Image source: The Motley Fool.
TCF Financial Corporation (TCB)
Q1Â 2019 Earnings Conference Call
April 22, 2019, 10:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good morning and welcome to TCF's 2019 First Quarter Earnings Call. My name is Jamie and I'll be your conference operator today. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer period.
(Operator Instructions) Please also note today's conference is being recorded.
At this time, I'd like to introduce Tim Sedabres, Head of Investor Relations to begin the conference call.
Timothy Sedabres -- Head of Investor Relation
Good morning and thanks for joining us today for TCF's First Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. Joining me on today's call will be Craig Dahl, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Brian Maass, Chief Financial Officer; Mike Jones, EVP of Consumer Banking; Bill Henak, EVP of Wholesale Banking and Jim Costa, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Credit Officer.
In just a few moments, Craig, Brian, and Jim will provide an overview of our first quarter results. They will be referencing a slide presentation that is available on the Investor Relations website at ir.tcfbank.com. Following their remarks, we will open up for questions.
During today's presentation, we may make projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company. We caution that such statements are predictions, and that actual events or results may differ materially. Please see the forward-looking statement disclosure in our 2019 first quarter earnings release for more information about risks and uncertainties which may affect us.
The information we will provide today is accurate as of March 31st, 2019 and we undertake no duty to update the information. The subject matter discussed in the following message is addressed in a joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC as part of the registration statement filed by Chemical Financial Corporation.
TCF and Chemical urge you to read it because it contains important information. Information regarding the persons who may, under the rules of the SEC, be considered participants in the solicitation of TCF and Chemical shareholders in connection with the proposed transaction, as set forth in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC.
I would now like to turn the conference call over to TCF Chairman and CEO, Craig Dahl.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Tim. Good morning, and thank you all again for joining us today. Let me start off today by briefly recapping our strong first quarter results and then update you on the current status of our proposed MOE with Chemical, which we jointly announced just under 90 days ago. When we announced the transaction, we highlighted how it accelerates the strategic plans of both companies by multiple years with minimal overlap of customer-facing employees and it brings limited disruption to customers and our business outlook.
Our first quarter results demonstrated that limited disruption as our teams kept their eye on the ball from a business development front and focused on serving our customers as we saw continued growth and success during the quarter.
Our focus has not shifted from improving the efficiency of the organization and driving higher return on capital over time, both of which we delivered in the first quarter and improved from the comparable quarter last year. We expect these themes to be constant throughout 2019 even as we work to finalize the proposed merger with Chemical.
On the other side of the transaction, these metrics are not expected to change in their level of importance as we continue to believe they are strong indicators of enhancements to shareholder value.
Let me begin with a summary first quarter results on Slide 2. EPS for the first quarter came in at $0.42. Now this included a pre-tax merger-related expense of $9.5 million or $0.04 per share. Excluding these charges, diluted EPS was $0.46 per share, which represents an 18% increase from a year ago.
In the first quarter, we continued to grow the balance sheet with checking and savings balances increasing nearly 9% compared to a year ago and continued to grow non-auto finance loans, which increased by $1.1 billion or 6.9% from the prior year.
Loan growth this quarter was supported by the seasonal increase in inventory finance balances which were up $642 million from year-end and increased by $291 million or 8.4% from a year ago. On a year-over-year basis, we also saw growth from the consumer real estate portfolios, which increased by $632 million or 13.4% as well as commercial, which increased by $206 million or 5.6% from a year ago.
This growth resulted in higher net interest income even as margin declined slightly due to our remix of the balance sheet. I would remind you that our emphasis on remixing the balance sheet, including the shift from auto loans to securities and other loans is focused on driving a higher return on capital over time.
We were disciplined on expense management as noninterest expense, excluding merger-related items and operating lease depreciation, declined by $4 million or 2% from this time last year. Result of this was an adjusted efficiency ratio for the quarter of 68.1% lower than last year's first quarter level. On the risk and credit front, we continued to improve the risk profile of the organization by managing the run-off of the auto portfolio, which declined by $278 million in the first quarter and we have now run-off 47% of balances since year-end 2017. Non-performing assets declined compared to a year ago and charge-offs, excluding auto, were 20 basis points for the quarter.
From a return on capital standpoint, we generated an adjusted ROATCE of 13.72% in the first quarter, our seasonally lowest quarter, up nearly a 150 basis points from a year ago. We were able to do this while growing our CET1 ratio, which reduced our risk profile over the course of the past year. As we look forward to the remainder of 2019, our business outlook remains largely positive and unchanged.
Even with the integration planning efforts well under way, the limited disruption from this transaction allows our teams to remain focused on organic growth opportunities throughout the year and their goals have not changed for new business development, and more importantly, on delivering a great customer experience.
In contrast to some of the daily headlines about slowing growth, tariffs, trade outlook or pending recessions, we continue to see a positive environment to grow and expand our business and serve our client base. We are aware of the length of the economic recovery we have enjoyed over this cycle and we are constantly examining our credit exposures and concentrations to review how and where we deploy our capital. Diversification in the portfolio both in terms of product and geography is a key tenet of our approach. This allows us to not have to stretch for growth in any one loan portfolio.
As I think about where the market is today, there does not appear to be a positive catalyst from interest rates or credit on the horizon. As a result, we recognize that bank outperformance going forward will likely need to come from effectively managing expenses.
Not only did we demonstrate our ability to do this in the first quarter, our merger of equals puts us in a great position to optimize the combined expense base of both companies as they become one and drive higher returns moving forward. This gives us a unique position over the coming years as we integrate the two banks and allows us to control what we can control and drive value for shareholders without the explicit benefits from the macro environment.
Let me share an update with you relating to our MOE on Slide 3, which highlights what we've been working on for the past 90 days since the announcement. To begin, not all MOE's are the same, from deal structure, to rationale, to execution, there are many differences to draw from. Our transaction is unique for a few reasons, primarily for attributes that have been in place since the early beginning.
One, we have a go-to-market brand selected and in place from day one, which was jointly agreed to and allows us to avoid market ambiguity.
Two, our leadership team, which we announced the next layer of management a few weeks ago, like many attributes of this transaction, comes from the best of both banks. I have said this in nearly every communication that we will leverage the best of both banks to create a new Company and the management team is no exception.
Three, Detroit will serve as the combined Company's headquarters. We jointly agreed to this early on in the process and I strongly believe we are well positioned to capitalize being the largest bank headquartered in Michigan, and we will also maintain substantial operations and presence in Minneapolis, Chicago and Midland.
Four, our regulators will be the Federal Reserve at a holding company and the OCC at the bank, and we look forward to continuing our strong working relationship with both regulators.
Five, minimal branch and client overlap. This one is key. Most of our cost savings are not coming from closing branches and exiting duplicative commercial teams or loan portfolios. One of the really unique benefits of this deal is that we operate in largely adjacent markets with slightly different business models and product sets, that allows us to be true -- to truly be complementary to each other.
Chemical brings traditional commercial banking with C&I and CRE across their many markets including Detroit, Grand Rapids, Cleveland, Midland and Greater Michigan. TCF brings expertise in lending verticals such as equipment finance, leasing and inventory finance. When we look at the shared loan relationship between the two banks, it is negligible. We are not in the same commercial relationships, inventory finance programs or leasing transactions. We each bring unique products, relationship managers, clients and programs to each other, which we believe we can leverage and build on to accelerate the growth profile of the combined firm.
In the first 90 days, we accomplished a great deal related to integration work. However, we also spent a good deal of time on the road meeting with combined investors in both firms. In these meetings, the top question that came across was why now? Why do this deal now? As I mentioned previously, this transaction accelerates the strategic plans of both banks by two years. Individually, we each had momentum in our stand-alone business prospects and very rarely do transactions benefit from two banks with momentum as often one is clearly on stronger footing compared to the other.
I truly believe the opportunity to combine these two institutions create substantial opportunity, whether it is optimizing the expense base to create efficiencies, increasing the already high revenue generation of the combined firm, even more so as we deploy new products to new markets across the Midwest, or by leveraging technology spend across a broader customer and asset base. When you think of our investments into digital banking over the past few years, we would not have spent any more dollars on development if we had launched the product and services over a customer base that was 30% to 40% larger.
Now, onto highlights from the first 90 days of integration planning, post announcement. One of our most important accomplishments during the quarter was establishing the joint Integration Management Officer IMO. The IMO is made up of approximately 40 work stream leaders from both organizations to oversee the integration process. These leaders that have transitioned to the integration project are engaged each and every week in planning efforts, both in Detroit and Minneapolis. This team is supported by an experienced external advisor we've brought on board to assist with the framework and to support our teams through the process.
As we move through this process, we will leverage the experience that Chemical brings from a full bank M&A standpoint, along with our own experience from adding numerous platforms and portfolios over the years. Combined, I believe we have the right people in place with the right experience necessary to support our integration.
With all of these pieces in place, we have begun to identify the work streams, and we are making key decisions that will shape the combined organization moving forward. As we sit here today, we are right on track where we're expected to be from an integration perspective. In addition, the registration statement and all regulatory applications were filed on a timely basis.
The special meetings of stockholders are expected to be held in June 2019 for both TCF and Chemical. We continue to expect the merger to close late in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Slide 4, provides an illustration of our balanced and experienced leadership team, including a Board that will be made up of eight Directors from each organization and a joint executive management team. I'm very excited about this team, given the depth of expertise and industry experience. As I have been telling everyone for the past three months, our objective in this MOE has been to utilize the best of both companies and that is what this joint team brings.
Overall, I become more optimistic everyday about what this MOE can mean for our investors as well as our customers, communities and employees. We have a unique opportunity to build something special and to differentiate ourselves as a leading Midwest bank by creating scale and making the investments necessary to compete and thrive in the banking industry now and in the future.
I will now turn it over to Brian to provide more detail around our first quarter financial results.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Craig. Starting on Slide 5, we had a really strong quarter from an expense control standpoint that led to a 115 basis point decline in our adjusted efficiency ratio year-over-year. As we mentioned earlier, this excludes $9.5 million of merger-related expenses during the quarter. Our core operating expenses, excluding lease financing equipment depreciation and merger related expenses were $225 million in the first quarter, down $4 million from the first quarter of 2018.
On the revenue side, we generated $358 million of total revenue during the quarter, up slightly year-over-year. While we saw strong net interest income growth, non-interest income declined $5 million from the first quarter of 2018.
Turning to Slide 6, we have continued to consistently see net interest income growth on a year-over-year basis each quarter. This increase has continued despite an ongoing balance sheet remix and the resulting modest pressure on our net interest margin. As we look forward, we expect to continue to grow net interest income on a full year-over-year basis.
Margin for the first quarter came in at 4.56%, down 4 basis points from the fourth quarter and down 3 basis points from a year ago. As we have commented over the course of the last year, we're remixing the balance sheet to drive higher returns on capital and margin is an output of these decisions. Even though margin is down slightly from a year ago, adjusted EPS is higher and adjusted return on capital improved by over 140 basis points even as our common equity Tier 1 capital ratio moved higher from a year ago.
These returns demonstrate our ability to grow earnings and improve return on capital, even as we give up modest spread by remixing the balance sheet toward more capital efficient and lower risk assets. We expect modest margin pressure to continue throughout the year as we run off the auto loan portfolio and redeploy the cash flow into securities and other loans, including select longer duration assets.
Turning to Slide 7, average earning assets increased 3.6% year-over-year. What continues to be important here is the improving mix shift toward more capital efficient assets. Auto has declined to just 8% of the portfolio, down from 14% a year ago. All other loans have increased from 75% to 77% of average earning assets and the securities portfolio now makes up 12%. Meanwhile, we have continued to see revenue growth, even as we remix the balance sheet. In addition, as a result of the mix shift, our risk weighted assets, as a percentage of total assets, has continued to decline and support our capital allocation and return on capital focus.
Turning to Slide 8, we generated $1.1 billion of loan and lease growth or 6.9% year-over-year excluding the auto run-off, with over $600 million of growth from consumer real estate and over $500 million from commercial and our other wholesale businesses.
You will also notice that inventory finance balances increased $642 million from last quarter. The first quarter is always our seasonal peak for inventory finance due to the overlap of Snow and Lawn & Garden products. In addition, the run-off of our auto finance portfolio continued to progress as planned with balances down $278 million during the first quarter. Given the reduced size of the portfolio, we still expect runoff of $800 million to $1 billion in 2019.
Turning to Slide 9, first quarter earning asset yields of 5.5% were up 31 basis points year-over-year as loan and lease yields continue to expand due to the recent rate hikes. Our strategy of competing as experts along with our pricing discipline and increases in short-term rates continued to drive our strong yield performance.
Our security yields are also increasing as new purchases in the first quarter had an average tax equivalent yield of 3.39%, above the blended portfolio yield of 2.88%. In addition, we took advantage of an opportunity to reposition part of our securities book and sell select lower-yielding municipal securities, allowing us to pick up incremental yield without materially changing the duration profile. This remix also improves the liquidity and risk profile of the portfolio. Given the Fed's expectation of holding rates flat in 2019, we will likely see earning asset yields level off moving forward.
Turning to Slide 10, we continue to grow our deposit base, driven by average checking and savings balances which increased 8.9% year-over-year. In addition, despite the current environment, we were able to increase non-interest bearing deposits $174 million or 4.6%. We continue to believe in the strength of our deposit composition with 83% of our deposits being consumer base.
Our cost of total deposits increased 9 basis points from the fourth quarter and have increased by 31 basis points from a year ago. While the average interest cost on CDs has increased faster than our non-CD book over the past year, we have been able to intentionally reduce our CD portfolio by $376 million. As I mentioned earlier, we expect to see deposit costs continue to trend higher in the coming quarters, primarily due to CD renewals at current market rates, but changes in future rate expectations should have some positive impact on promotional pricing.
Looking at Slide 11, the majority of our year-over-year decline was due to a $3.2 million decline in servicing fee income as the auto finance portfolio continues to run-off. This is resulting in a more favorable mix of non-interest income over time. In addition, leasing fees returned to a more normalized level following the seasonal high in the fourth quarter. We typically see seasonally high customer-driven activity in the fourth quarter. We would expect second and third quarter leasing non-interest income to be more in line with what we saw in the second and third quarters of 2018.
With that, I'll turn it over to Jim Costa to cover credit and risk.
James M. Costa -- Chief Risk Officer & Chief Credit Officer
Thank you, Brian. If we turn to Slide 12, you can see that we are continuing to reduce the risk profile of our balance sheet from a credit, operational and liquidity risk standpoint as the portfolio -- the auto portfolio runs off. NPAs declined $22 million year-over-year and were down slightly on a linked-quarter basis as well. 60-day delinquencies, a leading indicator for several of our portfolios were just 12 basis points, remaining at low levels. This gives us continued confidence in the overall credit quality outlook of our portfolio.
Provision for credit losses was $10 million in the first quarter, remaining relatively in line with the first quarter of 2018. Lastly, we are seeing improved liquidity as the balance sheet remix continues to progress, as well as a steady loan to deposit ratio of a 102% as of March 31st. Our cash and debt securities now make up 14% of total assets, up from 11% a year ago.
Let's turn to Slide 13. First quarter net charge-offs, excluding auto, were 20 basis points, up from a full year net charge-offs of 14 basis points in 2018. After an increase in commercial and inventory finance net charge-offs in the fourth quarter, both portfolios saw improvements in the first quarter. Overall, half of our net charge-offs in the first quarter came from the run-off of the auto portfolio with just $9 million coming from non-auto.
We've been talking all year about our reduced risk profile, which positions us well from a credit risk standpoint. Not only do we have an improved mix with the run-off of auto, but we continue to have strong diversification across our portfolio. Our credit risk profile is much better today than it has been in recent years.
With that, I'll turn it back to Craig.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Jim. Slide 14 reiterates our focus on making decisions that enhance our return on capital. As I mentioned earlier, our adjusted ROATCE improved nearly a 150 basis points year-over-year, despite a higher common equity Tier 1 ratio of 10.79%. We have shown an ability to generate higher return on capital with both higher capital levels and a lower risk profile.
As a reminder, we still have $78 million remaining under our current share repurchase authorization. We did not repurchase any shares in the first quarter as the S-4 was not filed until the end of the quarter. We continue to expect to purchase these remaining shares prior to the closing of the merger.
So with that, I will open it up for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
(Operator Instructions) And our first question today comes from Jon Arfstrom from RBC. Please go ahead with your question.
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks, good morning.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Good morning.
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Hey, just revenue and expense question here. Craig, you talked about no change in the revenue generation approach really of either company and you've been in this integration phase -- early integration phase, anything you can point to where you're maybe more confident or more optimistic about revenue synergies from the combined companies?
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, I mean I think I'm more confident on every line. I mean we've now been lots of -- lots of sharing a lot of work stream work from partners from both companies, and there is really a strong origination vent in that company as you know, and we've got really the strong asset classes in a lot of program-driven business that gives us every quarter a lot of confidence. So I would say that, yeah, I'm really confident -- more confident on all the revenue items.
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, good. And then maybe one for you Brian, you guys talked about disciplined expense management and not a lot left on rates and credit. So I think that obviously you've had a good expense quarter and I'm just curious, in terms of your expense performance for this quarter, is this a stand-alone performance would you say, and you can improve from here or is this maybe a bit of a head start in terms of the merger expenses starting to come out?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, you know a good question, Jon. What I would say is, this is really still the stand-alone expenses. Obviously, as we get closer to the merger, we'll be making decisions based upon what's best for the new-co on the other side of the merger. You'll see us breaking out merger-related expenses as they are. And there is a potential that there's some, I'd say in both companies, where there are certain initiatives that we had going on as a stand-alone that we could start to pause some of those initiatives until the close of the transaction. So we're confident that both in the short run as well as in the long run that we're going to be able to improve the efficiency ratio both on a stand-alone basis as well as -- like we announced with the transaction, really getting to a low-50%s efficiency ratio on a combined or consolidated basis.
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, all right. And then just one quick one for Jim, that charge-off number on auto, is that a surprising number to you or is that something that we can expect to potentially go higher as the portfolio runs out? Thanks.
James M. Costa -- Chief Risk Officer & Chief Credit Officer
I wouldn't say it's a surprising number. Jon. When you look at the behavior of these consumer portfolios, it looks like we've got a high spot in the winter time and if you look at the delinquency, 60-day delinquency, you see they've improved quarter-over-quarter. So my expectation is that will be on par, if not better next quarter.
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, all right, thanks a lot guys.
Operator
Your next question comes from Nathan Race from Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead with your question.
Nathan Race -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst
Hey guys, good morning.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Good morning Nathan.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Good morning.
Nathan Race -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst
Brian, just digging into your outlook on the margin going forward, it sounds like you expect some pressure going forward. I was hoping you can kind of just frame-up the magnitude of that pressure that we can expect on a quarterly basis over the next few quarters. It looks like you guys moved up deposit rates on some of your non-maturity deposits -- non-maturity products during the quarter. So, I get them, just curious within that context and also kind of what the differential you're seeing in terms of CDs rolling off versus what you're putting CDs on today?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So couple of questions there Nate, I'll try and address some, but as you know, we did have some additional asset growth between -- in the fourth quarter that led into kind of the first quarter's decline in the margins. So we did add some mortgage loans as well as the addition of the securities portfolio. So we still -- you know we're giving up revenue on that transition and that's part of the headwind. And I think I had talked about that from an auto perspective, it's almost 2 basis points each quarter kind of cumulatively that keep adding up. We had another 3 basis points headwind in the first quarter because we added more consumer loans or more consumer mortgages in the fourth quarter.
From a deposit cost perspective, everything is really progressing as we planned. We did see an uptick in deposit costs, again, we think deposit pricing is -- has been relatively rational but we also -- and that was 9 basis points on deposits, but our total funding cost went up 16 basis points in Q1 and really part of that is driven by, we did actually -- we do have some short-term borrowings that were outstanding in Q1 that I'd say are really at market rates. It was 2.67% in the first quarter and that really is just being used to fund some of the seasonal increase, you know the $650 million increase that we talked about in inventory finance so that had some increase in what I'd say the total funding cost.
I do expect, on a go-forward basis, I'd say I've got more of a positive outlook on deposit pricing. We see indications in some of the markets that we're in that competitors are pulling on kind of promotional pricing and we're -- we expect to be doing the same here. So I do think that deposit costs could actually slow as you go from kind of Q1 to Q2 relative to what you saw from 4Q into first quarter. So overall, you're going to see basis point reductions, you're still going to see an increase in deposit costs. But when you look at the individual components, we feel good about kind of where we're at.
Nathan Race -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst
Just so if I'm hearing you correctly, some of the transitory items within inventory finance and the wholesale funding increase this quarter should kind of abate somewhat before the next couple of quarters and so the margin pressure that we should see should maybe be just one or two basis points over the next couple of quarters. Is that a fair way to think about it?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, I mean without putting a certain number, it depends on what type of assets in the mix shift that we still have going on, on the balance sheet. And I'd say, overall, as you've seen us and we've been saying now for the last four or five quarters, we've not trying to manage or maintain even the NIM at the rate that it is at, adding whether it's mortgages or other assets that are more capital efficient and that are going to be of a lower risk quantity, we're going to have lower credit costs. We're going to have lower expenses. So even though we're giving up on revenue, we might be giving up on the margin, we still expect to be able to drive better return on capital overall. That's really our focus.
That's really our focus.
Nathan Race -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst
Understood, I appreciate all the detail and color. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from David Long from Raymond James. Please go ahead with your question.
David Long -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Good morning everyone.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Good morning.
David Long -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Even before the Chemical announcement of the Merger of Equals, you guys were focused on improving your efficiency and now that you've spent 90 days plus with them talking about -- thinking about the integration. Is there anything, when you're looking at your own individual expense base today that you think maybe there is greater opportunities for us on a stand-alone basis to rationalize some expenses than maybe what you thought, six months ago?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes, what I would say on that, this is Brian, right is, we are looking at how we bring together the companies. I'd say our confidence around the announced $180 million of cost saves, when we bring the companies together we still -- I'd say we've got increasing confidence toward that. From a stand-alone perspective, again I -- I mean, as I think I mentioned in one of the previous answers, you could see some slight change in initiatives or kind of run rate, but really a lot of the expense save is going to be when we bring together the two companies. And again, our confidence level around being able to achieve that is, it actually probably improved since we announced the transaction. As Craig said, we've had a lot of conversations on joint teams and reconfirmed a lot of the high level assumptions that we had and we can see a sight line toward being able to execute against that.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, this is Craig. I want to add you know about -- when we talk about relying on the experience that our partner brings to this, there was really a solid base of realism in the estimates that we put together. They were then vetted. Again, there was a bottoms-up and a top-down approach. Now that we've gotten into it, as Brian said, we have even more confidence that we have the right numbers.
David Long -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Got it, thanks. And then just a quick follow-up, the $78 million you have authorized to do repurchases with, can you maybe give us a little bit of color on what timeframe that can happen. I know there are some restrictions with the -- with the MOE out there?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, this is Brian. There are kind of windows where we'll be allowed to purchase and there's windows where we're not. So you know there is a shareholder vote that as I -- we said in the kind of prepared remarks that's coming up in June. There will be windows after that where we're going to be able to purchase our stock. So our intention is still to be able to purchase that $78 million between now and the close of the transaction.
David Long -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Okay, got it. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from Chris McGratty from KBW. Please go ahead with your question.
Chris McGratty -- KBW -- Analyst
Hi, good morning, Brian maybe a question for you on the securities build, how should we be thinking about just the pace? I think you said $800 million to $1 billion of auto, I think that was for the full year of run-off. How should we be thinking about kind of cumulative growth in the bond book from here?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So, if you look at 2018, I think we actually grew the securities portfolio, not at the same pace that we had auto run-off. So it could be, I'd say at most it would be equal to the auto run off for the year. But as we said, a lot of that cash can get redeployed into the securities portfolio at least initially. If there is a better use of that cash, as it relates to having higher returns on capital for the organization or funding other incremental loan growth, we can also use the run-off from the auto portfolio to fund that. So we really have a lot of optionality around it, but we would feel comfortable still continuing to build the securities portfolio throughout 2019 as well.
Chris McGratty -- KBW -- Analyst
Okay, great. And on the optionality with the auto, I think at the time of the announcement you said we're going to wait to evaluate whether we accelerate it. Any updated thoughts on whether you could more quickly exit the auto book and redeploy capital elsewhere?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
No -- I'd say, no new updates as it relates to that topic. It's obviously something that we'll continue to monitor markets and kind of availability for that. With the upcoming transaction, we're going to have more -- as Craig alluded to, we're going to have more avenues for revenue growth in place -- potentially more places to redeploy that cash. So it's something that we'll continue to monitor markets on overtime and see if it makes sense to accelerate that; but no, no current plans or initiatives in place for that.
Chris McGratty -- KBW -- Analyst
Okay, maybe just one modeling question before I step out. Tax rate going forward, is this a good rate? And also the merger charges, any color on what was in the merger charges this quarter like what line items and what sources of the Company. Thanks.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So tax rate, we still think is in the 23% to 25%. It was slightly lower in Q1 always, related to some equity-based comp. As it relates to the merger expenses in Q1 there's -- some of it's related to a banker fees that you pay at the beginning, as well as I'd say just legal as well as some advisor integration-related expenses and we'll see some of that continue in the next quarters even leading up to a close.
Chris McGratty -- KBW -- Analyst
That's great and thanks.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah.
Operator
Our next question comes from Jared Shaw from Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead with your question.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Hi, good morning.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Good morning
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Good morning.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Just following up on the deposit costs, how much do you expect to see transition out of time or rollover in time and where is that new rate coming on now?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, I'd say, this is Brian. In our CD costs, probably our highest promotional rate right now might be 2.6%. So that's where some of the stock will be rolling over to from a rate perspective. I'd say the balances overall have been declining in our CDs, so it's had less of a contribution to the overall deposit costs. You could see those stay flat or maybe even increase a little bit -- a little bit from here.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Okay and then on the inventory finance, looking year-over-year, the growth rate was slower than we've seen for a while there. Anything unique in this quarter or do you expect to see that sort of year-over-year growth rate return back to more double-digit as we go through the rest of the year?
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, I think it was -- this is Craig 8.4%. I don't see this -- I see this fairly consistent. The thing that's hard to predict is the sell-through of any existing or sort of carryover product I think with the abundance of snow in the quarter, there was a more of a sell-through on the sale -- on the snow product that means your ending balance is slightly lower. So I would say nothing that's systemically different.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
And then just finally for me, as you continue this transition into reducing the risk on the balance sheet and being more efficient on the capital side, where do you ultimately think the capital ratios should be for the Company as we deal with this new balance sheet -- the TCE ratio continues to grow, all capital ratios really continue to grow. Once we're done with this buyback, where should we be wanting to run from a -- from a capital point of view?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, this is Brian. I mean, what I would say is, we do acknowledge that we have excess capital as an organization and it is growing and part of that is we're limited in being able to -- with the transaction as far as the windows of being able to purchase stock. So that's why we don't have the $78 million done to date. A better indication of kind of where our capital ratios will be is what you saw us announce with the proposed merger transaction back in January, and I think there we had said, our common equity Tier 1 might be closer to 10% give or take some amount and total capital maybe closer to 12% is what we had said related to the transaction, when we come together. So, those are probably at least some -- gives you some ideas as to where the new company might be from a capital perspective, which is probably going to become more relevant. There is going to be limited amount of how we can adjust our capital between now and the close.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
But after the close, you think that's ultimately where it is at close or that's where you'd like to see -- that you think that's the optimal mix of capital for the balance sheet for both?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So that's where we expect to be roughly speaking at the close. Obviously on the other side of the close, when we get to the point that we have kind of fully implemented our cost saves, we expect to be generating a lot of capital in the high teens perspective, which is going to leave us a lot of optionality around changing dividend rates or depending upon where our share price is, doing more share repurchases with that amount of capital generation. Obviously, our first need of capital will go toward serving the organic growth needs of the Company as well as evaluating other opportunities.
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Okay, thanks very much.
Operator
Our next question comes from line of Lana Chan from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead with your question.
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Hi, good morning. Two questions, one on the core expenses I think excluding the operating appreciation, it was up about 2% year-over-year. Is that sort of a good run rate going forward or trying to keep it in the low single-digit growth rate?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
I guess, Lana, what I would say is our -- this is Brian, on our expenses on a year-over-year basis, excluding the merger related expenses, it was actually down 2% on a year-over-year basis, not up 2%.
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
I was just leading to operating lease depreciation too.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Oh, the operating lease depreciation? Yeah, I mean the operating lease depreciation is really related to transaction activity and to leasing revenue and that's related to the amount of operating leases that we have on the balance sheet. We continue to see that part of the business continue to grow. So you could see that part grow, but if that part grows, we will see leasing revenue as somewhat of an offset for that.
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
I guess, then let me just ask it another way, do you expect overall core expenses, excluding merger charges, to be relatively flat to slightly down?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, I mean what we're looking at is, we're being able -- we want to look at it, still being able to improve the efficiency ratio of the Company over the course of 2019 and I think you can see some of the expenses come down as we -- in the coming quarters.
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, thank you. And second question is about the loan loss provision, how should we think about that? Should we think about that going forward just roughly covering ex auto charge-offs?
James M. Costa -- Chief Risk Officer & Chief Credit Officer
I think it's been performing in line with our expectations, Lana. This is Jim. And as you could see, the portfolio is running off on auto roughly at $300 million thereabouts, $275 million a quarter. And the provisions are coming down accordingly on auto. So what I would say is -- or the allowance. So I would say consistent with recent experiences, what you should expect going forward, there is nothing that's evolved in the portfolio that has surprised us and therefore our forward expectations would be consistent with recent history. If there is some seasonality, I'd ask you to keep an eye on that, year-over-year comps are certainly important, but really no change in the projected outlook.
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, great. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from Ken Zerbe from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Hey, thanks, good morning.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
First question, just on Slide 11, the servicing fee income was down I guess $3 million year-over-year, should we expect that the entire servicing fee line, so not entirely sure how much is left over, but I assume probably sub-$10 million, but does that whole line go away as the auto loans go away or is there some of a mismatch there?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
No, this is Brian. So that line will continue to go down as it relates to auto servicing fee income. But we also do have servicing fee income on our consumer real estate portfolio, so it won't go down to zero.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Got you. Okay, even though -- so the $3.2 million is including both the auto and the resi portfolio.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
That's correct.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
They were combined down to that much. Alright that makes...
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
They're combined into that line, correct. The $3 million decline probably relates to auto from a year-over-year perspective. But what you see remaining on that line would be both auto as well as consumer real estate.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Got you. Okay, that's fair. And sorry, just going back to the expense piece, I just want to be really clear, I think you'd mentioned this to Lana's question that some of the expenses could actually come down, but it didn't sound like you meant all the expenses would come down. So I mean is it -- was there anything unusual in terms of -- or any unusual items that aired on the low side this quarter that might tick up next quarter?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, I mean there are certain things like even you saw -- there are, as it relates to some of the -- I think it's occupancy and equipment, you know that has some of our hardware and software costs and some of the investments that we've made into technology, so some of those lines continue to go up. But again, I look at -- in general, you're going to see a lot of expense control management between now and until the close of the transaction.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Got it, OK. So we should probably focus more on the efficiency ratio rather than the dollar numbers?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Correct. And it may not -- as you know, we've got just seasonality in our business overall, right. So we've got $650 million more of assets in Q1, those assets, some of that will come down as we get in the quarters two and three. So you can't necessarily look at everything on a quarter-to-quarter basis, but when you look at it on a year-over-year basis, we think we're going to be able to continue to improve or efficiency ratio for the full year of 2019. And then when we get into the other side of the transaction, we are going to significantly be able to improve our efficiency ratio as well.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Got you. And just a real quick question, since you brought up seasonality, it would -- how much is compensation seasonally higher in first quarter versus, say second?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
I don't know the exact dollar amount that contributes into there. There is obviously certain compensation things that appear in Q1 that you don't have in later quarters including extra FICA taxes and things like that, but I don't have a specific dollar amount to give you on that, but I can follow up.
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. Yeah, I think it was the FICA taxes I was thinking about specifically. All right, thank you very much.
Operator
Our next question comes from Brock Vandervliet from UBS. Please go ahead with your questions.
Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst
Thanks, good morning. Just following up on that servicing question, so what's the current breakdown between auto and consumer real estate?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
I don't know the split between that for the -- for the end of Q1. We can follow up on that.
Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay. Yeah, I was just trying to get a sense of you know if it's mostly auto, it's mostly going to go away, that's the -- that's the concern.
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Just on that point though, there will be a revenue decline associated with that servicing fee income going away, but there will be expense decline that goes away as well as we're servicing those loans. And just as a reminder, even though we've given up revenue, with the runoff of auto and if you look at our interest income; interest income from auto is actually down $15 million in Q1 of this year versus Q1 of last year. But overall, our consolidated interest income is up $27 million to $28 million.
So, even though we will have some of these revenue headwinds, even as it relates to servicing from the auto book, we've done a really good job of adjusting the expense base, improving the risk profile of the organization and even with those revenue headwinds on a year-over-year basis from last year, we've increased our EPS 18% on a core basis from first quarter of last year to first quarter this year. So we still feel confident we can manage, even with that little bit of servicing revenue that's going to run away from us.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, this is Craig. The only thing I would add to that is really the servicing revenue approximate our costs around it, so I think Brian is spot on from the standpoint, as that servicing revenue declines, the expense will go away with it.
Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay, little bottom line impact. And just stepping back on total loan growth, as you look at auto expected to fade out $800 million to $1 billion this year, would it -- any sense of what you're just total average loan growth could run for the year?
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, this is Brian. I'd say, similar to the guidance we gave at the beginning of year and what we experienced last year, excluding auto, we really see mid-single digits. Right now, even just Q1 versus Q1 of last year, we're up 7%. So mid-single digits, somewhere in that neighborhood is what we think we can achieve. In the rest of our businesses, we're seeing good growth. As Craig said inventory finance is up 8.4% year-over-year, commercial is up 5.6%; so from that regard, we feel good about the loan growth.
Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst
Okay, thank you.
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from David Chiaverini from Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead with your question.
David Chiaverini -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst
Hi, thanks, couple of questions. Starting with inventory finance, so, a year ago you put in place a few new programs in inventory finance, are the new partners performing as expected? And the reason I ask is because I noticed a modest uptick in net charge-offs and delinquencies there?
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, this is Craig. Yeah, everything is basically performing as we would have expected it to. The new programs have been performing as we would expect and so some of that charge-off and delinquencies changes are simply the normal year-end kind of activity that we -- that we would encounter, so.
David Chiaverini -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst
Okay, great. And then, shifting gears, you've mentioned about how Chemical and TCF have complementary lending products. I was curious, when do you expect the training to occur for the lenders on both sides to learn about the new products and to ask another way, when can we expect a possible uptick in loan growth from the merger, would it be a year after closing or as soon as a couple of quarters after closing?
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
As far as the training goes, one of the items is, it's not really loan growth immediately after the merger, it's not going to be depending on how well trained the bankers are because we're going to want the bankers and the sales teams performing the things that they're already doing and that sort of training, product training will be phased in over time, but it won't be necessary for them in order to do their day one job.
As far as trying to predict exactly when loan growth, one of the things that we've talked about is how little customer and sales team disruption there is. So my -- our objective is going to be to hit the ground running from the merger point and it's to have loan growth, literally immediately upon the consolidation of the company, because we're not going to be taking sales teams away from their customers, we're not going to be changing banker's territories. Those kind of things are not going to be happening in our deal.
David Chiaverini -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst
Great, thanks very much.
Operator
Thank you for your questions today. Should any investors have further questions, Tim Sedabres, Director of Investor Relations will be available for the remainder of the day at the phone number listed on the earnings release.
I'd now like to turn the conference call back over to Mr. Craig Dahl for any closing remarks.
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
I just wanted to say thank you for -- to everyone for listening this morning. As I think about the Merger of Equals, I want to reiterate why we believe this partnership makes such good sense. First, it provides enhanced scale and capabilities. The combined organization will be strategically positioned to capitalize on market opportunities and better serve our customers. Together we'll have the scale to invest, compete and outperform.
Second, it accelerates the strategic evolution of both banks. Complementary operations from each bank will broaden the opportunities to capture greater market share.
Third, it provides a more balanced loan and deposit mix, which brings upside growth potentials with lower relative concentrations while many -- while maintaining the strong and aligned credit cultures of both banks.
Finally, it provides complementary values and community focus. We both share a legacy of developing deep community ties along with core values around customer service, accountability and adaptability to market changes. This partnership will only strengthen this commitment going forward.
I'm pleased with the progress we have made to-date and have the utmost confidence in our Integration Leadership team to ensure we deliver on our commitments. We appreciate your interest and investment in TCF. Thank you.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, with that, we'll conclude today's conference call. We do thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Duration: 57 minutes
Call participants:
Timothy Sedabres -- Head of Investor Relation
Craig R. Dahl -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Brian W. Maass -- Chief Financial Officer
James M. Costa -- Chief Risk Officer & Chief Credit Officer
Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst
Nathan Race -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst
David Long -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Chris McGratty -- KBW -- Analyst
Jared Shaw -- Wells Fargo Securities -- Analyst
Lana Chan -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst
David Chiaverini -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
