Wisdomtree Investments Inc (WT -0.90%)
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Q4Â 2018 Earnings Conference Call
Feb. 01, 2019, 9:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
See all our earnings call transcripts.
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the WisdomTree Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Jason Weyeneth, Director of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.
Jason Weyeneth -- Director of Investor Relations
(technical difficulty)
It's my pleasure to turn the call over to WisdomTree's, CFO, Amit Muni.
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Jason, and good morning, everyone. Since our operating data is already known, I'll quickly go through the important items for the quarter, discuss our outlook for 2019 and then turn the call over to Jono for some closing remarks before we open it up to Q&A.
So, beginning on slide 3. Despite market headwinds, we demonstrated positive organic growth during the quarter. Our global AUM was $54 billion at the end of the year. However, with net inflows and the market rebound in January, current AUM is over $58 billion, recovering much of the fourth quarter decline.
Like all asset managers had this quarter, we experienced negative market movement of over $5 billion. Continued political and economic uncertainty in Europe, growth concerns in Japan and a broader risk of settlement drove further outflows from HEDJ and DXJ. However, as this chart in the middle reflects, the rest of our franchise exhibited solid and diversified growth. We saw the benefits of our April acquisition of ETF Securities as commodity flows were strongest amid the global equity market sell-off. And we also saw robust demand for our fixed income ETFs where momentum continues to build. And as you can see in the chart on the right, our geographical diversification efforts are paying off with inflows in Europe and Canada, more than offsetting the DXJ and HEDJ driven US outflows.
Digging a little deeper into our US segment flow highlights on slide 4. We continue to see the breadth of -- the benefits of flow breadth and depth from our strategic initiatives around Advisor Solutions, investments in technology and new distribution channels and partnerships. The number of funds with creations on a daily basis remains above historical levels and the percentage of our assets in core funds continues to grow, generating inflows for the 13th straight quarter.
At the fund level, we saw positive demand in our floating rate treasury funds, USFR which generated inflows of $790 million in the quarter, with growth continuing into 2019. USFR has grown from just under $1 million at the start of 2018. The $2 billion today, reflecting client demand due to the rising short-term rates, a flattening yield curve and increased volatility of riskier assets. Despite the substantial equity market sell-off, our domestic equity and emerging market equity funds generated solid inflows with domestic equities recording the strongest flow quarter in two years led by our large cap strategies DGRW and DLN. While AUM was pressured due to market volatility, flows into our core funds were positive for the 13th straight quarter totalling $1.2 billion in the fourth quarter. The best result in at least four years.
Now, let's take a closer look at our international segment flows on slide 5. The gold start of (ph) this quarter goes through our international segment was generated inflows, led by our gold products as commodities shifted into favor and the funds we acquired from ETF Securities exhibited market leadership. Gold inflows totalled $667 million across the complex, representing 27% market share of Europe listed gold flows compared to our AUM market share of 25%.
We also had positive flows into our oil ETPs as the price of oil fell. Our UCITS had inflows of $223 million, also driven by demand for our broad based commodity ETFs. Our Canadian listed products generated inflows of $85 million, driven by the launch of our Core Plus Bond fund and flows into our quality dividend growth ETF. For the year, we generated over $300 million of Canada listed ETF flows.
Now let's turn to the financial results on slide 6. Revenues were just under $68 million for the quarter, reflecting lower average AUM due to the significant pressure on global asset prices as all asset managers experienced. On a GAAP basis, we had a net loss of $12 million, which included several non-operating charges. First, the increase in the price of gold led to an after-tax non-cash charge of $5.4 million for our future gold commitment payments.
Second, we wrote off the carrying value of the option we have to purchase the rest of AdvisorEngine, as we left the option expire. In the context of the challenging market backdrop at the end of the year, we didn't feel, it was prudent to exercise the option at this time, but we remain their largest shareholder. We have a great relationship with AdvisorEngine and are excited about our growth prospects with them. We also wrote down the carrying value of our intangible asset in GCC and ownership in Thesys Technologies. We also incurred $1.5 million of severance and other charges as part of our previously announced cost reduction initiatives.
And finally, we incurred 800,000 of acquisition related costs. Adjusting for these items, we earned $10 million or $0.06 a share in the quarter. The adjusted tax rate in the quarter was 23%. As we look forward, we still expect a blended tax rate of roughly 26% to 27%. The lower rate in the fourth quarter, reflected the benefit of tax windfalls from the exercise of low priced stock options. Please see the appendix of this presentation where we disclose additional information on the tax effect of stock-based compensation on our projected tax expense in the first quarter.
Turning to the US segment on the next slide. Gross margins were 80.2% down sequentially reflecting lower average US listed AUM in the quarter. Negative mix shift, recent product launches and some seasonal charges associated with the annual rebalances of our ETFs. Adjusted operating margins for the US segment were 23.7%, reflecting the lower revenue and gross margin. Total US segment expenses excluding acquisition and severance-related costs increased 4% sequentially to $34.9 million, primarily by higher marketing and sales expenses which typically pick up in the fourth quarter. The compensation ratio for the full year was 27.4%. The low end of the 27% to 29% guidance range, after adjusting for the severance costs.
Turning to slide 8, let's take a look at the financial results of our international segment. Gross margins were 69.1%, down sequentially reflecting the higher cost due to timing of certain expenses. Adjusted operating margins for this segment were 18% reflecting the decline in gross margins and modest growth in discretionary spending. Total international segment expenses excluding acquisition related costs increased 7% sequentially to $18.1 million as we can increase (ph) scale benefits of the ETF Securities transaction and invest for accelerated growth in the region.
Now, let's turn to our 2019 expense outlook on slide 9. We are updating some of the guidance metrics. First, beginning with compensation. Previously, we guided this line item as a percent of revenue, however, as we have experienced volatility in our flows and revenues can lead to this line item being very difficult to model. To allow you to better model this expense going forward, we are disclosing a dollar range that reflects the minimum levels of compensation to run our business and a high end if we meet certain internal targets.
We expect compensation expense in the US to range between $53 million and $63 million and $17 million to $19 million for our non-US business. There could be upside to this high end of this range, if our results exceed our internal targets. We will give you updated guidance if we believe we are trending toward that. Based on our current AUM and asset mix, we expect gross margins for our US business to be between 80% and 81% and 70% to 72% for our non-US business. Both of these are near-term guidance numbers and will update these if we experience a change.
You have heard us talk about the benefits of entering into preferred or exclusive relationships with third-party platforms. As we continue to build out these relationships, we expect that line item to be approximately 3.5% of revenues in the US. Given the market backdrop, we are holding all of our other expenses flat to annualize second half numbers, which already take into account our previously announced cost reduction initiatives. Our priority and focus is to make the right investments to grow our business to maximize value to our shareholders, while at the same time managing our cost base.
As our business scales, we will see upside in our margins, with operating leverage across compensation, fund costs and discretionary items. We have proven before, we can achieve among the highest margins, so we can achieve those again. It's all about scaling our AUM.
Now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Jono.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
Thank you, Amit, and good morning, everyone. While 2018 was a frustrating year due to continued negative sentiment around the Japan and Europe themes as well as the broad sell-off in global markets, we remain laser-focused on what we can control, our strategy and our execution. As you know, a key priority over the past several years has been to improve diversification of our assets under management and position WisdomTree to generate organic growth in a broader range of macroenvironments. I am pleased with the progress that we made in 2018.
As a tangible proof point in the fourth quarter, we are likely one of only a few public asset managers to generate positive organic growth, despite continued outflows from DXJ and HEDJ. This morning, I want to highlight three areas, our increased presence in commodities in Europe, our growing domestic fixed income business, and the fundamental changes we have made toward distribution.
First on commodities in Europe. Our acquisition of ETF Securities, Europe's leading commodity ETP platform in April was transformational. In addition to being immediately and significantly accretive to earnings, it was very strategic to us, because the acquisition helped us to increase our presence in Europe, diversify our global product suite, and reduce the volatility of our assets under management. The fourth quarter achieved all of those desired and expected benefits. During the fourth quarter, our $16 billion commodity franchise provided important growth, generating nearly $1 billion of inflows. Impressively, WisdomTree took in more than $0.50 of every $1 that went into Europe-listed commodity ETPs, an example of strong execution. And this momentum into commodities continued in January -- in January, where we captured inflows of $380 million.
Second, I want to comment on domestic fixed income. We began developing our domestic fixed income suite in 2013, with a focus on funds position to benefit from rising rates. As sentiment began to align, we executed well. Our domestic fixed income suite grew during the last 13 months from nearly 5 (ph), I'm sorry -- our domestic fixed income suite grew during the last 13 months by nearly 500% from under $500 million to at the start of 2018 to just under $3 billion today. In particular, over the same 13 months, our floating rate treasury ETF, USFR grew from just $1 million in assets to over $2 billion and the fund has established itself as the asset and liquidity leader. This demonstrates that we can compete and win against larger firms in the very competitive category of domestic fixed income. We view success in domestic fixed income as strategically important in attaining our market share goals.
With credit quality increasingly front and center on investor minds, we believe, our first-to-market suites are fundamentally weighted and strategic core bond ETFs are well positioned to complement the growth of our rising rate products. And finally, on distribution, we've made several changes to best position us to thrive and drive faster organic growth going forward. While we are still early in the execution, we did achieve over $3 billion in net flows from these strategic initiatives in 2018. We struck a number of new strategic partnerships, which started in the fourth quarter of 2017 with TD Ameritrade and continued through 2018 with Cetera, Ally, E*Trade, Oranj and Interactive Brokers.
We believe we have done more strategic deals than any other ETF manager last year, and the pipeline looks strong for 2019. It is significantly easier for advisors and clients to do business with us now than at any point in WisdomTrees' history. Also, a significant component of executing our distribution goals revolve around data intelligence. As you know, we partnered with IBM Watson, which has led to meaningful changes in how we operate the sales organization. This has already led to efficiencies, across distribution and marketing while enhancing our effectiveness overall.
And finally, we launched our Advisor Solutions program in late 2017, with the objective of building better and deeper client relationships, which act as a catalyst to drive more consistent and more diversified flow. In the past 12 months, this program has been -- I'm sorry, in the past 12 months that this program has been in the market, the feedback has been exceptional.
We have already seen meaningful increases in advisor wallet share at those firms, that have adopted our solutions program. This may be the most significant green shoot or initiative we have undertaken at WisdomTree, the one, whose potential is greatest to drive consistent accelerated organic growth in the future.
As you can see on slide 11, net flows and organic growth, excluding DXJ and HEDJ have been strong and accelerating. In the fourth quarter, ex (ph) the two funds, we generated 17% annualized organic growth across the global platform, driven by a combination of domestic fixed income, domestic equities and commodities. While it's only been one month, trends in Q1 are impressive and we're hopefully setting up for the type of growth we know is possible from our platform, given their current AUM levels, simple math would suggest DXJ and HEDJ outflows should slow in 2019, and we expect strong growth from the remainder of the platform.
We know we have the right strategy and are positioned on the right side of the secular trends and are beginning to see the impact of the significant investments we made over the past few years. It's been a challenging few years, but I believe we've crossed an important inflection point with the business and are poised for the next wave of growth.
Thank you for your interest in WisdomTree, and we'll now open it up to questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. (Operator Instructions) And our first question comes from the line of Dan Fannon with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Daniel Fannon -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Hi. Thanks. Good morning. I guess, first Jono the comments around, I think it was $3 billion from the new distribution agreements that you've signed and a healthy backlog, I think for new partners, so could you talk about where you are in kind of the evolution of some of the newer ones, meaning, it was their initial step up and then they kind of naturally mature or should we see even the ones that you already have, like, I guess, where do you think you are in terms of the penetration of those relationships. And then also, a little more color, I want you to talk about the backlog of additional partners.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
I'm going to -- thank you for your question. Kurt MacAlpine, our Global Head of Distribution, why don't you take the first crack at the answer, please?
Kurt MacAlpine -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Distribution
Sure. So, hey, Dan, when we think about the timing around the impact of our distribution partnerships, there's really two factors that matter. So the first one is, are the firms that we're partnering with using ETFs today? And then, do the advisors not in the platform? Are they aware and believe in our modern alpha approach to investing? So, if you think about partnerships, when we sign them with RA (ph) custodians and RA firms like a TD Ameritrade for example, we typically see immediate impact. These firms are familiar with ETFs and they have advisors that are actively looking for differentiated strategy. So by us, removing the friction of doing business, we tend to see an immediate impact on our flows and that impact has been as persisted, since we've signed some of these deals.
When we are signing partnerships with IBDs, retail platforms, bank brokerages and things like that, the time to execution is longer, as we're playing a much more active role in educating their advisors and clients on the benefits of ETFs over mutual funds, and then also the, on educating them on the WisdomTree story overall. This doesn't mean that the potential of these platforms is any lower. In many instances they might actually be higher over the long term. It's just the time to realize the impact is longer, given that education process and role that we need to play.
In terms of the pipeline -- I guess, if you're just asking about, what does the pipeline look going forward? I think one of our advantages here is that we were very early, from an industry perspective and getting out in the marketplace and having in shaping these conversations, and we are in the flow in a lot of different places, whether it's RA space where we've done some deals, IBD space, where we've done some deals, but also in new segments of the market as well.
Daniel Fannon -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay, thank you. And then secondly, on expenses, I understand you're flat with the second-half run rate on the discretionary side. I guess, can you talk about where you are spending for growth and maybe the flexibility assets have kind of rebounded here in January, but if we kind of go the other way, how we should think about your expense structure in a less favorable environment?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure. Dan, it's Amit. So there, obviously a lot of our expenses can move around with AUM. But there are minimum cost levels that we have, just operating the business and that's why we've given some of the updated guidance. I think we are -- we always look for ways to bring more efficiencies into the business. We define ways, currently to recycle some of those efficiencies, so that we can continue to make investments. But we've proven in the past that, look if we do see some prolonged downturn, we can take down some of our discretionary expense spending around marketing and sales. We do, we will see leverage and downside in compensation, when we do see declines in AUM. So there is flexibility that we have. We've proven in the past that we can -- that we can manage that expense base if we do see declines in the revenues.
Daniel Fannon -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bill Katz with Citigroup. Your line is open.
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you very much for taking the question. Just sort of staying on the guidance for a moment. Could you walk us through, maybe the upside, downside scenario that you talked about, Jono, just in terms of, or Amit, just in terms of the low versus the high end, what are some of the maybe underlying key metrics we should be looking at, when we consider sort of that range?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
For any particular line item bill or just (multiple speakers)
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
I think maybe, just I think the big deltas would be the comp right. So let's talk about maybe the US comp side perhaps.
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, so -- so we've given a range this time, so hopefully make it a little bit easier for everyone to model that. Obviously the, incentive comp is the biggest component of that, and there is various factors that go into that. Our incentive plan is built to 50% of us meeting certain financial and operating metrics, and 50% of it is discretionary. So, I -- we don't disclose what exactly those targets are, but maybe to help you think about it, if you look at Street consensus today, our global inflow target that's out there is about $2.7 billion of AUM. I would say, that would probably get you something in the middle of the range of the guidance that we gave. If you just kind of wanted to have a guidepost to work off those.
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Okay, that's helpful. And just staying on that theme for a moment. You've been retooling the business for a bit of time, and certainly appreciate the volatility of markets as well as the, sort of the parabolic rise and decline in HEDJ and DXJ. But is there a point where the investment spending spigot starts actually turn off a little bit. So you can drive the organic growth, drive the operating leverage little bit better here, because it feels like, it's a story that has been on the cover for a bit of time now and this guidance is, looks like about 20% below the Street. I'm just trying to. So in the sense, where is that inflection from a financial perspective that follows the flow pickup?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So, if -- you followed us for a very long time, you know, we've made a lot of investments over the last several years to help build out, our distribution capabilities, our product set, building out our geographies, our technology, our data capabilities. And we've been taking down that spending or those investments over the last several years, because we're starting to see the benefits from that. Over the last two years or so, you've always seen the expense side of that business. And now we're starting to see the revenue parts of those investments coming in.
And you can see from the guidance that we've given is that, we're holding our expenses, sort of those discretionary spending flat, because we are getting, we are starting to see the benefits from that. So, now we can as we own starts to scale, we can now start to drive, drive up those operating margins.
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
And just one last one. Thanks for taking these. And sorry to repeat the same theme a little bit on the questions. So, if you continue to enhance your distribution, how do you and the product mix, where it is, how do you think about the interplay between growth versus fee rates, and the incremental margin on that?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
So, if we're talking about the pricing of funds, we -- I think we are really one of the strongest in terms of how we price our funds. The key to fees for ETFs is, each fund has to be competitive within its space. And so some of what it is, is just mix. So it's a very volatile risk off environment -- risk off environment, floating rate treasuries was a very strong asset gatherer at 15 basis points, not discounting the exposure were -- priced at the same price as the other competitor in the space. But that's just a -- a mix that we're dealing with.
We do believe that some of the strategies can generate faster growth, things like solutions. But that, it's -- you touched on at the very beginning of your question about the DXJ and HEDJ. It's been, they were parabolic up, they were extraordinary -- really painful on the way down, and it is just very difficult to show net, net growth and margin against that backdrop.
And then, coupled with in 2018, with about $8 billion of negative market move for the year. It just has a very, as you who follow the industry and all of you follow the industry, it's very challenging. What's positive for us is the organic growth rates, are starting to breakthrough DXJ and HEDJ and maybe those will turn positive. But, at a minimum we're hopeful that, we have now gone scale on, enough other things, whether it's fixed income or commodities, or global equities away from currency hedging that we can overcome those from a low perspective.
But I don't think we -- when we launch new funds, newer vintages, the funds have been very price competitive. And if you go dig deep into -- like Amit's first page about where the flows were happening, you were seeing flows both in things like, in emerging markets, in original emerging market funds like DEM, well as newer funds at different price points like ex state-owned enterprises.
We're very, very comfortable with the balance that we have on pricing, and again, we highlighted this last call, fees are very important for sure, but after fee, performance is equally important or more important, at particularly as you're bringing new advisors into ETFs who have historically been selling active mutual funds. It's really resonating, the full solutions program with the modern alpha spin, so we're very happy with the way we're pricing and we think we can grow faster, if market sentiment is constructive. And the only other element, since we're an all-ETF shop, ETFs globally in 2018 were down about 40% from a flow perspective, so it was a challenging backdrop in every way.
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you for taking all the questions this morning.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Robert Lee with KBW. Your line is open.
Robert Lee -- KBW -- Analyst
Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. My question is on flows and maybe looking at them in a different way. I mean, clearly fourth quarter, you guys did well, considering what was going on, in the industry and getting off to a good start this year, but beyond kind of the net flows, can you maybe -- if we were to try to think of the revenue contribution of those flows, would it be similar to kind of the flow impact on AUM? Or is there a meaningful difference? I mean, is that, can you maybe give us some color on how that's been trending?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
So, we have seen flows coming in, a mix, right -- on our gold products, USFR was particularly strong more recently. So, that -- because of that mix change that we're seeing, you see that affecting the gross margin coming down slightly, as well as the cost of just some additional fund launches getting into the cost base as well, just waiting for them to scale. So, you do see that in the average revenue cap for the fact that more flows are coming into some of our lower priced funds.
Robert Lee -- KBW -- Analyst
Okay. And maybe following up on the distribution deals, I mean, obviously a lot going on. It's a very US focus understandably, but can you maybe talk about similar things that you maybe have in the works or you're thinking about as you -- as your European businesses start to scale?
Kurt MacAlpine -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Distribution
Yeah. So, it's Kurt MacAlpine here again. So, I would say that the approach to the distribution deals is definitely global. So, we're thinking about it as, once again, the theme around opportunities to get closer to our clients and reduce the friction of them doing business with us. So, in addition to a big focus, and you've seen and heard a lot about us in the US. We do have distribution deals in place in a number of different markets, albeit smaller in nature at this point.
So, we do have commission-free deals available in Japan. We have strategic deals in Canada. We were just announced this year to be Samsung's ETF model manager in South Korea, which has a distribution component to it. And we have a distribution model arrangement in Italy as well. So, I would say similar to the US, it's a big focus for us, there's more to come, and I think you'll see more from us, both in the US and internationally over the next months and years.
Robert Lee -- KBW -- Analyst
And one last question, I appreciate your patience. This is -- I guess around capital management. Thinking about not exercising the AdvisorEngine option in the fourth quarter, given what was going on, it was understandable, but considering that a while back you kind of reduced the dividend and talked about wanting to maximize capital flexibility for strategic opportunities. And certainly the fourth quarter highlighted, the potential operating leverage, negative operating leverage in the business and the industry. Is that at all shifting how you're thinking about your capital usage going forward? Is even the modest $0.03 dividend the right level? I mean, any change, just given what you went through in the fourth quarter?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I would say, look -- you know we're conservative when we think about how we best deploy our capital. And I'd say, we try to balance it between making sure we have the right amount of capital to focus on growth and strategic opportunities, making sure that we do the right thing to return excess back to our shareholders through dividends and buybacks. And we also have the debt that we took down as part of the ETF Securities transaction. I think, when we -- if we see some more stability in the markets, we will think about how best to redeploy that capital or change the shifting of the balance of what's our priority, but right now we're kind of happy with the current mix that we have in place.
Robert Lee -- KBW -- Analyst
Great. Thanks for taking my questions.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Michael Cyprys with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Michael Cyprys -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Hey, good morning. Just following up on the AdvisorEngine, the expiration of the option there, can you just talk about that a bit more? How much would that have cost you to exercise? How much incremental ownership would that have given you? And then, if you could talk about kind of what's remaining, any sort of options left that you have, and if it was compelling, which I guess is what you guys were suggesting on prior calls, why not just go ahead and exercise it?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure, Michael. So, we're not going to disclose, unfortunately, a lot of what you asked, but I would just say, look -- we have a very good relationship with AdvisorEngine. As I said in my prepared remarks, given the market backdrop, we decided not to exercise the option. The option was to buy all the remaining stakes, that we would own 100% of AdvisorEngine. I would say, look, if we do see an improvement in the business environment, if we do believe that we would have accelerated growth after owning 100% of them. And if we think, it's the best way to maximize value to our shareholders, it's something that we would look at in the future. But we're very happy with the current relationship and our existing shareholder interest in AdvisorEngine.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
This is Jono. Just add to it, we're happy the way we structured this from the beginning, so we've been able --AdvisorEngine, an early stage business had losses, had losses. We've been able to keep those losses off of our income statement while they have been developing up their business, as well as allowing us to integrate them as a part of our solutions program. So it's actually been a very positive structured deal for us which gives us a lot of flexibility. And as Amit said at the beginning, we are their largest shareholders, we have strong shareholder rights, so we'll be able to make the most of this going forward, we believe.
Michael Cyprys -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
And to your point on AdvisorEngine making those investments there and trajectory, can you just give a little bit of color on the trajectory of losses and your updated thoughts around when that would turn from a loss to a profit position, the pacing of those investments? Just any sort of color, any sort of metrics you can share around the AdvisorEngine business?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
The only thing that we've said in the past, and I'll reiterate it, maximum losses would have been, we believe, for their business in 2018.
Michael Cyprys -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. And if I could just throw in, maybe a separate follow-up question, just on the product development side, if you could just share your expectations there for new product launches in 2019, how many new product launches should we be expecting, and where do you see the white space today?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
What we don't want to do is telegraph anything that hasn't been filed. The industry is incredibly competitive. I think you'll continue to see -- first of all, we have to think of product launches on a global basis now, and we're very much trying to coordinate what we're doing globally and if it's possible, to get IP to go all around the world, things like our multifactor are starting to appear around the world. But I think -- and on the other side, we've always tweaked fund closures as well, trying to be as -- squeeze out as much efficiency as possible. But I will say we saw -- we're very excited with what we saw at the end of last year around some of the new product launches. And I think that we're not seeing the shortage of constructive ideas to bring to the market. But I don't think it will be an unusually large or small year, sort of just middle of the road by versus the prior years.
Michael Cyprys -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris Shutler with William Blair. Your line is open.
Christopher Shutler -- William Blair -- Analyst
Hi. Good morning. Jono, as you think about where the industry is going, to what extent do you expect the big banks and brokers to ramp up their own product development efforts around proprietary smart beta funds?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
I think that over the last number of years, you've seen lots of new entrants and people with proprietary distribution launch product, both combination of beta and smart beta. And I think it makes sense, that they have done so. And I think that it will continue. Again, the structure continues to prove itself out. I mean, I would say, the fourth quarter was very constructive for ETFs in general.
When you think the capital gains that mutual funds delivered in the fourth quarter, it's a good reminder to advisors that if they haven't moved their business over to ETFs, it's something that gets harder and harder for them to ignore. We think that it's a great catalyst for future growth. Smart beta, modern alpha performed very well in the fourth quarter and in the year, and I expect WisdomTree's approach to ETFs to really resonate on a going forward basis.
As we're doing more fully transparent to active, I think we get more performance differentiation and more difficult for copies to come out in the market from competitors. So net-net, the industry has evolved really the way that I thought it would evolve. It was always intense, and it continues to be, but there's really no surprises, I don't believe.
Christopher Shutler -- William Blair -- Analyst
Okay. On the fixed income ETFs, which you had a lot of success with last year, what's been the largest channel contributing to those inflows?
Kurt MacAlpine -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Distribution
It's Kurt MacAlpine here again. It's actually been a very nice mix across channels, so it's coming from a combination of the wireless (ph) channel, the IBD channel, the RA channel as well. So it's been pretty consistent across the channels, which is great to see. The other piece which I will mention is given the efforts that we've made around the data intelligence and building out those capabilities, the visibility that we have on who owns our strategies is really at an all-time high. So we have a very good understanding, to your question around, who holds the strategies, not only at the channel level but at the individual firm and advisor level, which is really helpful to our sales efforts but also our client servicing efforts.
Christopher Shutler -- William Blair -- Analyst
Okay. Good to hear. And then lastly, the quarter-over-quarter increase in the sales and biz-dev (ph) expense, if you could talk about that and the higher spending on corporate consulting-related expenses, if you could just explain that. Thank you.
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So, we typically, our sales and marketing expenses sort of slow down in the third quarter. If you go back the last couple of years, you'll see in the summer months we sort of -- just to manage the cost base, we take that expense down. And in the fourth quarter that expense ramps up. So you do see a little bit of seasonality in that. And on the corporate consulting, it was just closing out some open projects that were going on toward the end of the year.
Christopher Shutler -- William Blair -- Analyst
All right. Thanks, Amit.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Michael Carrier with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.
Michael Carrier -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Thanks, and good morning. Maybe first question just on the competitive front, if you look at some of the distribution arrangements that you guys have in place, obviously it's been driving healthy flows. The flipside is the third party distribution fees, those continue to ratchet up. So just when you guys are looking at it and maybe how we should look at it, should it be, like on the revenue side, like a net revenue just as you continue to drive more of the business in those channels? How do you think of some of the net revenues or the economics relative to the past?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So like I've said, this opens up a new distribution channel for us, or it helps us, as Kurt said, reduce some of the friction of selling our ETFs. I mean, you can look at it as a net revenue concept, but it's just another way for us to drive flows.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
Go ahead.
Kurt MacAlpine -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Distribution
Just one other thing I wanted to add, if you think about -- I guess if you're looking at, just the overall cost base, one of the greatest benefits of these partnerships is the access to data that they provide us with. Right. So that data allows us to do two things. One is to identify and begin covering clients that we haven't had a relationship with historically. So, essentially expanding that overall pool of people, and then also better understanding who we have relationships with today and ultimately, hopefully, and I think we've demonstrated in proving our success rate with them.
One of the levers that we're using to do that is a really strong and increased presence around digital selling and digital marketing, which obviously is a very cost-effective lever. So while you may see some shift from a -- on the top line sometimes, depending on the channel and the relationship, you do get a pick-up on the bottom line given how much we're using digital, really tapping into the data that's provided from these platforms.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
And you would hope that these partnerships and platforms allow us to achieve, just ultimately faster growth -- I mean, that's the belief as well.
Michael Carrier -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks. And then Amit, just on the range of the compensation, you mentioned there are certain targets that you guys don't disclose. Just wanted to get some sense, you mentioned the flows in terms of Street expectations, maybe if you don't want to give the exact targets, just what are some of the things that we should be thinking about as the year progresses, whether it's sales, whether it's margin, just things that could, kind of direct that comp higher or lower.
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So, I mean, they're the logical ones that you would think of that help drive our business and that are good for our shareholders. So, we look at things as market share, flows, our revenues, our margins, how our stock has performed versus the other publicly traded asset managers. Those are all the sort of types of metrics that we look at in determining compensation. Again, it's like 50% of that is performance-based and then 50% of it is discretionary, determined by our Board.
Michael Carrier -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks a lot.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Brennan Hawken with UBS. Your line is open.
Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst
Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just a quick one on the pricing for the international hedged, currency hedged products. Have you considered taking a look at where your pricing is versus the substitute products that some of your competitors have launched? And at this point now that the AUM has declined to a point where it's not nearly as impactful, have you thought about maybe adjusting the pricing, so that you could be more competitive and perhaps draw in more flows or inflect the flow trends that we've seen as some of the lower priced competitors have gained share there?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
This is Jono. So, DXJ is still has about 72% market share against the other large players in the space in the currency hedged specific, and HEDJ actually saw its market share go up a few percentage points over the course of 2018. So, as the liquidity leader, the asset leader, sort of the brand leader in those spaces, I'm not feeling a lot of pressure to lower fees in any way. What we need to see is sentiment around -- I mean for us, the big ones would be around, sentiment around Europe and Japan to improve, and we would see -- we would expect to participate in any change in sentiment, to a positive change in sentiment proportionally to our AUM.
Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay. That's fair. And then separately, there's certainly a bit of a struggle as far as scale goes. You guys have referenced improving the margins as your scale builds, but generally speaking, it's been increasingly clear that ETF business is a scale gain. What makes you confident that going it alone versus partnering with a competitor is the right and value maximizing proposition for shareholders?
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
So, first of all, we represent something like -- we're the sixth largest ETF sponsor in the world from a revenue standpoint, which is a real measure of scale. We're in the largest markets around the world. I do believe, though, as I said earlier in my planned comments, it's been a frustrating few years. The outflows in DXJ and HEDJ have masked lots of transitions and improvements to the business model. But when you look from an M&A standpoint, I think that we have something that is very valuable.
You might think that these, in light of the way the asset management industry is trading in general, that this wouldn't necessarily be a good time to consider anything from an M&A standpoint, but we are a fiduciary public Company, we have to do the right thing. But as I sort of ended the presentation, I think if we can achieve the best-in-class organic growth of the publicly traded asset managers, we can get back to being one of the better performing publicly traded asset managers. I think the two will go hand-in-hand, and I think with higher AUM, and we're thrilled with what's taken place in January versus Q4, margins will come back as well.
Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst
Thanks for the color.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Mac Sykes with Gabelli. Your line is open.
Macrae Sykes -- Gabelli -- Analyst
Good morning, Amit. On this US floating rate ETF, can you just parse out some of the flow action this quarter, whether it was share gains from typical money market funds or more related to de-risking from the market, and then how we should think about growth going forward?
Jeremy Schwartz -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Research
Hi, this is Jeremy Schwartz, Global Head of Research. So, I mean, USFR is competing really as a core defensive fixed income division. So we talked about the volatility in equities and USFR, if you just look at its performance across time, it's a very steady position. It competes with a few different bond categories, from the shortest term government bond fund to short-term credit funds, to even bank loans, that people are using to manage duration traditionally just with the credit sales on top of it. And so what you saw with some of these other traditional, more credit-oriented instruments in Q4, people have been trying to manage duration with them but there was big sell-off in, whether it's bank loans or even the more LIBOR type floating rate funds.
And when you think about just the risk-return trade-off today, how much risk you're taking on the traditional bond indexes, where duration keeps extending, and you have the longest duration for the ag in a long time, and then you have no real compensation for that duration. So the spread to go the 10-year bond versus the 240 (ph) you get essentially in Fed funds and in USFR, we're seeing a lot of resonance of just taking less risk, whether interest rate risk or credit risk. And so as a core short-term bond fund, we think it's a really good exposure for the short-term and the long-term.
Macrae Sykes -- Gabelli -- Analyst
And then my last question would be around this IBM Watson relationship. Can you talk -- maybe parse out one example of where it could lead to enhanced productivity? Just wanted to understand a little more about the relationship.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
Sure, absolutely. What IBM Watson has done for us is we, on our own -- I've talked about this a little bit in the past, where we've created one integrated database that captures everything we know about clients. So all of our sales data, all of our marketing data, all of our asset data and all of our flow data. So, essentially, what IBM Watson does for us is they run a predictive algorithm on top of that, including all of the demographic information that they have on these underlying people.
So, just to give you -- I'll give you two quick tangible examples. How our sales team thinks about their territory managements and their client list construction is informed by the insights that are generated by IBM Watson. So, that's kind of one area where people are thinking about structuring and spending their time with clients that have the highest propensity of positioning to do business with us. Another area, as I mentioned a little bit earlier today, one of the great values of these strategic partnerships is the data that comes along with them. So, when we receive that data on these firms and advisors from our strategic partnerships, it goes into our IBM Watson algorithm and gives us a very good sense for who are candidates that are likely to do business with us in the short term, and that allows us to either sell to them or market to them in a much more targeted and segmented way. Are those details helpful enough?
Macrae Sykes -- Gabelli -- Analyst
Yeah. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research. Your line is open.
Keith Housum -- Northcoast Research -- Analyst
Good morning. Yeah. Amit, looking on the international segment a little more, can you provide a little bit more color on the gross margin decline and the timing of the certain expenses? I'm just trying to understand how that works with the guidance for next year of 70% to 72%.
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So we have some higher expenses in the fourth quarter than we had anticipated. To be honest, it's part of the ETF Securities transaction, we trying to get sort of the accrual-based accounting all sort of lined up, so we had some timing differences sort of when the expenses came in. And that was predominantly, what caused the higher expenses in the fourth quarter. We think that's all going to get normalized and that's why you see that sort of ramping back up to that normalized 70%, 72% level going forward.
Keith Housum -- Northcoast Research -- Analyst
Okay. And I'd like to appreciate that, fourth quarter had some good inflows, but I think the total funds are still a little bit less than when you guys agreed to acquire the Company, I think the ETF acquisition. But also, your margins have come down. Is there any chance or any concern that you may have an impairment with that acquisition?
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Don't know what's going to happen in the future, but no, we feel very comfortable where we sit today, that's not going to be an issue.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
And since -- just one small nuance, since the close of the acquisition, actually, assets are up and inflows are positive.
Keith Housum -- Northcoast Research -- Analyst
Okay. Great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back to Jonathan Steinberg, CEO of WisdomTree for closing remarks.
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
I just want to thank you all for your interest in WisdomTree and we'll speak to you again next quarter. Thank you. Have a good day.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.
Duration: 51 minutes
Call participants:
Jason Weyeneth -- Director of Investor Relations
Amit Muni -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jonathan Steinberg -- Chief Executive Officer and President
Daniel Fannon -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Kurt MacAlpine -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Distribution
William Katz -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Robert Lee -- KBW -- Analyst
Michael Cyprys -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Christopher Shutler -- William Blair -- Analyst
Michael Carrier -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst
Macrae Sykes -- Gabelli -- Analyst
Jeremy Schwartz -- Executive Vice President and Global Head of Research
Keith Housum -- Northcoast Research -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
