Image source: The Motley Fool.
United States Steel Corp (X 0.92%)
Q4Â 2018 Earnings Conference Call
Jan. 31, 2019, 8:30 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
See all our earnings call transcripts.
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good morning everyone and welcome to the United States Steel Corporation's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded.
On the call this morning will be U.S. Steel President and CEO, Dave Burritt; Executive Vice President and CFO, Kevin Bradley; Dan Lesnak, General Manager of Investor Relations and Kevin Lewis, Director of Investor Relations. After the close of business yesterday, the Company posted its earnings release and earnings presentation under the investor section of its website.
Today's conference call contains forward-looking statements and future results may differ materially from statements or projections made on today's call. The forward-looking statements and risk factors that could affect those statements are referenced at the end of the Company's earnings release and in the earnings presentation and are included in U.S. Steel's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and updated in their quarterly reports on Form 10-Q in accordance with the Safe Harbor provisions.
I would now like to turn the conference call over to your host U.S. Steel, President and CEO, Dave Burritt.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. These are the headlines for 2018. Strong earnings and important progress on strategic objectives including; one, we delivered our best return on capital employed since 2008 over 20%. Two, we returned over $100 million of capital to stockholders in 2018 including $75 million of share repurchases in Q4. Three, we made excellent progress on our asset revitalization program exceeding all of our 2018 targets.
But let me start the call with a few comments on our core values; the safety of our employees and the safety of the communities in which we work and live.
I am pleased to report that in 2018, we achieved significant improvements in our already industry-leading safety performance. We had 9% improvement in our OSHA recordable rate and a 23% improvement in our days away from work rate.
A strong collaborative effort by all of our employees, both represented and non-represented is the driving force behind our continuing safety improvement. As with safety, we are committed to continuously improving our environmental performance as evidenced by the significant investments in environmental improvement projects we continue to make across all of our facilities.
As you may have seen in the press, we had a fire at our Clairton coke making facility on December 24th. No one was injured by the fire or in the efforts to extinguish it. We're thankful for that as well as for the efforts of our employees, local firefighters and other first responders early on Christmas Eve morning.
The fire damaged a portion of the facility that is a key element of the coke-oven gas desulphurization process. We acted quickly to mitigate environmental impacts while we are making the necessary repairs to the facility. We continue to communicate with the appropriate regulatory agencies and update them on our progress.
We take our environmental responsibilities very seriously. In fact in early October, we completed significant environmental improvement projects at Clairton and other Mon Valley Works facilities. These projects were developed in cooperation with the local regulatory agencies to help the region meet its new federal SO2 air quality standards.
We are focused on completing the repairs as safely and quickly as possible in order to return the facility's desulfurization process to normal operations. We've launched a dedicated website, www.clairton.uss.com and would encourage you to visit that site for additional details on the incident and updates regarding the repair process as they are available.
Before I turn the call over to Kevin to discuss our results and guidance, I'd like to highlight some of our important accomplishments during 2018. As mentioned at the beginning of my remarks, we showed a strong improvement in our safety performance in 2018 and we are grateful to all of our employees for their commitment to safety.
We achieved a return on capital employed of just over 20%, our strongest performance since 2008. We continue to make good progress on our asset revitalization program and exceeded our 2018 scorecard goals.
We safely and efficiently restarted the steelmaking operations at Granite City positioning us to benefit from strong spot market conditions for most of the year. We reached agreement with the USW on a new four-year collective bargaining agreement providing our represented employees with well-deserved rewards for their hard work and dedication.
We continue to strengthen our balance sheet by opportunistically eliminating our highest cost debt and extending our debt maturity schedule to provide a solid foundation to continue investing in our assets. As a result of our stronger balance sheet and improved earnings, we were able to enhance our capital allocation strategy, returning $100 million to our stockholders in four months through our stock repurchase program.
I will now turn the call over to Kevin to provide an overview of our financials and our guidance. Kevin?
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks Dave and good morning everyone. Adjusted EBITDA was $535 million for the fourth quarter, up 2% sequentially and up 66% versus the prior year quarter. Full year adjusted EBITDA was $1.76 billion an increase of $612 million or 53% versus 2017.
Revenues for the quarter of $3.7 billion were 18% higher than the fourth quarter 2017. For the full year, revenues grew by 16% and finished at $14.2 billion. Q4 adjusted EPS of $1.82 was $1.06 higher than the prior year quarter. Full year adjusted EPS of $5.36 was significantly higher than 2017 adjusted EPS of $1.94.
Moving toward segments. North American Flat-Rolled generated 16.1% adjusted EBITDA margins in Q4 and finished the year with adjusted EBITDA margins of 12.6%. This represents margin expansion of 400 basis points versus 2017. Europe generated EBITDA margins of 13.8% for the year, but we did see a pronounced pullback in Q4 to margins of 11%.
Margins in our European steel market continue to be challenged due to falling steel selling prices and increasing raw material cost. Tubular Q4 EBITDA, while positive for the quarter at $8 million was below our expectations, as selling prices for both seamless and welded pipe decreased in the quarter.
The strong financial performances for our business in 2018 allowed us to make significant progress on our balance sheet and capital structure. Let me go through some of the highlights. In the year, we retired $322 million of debt and extended our maturity profile. Our next senior note maturity is not until 2025.
This further derisks our execution on the asset revitalization program and gives us a good runway to continue to execute our strategy. In the quarter we began executing on our previously announced stock repurchase program. In Q4, we repurchased $75 million worth of stock, in January we repurchased an additional $25 million.
Since the announcement of the program on November 1st, we have repurchased just over 2% of our shares outstanding. We continue to believe stock repurchases are an attractive value opportunity and remain committed to our balanced capital allocation framework.
Turning to guidance. Given the high levels of volatility the industry is currently experiencing, we are modifying our guidance methodology. While we provided quantitative first quarter guidance, we will transition the guidance cadence consistent with other large domestic steel producers beginning in Q2.
We are also providing full-year projections for several operating, income statements and cash flow statement items that we believe will be helpful for our investors and analysts. We currently expect first quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $225 million.
This excludes the expected first quarter impact of the Clairton fire Dave discussed earlier in his remarks which is expected to be approximately $40 million. For our Flat-Rolled segment, we expect Q1 EBITDA to be higher than first quarter of 2018 primarily due to higher average realized selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material cost.
We expect Q1 EBITDA for Europe to be lower than Q1 of 2018 primarily due to lower volumes, higher raw material costs and an unfavorable change in FX. Tubular is expected to increase Q1 EBITDA compared to Q1 2018 primarily due to higher average realized selling prices and increased volumes, partially offset by higher cost for steel substrate.
With that, I'll turn it back to Dave.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Kevin. Before we move to Q&A, I have three things I'd like to discuss. Capital allocation, strategy execution and steel markets as we enter 2019. First, I want to remind you of our capital allocation framework and three priorities for cash, maintain a strong balance sheet supportive of the company's strategic objectives, invest in operational excellence, technology and innovation to reduce cost and increase capabilities, return capital to stockholders through consistent dividend payments and opportunistic stock repurchases.
Second, we are encouraged by the execution of our strategy in addition to continuing our progress on asset revitalization program. We're also improving our ability to serve growing markets by investing in new finishing facilities in both the U.S. and Europe. Progress on the new state-of-the-art continuous galvanizing line at our PRO-TEC joint venture to produce coated Gen 3's advance high-strength steel products for automotive customers remains on track with the first production from this line expected in the third quarter.
We also recently announced the construction of a new dynamo line at the U.S. Steel Kosice to produce sophisticated silicon grades of non-green (ph) oriented electrical steel products that will serve growing demand for electrical vehicle and power generators with the first production expected in the fourth quarter of 2020.
We have strong customer support for both of these facilities and are focused on increasing our exposure to these very attractive and growing markets. Third, turning to steel market, we believe the fundamentals, demand signals remain positive as we enter 2019. Auto sales finished 2018 at or above 17 million units for the fourth consecutive year which has never been done before and we expect 2019 to be another good year for the auto sector.
We currently expect that 2019 will be the continuation of the 2018 demand recovery in the yellow goods sector. Energy markets continue to perform well supported by the continuation of the line pipe products in 2019 and many new projects in the bidding process as we speak.
Construction markets have been a bit choppy heading into the winter, but the 2018 trend was better than 2017. Our construction customers have indicated that we might finally have a more normal construction season that starts slowly in the first quarter and then picks up momentum as the winter weather dissipates which has not been the case in the past few years.
Based on the trajectory, the prices in the U.S. spot market have been on since August peak, January scrap prices falling for the first time since 2006 and a lack of clarity that the rest of the winter brings with raw material cost buyers are continuing to play their hands very carefully.
We expect a slight growth in steel consumption in 2019 and we also expect import volumes to decrease in 2019. Given this combination of supply and demand changes, we have every reason to believe that the buying activity will accelerate as the quarter progresses. In fact, we are already beginning to see this take place in our Flat-Rolled segment as our January daily order entry rates are running above fourth quarter levels.
Like every new year, we are faced with new opportunities and challenges and I'm pleased with the progress we have made, but we have more work to do. As the market continues to change, we remain focused on the things we can control. I have no doubt that 2019 will be yet another meaningful year of progress for our company.
With that, let's move to Q&A. Dan?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Thank you Dave. Greg, can you please queue the line for questions?
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Your first question comes from the line of Chris Terry from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Chris Terry -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Hi guys. A couple of questions from me. I just really wanted to focus on cash flow. Firstly on the $1.2 billion of Capex for 2019, can you give a bit more detail on what's included there? Just interested in anything that relates to the Fairfield EAF and what's included for European spend?
The second question also related to cash flow. In the asset revitalization program, I believe you spent $584 million to date. You got $300 million to $350 million for this year and then a pick up to $600 million for the next year. Are (ph) now in numbers that would mean that for the next two years depending on steel prices you'd be free cash flow negative.
So just wondered how you talk about the buyback and capital returns dividend, et cetera in that context. Thanks.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Hi, Chris. This is Dan. I'll take that CapEx piece. So the CapEx projects we're going (ph) out there as Dave mentioned, we do have a Dynamo line in Europe and we'll have probably maybe $40 million or so spending this year related to that.
We also have some additional outage work, maintenance outage work in Europe this year. We have some of higher maintenance, normal maintenance capital for Tubular this year, and then also you're seeing, Granite City Works they're still making operation and Granite City Works have been off-line for two years.
So you haven't seen that for the last couple of years, so now that we are operating those, we'll have a normal maintenance capital that goes into support the halt (ph) in the Granite City. So those are some of the bigger moving pieces, the PRO-TEC facility Dave mentioned is actually funded by that JV itself. So that's where the big change for CapEx year-over-year for us is.
I don't know if Kevin you want to talk about the AMP spending?
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So you're seeing 2019 overall CapEx up as Dan just explained, but on an AMP standpoint, fairly consistent year-over-year, we're following our program and we look to finish that on time and on budget. So AMP spending, now we're not going to get into kind of a long-term cash flow kind of consistent with our change in methodology on guidance. We're not going to speculate on longer-term EBITDA and cash flow, but CapEx at $1.2 billion, we feel very comfortable with and we feel like our balance sheet and our capital structure are in great shape and can support the kind of investment we need to and want to do in our business.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
And I guess Chris, the only thing I want add to remind everybody is back before we started the asset revitalization program, (inaudible) program, we constantly went out and pushed our cash balances to much higher than the historic levels. So we created ourselves a lot of financial flexibility, our expectation we started a program while we may well burn some of that back, but like I said, we're starting to point well below the historical cash levels of the Company.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
And Chris this is Dave. You had also a question in there about the EAF and you heard me say before it's not a question of if but when. If you think of the criteria that we are working through in order to make sure that we did the Electric Arc Furnace it was, we needed to have the 232 checkmark. We needed to have a good balance sheet and ability to finance it easily, checkmark.
We need to be positive EBITDA for the foreseeable future, checkmark. The thing we're working through now after we've got the labor agreement we're working through some local issues because it's important to us that we have common metrics and incentives for the local represented employees as well as with the management and we're not quite done with that, but I believe I'm optimistic that we will find the path forward and would like to be able to announce that this year.
Chris Terry -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Okay, thanks. (Technical Difficulty) last year, this time last year your guidance for the 1Q was $250 million. I think you went in slightly above that, I think you reached $255 million when you actually reported. This year at $225 million adjusted EBITDA, you talked about the cost pressures on some of the raw materials. Just wondering if you can go through some of the puts and takes of the $225 million guidance. Thanks.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
We just -- before I turn it to Dan here, the big issue here in terms of what you think about 2019, Europe is under a lot of pressure. And that's a big change for us, we're seeing margin compression, prices are down there and input costs are up. We do think this is the same kind of thing we've been going through here in the states with trade and we believe that Europe is going to be sorting through this, throughout the balance of the year.
They've got some measures that they put in place but we're seeing a lot of pressure on Europe that wasn't anticipated and we saw some of that pressure coming in late last year and you guys all saw it too when you were doing your analysis, and it's definitely bigger than what we thought it was going to be. But as far as the actual bridge, Dan could you take us through that?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah, I think that Dave, I think that really hits it in Europe. You know, as I said, we're -- Europe, there is some energy inflation that's part of being still making Europe the cost of CO2 credits per credit is moving up. So there is a bit of energy and then CO2 headwinds. FX, we'll see how that plays out, but right now there will be a little bit of a headwind.
On a Flat-Rolled side, I think certainly that the significant drop in spot prices we've seen is impacting a lot of our tons, so we're going to see price realizations down. Unfortunately that magnitude of that spot price is more than offsetting the gains we made on our annual fixed price contract because we did see margin enhancement on the annual fixed, but there were smaller percent of our tons and the spot market is just overwhelming, at this point the rest of our volumes.
Raw materials pressures and also in here particularly we called out a $20 per ton increase in coal. We had some higher outages as we mentioned, we said we could do more asset revitalization work this year and last year, so compared to last -- third and fourth quarter outages are up. These are more against fourth quarter for you guys.
Mining, seasonality mining, that is generally about $30 million headwind. So I think what we're seeing is we're seeing pressure in just about every sector from 4Q to 1Q every piece of the puzzle from 4Q to 1Q. But those are kind of the big drivers. Tubular is starting to see a little bit of uptick in pricing which is helpful. That pretty much gives us a pretty balanced look quarter-over-quarter for Tubular.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I'll just also add, you know, typically the first quarter is all low (ph) bar. We're not here on fire concerned about what's happening with the business. We feel good about those areas of the business that we can control and our area of focus. So we're comfortable that we'll have another good year. It's just that we do have these headwinds particularly the unexpected headwinds here in the fourth quarter related to price that are carrying into the first quarter and we'll have to see how well that plays out.
But meanwhile, we had a great balance sheet and we're executing on our strategy as we said we would for things we control.
Operator
You're next question comes from the line of Curt Woodworth from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
Hey, good morning everyone.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Curt.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, Curt.
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
First question just on Clairton, in the most recent release it looks like you're extending coking times and injecting more gas into the boilers to I think diminish some of the SO2 emissions. So can you just talk to, do you expect to buy merchant coke the next several quarters? Is there a scenario where you may have to idle a few batteries, and then could you just say what are the components of the $40 million cost you outlined for 1Q?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure Curt, this is Dave. First, I just want to highlight once again that we are committed to our community and our shared environment, and our role as an employer and good corporate citizen, this is an unfortunate incident and the people have who have worked through this and kept people safe, I'm immensely proud of, and meanwhile we have some work to do to get this behind us. We are confident that we will be able to get it behind us and we're working very closely with the Allegheny County Health Department as required in making sure that we're staying close to whatever improvements we need to be in compliance.
So Dan, if you could take through the balance?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Sure. Curt, if you look at our volume guidance for the year for steel shipments, and seasonally first quarter is a lower shipment level for us, but as we look at our projections for shipments, steel shipments, even given the extended coking times which is certainly important to help mitigate the activity, the environmental activity at Clairton.
When we look at those plus the commercial arrangements, (inaudible) we already have in place, right now our expectation is that we will not need to go beyond what we already have in place. So we're pretty comfortable there. Our focus is on getting that facility back to where it belongs. So I don't think we'd go speculate on too many hypothetical situations.
Where we are going to get the facility back in compliance and on timeline we have in place we think we are OK on our coking needs.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
And Curt just to give you a little bit more color on the breakdown of the $40 million probably in between $15 million and $20 million of that would be kind of the physical repair cost. The bulk of the remainder is the natural gas purchase cost in leu of the coke oven gases we would have been utilizing.
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
Okay, that's helpful. And then just a follow up. I guess back to the guidance question that Chris sort of triangulated. If you -- based on our numbers with -- the mining delta is usually $30 million to $40 million headwind into 1Q.
We see spot pricing down roughly $110 million in terms of your spot book, but to your point, auto reset higher so that mitigates that. So it still seems like it's a pretty significant sequential delta down $310 million from 4Q.
And I hear you on Europe in Tubular, but it's hard to see how those could be account for the rest of the $200 million. So is there, anything more specific than that, that maybe we're missing or is there a outage cost baked into 1Q? Do you see 1Q as a very low on volume relative to the cadence you see for the rest of the year to get to $11.5 million? Just because it seems like a very high delta.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, Curt. 1Q volume is definitely not a one fourth of that $11.5 million, yeah, we have lower volumes in flat-rolled 1Q. In total between Flat-Rolled and Europe, your outage cost versus 4Q are up $40 million $50 million. So that's a big piece of it, but I think the other thing is it's not just our spot tons because we only think about the adjustable contract we generally have some time lag on them.
A portion of those get a fresh renegotiated starting point at the beginning of the year. So on a piece of those contracts, the spot price drop is more immediate than you just normally see the lag throughout the year. So I think that's part of it too.
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
So how much of your contract book reset Jan 1? And is there a lag in that? So are you not seeing the benefit of the auto resets?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
We have not completed all the negotiations for the 30% of our book that were January 1. So some of them are carrying over right now until we get recent (ph) new number which will then cover from the start of the year. But the ones that are in place I remember, they're not just autos, there are some other ones where we had them fixed. The ones we had completely negotiated, they are margin accretive, we believe we did well on them except when that's -- when you're looking at 60% 65%, 66% of our tons being really very close to spot, it's hard to offset that with just 35% to 40% of your volumes.
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
Okay. And then just to clarify the Fairfield EAS CapEx. Is that embedded in the $1.2 billion?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
It is not no.
It is not? Okay. Alright. Thank you very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Timna Tanners from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
Yeah. Hey, good morning guys.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Timna.
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
I wanted to dive into Tubular a little bit because when you talk about the portion of your business that filled the spot, some of that is around Tubular assets. So I was wondering a, why that doesn't look a little bit better. Isn't it a bit more of an offset into the first quarter or beyond? And then just taking a step back on Tubular, like what is the right EBIT-per-ton that you see right now given, assuming flat substrate costs like assuming flat hot rolled like. Can you just give us a rough amount to help us navigate up or down, what you think the run rate earnings are on that business?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Timna to be honest, we haven't done that calculation because that's not really not what we expect to happen. So I don't want to guess, it's not fair for you guys, for me, to guess the things we haven't actually done the analysis on.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
And Timna just a little bit of color on the substrate cost because obviously, steel prices were dropping. A lot of what we ended up shipping in Q4 was actually based on Q3. So they had inventory coming into Q4, that they consumed and that inventory was at kind of higher prices. So it's kind of a delay factor in terms of the margins we saw in Q4 from a substrate perspective.
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
So you're yet to realize the benefit of lower cost into your Tubular division for further Q1, Q2 --
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
We did totally realize on yet.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
And there are still some pretty good price pressure in 4Q that's -- we think that's going to start the rushing force but there was pretty significant price pressure in 4Q.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, a lot of the -- you know, when we announced that pricing increase in May of last year, we benefited, we talked about that in the last call in Q3, just about all of that reversed out. That commercial benefit that we saw in Q3 reversed out in Q4, and that was the biggest issue we had.
You remember, I had estimated that we'd be positive Q2, Q3 and Q4, but also for the full year and obviously we didn't accomplish that. We were disappointed in the Q4 performance and we need to rectify that.
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
Okay. Second question is regarding your volumes going forward, a couple of things. One is you talked about additional 1 million tons from your asset investment program, and I just wanted to understand was that rolling, is that hot end is that -- assuming another 1 million tons when we add up all the volumes coming on, should we be adding that or is that offset elsewhere?
And then getting asked about Granite City, obviously we started at given stronger market condition. Is there a price or is there a framework and at what point you would consider maybe idling it again?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yes sure, Timna. So the volume benefits from the asset realization work, we're seeing that on the assets we've worked on, but we are taking more obviously this year so net out of Gary, Great Lakes, Mon Valley we get less this year than last year just by the amount of outages we're taking.
As far as, I think as far as in general I think we have a very, very good track record over the last decade or so of doing a good job of matching our production to order book.
We've been -- we've made the adjustments we've had to make very consistently over the years. So I would say if we saw a change in order book, as I said, then we had to do something about our steel making levels we would. The one thing I would caution you is that it's not about price, it's about demand and it's not about Granite City.
It really depends on where the order book would move on what facility we may need to reduce production, but I think we've shown, we will reduce production when it's appropriate for our order book, but don't assume that Granite City is a flex facility, it's more about where the demand is for which products and how that fits in our footprint.
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
Okay, thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Seth Rosenfeld from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Seth Rosenfeld -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Good morning. A couple of questions, first on the asset revitalization plan and then moving over to Europe. Just for the revitalization spend, you commented that really nothing has changed with the schedule of investment, but I believe the past guidance for the 2019 would be peak CapEx, whereas now it appears pretty stable year-over-year, and to hit that for $1.5 billion budget that would imply an 80% increase in CapEx for 2020.
So I just wanted to better understand how you're think about the staging of the revitalization spend, perhaps there have been any change with what they've capitalized versus expense in 2019. I'll start there please.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, so this is Dan. I think the changes when we talk about the project schedule, the project schedule is one thing, how the capital actually flows through the cash flow statement is based on when it's paid, and I think our procurement team has done a tremendous job on getting us very good payment terms.
So I think our process are getting down on the same pace, but actually some of the payment is going to fall into may be the next year, and I think that's going to happen next year too. So it's more a timing of payables not the pay, so we're actually executing the projects.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
And I would just add, and Seth, you were talking about the expense side too. I would say the -- on the increase in CapEx, the profile, the kind of projects we're doing, we will see a slightly higher amount of expense associated with that CapEx for things that obviously aren't capitalizable under our policy. So the ratio I would say spend for CapEx is unfavorable in '19 relative to '18.
Seth Rosenfeld -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you. (Technical Difficulty) sharply lower year-over-year. It appears to be lowest since 2014. Can you just walk us through the drivers of that drop, the mix between if you're seeing weaker demand for finished goods or just primarily just weakness within the semis?
And with regards to the timing of outages, can you confirm in what quarters we should expect the biggest hit to volumes in Europe? Thank you.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yes Seth. You actually broke up a little bit in the beginning, but I've noted some rest of the question, you were asking about the volume change and the volume guidance for Europe and the biggest change is in the demand for semi-finished.
If you go back every year we -- in our 10-K we disclose our breakdown of shipments by product. If you go back starting in '15 it was a pretty noticeable jump in semi finished sales for U.S. to Europe. That was marked additions that's staying soft for last couple of years. That demand for semi finished is now reverted to more historic levels.
So that's a very big driver. The cadence of outages, look, seasonally we try and match up with seasonality. So 1Q, 3Q would be typically when you might take a little more outages. But there's probably not as nearly as wide a severity on shipments by quarter in Europe that you might see here, but it is -- there was a noticeable change in demand for semi-finished in Europe that is really the biggest driver behind that volume change for us from the last couple of years.
Seth Rosenfeld -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Thank you. With regards to the finished sales in Europe though are you seeing any change in demand trends there of note or still relatively stable?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Those are pretty stable. The only obviously the impact in Europe now are the imports, the safeguards, the preliminary safeguards didn't help on imports. So imports were still high which is why you're seeing the anomaly where selling prices are going down, the raw materials are going up as opposed to the much more traditional cost push, cost pull, you you saw in Europe.
Seth Rosenfeld -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Fields from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Hey everyone. Is it your intention to keep the $228 million outstanding on your European revolver outstanding through the year, or do you intend to pay that down over the course of 2019?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
No. So we're not intending to pay it down. It's a very inexpensive source of capital for us at your LIBOR plus 1.7%. We may in fact choose to draw further on it. So that's not that wouldn't be something, we're not looking to pay that down anytime soon. We're happy to access that capital. It's very efficient.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay, great. And then given the great work you've done on your balance sheet in 2018. Do you feel like your balance sheet is at this point in a good enough state to weather the next steel downturn whenever that is or do you think that there's any additional work to do before you kind of get to that place where you'd like to be before an eventual next downturn?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. You know, Matt we feel really good. It's not just that we've shrunk the debt, but more importantly we've extended all the maturity. So there's nothing coming at us. In fact the first thing we have is really the 5-year European revolver. Beyond that 2025 where all of our high year yield debt interest rates are down for us and we've got much more flexible covenants in all of our facilities.
So we feel really good about our opportunity here to do what we need to do on revitalization, execute our strategy, I think there's been some good work, I think we put this tailwind of 2018 to good use on the balance sheet and capital structure.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay, and if you indulge me in one more, building on Curt's earlier question about Clairton, are there any contingency plans in place at this point in case you have any out-sized liabilities either environmental, operational or if you have to engage in some increased CapEx in any meaningful way in that facility?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes absolutely. We have a team addressing these types of issues. Again working closely with the community as well as with our supply so that we make sure that we meet our customer requirements and also take care of the community in which we live. So yes, absolutely we're all over this.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Alright, thanks very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Matt Vittorioso from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Matthew Vittorioso -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Yeah. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just on the back of Matt's questions on the balance sheet. Just curious, you ended 2018 with about $1.4 billion of net debt. Your comp for higher CapEx this year, steel prices are down. Just trying to think what is your comfort level as far as pushing net debt higher for the sake of executing share repurchases?
Or maybe if you could just talk about sort of your comfort level in pushing net debt higher, is $1.5 billion the right level, $2 billion what do you think the right level of net debt for this Company is currently?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah, Matt. We're not for solving for a specific net debt number obviously we're really comfortable with where we are today. In terms of the share repurchase, we're happy that we've got out of the gate pretty fast, right. We're $100 million into a $300 million program in the first three months.
So it's a two-year program, but we wanted to demonstrate that we're obviously serious about this and we think that's been the case in the $100 million so far. But we're not going to really speculate around anything beyond that until we fulfill the program.
Matthew Vittorioso -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Well, do you feel obligated to settle their program? I mean, I guess as creditors or bondholders, I mean, how would you view share repurchases in the context of a declining steel price market. I mean, I guess you can exercise some discretion there or again, do you feel --?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Fair question. Obviously part of the reason we chose share repurchase as the method for returning capital to our shareholders, we do have flexibility and we do have control, but as we've said, we want this to be a regular component of our capital allocation strategy. Our liquidity is strong, the balance sheet is strong. So at this stage, we're pretty comfortable with our ability to execute on that program over the two-year period.
Obviously, any outflow of cash for the Company is always going to consider the health of the industry, the health of our Company and our free cash flow, but given the balance sheet right now, we feel very confident.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of David Gagliano from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Hi, thanks for taking my questions. I just have a few follow-ups. I'm trying to get a little more detail. On first of all on the $875 million of non-ARP capital spending this year, it's a pretty big jump, it's over $200 million versus 2017, up. I know you flagged a fewer of the bigger ticket items, a lot of detail behind it I guess the question is how much of a jump in 2018 versus 2017 would you call it kind of a onetime in nature type of jump? Or perhaps another way to ask you more directly what should that number be expected to be beyond 2019? In the non-ARP capital spending?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Hi Dave, this is Dan. That really depends on what kind of other projects we would grow, project that we get into, but you know, the biggest growth project that's flown in the '19 is the Dynamo line in Europe. So, I mean, it's going to depend on growth probably as the EAF gets restarted that would certainly show up, but I think when you think about our spending absent any growth projects, you probably should be looking at a baseline of 500 to 600 for a company of our size, and like as we said, we would announce a new growth project, you need to layer those on top.
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, all right. Thanks. And then just regarding the first quarter, questions around the first quarter. What are the specific volume assumptions in the Flat-Rolled segment, and what is the weighted average price assumption in that segment included in the first quarter guidance?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Well, that's a detail that none of our competitors have ever given. We're not going to reveal it. But while volumes are down in 1Q because of the outages, we'll say that so sequentially volumes were down if you look at it that way from 4Q.
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, and then...
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
As we said there's definitely price pressure because reset were worn-off (ph), and get specific on quantifying what it does to it, but definitely prices are going down, there's no doubt.
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Understood. Just trying to obviously calibrate given the change in the communication moving forward, just trying to figure out how we calibrate better, but...
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
And I guess I would say in all the other categories beyond just price and volume when you talked to maintenance and outage expense and raw materials and seasonality mining, I mean, all those categories are also pressures versus 4Q.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
I mean, the biggest two elements of the drop from Q4 to Q1 are the outage related tons and expense or that combined a very big portion of it and then -- and the other part is the variable and spot tons that Dan has referred to are significantly down well more than offsetting the benefit we're getting on the fixed contracts that turned over at year-end.
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Totally understood from a qualitative front, I just don't really understand why you just don't tell us the specifics. But I guess moving on, the last question regarding the lack of free cash flow versus the buyback that was asked earlier. I think -- how do you plan to fund the buyback given there's really looks like there's a lack of free cash flow over the next few years?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
You mean the remaining $200 million?
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Exactly (ph).
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah. So again, we've got pretty strong cash position today at $1 billion, completely $1.5 billion undrawn U.S. revolver still a few million, $100 million undrawn on our European revolver. So we're in really good shape, and we're not going to give cash flow expectations for the year consistent with the new guidance methodology. We'll have to see how that plays out.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of David Lipschitz from Macquarie. Please go ahead.
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
Good morning.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, Dave.
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
Just in terms of Fairfield once you do give the go-ahead, what's the CapEx that's left to build that?
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The CapEx for the furnace itself is about $150 million and you're looking at probably about 18 month, 20-month window. The additional CapEx for air separation unit and there is some work that we need to do on the rounds casters, and so the number would be higher than what Dan called out.
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
Okay. And the stuff you're doing with that and other stuff is that assuming is there anything you're doing now assuming section 232 continues? Or are there any thoughts if that already pulled back what would happen?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
So we're optimistic that 232 will continue. We don't see the administration blinking on any of this. This is absolutely essential to national security and we need to make sure we have this level playing field. So we have a high degree of confidence that 232 will not be pulled back.
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
And then just my final question. Will ARP be definitely done next year and after 2020?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah. Right now our expectation is the -- physically (ph) project will be completed timing of payables may have some of that cash flow to the cash flow statement in '21 but we fully expect these projects to be done by the end of '20.
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Hi, good morning. Should we expect on Europe that, that business will be in the black for the first quarter? I mean I know there's been a lot of pricing weakness there particularly in the last three months to six months and so just trying to calibrate that, you know, that (inaudible) because it looks pretty staggering right now.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Well, we shall be profitable, sure, pretty strong, we're still seeing a pretty strong margin squeeze, yeah, even EBITDA level, and EBIT level also yeah, but that -- it's just a strong margin squeeze from what we've seen in the last several years.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay. And then just a follow up on the Clairton coke batteries, any sense of magnitude you could provide us in terms of what those assets are running at in terms of utilization standpoint versus normal? And should we expect some carryover relative to that $40 million in the second quarter as well as you work through some of these remediation plans? Thanks.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
I mean, our coking times are normally running 18 hours, we're probably up to about 22 in general, so that will get you about 20% reduction or so, yeah, I mean, obviously we said we were hoping to have the repairs done by May 15th so there will definitely be some second quarter impacts.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
There will also be some capital requirements associated with the repair from the fire that we'll give some more color on in Q2.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Is that included in the guidance the $1.2 billion?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
There's an estimate in the $1.2 billion.
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks Kevin.
Operator
Your question comes from the line of Tyler Kenyon from Cowen. Please go ahead.
Tyler Kenyon -- Cowen -- Analyst
Hey, good morning. Just with respect to the Flat-Rolled volume guidance. I was just wondering if it were possible to flush out your anticipated impact just from the maintenance and outage throughout 2019? And any more color you could provide for us just as to the sense of magnitude on the step up and maintenance in outage expense would be helpful.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Like Kevin said, just specific to the AMP, we probably see more pressure, but total maintenance and outage I don't think we've gone to that level, but certainly we have more I'd say we have more facilities running this year than we did last year for the full year.
So general maintenance outages will be up just from the fact that we're running a bigger footprint than we did last year since we're going to be running most of the facility for full year at this point than where we ran them part of the year last year.
Tyler Kenyon -- Cowen -- Analyst
Okay. And then just on the volume guidance for Tubular, 10% growth, pretty healthy. It sounds like you have some solid book of business just on the Line pipe type side. But are you expecting any growth just within the OCTG shipments? I'm just asking in light of some of the E&P budget cuts that we've seen year-to-date and trying to flush out your optimism just for that segment.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
I would say, Tyler that -- our guidance range is very much what we shipped last quarter, 4Q. So it is no, it's not really much more growth from where we already are. Our facilities are running pretty full. The ones that are aligned with the onshore rig counts are pretty full, onshore rig counts are still holding up pretty well. So at this point we're not seeing -- we're not expecting a big change from kind of where we shipped in 4Q that's how we got to that full year number.
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Just a little bit of clarity. Our line pipe volumes show up in North American Flat-Rolled, not in Tubular. While shipments to Line pipe producer show up in flat-rolled. We do have some sale of Tubular Mills that is line pipe, but most of it is OCTG.
Tyler Kenyon -- Cowen -- Analyst
Okay.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Derek Hernandez with Seaport Global. Please go ahead.
Derek Hernandez -- Seaport global -- Analyst
All right good morning everyone. I want to check in on how Flat-Rolled demand has recently received the price increases week? And if you see buyers stepping off the sidelines here and going forward?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
We announced them when we expect to collect them, I think it's too soon to tell it. It takes a while for the system to digest them, but our expectation is we're going to collect that $40 we announced. How soon? That remains to be seen, there is also market impact on assets. We don't make announcement we don't expect to collect.
Derek Hernandez -- Seaport global -- Analyst
I see. Thank you very much. And then, how are you seeing demand for iron products overall following Valley's announcement this week?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, hey, this is Dave. First we have to acknowledge the tragedy that happened. That was -- this is something that we all need to be cognizant of. We need to take a moment just to reflect on what this means and do everything we can to support the people that are there because this is an incredible event that's happened across the whole organization there and the community. So that should be the first priority.
But for us, we are doing what we can to make sure that we'll support and certainly we'll have an impact on the pellet supply and, you know, our situation is here in North America where long pellets and of course we buy pellets in Europe so you think about how that works, but technically speaking we don't see a lot of impact on the first quarter commercial or cost.
And we do have the flexibility, commercial flexibility to increase our participation in the global iron ore market and of course we continue to evaluate the market dynamics of what this shortfall is going to have. It's really early in the process, clearly there will be impacts, but given our footprint and where we are today, we're going to have probably positive here in North America, but there will be a negative impact on our European operations.
Derek Hernandez -- Seaport global -- Analyst
I see, thank you very much for your comments.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of of Andreas Bokkenheuser from UBS. Please go ahead.
Andreas Bokkenheuser -- UBS -- Analyst
Thank you very much. Just a question on demand. You obviously mentioned that you expect demand to be strong this year and you expect the imports to be down. When we look at apparent demand for flat steel in the U.S. last year at least on our numbers, demand seems somewhat flattish, but mill sales were up as mills captured market share from imports.
Do you effectively agree with that? And is that how we should think about 2019 as well that demand is somewhat flattish at a high level, but the mills or you will keep capturing market share from imports? Is that the right way of thinking about it?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah, Andreas. This is Dan. I would say, yeah, we expect consumption in the U.S. to move up slightly. We're not talking about a big change, but we expect to be up a little bit, percent -- in that range percent or so, but we also do expect particularly how narrow the arbitrage is now that the imports are going to be lower, so there's an opportunity for the domestics to pick up some of the volume from imports.
That's kind of how we got to our assumption that we're going to be about that $11.5 million-ton range for flat-rolled segment.
Andreas Bokkenheuser -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay, that's very clear. And just a follow-up on the previous question. You're obviously confident you can push through the $40 a ton increase in prices. Are you guys commenting on from what base that is? I mean, obviously the prices we've seen is 670, 680 are you commenting on that set $40 on top of the 680 or is it just a $40 on a price that's closing.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
No we're talking about $40 from where we were with our customers and everybody (ph) is also a bit different, typically we had only one of our competitors ever when we saw taking (inaudible) at the base levels and we haven't done that historically.
So I would say general markets are where they are and we're just going to push $40 higher than what we had been asking. Maybe we're in a little bit different position from some, but we're running on restricted footprint because all the work is done on the assets. So we may be a little more selected by what we book and what we don't book.
Andreas Bokkenheuser -- UBS -- Analyst
That is very clear. Thank you very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Piyush Sood from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Piyush Sood -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Hey guys, good morning, couple of questions. First, when you look at your asset revitalization plan, the $150
to -- sorry, the $125 million to $150 million EBITDA increase you expect this year? Would you -- do you think it's more back half loaded is it like an exit rate, or is a part of it already included in 1Q?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
It's being much more back-end loaded because as you do projects, the early you get some done, you'll benefit sooner than later, but it's definitely skewed toward the back end of the year as you're doing a lot of the work and certainly we take advantage of one (inaudible) in our order book. So we have outages in 1Q, we're powered up for that reason. So it's just on the cadence of what we get them done and when it flow through, but it shows up more later in the year.
Piyush Sood -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
And another question on asset revitalization. I think the total used to be around $1.5 billion in Capex and maybe, I think $0.5 billion in the OpEx. So, do you think we are still within that ballpark? And is there room for the total to go either up or down?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
We still expect to stay within that. Certainly we're always reevaluating the work to be done, if we get it done more efficiently, absolutely, but we do not at this point expect to go over that number now.
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
But if we could go faster on this, we absolutely would.
Piyush Sood -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
And when you say faster, would that be maybe this year or is that more of a 2020 kind of comment?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Well, we'll be done with the program in 2020. So to the extent we can accelerate anything to get value more quickly over the longer term, we would accelerate projects and we frequently revisit our footprint looking where the opportunities are and again looking where the outages are and so if we could actually move some of these things up, we definitely would do it, but for now, we on the path as described in the material we sent to you.
Piyush Sood -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay, thanks guys. That's helpful.
Operator
And your final question today comes from the line of Karl Blunden from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Karl Blunden -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Hi guys, thanks for taking the time. Just a quick one here. You had mentioned on liquidity it's strong and you don't have very high cash needs relative to your balance. Could you quantify what your minimum cash level is that you're comfortable running with?
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Yeah, we've kind of said while we're playing out the revitalization program, I think 750 (ph) is probably a good area anything above that we're pretty comfortable.
Karl Blunden -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Got it. And then comment earlier on Granite City and the rest of your network, we're focused on to some extent where your customers are in serving them. Could you comment a little bit on what your thoughts are regarding the new capacity announcements that we've seen from steel peers in the country and how you network is positioned relative to where that capacity could come online?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes sure. I think obviously we have a great deal of respect for our competitors and it does look like they are going to be adding capacity over the longer term. What we're focused on here is making sure that we're delivering on our promises. It's not about capacity additions for us, it's about utilizing our assets in the most effective and efficient way possible and that's why we're able to do the revitalization program and how we're getting the extra tons and not by adding excess capacity, but instead capitalizing on what we have.
And as far as the opportunity to lose business, we certainly see that as a challenge, but I think we're up to that challenge given the improvement that we've seen in our mills in Gary and our mills in Great Lakes Works and the improvements that we're making at Mon Valley. Each and every one of our facilities at Granite City are doing much better and that has shown up in our ability to meet or exceed every one of our targets related to asset revitalization.
So as it comes with competitors, we welcome the competition, and we believe that we're up for it and by the way we have been capturing some market share here along the way and a big chunk of that of course is related to imports, but people shouldn't count us out. We're focused, we're disciplined and we're going to focus on the things that we can control.
Karl Blunden -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Thanks very much. Appreciate it.
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
So that's the end of the queue. Dave you have any final comments for us?
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
I do. 2019 will be another strong year of investment and operational improvement on our path to building the stronger and more profitable U.S. Steel. We are focused on creating long-term sustainable value for all of our stakeholders. We have made good progress so far and see many more opportunities ahead of us. Thank you. We'll now get back to work with safety and environment as our core values. Thanks everybody.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Executive TeleConference. You may now disconnect.
Duration: 60 minutes
Call participants:
David Burritt -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Kevin Bradley -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dan Lesnak -- General Manager-Investor Relations
Chris Terry -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Curt Woodworth -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst
Timna Tanners -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch. -- Analyst
Seth Rosenfeld -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Matthew Vittorioso -- Jefferies -- Analyst
David Gagliano -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
David Lipschitz -- Macquarie -- Analyst
Phil Gibbs -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst
Tyler Kenyon -- Cowen -- Analyst
Derek Hernandez -- Seaport global -- Analyst
Andreas Bokkenheuser -- UBS -- Analyst
Piyush Sood -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Karl Blunden -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
