Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Otonomy (OTIC) Q4 2020 Earnings Call Transcript

By Motley Fool Transcribing - Feb 12, 2021 at 1:31AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

OTIC earnings call for the period ending December 31, 2020.

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Otonomy (OTIC -5.16%)
Q4 2020 Earnings Call
Feb 11, 2021, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents:

  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:


Operator

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q4 2020 financial results and business update conference call. [Operator instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Robert Uhl. Thank you.

Sir, please go ahead.

Robert Uhl -- ICR

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Otonomy's fourth-quarter and full-year 2020 financial results and business update conference call. Joining me on the call from Otonomy are Dr. David Weber, president and chief executive officer; and Paul Cayer, chief financial and business officer.

Before I turn the call over to Dr. Weber, I would like to remind you that today's call will include forward-looking statements based on current expectations. Such statements represent management's judgment as of today and may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the timing of results and activity for ongoing clinical trials, statements relating to the use of and expectations regarding the negative binomial model for the Phase 3 clinical trial of OTIVIDEX, plans to submit a new drug application and regarding launch preparation, expectations regarding design, patient enrollment, initiation and timing of results for planned clinical trials, expectations regarding preclinical programs, including statements regarding development studies and activities, data presentations and development timelines, statements relating to the potential benefits of and activities under the license agreement between Otonomy and Kyorin, expectations regarding Otonomy's business plans and market opportunity and expectations regarding cash runway and Otonomy's ability and resources to support its product pipeline and development activities.

Please refer to Otonomy's filings with the SEC, which are available from the SEC or on the Otonomy website for information concerning the risk factors that could affect the company. I will now turn the call over to Dave Weber, president and CEO of Otonomy.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Robert. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on this call to discuss Otonomy's business updates, as well as financial results for the fourth quarter and full year. 2020 was both a productive and successful year for Otonomy. Key accomplishments included the following: we completed patient enrollment in the Phase 3 trial of OTIVIDEX in Meniere's disease and are on track to announce results by the end of February.

We announced positive clinical results for OTO-313 in tinnitus and are working to initiate a Phase 2 trial this quarter. We announced positive clinical results for OTO 413 in hearing loss and plan to start an expansion of the trial in the second quarter. We expect that results from both the OTO-313 Phase 2 trial and OTO 413 extension study will be available mid-2022. We also advanced our multiple preclinical programs, including a gene therapy program for the most common cause congenital hearing loss.

To help fund this broad and rich pipeline, we completed a successful financing that attracted new top-tier biotech investors to the company and significantly extended our cash runway. Overall, I am very proud of our accomplishments during 2020 and excited to continue our progress this year, beginning with the OTIVIDEX Phase 3 readout later this month. During this call, I'll provide a brief update on our programs and then ask Paul to summarize the financial results. We can then open up the line for any questions.

Beginning with the OTIVIDEX Phase 3 trial in Meniere's disease, we enrolled a total of 149 patients from the United States and Europe, exceeding our target of 142 patients. In November, we announced that a review of the revised statistical analysis planned by the FDA confirmed use of the negative binomial model for analysis of the primary endpoint for this trial. We proposed use of the negative binomial model because we believe it provides the best fit of the OTIVIDEX clinical data based on the Phase 2b trial, the AVERTS-2 trial, and the integrated data sets from both trials. The final patients in the trial completed their last visit just before the end of December, enabling us to announce results by the end of February.

Assuming positive results, we plan to submit a new drug application to the FDA in the third quarter of 2021. Turning to OTO-313 for tinnitus. We have completed our planning for the Phase 2 trial, which is based on the positive Phase 1/2 results we announced last year. This trial will enroll a total of 140 patients with unilateral tinnitus of at least moderate severity as measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index or TFI.

As in the prior trial, where we observed a high correlation between the various metrics and responders, we will also track tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and patient global impression of change. To enrich the study population, the trial will exclude patients with severe hearing loss, who we believe are less likely to respond to treatment. And we are increasing the minimum TFI score required for entry to prove our ability to see a treatment benefit. We will also expand the patient population eligible for enrollment by increasing the time from tinnitus onset from six months to one year.

Finally, while we will continue to use response at both months 1 and 2 following a single treatment for primary efficacy, we will also extend the total observation period out to four months to assess the durability of the treatment effect. Our clinical team is working to finalize the operational aspects of this trial in order to initiate the study by the end of this quarter, and we expect to have top-line results in mid-2022. Our third clinical-stage program is OTO-413, a sustained exposure formulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF, that we are developing for hearing loss due to cochlear synaptopathy. Recent research has identified damage to synaptic connections as an underlying pathology in noise and age-related hearing loss that manifests as speech and noise hearing deficit.

Neurotrophic factors, including BDNF, have potential therapeutic effects in the cochlea by promoting the survival of spiral ganglion neurons, increasing neurite outgrowth, and reconnecting neurons with cochlear hair cells after damage. In December, we announced positive top-line results from the Phase 1/2 trial that provides clinical validation of this therapeutic approach for hearing loss. This ascending dose trial demonstrated that a single intratympanic injection of OTO-413 was well tolerated across all dose cohorts. Furthermore, the therapeutic activity of OTO-413 versus placebo was demonstrated for multiple clinically validated speech and noise hearing tests at consecutive time points of days 57 and 85 compared to placebo.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2021, we plan to enroll additional hearing loss patients in an expansion trial to evaluate a refined study protocol in preparation for Phase 2. This expansion study will randomize subjects to a single treatment with OTO-413 or placebo and evaluate a reduced number of endpoints, focusing on the three speech and noise hearing tests assessed in the initial patient cohorts. These are the digital noise, words and noise, and American English matric test that uses phrases. Enrollment criteria will continue to target a broad hearing loss population to support the design of a Phase 2 trial.

We expect top-line results from the expansion study to be available in mid-2022. Finally, a brief update about our three preclinical programs that are focused on additional hearing loss pathologies and patient populations. The first of these is OTO-825, our gene therapy collaboration with AGTC that targets GJB2, the most common cause of congenital hearing loss. Patients born with this mutation can have severe to profound deafness in both ears that is identified in screening tests now performed routinely in newborns.

We presented preclinical results in the past year, demonstrating that a gene of interest can be expressed and support cells of the cochlea, which are the relevant target cells for treating GJB2 deficiency, using novel and proprietary AAV capsids. Also consistent gene expression was observed for at least 12 weeks following a single local administration in nonhuman primates. These results supported selection of OTO-825 for advancement into IND-enabling studies. We have recently generated some very exciting preclinical results for this program that we look forward to presenting at an upcoming conference.

We also presented data during 2020 related to our OTO-510 program targeting otoprotection for patients at risk for cisplatin-induced hearing loss or CIHL. Cisplatin is a potent chemotherapeutic agent that is widely used to treat a variety of cancers in adults and children. Unfortunately, it is also commonly associated with severe adverse effects, including Cisplatin-induced hearing loss that is progressive, bilateral, and irreversible. We have identified a novel class of agents that potentially bind to Cisplatin and provide greater otoprotection in preclinical models than known anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic molecules and increase potency relative to other Cisplatin binding molecules currently in clinical development.

These results highlight the therapeutic potential of our locally delivered OTO-510 product candidate to provide superior otoprotection without tumor protection. Our third preclinical program, OTO-6XX targets hair cell repair and regeneration as an approach to treating patients with severe hearing loss. It is well-established that damaged cochlear hair cells through aging, excessive noise, or exposure to ototoxic chemicals leads to hearing loss and that these cells do not regenerate naturally. In a similar way that we are repairing neuronal connections to hair cells with BDNF, we believe it is possible to repair and regenerate the hair cells themselves through drug treatment.

During 2020, we entered an exclusive license agreement with Kyorin Pharmaceutical Company, providing us with worldwide rights to develop and commercialize one of their novel compounds for the treatment of hearing loss. This program is complementary to OTO-413 and expands our targeted patient population to include those with severe hearing loss. In summary, 2020 was a very successful year for Otonomy as we made significant advancements across our broad pipeline. The positive clinical results for OTO-313 and OTO-413 provided validation for these programs and position us as the only company in the neurotology field with clinical-stage programs for both tinnitus and hearing loss, two large patient populations with significant unmet medical need.

Furthermore, we are excited to be approaching the highly anticipated completion of our OTIVIDEX Phase 3 trial in Meniere's disease and following positive data, look forward to shifting our focus to the NDA submission and launch preparation. And finally, although our gene therapy and other preclinical assets receive little attention because of the focus on our clinical assets, these programs address important indications, and we plan to share compelling preclinical data and information about development timelines in the coming months. With that, I'll turn the call over to Paul Cayer, our chief financial and business officer, who will provide a summary of our financial results and plans.

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

Thank you, Dave, and good afternoon, everyone. Overall, our expenses for 2020 were in line with our financial guidance, and our cash balance reflects the successful financing we completed in July. Now, let me briefly recap the financial results from 2020 that are fully described in today's earnings release and 10-K filing. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we reported total non-GAAP operating expenses of $8.5 million, with GAAP operating expenses totaling $10.1 million.

The primary adjustment for non-GAAP expenses is exclusion of stock-based compensation. So this is the financial metric that best approximates our spending level. For the full-year 2020, total non-GAAP operating expenses were $36.5 million with GAAP operating expenses totaling $42.6 million. These expense levels were in line with our financial guidance and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to carefully manage our spend.

As of December 31, 2020, we held a cash balance, including cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling $86.3 million. This compares to $60.7 million for the prior year and reflects the financing we completed in mid-2020 that raised gross proceeds totaling approximately $69 million. The importance of this financing was twofold. First, we were able to strengthen our shareholder base with a number of top-tier biotech investors.

And second, the additional funds extend our cash runway through the next set of catalysts for OTO-313 and OTO-413, putting us in a solid financial position going into the data readout for OTIVIDEX. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Dave.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Paul. Operator, we are now ready for questions.

Questions & Answers:


Operator

Thank you, sir. [Operator instructions] Our first question is from Ken Cacciatore from Cowen & Company. Your line is open.

Ken Cacciatore -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Hey, guys. Good afternoon and congratulations on really broadening out the company and all the progress and all the different plans. It's really starting to show all the work that's been done. My first question is on Meniere's.

I know we're getting close now to the date right around the corner. I thought it would be good to just take an opportunity to step back and talk about the disorder itself. The commercial opportunity to kind of best you can frame it. And to what extent in terms of sales force size you think would be appropriate to approach it.

So just trying to get some views of -- kind of early views or thoughts around the commercial opportunity? And then maybe also just a discussion -- and you went into it, obviously, with the change of the statistical plan, but maybe some of the nuance differences with this study or the steps that you took in this study to try to ensure a little bit of a different outcome, as you try to control for the kind of the patients that were entered into the study. And I'll leave it at that for right now. Thank you.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Thanks, Ken. I appreciate you participating today. Why don't I take the second question first and then let Paul address the market opportunity in our commercial planning? So with regards to the differences of this study to the prior studies.

Clearly, what we've been able to do here is really learn from the prior work and identify what we think were key drivers in the prior failure of the AVERTS-1 trial, but the success of the AVERTS-2 trial. And that was really around careful patient selection, ensuring high-quality Meniere's patients that were well-known to the clinicians. Really choosing high-quality clinical centers. Primarily, these are academically associated or academically, what I'll call academically inclined clinical investigators.

So that's important because they understand really the importance of careful patient selection, as well as the criticality of communication with patients because, obviously, the communication with patients can drive placebo response. And so not only in terms of selection of the clinical sites was that important, but also then in training. So we undertook extensive training of both investigators and their staff on proper communication to the subjects. As well as in even training for patients regarding the nature of clinical trials, we don't know if the drug works or not, and the importance of reporting their symptoms as they experience.

I think the final things that are really key here was really tightening up on our inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure that we were really excluding patients who may have syndromes or conditions that are highly similar to Meniere's, but that are not Meniere's, things, for example, like vestibular migraine. And so we worked with KOLs to tighten up those criteria. So these were all very key steps to our approach that we think will show great benefit in the present study that will soon read out.

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

Yes. Hi, Ken. It's Paul jumping in about the market and some initial comments about how we're thinking about the commercial build. So it's a very attractive market that has yet to be developed.

Having said that, we believe there are over 850,000 patients in the U.S. that have the diagnosis based on health claims data. About a third of them seek treatment each year. That's clearly an opportunity by getting out to patients and letting them know that there is an effective and approved therapy available.

We think that that number will grow on time and expand the market. But even if you just take the third or so that are seeking treatment each year, about half of them are already treated with steroids, whether it's high dose oral steroids or repeat injections with the off-label steroid solution. So we'll clearly focus on converting ENTs, who are the target audience for this, from using off-label steroids to using OTIVIDEX. We actually, based on the market research, believe that many of them will start to offer that to their patients as sort of first-line treatment, whereas steroids are currently second line behind diuretics and low salt diet.

So increase the usage of steroids by providing OTIVIDEX as a single administration approved product with robust clinical data and then starting to sort of expand the market. From a commercial build-out, the nice thing is this is a specialist audience, about 10,000 ENTs. And within that, it's actually a smaller set that are the neurotologists and otologists that are the real specialists who will be the focus of our initial efforts. So we'll provide more guidance around how we see the commercial build, but we think it can be a very targeted, focused launch, really focusing on those high-volume existing users, get some good usage and ramp going, and then sort of expand from there.

And clearly, a lot of what we're going to be working on is on the buy-and-bill side to get the J code, to establish good history of reimbursement, and to really support providers that way.

Ken Cacciatore -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Thanks so much and good luck going into the data.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Ken.

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

Thanks, Ken.

Operator

Your next question is from Tyler Van Buren from Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

Hey, there. Good afternoon and congratulations on all the progress. I had a follow-up on the commercial discussion and the things that you just mentioned. I guess, can you talk about how easy it is to access these neurotologists and otologist as you look to potentially roll out OTIVIDEX? And for those who are familiar, I guess, with the OTIPRIO experience, it would be helpful to maybe compare and contrast how this might be different from OTIPRIO? And then secondarily to that, just wanted to hear the latest on CMC and manufacturing in terms of the scale that you guys could potentially have for OTIVIDEX prior to a launch at the end of next year.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So, Dave, if you want, I can take the first part and then throw it back to you for the kind of the second part. So with respect to identifying and targeting, Tyler, I mean, that is the nice thing about this. It's not a broad set of clinicians that we'd have to go after.

It is not only the ENTs, as I mentioned, but within the ENTs, those otologists and neurotologists. If you look at the data, which we obviously have, those are the routine users of intratympanic injections for treating Meniere's patients. Now, what's interesting that the market research suggests is that the sort of more general ENT is interested and wants to use that kind of treatment approach. But frankly, the off-label use of liquid steroid solutions is not very amenable to broad utilization.

They don't know what formulations to use. They don't know how much to deliver. They don't know how often to bring the patient back. None of that has been standardized.

And obviously, with single administration of OTIVIDEX, we've kind of taken all of that uncertainty away and provided not only an approved product, but that will provide a lot of support. So we actually think it will be very straightforward to identify that subset of clinicians that not only are routinely using IT injections today, but those that are seeing good volume of Meniere's disease patients and are ready for a product like OTIVIDEX. So we're kind of anxious to get out and actually start to kind of build that awareness. Sorry, was there a second part of the marketing question before going to CMC.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

Well, I think it was – yes, sorry. Go ahead.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

On the OTIPRIO experience -- yes, sorry. Yes, I mean, it's obviously very different. I mean, as you remember, with OTIPRIO, the kind of the challenge with its initial indication was not with ENTS, who really liked the profile and wanted to actually use the product in -- sort of broadly. But in order to do that, they'd have to have the formulary at the hospital approve its use, and that's what took quite a bit of time when we had the sales force in place.

So kind of the challenge with OTIPRIO, at least with its initial indication, was not with ENT, it was with that access in those facilities. So we bypassed that entirely with the OTIVIDEX because the primary site of care for Meniere's patients is in the office. And the great thing about the kind of the setup from an access standpoint is intratympanic injection already is reimbursed under an existing CPT code. It's very straightforward to get the unique J-code for OTIVIDEX, and we will clearly be providing a lot of access, support services, not only for those providers but also for the patients.

So we think it's a very different situation from OTIPRIO just because of the access.

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

Yes. And then, Tyler, to address your question about CMC manufacturing. As we've said, we will be prepared to and anticipate submitting the NDA based on successful results in this clinical trial in the third quarter of this year. And in that, it really is only the clinical data from this clinical trial, as well as the integrated efficacy and summary that we need to put together.

We already have our CMC information and, in fact, have been preparing for the NDA, and we have completed registration lots. So I think it's important that people remember, we've already had one successful approval with OTIPRIO and commercial support there. And obviously, know how to do this. So with regards to scale, I think, again, this is something that we expect no issues with regard to the need to support the product in the market, in terms of quantities because it's a very small dose that we're giving to individual patients.

So our batch size is very similar to retinal drugs, are very small. And so with one batch, we can make a large amount of materials, and we have a very nice expiration dating program for this product. So I think, all in all, we're well-positioned. And I'll just also say we've completed all of our safety work as well with the repeat dosing of OTIVIDEX to support the every-three-month dosing regimen.

And so we look forward to taking the clinical data and submitting the NDA on success in the third quarter.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

Wonderful. Thanks for the thoughts.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Tyler.

Operator

Your next question is from Oren Livnat from H.C. Wainwright. Your line is open.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

Thanks, guys. I actually have a few. Can you just remind us in this third OTIVIDEX Phase 3, where -- how much room for error are you leaving yourself with the powering with regards to the data you saw in the prior Phase 2b in AVERTS-2? And assuming that's positive, you mentioned the 3Q NDA filing. I don't remember if you've ever spoken about hopes or expectations for a potential priority review given fast track designation? And I have a follow-up.

Thanks.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

OK. Thanks, Oren. Yes. First, in terms of the error and what we've allowed ourselves, I think we have taken a conservative approach here.

So when we say that we're 90% powered, we did not hit the -- basically try to keep that close to the 90%. And then furthermore, we over-enrolled. So we enrolled 149 subjects over the target of 142. So we think we're in a very good position power-wise.

And we also think this is also one of the strengths of the negative binomial, as we've shown the data comparing the negative binomial to the Poisson, not only is it highly sensitive, but also, it's a very robust statistical test even over Poisson. So we think that those coupled together give us a lot of power and a lot of ability to handle this very unique data set. With regards to priority review, obviously, it is something that FDA looks at following review and acceptance of the NDA. But we clearly have experience of submitting NDAs successfully.

So we think we're in a very good position to that, and we've been working on the NDA. We did not wait to start that work. We have been working on the NDA submission, while this third trial was going on. Furthermore, I'll just remind people that we have a Fast Track designation.

So that should be favorable for a priority review. But again, we will need to submit and wait for the FDA to see if they will accept our request. I will point out that with priority review in third quarter that would put us into the first part of 2022 for commercialization.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

Right. So I guess on that front, if you do get priority review or I guess in case you need to prepare for that positive development, when do you think you'll really -- assuming positive Phase 3, when do you think you're going to start really ramping up the commercial investment?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think we'd start working quickly on that. We've already started thinking about our preliminary steps, have already started about -- thinking about the pieces that we need to put in place, and we would start implementing that based on the positive data from this trial. So I think importantly here, as Paul indicated in his discussion about the market and our approach, this will be very much of a ramp launch. It is not something, where we need to bring in a large number of people immediately, both because we already know our target audience of what we're going to target first.

It's a very limited number of targets initially, to build out that reimbursement data and support for the product among KOLS, which we can then expand upon. I think also our work with OTIPRIO has given us a lot of knowledge and capabilities that are already either in-house or that we have through working with other vendors and partners. So I think we have a lot of potential here to ramp very quickly, and it's not something that we're concerned about. We think we are very capable of doing that.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

All right. Appreciate it. I will get back in queue.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Oren.

Operator

Our next question is from Charles Duncan from Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is open.

Charles Duncan -- Cantor Fitzgerald -- Analyst

Super. Afternoon, Dave and Paul. Thanks for taking my question, and should you live in interesting times, hope things go well. I wanted to ask a question on the Meniere's study and first -- which is, call it, timing of data.

I know that it's weeks, not months. But what is really kind of a driver to the data timing? And more substantively, this may seem like a silly question, but you mentioned positive results. And I guess the question is, what do you consider positive results beyond the stat sig, when you think about response rates versus reduced number of Meniere's events or days, what kind of effect size are you looking for that based on thought-leader discussions would be meaningful to the community?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thanks. Thanks, Charles, for those questions. So with regard to timing, I mean, as with all studies for registration, there's been a properly orchestrated process of going through data query and resolution, ensuring that all documentation is verified and signed off by the investigator, appropriately bringing down materials at the clinical sites and closing out the clinical sites.

And then, of course, ultimately getting to database lock analysis by the statisticians. And then obviously, at that point, then, looking at the results. So that's been the process that we're going through. And why we have -- through the excellent work of the investigators, the site staff across the world, as well as our own CRO and clinical team, we've been successful in doing all of that despite the challenges with COVID.

So quite impressive work that allows us to meet that goal by the end of February that we've announced now. So with regards to the positive -- well, clearly, from an FDA standpoint of stat sig, we already have one successful Phase 3 trial. We need one more. And that requirement is a statistically significant outcome at 0.05 or less.

With regards to the markets and what clinicians and patients are looking for, it really comes from them. As we've talked with both patients and clinicians, what we routinely hear is that if we can just save them one day of definitive vertigo, really helps them a lot. So while these patients may be experiencing a lot more, it really is any day that you can save them is the day they get back. And so the hurdle here is really low.

In terms of our ability to have a positive treatment effect. That said, however, what we've seen from our work, as we've shown for both the AVERTS-2 trial and has been also very consistent with the Phase 2b as we see much more than that. What we're seeing on the average is 2.5 days of definitive vertigo sphere, but more importantly, I think even more is that it's a reduction of the vertigo episodes in total and reduction of the severity. So all those things taken together really provide a robust benefit to these patients.

And then I'll just remind you that as we look at the responder analysis, 40% of the patients treated with OTIVIDEX across the AVERTS-2 and the Phase 2b trial, demonstrated no definitive vertigo episodes in the third month following treatment. So that's obviously quite profound in terms of that population. And even when we look at the ability to reduce the number of episodes by 50% or even 75% is quite pronounced. So I think we're very confident in the ability of OTIVIDEX to help these patients and that it's a robust treatment effect.

And again, with that positive result on the statistical outcome, I think, the product will fare very well in the marketplace.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

That's helpful added color, Dave. Let me just ask you for a qualitative feel or perspective on the bring down of this study in terms of investigators adhering to protocol and capturing all the data needed, working with characterized patients. How do you feel maybe even relative to the AVERTS-1 experience? Or maybe that's not an easy comparison?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think in terms of -- with regards to this trial and the work this team has done, the investigator, site staff, even patients, has been exemplary. I'm totally confident in the quality of the study and the bring down of the study. We had extremely high compliance throughout, even through the COVID times, when we were initially going into the COVID epidemic, we saw a very high compliance being retained and have seen that throughout. And so I think, from the standpoint of the documentation, from the standpoint of patient compliance, from an investigator compliance, I am delighted with what I've seen.

I don't know that I'd want to try to compare across studies. Clearly, this study was much more -- is done not only in the U.S. But in many countries in Europe during what is a very unusual time for all of us with COVID. And I could not be more proud or impressed by what the group of people involved here have done with this trial.

And the compliance that the patients have demonstrated, I think, speaks to this issue of their unmet need. And how significant their unmet need is in terms of looking for therapy that they have that kind of high compliance.

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

OK, very good. And last question is regarding the filing of the NDA. Just to clarify, would you be filing for an indication of treating Meniere's generally or specifically with one dose? Or do you think that it won't be limited at all in terms of redosing? And then I guess that brings up another question. What would you like to do in the future? Would it include redosing? Or do you think that's not going to be necessary in this setting?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Good question. So with regards to the indication, the indication will be for the treatment of vertigo symptoms of vertigo associated with Meniere's disease. That is what we're treating is the vertigo.

And in terms of the redosing, what we have done, and this was in work with the FDA, an agreement with them, that we conducted our repeat dose safety work, which has all been completed successfully and is ready to be submitted with the NDA to support, up to every three months of administration. You'll recall that in Phase 2B, we conducted an additional month of observation and saw that the effect was starting to wear in some patients. And so that was the purpose of designing that every-three-month administration. So that's what we expect in the label.

It's a single use for course of treatment with retreatment being available every three months. We think that patients will really kind of fall into two groups. There will be patients who say, "I want to be seen every three months and receiving administration, so I can minimize my vertigo symptoms." And there will be some patients who say, "Hey, I'll come back when I need to. If I'm doing well for a few months, and I don't need it, I'll then come back when I have an attack and I need it." So we think that will be the initial type of patient population.

So we think about an average of two administrations per patient per year. Now, we do think of kind of the future, we're very actually excited about the potential for this product to be able to spare the hearing loss that these patients suffer. I think while these patients are really struggling because of the vertigo, and that keeps them from going to work or being with their families. One of the things that they talk about next is the impact on their hearing.

As you know, these patients will typically ultimately become deaf in that affected ear. For example, our founder is now deaf in that ear. And there's always the risk that they can get bilateral Meniere's, which is very scary for them. So one of the things that has been suggested from the literature is that it may be possible that with continued treatment and maintaining that treatment that there may be ability to spare the hearing.

And obviously, that would be a great way to support that every-three-month dosing. And so this is something that we have actively thought about. That is something that we could do post approval is get into additional work to look at that ability to spare the hearing over a long-term study.

Charles Duncan -- Cantor Fitzgerald -- Analyst

Super. Look forward to the data and increased pipeline visibility yet this year. Thanks for taking my questions, Dave.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Charles.

Operator

[Operator instructions] Your next question is from Yogesh Dayma of Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Yogesh Dayma -- Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. -- Analyst

Hey, thank you. Yogesh here on behalf of Frank. Thanks for taking my question. Just a quick one here on tinnitus in OTC-313.

So I'm assuming that in the next Phase 2 trial, you guys are including person who has little tinnitus, or some person will have considerable tinnitus. So what efforts you are making in order to minimize statistical floor issue in this trial.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So thanks, Yogesh, for your question. So in the Phase 2, what we are doing is taking some of our learnings from the Phase 1/2 trial and having looked at this data, and it's part of the data that you can see in our corporate deck, is we have looked at the impact of the incoming tinnitus functional index, that is the measure of the severity of the tinnitus at baseline. In the Phase 1/2 study, patients had to have a 25 or higher score on the TFI, that's out of 100, which would indicate moderate and moderate to severe tinnitus.

What we're going to do is raise that TFI score for inclusion up. And by doing that, we'll go to a little bit more -- it will still be moderate, but I'll call it more of the middle moderate to moderate/severe type of patient in their tinnitus. That will give us basically a better ability to not only see a larger treatment impact but also separating it from placebo. And actually, you can look at our slide deck and look at the slide that we have for the TFI for the total population, and then a couple of slides later, we have that same graph now just for patients with a TFI score of 40 and higher.

And it really illustrates the point I just mentioned of really giving you a very clear and increased response on the improvement in tinnitus for 313, as well as a very clear differentiation from placebo. And so we think that will help with the floor effect, and we believe that that will also help minimize the placebo effect.

Yogesh Dayma -- Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. -- Analyst

Perfect. That's super helpful. Thank you.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

We do have a follow-up question from Oren Livnat of H.C. Wainwright. Your line is open.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

Thanks. I just wanted to touch on the pipeline as well. For 313, can you just -- again, I think I might have missed it in the script. You said you're going out to four months, but what is the primary observation endpoint?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thanks, Oren. The primary endpoint is the same as in the Phase 1/2. So we're going to hold it to the same time points that we used there.

Namely, that is the -- I get confused between the 413 and 313 sites.

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

It's month 1 and 2.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, month 1 and 2.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

OK. And I think at some point, you were talking about doing bilateral patients like maybe two Phase 2s. And I'm just wondering, is that still in the cards? Or are you hoping to maybe elucidate the drug effect in this better, different, enriched patient population before you start pushing the envelope?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I mean, I think, first of all, it's very clear on the unilateral side that we can see the benefit and follow it quite closely. And so, we wanted to get going with unilateral promptly. We are still considering bilateral, but we are trying to get learnings there.

I can tell you that KOLs do have -- there is a question of the impact you'll have across both years. And so, it is something that we want to do a little bit more work to really understand how best to design that trial. We do think that there is opportunity in bilateral patients for sure, for this product. But it really more is in regards to how to properly do this study, and that's part of what we're working on with this.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

OK. And then just lastly, on 413, I'm still a little confused. What is the main difference in this new expanded cohort versus what we saw before? Is this a different dose, a different treatment? Or is it really just focusing on the narrower set of endpoints? And if the latter, what do you think you'll learn that you did not already learn before?

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I think several things with this additional expansion cohort. So first of all, if you recall, we were doing a lot of additional measures. We talked about all the different audiometric measures we were doing, things like middle ear muscle reflex, additional audiometric measurements, a lot of testing in addition to the speech and noise test.

And even there, we had an extensive amount of testing with the speech and noise. And so that was because -- and we all have to remember, this is the first of its kind study that we've had, the first in human. And so working with our key opinion leaders and expert audiologists, we're learning a lot that has never been -- because this has never been done in clinical research before. And so, what we're doing here is we're refining what we've learned about what to look at, what really shows the ability to see a difference between treated and untreated.

And so, one of the things that you see that we will have done is narrowed down the measurements that we're doing both in terms of audiometric measures but also even in terms of the speech and noise testing that we're doing. We will still continue with those three tests, but we were actually looking at different variations in addition to those different tests. So we've now been able to refine that down. The final thing and the reason for the expansion is we did 16 patients, as you know.

And in our comparison in the study with placebo versus treatment. And what we want to do is get more patients as well. So basically get down to more of exactly what we think we're going to be doing in Phase 2, but also get a larger number of patients. That will do two things for us.

One, it will further confirm the result that we saw. So give us further confidence that we are seeing that treatment effect and the size of that treatment effect. But also now, we have the ability to really power the Phase 2. And that's really the most important one of why we're doing this is, we just feel that it would be better to have a larger patient population in order to size the Phase 2 and ultimately then select which of the speech and noise tests we think should be primary.

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

OK. That's very helpful. Appreciate it. Good luck.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Oren.

Operator

I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back to you, Dr. Weber.

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, thank you, everyone, for participating in our call today. Please note that we will be attending the Cowen, the H.C. Wainwright, and the Oppenheimer Virtual Health Care conferences in March and hope to speak with many of you then. Have a good evening, everyone.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 52 minutes

Call participants:

Robert Uhl -- ICR

Dave Weber -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Paul Cayer -- Chief Financial and Business Officer

Ken Cacciatore -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Tyler Van Buren -- Piper Sandler -- Analyst

Oren Livnat -- H.C. Wainwright -- Analyst

Charles Duncan -- Cantor Fitzgerald -- Analyst

Yogesh Dayma -- Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. -- Analyst

More OTIC analysis

All earnings call transcripts

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Otonomy, Inc. Stock Quote
Otonomy, Inc.
OTIC
$1.84 (-5.16%) $0.10

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
331%
 
S&P 500 Returns
115%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 05/21/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.