last July -- or July a few months ago, you'll start to see them have a little bit of revenue contraction as those lower lead costs get reflected in billing rate. So that's why it kind of keeps at slightly lower. So those are kind of the headline numbers for gross profit rates. When I look at -- the consensus for -- so I think on average the analysts were a little ahead of us in Q3. I think when I look at Q4, I think you're not far enough along. And I think I feel pretty confident right now that the consensus' full-year number for the analysts is -- we'll be able to beat handily. And I'm going to throw out at least a dime on that at the moment.
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Okay. That's really helpful. Thanks. And you made one comment about Alpha that I wanted to just dig in a little deeper on. You mentioned that you also supply some of the competitors. So could you even roughly quantify how much of your revenue comes from Alpha's competitors who might look to -- whom might look for another battery supplier?
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, its very manageable to some. I think the absolute worst case number is in the zip code of 40 million, and we've spoken to a lot of those folks, and I think it would be unlikely that we would see that.
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Okay, got it. And then I don't know if this is the number you could share, but curious what the percentage of revenue associated with lithium is now? I guess excluding Alpha, it sounds like you're gaining some traction with some of the lithium products.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
So, when you exclude what we do in aerospace and defense, and you just look at our traditional, industrial, motive power, telecom, those sorts of businesses. Yet we really haven't started jet (ph). I just, the product development cycle takes some time. So we're literally in the midst of launching the first variant as we speak, and the line -- as I said in my prepared remarks, we really won't have the full line ready until the spring -- summer -- early summer. There is a big trade show in Chicago that we're trying to get everything launched for, and it wasn't originally our plan. The original plan was to launch a more slowly, more piece mail -- piece mail, because I really frankly didn't want to eat as much OpEx as we've been having to eat lately. But we'll listen to the customers. I think we're doing the right thing. We're spending a lot more money than we had originally planned. But we want to get those products out sooner and have a full line card come the spring for the launch. And the feedback, I've just got a text this morning from the CTO, and we just got some customer approvals. So things are moving forward very much according to plan that we laid out at Investor Day. And I can only tell you everything at Alpha and what we're doing there can -- all it can do is accelerate what we had already laid out with regards to ESS and using lithium. And I made this comment in my prepared remarks, but it's very, very important, is that, by having complete control of the system, the enclosure, the energy conversion, the controllers, the lithium battery BMS, we're going to be able to do some very differentiated things by having one set of firmware and software to control the entire system, and that what is -- what is most exciting to me in the long run. That won't happen overnight, but thus the Alpha transaction will only accelerate everything we've talked about in the past.
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Okay, got it. Thanks, Dave. And then Mike, do you mind -- this is my last question. Do you mind giving us the -- which data for the three months, I guess would be the three months ending October, if you have it for Americas, Europe, the regions?
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, give me a second. Okay, I got it in front of me. So trailing three months, the Americas' three months compared to the prior year was up 3% for the Americas and in Europe or I'll go to EMEA, it was up 14% and Europe was 15%, and Asia was up 15% for total worldwide of 15%.
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Thank you very much.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Q&A portion of today's conference. I would now like to turn the call back over to your host, Mr. David Shaffer for closing remarks.
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
I want to thank everyone for taking your time to attend the call today. Have a great day.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference, and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Duration: 61 minutes
Call participants:
David Shaffer -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Michael Schmidtlein -- Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Michael Gallo -- CL King -- Analyst
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
John Franzreb -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Brian Drab -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
