Image source: The Motley Fool.
Insteel Industries Inc (IIIN -2.74%)
Q1Â 2019 Earnings Conference Call
Jan. 17, 2019, 10:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
See all our earnings call transcripts.
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Insteel Industries' First Quarter 2019 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.
I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference. Mr. H. Woltz, President and CEO. Sir, you may begin.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning. Thank you for your interest in Insteel and welcome to our first quarter 2019 earnings call, which will be conducted by Mike Gazmarian, our Vice President, CFO and Treasurer, and me.
Before we begin, let me remind you that some of the comments made on today's call are considered to be forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risk factors are described in our periodic filings with the SEC. All forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and information that is currently available. We do not assume any obligation to update these statements in the future to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or new information.
I'll now turn it over to Mike to review our first quarter financial results and outlook for our construction end markets, and then I'll follow-up to comment more on business conditions.
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Thank you, H, and good morning to everyone joining us on the call. As we reported earlier today, the first quarter of fiscal 2019 proved to be a challenging period for Insteel as the usual seasonal downturn was exacerbated by the excessively wet weather across many of our largest markets and low-priced import competition, which reduced shipments well below expected levels. Excluding the nonrecurring gains referenced in our earnings release related to the disposition of fixed assets in the current year and the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities in the prior year, net earnings came in at $0.19 a share compared with $0.23 a diluted share a year ago.
Shipments for the quarter fell 17.2% from last year and 14.5% sequentially from Q4, primarily due to the weather-related construction delays in Texas, our largest market, and across the Southern and Southeastern regions of the country. Our shipping volumes were also adversely impacted by a continued increase in low-priced imports, particularly in our PC strand business, which has been facilitated by the Section 232 tariff program.
As a we've conveyed on previous calls, the tariff has served to provide offshore competitors with a significant cost advantage, relative to the domestic strand producers that are driving US prices for hot-rolled steel wire rod, our primary raw material, substantially above world market levels. As you would expect the drop-off in shipments for most pronounced in the posttension PC strand market or the commercial segment is subject to import competition.
Average selling prices for the quarter rose slightly from the fourth quarter and were up 28.7% from a year ago, reflecting a series of price increases we've implemented in response to the escalation in our raw material costs.
Gross profit for the quarter fell $0.7 million from a year ago, and gross margin narrowed 140 basis points, driven by the reduction in shipments and higher unit manufacturing costs and lower production volume. On a sequential basis, gross profit was down $8.6 million from the fourth quarter and gross margin decreased 560 basis points due to the same factors compounded by higher raw material costs.
SG&A expense for the quarter increased $0.8 million from a year ago, primarily due to the relative year-over-year changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. The value of the policies fell $0.5 million this year with a decline in the financial market as compared to a $0.3 million increase last year. These additional costs were partially offset by lower incentive compensation expense under our return on capital plan driven by the weaker results in the current year. As we indicated in the release, the $0.8 million of other income for the quarter reflects a $0.7 million net gain on the retirement of fixed assets that was nonrecurring in nature and is reflected as an adjustment to operating cash flow on our cash flow statement. Our effective tax rate for the quarter dropped to 23.5% from 24.9% a year ago, excluding the impact of the $3.7 million deferred tax remeasurement gain on the prior year amount.
The lower rate reflects the net effect of the reduction in the statutory rate to 21% from 35% for all of this year versus only three quarters last year, plus the elimination of the benefit previously provided by the Section 199 domestic production deduction under the old tax law.
Looking at the fiscal 2019, we currently expect our effective rate to run in the range of 23% to 24%, subject to future adjustments related to the level of earnings, changes in permanent tax differences and the other assumptions and estimates entering into our tax provision calculation.
Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow statement. Operating activities used $22.8 million of cash in the first quarter due to a working capital bill that was driven by $25.1 million reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a $21.1 million increase in inventories. You may recall that we had ended the previous quarter with an elevated accounts payable balance of $60 million, largely due to a sharp increase in raw material purchases as we replenish our inventories from the depressed levels of Q3.
Over the course of the first quarter, we scaled back our purchases, particularly during December, reducing payables by $19.6 million. Despite these measures, inventories increased during the quarter, primarily due to the weaker-than-anticipated shipments. Based on our Q2 sales forecast, our quarter-end inventories represented 4.1 months of shipments compared to 3.4 months at the end of the fourth quarter. The average unit cost was higher than our beginning inventory balance in Q1 cost of sales, which implies that we could experience some margin pressure during the second quarter as the higher cost material is consumed.
Capital expenditures totaled $6.2 million for the quarter, up slightly from last year, focused on cost and productivity improvement initiatives in addition to recurring maintenance needs. We ended the quarter with $15.5 million of cash on hand and were debt-free with no borrowings outstanding on our $100 million credit facility.
In allocating our cash flow and managing the cyclical nature of our business, we focus on three objectives; reinvesting in the business for growth and to improve our cost and productivity; maintaining adequate financial strength and flexibility; and returning capital to our shareholders in a disciplined manner. Going forward, we will continue to balance these objectives in deploying capital and any excess cash balances. As we move into the second quarter, our market outlook for the remainder of the year remains positive with the growth in infrastructure construction expected to offset some moderation in nonresidential activity.
We should also benefit from the weather-related deferral of business from the first quarter, although any favorable impact will likely occur over an extended period considering the tightness in the labor markets which makes it difficult for contracts to play catch-up.
The infrastructure-related portion of our business should benefit from higher state and local infrastructure spending in many of our markets as rising tax collections and recent funding initiatives, such as fuel tax increases, bond financings and other valid measures begin to have a greater impact.
The outlook at the federal level, however, is clouded with uncertainty at this time, due to the ongoing shutdown and the lack of a normal appropriation for the entire fiscal year, which could cause state and local officials to become increasingly hesitant to authorize projects.
Federal funding has continued to flow from the DoT during the shutdown since it draws on the user fee supported Highway Trust Fund, not the general fund. However, since the government was operating on a continuing resolution that expired on December 21, state DoTs have only received about 25% of their full 2019 highway allotments. Also, the continuing resolution maintained federal funding at 2018 levels, creating an additional shortfall since Congress has provided increased funding for roads and transit in 2019.
The most recent reports for the Architecture Billings and Dodge Momentum Indexes has been somewhat mixed with the ABI reflecting greater strength. In November, the ABI remained in positive territory for the 14th consecutive month, rising to 54.7 and through the first 11 months of the year, the index has averaged 52.3, up slightly from 52.2 last year. After getting off to a strong start the Dodge Momentum Index, another leading indicator for nonresidential building construction, has moderated over the second half of the year. For the full year, the overall index was up 4.3% from the end of 2017 with the institutional component of 8.5% and the commercial component rising 1.6%.
Yesterday, the AIA released its semiannual construction forecast for nonresidential building construction for 2019 and 2020, which reflected continued growth for both years. Spending on nonresidential buildings was projected to increase 4.4% this year, driven by stronger gains in the industrial and institutional sectors with the individual firms' forecasts ranging from 3% up to 6.3%. For 2020, the gross rate was projected to slow to 2.4% with the range widening to negative 0.9% up to 4.5% growth.
I'll now turn the call back over to H.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Mike. As Mike indicated, we're disappointed with our first quarter results that were driven by week shipping and production volumes that we attribute primarily to adverse weather conditions and growing import competition in certain markets. While we aren't happy with the Q1 results, we continue to believe that the underlying market fundamentals are reasonably strong and should support our forecast of another year of growth and demand for our reinforcing products.
As we reported last quarter, our financial performance for 2019 should be viewed in the context of the effects of the Trump administration's Section 232 tariff program, which is increasingly eroding the competitiveness of US producers of downstream steel products that are exposed to foreign competition. We previously reported that the combination of antidumping duties and the administration's Section 232 tariff regime had caused chaotic conditions in the market for wire rod, our primary raw material, beginning in Q2 of 2018. These factors caused a significant disruption in the availability of imported wire rod, which domestic producers were unable to backfill, resulting in shortages during late Q3 and early Q4. Prices rose substantially, and we were required to purchase imports at premium prices relative to the domestic market to ensure that we could meet customer commitments.
By the end of our fourth quarter, availability concerns had abated as speculative purchasing tapered off and the prospect of additional domestic capacity from the Georgetown, South Carolina Steel Mill became a reality. As we had predicted, in the aftermath of the 232 tariff, US wire rod prices increased to well above the world market level. Today, according to the indices published by Fastmarkets AMM, an authoritative source for worldwide pricing trends, US wire rod prices are more than $200 per ton higher than the world market price. Since no tariff was applied to most imported downstream products, including PC strand and welded wire reinforcement, US downstream markets have become far more attractive to foreign producers and import volumes have risen considerably, facilitated by substantial underselling, which has compressed margins of domestic producers.
Considering that millions of US jobs at downstream steel users are dependent on the competitive sourcing of hot rolled steel versus less than 100,000 jobs in the steel melting end of the supply chain, it is unclear how the tariff program supports the job-creation objectives of the administration. If the 232 program continues, as appears likely, it's imperative that the tariff is extended to downstream products derived from wire rod in order to eliminate a harsh penalty that is imposing on downstream producers of steel products, such as Insteel. While we are forcefully making our point with the administration, there's no way to predict whether our efforts to expand tariff coverage to downstream products will be successful.
Turning to CapEx. We reported last quarter that our initial estimate for 2019 was $22 million, subject to revisions as we move through the year. Investments will continue to be targeted toward expanding our product capabilities, lowering the cash cost of production and updating technology, including information systems. During the current quarter, we expect to bring online a new engineered structural mesh production line that will increase capacity for certain niche products as well as contribute to substantial reductions in cash operating costs. Market conditions appear to be favorable and should support our plan ramp-up during this fiscal year.
Notwithstanding our tariff concerns, we'll continue to be vigilant in pursuing attractive growth opportunities, both organic and through additional acquisitions and remain focused on improving our operational effectiveness and realizing the anticipated benefits from the substantial investments that we've made in our facilities to lower manufacturing costs, reduce lead times and improve quality. This concludes our prepared remarks, and we'll now take your questions. Lauren, would you please explain the procedure for asking questions?
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Yes, thank you. (Operator Instructions). And our first question comes from Julio Romero with Sidoti & Company. Your line is now open.
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Hey, good morning, H, good morning, Mike.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Good morning.
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
So my first question is, just given the import pressure, I think you guys are doing outstanding from a pricing standpoint, holding your ASPs here. Can you maybe just give some color on how you're able to hold that pricing? Was it the past price increases that are kind of coming to fruition, or were there any new pricing past? And maybe the full impact of maybe how you see pricing going forward?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, well, thank you for the compliment, which may or may not be deserved. The reality is that with many of the import sources to quote in our markets, particularly in PC strand are quoting out three or four months. So the impact on ASP is in our PC strand business and particularly on spreads and margins is likely to be more consequential as we look into Q2 and possibly Q3 than it was in Q1. So our decision was, either we compete with the imports or we curtail operations. And at this point, we've decided that we're going to compete, we're going to stay in the market. And undoubtedly, we'll suffer the consequences of that from a margin point of view.
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Got it. And just as a follow-up to that, I guess, can you maybe talk about the mix in the quarter of welded wire versus PC strand? I assume it was a little bit more weighted to welded wire relative to the historical split?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Yes, that's accurate. The drop-off in shipments was the most pronounced in that segment of the strand market that's susceptible to import competition. So it was more severe in strand than welded wire.
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Okay. And then maybe just one more before I'll hop back in queue is I appreciate the color you gave on federal funding impact for the shutdown here, would you expect any impact on volumes to become -- is there going to be a ramp-up of it becoming more material if it drags out past maybe the end of January here?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Yes, I think the longer it drags out, the more downside risk there is, as we move toward, typically, the busiest time of the year from a construction standpoint. So I mean, we're obviously hopeful it gets resolved sooner rather than later. But if it continues out for a few more months, then I think it could begin to have a more severe impact due to the resulting uncertainty.
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Okay, got it. Appreciate. Thanks for taking my questions.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure.
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Thanks.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Phil Gibbs with KeyBanc Capital Market. Your line is now open.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst
Yes. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question gentlemen. I have just a question on -- around the comment you made on the speculative purchasing tapering off into 2019 for wire rod material to head yourself with some foreign buys. Are you starting to see with the new mill on the East Coast up now on the rod side, are you starting to see pricing soften up a little bit? Or is that something that you haven't seen yet?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No, I think maybe there has been some softening. As you know, scrap has tailed off some, which is a primary driver of our suppliers' cost structure. And I think as you saw with Insteel shipments for Q1 softening up considerably, I think that, that trend certainly has not been limited to Insteel. I think it's a trend that has occurred across many of the wire rod consuming markets. And I think as [inaudible] producers and wire rod producers are feeling that, and it's probably become a little more competitive. But relative to the distinct disadvantage that we have incurred relative to world market, it really hasn't made -- it hasn't made any real change in that circumstance.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst
Just for our education, because I think a lot of the points you're making are very important to manufacturing. Can you give us any sense in terms of how much you think some of these foreign producers have taken share over the last 6 to 12 months? I mean, I don't know your market share -- domestic versus foreign on some of these downstream products, but anyway you could put into perspective how you feel that shifted?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, I guess, first, I would tell you that our data was effected by the government shutdown. So we're not all the way current on exactly what has happened up through the most recent reporting periods. And I would also tell you that I think a lot of the damage is probably prospective not retrospective, because this pressure has been building through the last 6 months. And I think that we'll continue to see imports ramping up going forward and that probably the most significant impact is yet to be seen.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst
That's helpful. And just last question here, if I could, I appreciate what you guys have said. Your volumes are obviously down a staggering amount in the first quarter, and I know that you said that there's some catch up to come over the next several quarters. Just -- what does your crystal ball today tell you in terms of how much volume weakness, I guess, you may see this year? Because it's going to be hard to catch up off of the 17% comp?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, well, I think if you get back and just look at expectations for the underlying level of demand for our products, that story is positive, that's not negative. And as we have come back from the holiday period after the new year, we've seen shipments reasonably robust coming into the new year. So I think we will make up part of the deficit that we've run through the first quarter. But as Mike pointed out in his comments, I think there is a significant limit to what contractors can do in terms of accelerating their progress on job sites because I believe most are really labor constrained at this point.
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Yes, And I think we could see more improvement in the second half of the year, during the busy season, especially from a comp standpoint where we saw some softening in the fourth quarter of '18.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst
Thanks, gentlemen.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure.
Operator
Thank you. And the next question comes from Tyson Bauer with KC Capital. Your line is now open.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Good morning, gentlemen.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Tyson.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Mike, could you give us a little more color on some of the margin impacts that are -- would be associated with incomplete cost recoveries versus the reduced volume? And which one's easier to get back, depending on how the market plays out as you get into the seasonally stronger quarters?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Yes, I think from a year-over-year standpoint, I mean, it would primarily a volume issue, which was largely weather related. Our spreads were actually up from last year. We did see some compression from the fourth quarter. But overall, I mean, I would attribute the reduction in gross profit, primarily due to the volume-related impact, both in terms of the contribution effect and then just the impact on our production volumes, which has an unfavorable cost impact as well.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
So all things equal, you'll still have the effect of the imports and those pressures, but as you begin to increase those volume throughputs and like operations efficiencies, that should provide some relief?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Yes. Yes, definitely. We should see a significant favorable cost impact as the margins move back up.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Okay. Have you gotten any clarity in your discussions with the administration on Section 232 whether what you're asking would require a new process? Or whether that would just be an expansion of what's on the books, which could be enacted at a quicker time line?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, that's a good question and highly relevant. And the answer is, depending on who you ask, you can find the answer that you want. And it's not clear exactly which path would be most reasonable. So it could be one or it could be the other. I think that's uncertain at this point.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Okay. One of the schools of thought was the immediate impact was because of the access global capacity was then being diverted to the US on imports, and especially PC strands and others. But as that excess capacity got used up, there would be a finite pressure here in the domestic market. As things slow globally, is that what you're referencing that we could see additional pressure? Or is there a level where we just get to a static point?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, I think the play here is the length of the pipeline for imports where they are quoting -- they're quoting for delivery out 60 to 90 to 120 days. So the margin pressure with respect to import competition will ramp up this quarter. But I don't immediately get the feeling that a global slowdown is going to create significant ramped up volumes of strand in our marketplace. I think that strength's going to be here anyway. Just because the pricing is attractive in the market compared to alternatives that they have elsewhere.
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
And Tyson, just to provide some added perspective on the import-related impact on the quarterly results, we'd estimate that about 25% of the year-over-year drop-off was occurred in those portions of our business that are susceptible to import competition. Now that business was also affected by the weather, and it's difficult to segregate how much was driven by the weather-related impact, but, I mean, that would be at the high end of that 17% shipment reduction, about 1/4 of it occurred in the import-sensitive part of the business.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Got it. And the last question for me. You decided to put it in the press release. You discussed the EMS market share growth versus rebar, does that imply that we're finding an easier pathway to get state DoT approvals for your product and states that have been typically more union-driven and labor have soften in that stance that is allowing you grow your slice of the pie regardless of what the pie itself is doing?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, there are a couple of issues embedded in that question. And first, I would say that from a DoT perspective, there haven't been a whole lot of changes there. And some DoTs are more receptive to the substitution than others, but we are not telegraphing to you, there's been a significant change there one way or the other that the primary area of growth for us with engineered structural mesh will be in the nongovernmental and the private and commercial sector, where we are doing conversions to ESM from rebar. And also, we're not telegraphing to you that, that has come -- become substantially easier. It's still a time-consuming labor-intensive process to make those conversions. But that is where we expect to see the most significant growth in that private sector and not in the public sector.
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
All right. Thank you, gentlemen.
Operator
Thank you. (Operator Instructions) And our next question comes from Steve Marascia with Capitol Securities Management. Your line is now open.
Steve Marascia -- Capitol Securities Management -- Analyst
Thank you. Good morning, gentlemen. Just a follow-up on what you're talking about. Just a follow-up on the government shutdown. I know the infrastructure story kind of is apparent. Can you go into a little more detail, if you can, about how it might possibly affect you guys going forward? Say, if does go on for another three or four months?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
I think it really goes down to a question of the impact of the continued uncertainty on funding decisions at the state and local level. That will be our primary concern, particularly, as we move closer to the busiest time of the year from a construction standpoint. Because if it gets -- if it moves out too far then there is a potential that you miss the window to begin work on projects during the current season. So I would say that's our primary concern.
Steve Marascia -- Capitol Securities Management -- Analyst
Do any of your customers have dealings with federal agencies in terms of permitting in various activities?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No, typically not.
Steve Marascia -- Capitol Securities Management -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you very much.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis. Your line is now open.
Adam Thalhimer -- Thompson Davis -- Analyst
Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Adam.
Adam Thalhimer -- Thompson Davis -- Analyst
Just wanted to ask a quick one on what you said on commercial. I think you said may be some moderation or softening late this year. And I was just curious if that's a comment from you looking at the macro data? Or is that more from something you're hearing from your customers?
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Really a combination, I think, where commercial had a long healthy run here just given where we're at in the cycle, likely it is that we could begin to see some softening. And that -- I mean, that's born out in AIA construction forecast that I referenced, where the mix is changing with some softening in commercial and a pickup in industrial and institutional segments as well as infrastructure as well I think there's just more -- the outlook there, it just appears to be more favorable at this time.
Adam Thalhimer -- Thompson Davis -- Analyst
On the infrastructure side?
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, yes. Assuming that just -- again assuming that this shutdown gets resolved in a timely manner.
Adam Thalhimer -- Thompson Davis -- Analyst
I thin we all hope that. Okay, thank you.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And at this time, I'm not showing any further questions. I would now like to turn the call back to our speakers for any closing remarks.
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay, well, we appreciate your interest in the company and we encourage you to follow up with questions if you have them. And we look forward to talking to you next quarter. Thank you.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.
Duration: 33 minutes
Call participants:
H.O. Woltz III -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Michael C. Gazmarian -- Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Julio Romero -- Sidoti & Company -- Analyst
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst
Tyson Bauer -- KC Capital -- Analyst
Steve Marascia -- Capitol Securities Management -- Analyst
Adam Thalhimer -- Thompson Davis -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
