Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Genesis Energy Lp (GEL) Q2 2019 Earnings Call Transcript

By Motley Fool Transcribers – Aug 6, 2019 at 11:23AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

GEL earnings call for the period ending June 30, 2019.

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Genesis Energy Lp (GEL -7.56%)
Q2 2019 Earnings Call
Aug 6, 2019, 9:30 a.m. ET


  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:


Welcome to the 2019 Second Quarter Conference call for Genesis Energy.

Genesis has four business segments. The offshore pipeline transportation segment is engaged in providing the critical infrastructure to move oil produced from the long-lived world-class reservoirs from the deepwater Gulf of Mexico to onshore refining centers.

The sodium minerals and sulfur services segment includes trona and trona-based exploring, mining, processing, producing, marketing and selling activities as well as the processing of sour gas streams to remove sulfur at refining operations.

The onshore facilities and transportation segment is engaged in the transportation, handling, blending storage and supply of energy products including crude oil and refined products.

The marine transportation segment is engaged in the maritime transportation of primarily refined petroleum products.

Genesis operations are primarily located in Wyoming, the Gulf Coast states and the Gulf of Mexico.

During this conference call, management may be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The law provides safe harbor protection to encourage companies to provide forward-looking information. Genesis intends to avail itself of those safe harbor provisions and direct you to its most recently filed and future filings with the Securities Exchange Commission.

We also encourage you to visit our website at where a copy of the press release we issued today is located. The press release also presents a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures.

At this time, I would like to introduce Grant Sims, CEO of Genesis Energy, L.P. Mr. Sims will be joined by Bob Deere, Chief Financial Officer and Ryan Sims, Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development.

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, and welcome to all. As mentioned in this morning's release, we're pleased to announce total segment margin of $184.1 million and a calculated bank leverage ratio of 4.96 times for the second quarter. Leverage is down from 5.63 times just one year ago. In fact, this is the first time in close to three years where Genesis has achieved a leverage ratio below 5.

Despite several unexpected challenges over the previous 12 months, our diverse and market-leading businesses continue to perform, allowing us to naturally delever our balance sheet, a process we believe continues in the coming years.

By achieving a bank leverage ratio below 5, we will now benefit from a 25 basis point reduction in the pricing grid associated with the outstanding amounts under our senior secured credit facility. This, when combined with the Federal Reserve's recent 25 bps reduction of the Fed Funds rate and potential further easing will translate into meaningful reductions in our borrowing cost on our floating rate debt, which stood at $967 million at quarter end.

In fact, this outstanding debt is down some $340 million from the year ago quarter. We received approximately $290 million for the sale of our Wyoming assets. So over the last 12 months, we've managed to reduce total borrowings under our revolver by an additional $50 million.

During the quarter, our offshore pipeline transportation segment saw consistent volumes across our asset footprint and continues to benefit from increase in activity in the deepwater, including both infill drilling, a new stand-alone development opportunity.

The quarter was highlighted by first oil flow in late June from the logged operated Buckskin development. Buckskin is a subsea tie-back to the existing Lucius production platform and is 100% dedicated for the life of its lease to our SEKCO system, our longest lateral in the Gulf of Mexico, and to our Poseidon system for ultimate transportation to shore.

The development has an anticipated peak production rate of 30 kbd and we expect to see a meaningful financial impact as production ramps throughout the second half of 2019. Importantly, the Buckskin development required zero capital expenditures from us and highlights a significant operating leverage of our offshore footprint. It is also representative of the types of developments and opportunities we are seeing across our market leading asset footprint in the central Gulf of Mexico.

In early July, we experienced temporary throughput disruptions on our offshore systems as the producing community shut in production associated with Hurricane Barry. We experienced no permanent damage to our assets, but do expect some negative financial impact to our third quarter results.

Barry was an anomalous storm in terms of our operations in the Gulf. Rather than a typical storm, which approaches from the south and disrupts normally only half or so of our throughput, Barry actually formed in Alabama, moved south and then west before turning north, temporarily shutting down almost all production in the central Gulf of Mexico.

Given this passive speed most production would have been expected to be offline for three to four days. However, residual non-Barry related weather delayed the safe remaining of production and transportation facilities by one day.

Once our another folks were to redeploy to offshore locations, a third-party provider of the largest communication systems in the Gulf experienced issues restoring service. As a result, look, we would have expected to be a three or four day -- three to four day event turn into an eight to nine day event, affecting some 90% of the throughput on our offshore system. While we hope we do not experience any additional downtime in the third quarter, any additional disruptions could further negatively affect the third quarter's results.

We remain on track to exit 2019 with an incremental 40 kbd to 50 kbd of long-term dedicated volume across our footprint, relative to the fourth quarter of 2018. Our team continues to work diligently to finalize agreements to add a significant incremental volumes we have previously disclosed. The fundamentals and activity levels in the Gulf of Mexico remain very strong and we continue to be excited about our ability to add incremental dedicated volumes to our market-leading position with little to no capital required.

During the quarter, our onshore facilities and transportation segment performed as expected. Rail volumes delivered from Canada to our Baton Rouge complex resumed in April with increased volumes in May, June and July that exceeded the minimum take or pay volumes, which allowed our main customer to utilize all of the prepaid credits they accrued in the first quarter.

However, we expect August and September volumes to ramp down as the current near-term differential does not support movements, but in the aggregate, we should see similar volumes in the third quarter as we experienced in the second quarter. We continue to monitor the easing of production curtailments by the government of Alberta and if they continue to reduce the self-imposed production curtailments through the remainder of 2019, we believe market condition should exist to return to fourth quarter 2018 volumes by the end of 2019 and into 2020 at our Baton Rouge complex.

Turning to our sodium minerals and sulfur services segment. During the quarter, we experienced lower production volumes due to a longer-than-anticipated planned move of our longwall mining machine. During the move, we proactively completed several additional debottlenecking projects and maintenance-related items. The longwall move, along with the additional work we performed, has successfully been completed and we expect to run at our near slightly expanded full capacity for the foreseeable future.

We remain on track for our full year estimate in our soda ash business for 2019 as we continue to expect higher volumes, along with stronger export pricing in the second half of the year. Our view of the international market supply and demand balance for the remainder of the year remains unchanged. And we believe prices are likely to strengthen in the coming years.

Our refinery services business also performed as expected despite some unexpected challenges, including unplanned turnarounds and production issues at a number of our host refineries.

So far in the third quarter, our refinery services business has experienced some supply chain disruptions beyond our control to some of our South American customers. If not restored in short order, third quarter margin could be negatively affected by a $1 million or $2 million.

Our marine transportation segment continues to perform as expected and segment margin increased slightly for the sixth quarter in a row. As previously discussed, we continue to remain optimistic that we have seen the bottom for the quarterly segment contribution from our entire fleet of assets and recent strength in near term day rates and utilization rates is reflective of an improving market.

In summary, our businesses generated financial results that provided 1.39 times coverage of our common unit -- to our common unitholders, inclusive of a full quarter of cash distributions paid to our preferred unitholders, and a sequentially decreasing leverage from 5.8 times to 4.96 times.

Our target coverage ratio, including all preferred cash distributions, remains 1.4 times to 1.6 times and we expect our quarterly distribution rate will remain at $0.55 per common unit for the foreseeable future.

As we look toward the second half of the year, it is likely we will end up toward the lower end of our previously adjusted EBITDA guidance for 2019 of $685 million to $715 million. Notwithstanding generally non-recurring challenges, which can arise in any quarter and with the noise from the first half of the year being largely in the past, other than a couple of the things mentioned earlier, the long-term fundamentals across our businesses are strong and appear to us to be getting stronger.

We continue to believe the fourth quarter of 2019 remains more indicative of our businesses going into 2020 and we are confident that the growth anticipated from our existing footprint will keep us on track to naturally delever our balance sheet and achieve our long-term leverage target of 4 times in the coming years.

We intend to be prudent, diligent and intelligent in achieving and maintaining the financial flexibility to allow the partnership to opportunistically build long-term value for all our stakeholders without ever losing our commitment to safe, reliable and responsible operations.

As always, we would like to recognize the efforts and commitment of all those with whom we are fortunate enough to work.

With that, I'll turn it back to the moderator for any questions.

Questions and Answers:


Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Jay Schultz.

TJ Schultz -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Great. Hey, Grant. It's TJ. I think just first as you think about offshore and when would you expect to finalize that in some of those dedicated volumes in the 2020, 2022 time frame. I think you've talked in the past about some specific dedicated volumes in 2020 in the 80,000 barrel per day range. So just trying to understand when the next potential Buckskin type zero CapEx tie-in could occur?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

I think again we gave the estimate, I think in the last quarterly call, I think that's -- we're basically guiding the I's and crossing the T's [Phonetic] on the number of those as a practical matter, I mean, due to logistical reasons of proximity to our existing systems and the capacity that we have where some of our competitor pipelines don't have incremental capacity. I think it's their probability of us not getting to the finish line on a contracted basis is basically zero on most of the times that we mentioned last time.

So I do think that we have incremental volumes coming in, and in 20' and then even larger ones in 2021, especially with toward the end of '21 or early '22 with Mad Dog 2 coming on. So our ramp that we intimated and gave some guidance on in previous quarterly calls, I think, is still very much intact.

TJ Schultz -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay, understood. And then the leverage plan you talk about getting the 4 times in the coming years. As you think about your ability to pursue some potential growth projects, whether that's expansion in soda ash or additional offshore pipes, just your thoughts on the ability to finance some of this more meaningful growth should it arise, just in the context of your leverage goals would be helpful. Thanks.

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think that certainly in the offshore, when combined with the downstream economics that to the extent that and these are discretionary expenditures, but the aggregate return profiles of what we would view is incremental capital to be spent in the Gulf of Mexico again taking into account the downstream economics, they're less than 5 times deal. So including longer-term take or pay to guarantee that, if you will, and not take timing or a reserve risk in most cases, so we view those as in essence financeable under almost any kind of scenario with the flexibility that we have under our revolver where we would get material project, EBITDA credit from the strength of the take-or-pay agreements that we have with people.

The -- on the other opportunities in the soda ash business, I think that we have discussed the Granger optimization project, which we do believe at the end of the day on a run rate basis, it's less than a 5 times deal. The difficulty there is a little bit. It is a three-year construction period. So we would look at other ways to potentially finance that with out recognizing that we have a three-year capital spend and it would kind of bridges, if you will, to where we're closer to the incremental EBITDA contribution that we would expect from it three years once we FID it.

TJ Schultz -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Got it. Understood. Thanks.

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.


Okay, thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Shneur Gershuni.

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

It's actually Shneur Gershuni, but good morning, everyone. Just a couple of quick questions here. Maybe partially to follow-up on TJ's question. So when you're thinking about FIDing the project and so forth or you sort of thinking about like a sale leaseback type of arrangement or some of those JV structures that we saw with Targa and some of the others. Is that sort of the structure that you're thinking about, or are we thinking about it incorrectly?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

I'm not sure that we are precluding any structures at this point, but we are trying to do is come up with a structure that we feel allows us to start the project, get it under construction, recognizing that there is a three-year lag before in terminal leak, but it does not conflict with our otherwise deleveraging goals. So I am not prepared at this point to discuss the various structures that are under consideration, but that's what we're trying to achieve, Shneur.

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

Okay. No, that makes perfect sense. And I think the last time we had met that you had noted that you were updating the original expansion plans that I think were done in 2013 or 2014 or somewhere in that time zone. Has that happened of the costs materially higher and so forth. Just kind of curious if you sort of least made through that the reevaluation process?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think that we are well into that and that we believe that we're in the, call it, plus or minus $325 million range in today's dollars to fully affect the 700,000 ton plus expansion at Granger.

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

Okay and then just switching gears a little bit here. Nice to see the debt balances come down and so forth. You sort of talked about the low -- you triggered the lower rate by getting under 5 times. Just given where the tenure is at today, does it make sense at this point right now to possibly term out a portion of what's on your facility just sort of take advantage of where rates are today broadly speaking?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

I mean I think on any kind of historic basis that there's clearly been a fairly dramatic recovery in -- in energy unsecured paper. On the other hand, it's still a couple of hundred bps wide where we could price currently and we do have a fairly clear -- in our mind, fairly clear path forward of paying down, continuing to pay down over the coming years outstanding revolver. So, other than some existing maturities that we think that we could roll and extend by doing an early call on reasonably flat where we -- the current coupon on them, I don't see that we're in the big, there is a lot of impetus for us to term out our statements under revolver.

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

So, you're effectively saying you're comfortable with the amount that's drawn on the revolver today that it just given where commodity prices have exhibited a lot of volatility and so have drilling plans and so forth, you don't think it's prudent to take down a little bit further?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

We don't -- we don't have any concerns about the current outstanding slow.

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

All right. Perfect. Thank you very much guys. I appreciate the color.

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.


Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Ethan Bellamy.

Ethan Bellamy -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst

Hey, guys. Good morning. You seem pretty confident about soda ash pricing in the medium and long term. Could you peel the onion for us there a little bit? And will that hold if we see worsening global economic conditions?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I mean, I don't know that we are under a significant worldwide recession that -- I think that there could be some reduction in at least the demand growth, but again we see demand growing. Not necessarily in EU, the US or China proper, but certainly in Southeast Asia and flat glass demand as well as lithium demand in South America. So as long as we have increasing demand with no increasing whether or not it's 100,000 tons a year or 900,000 tons a year without incremental natural supply coming on, we still see that the market is very balanced.

We're currently aware of at least two not inconsequential supply disruptions. So which are going to be ultimately solved and hopefully for their psych [Phonetic] sooner rather than later, but we certainly see the demand supply balance in the cost advantage of natural production vis-a-vis what only the synthetic production, which is currently as a practical matter, serving the incremental demand is -- that fundamental is -- fundamentally is a change in our view at this point.

Ethan Bellamy -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst

Okay, that's helpful. And then in the marine business, it looks like your utilization is held up and it looks to be pretty good there. Should we expect that going forward and what does the rate environment look like right now?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Well, I would say that yeah we expect utilization to hold up based upon fundamentals, the things that we've talked in previous calls relative to IMO 2020 could actually for our style and of barge or inland barge certainly with internal heaters could add incremental demand because of getting the right barrel or right intermediate refined barrel to the right refinery location to meet the IMO standards.

So we think utilization remains high. We are seeing at the margin incrementally increasing spot rates which, and I think the litmus test is that we've actually had some customers start talking to us about terming up, which means and how we view that is in their mind they believe that rates are going to go up. So they're trying to lock-in.

So I think fundamentally we feel reasonably comfortable that as we've said, we've put in a bottom, it's baby steps for the sixth consecutive quarter in a row we've had marginally improved performance out of the overall segment. So, but we've also stated that we don't expect it to be running back to 2014, 2015 levels any time soon.

Ethan Bellamy -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst

Thanks, Grant. One last question. Very big picture. There are a lot of assets for sale, there's an IPO logjam. Do you guys -- are you actively looking at the M&A or consolidation opportunities that are out there?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

We're not active in, I mean, hey, I don't make a lot of comments on that, but I would say that we're -- we don't look at things like that. We believe that we are focused on continuing to deliver on our promises and taking advantage of the opportunities that we have of our existing footprint, which we think the return profiles and the long-term value creation are far superior to participate in frothy M&A activities.

Ethan Bellamy -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst

Good to hear. Thank you very much.


Okay, thank you. [Operator Instructions] And there are no more questions at this time. Presenters?

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

Okay. Well, thanks everyone. And I will talk to you in 90 days or so. Thank you.


[Operator Closing Remarks]

Duration: 25 minutes

Call participants:

Grant E. Sims -- Chief Executive Officer

TJ Schultz -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Shneur Gershuni -- UBS -- Analyst

Ethan Bellamy -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst

More GEL analysis

All earnings call transcripts

AlphaStreet Logo

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Genesis Energy, L.P. Stock Quote
Genesis Energy, L.P.
$9.91 (-7.56%) $0.81

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/25/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.