Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Stifel Financial Corp (SF) Q2 2021 Earnings Call Transcript

By Motley Fool Transcribers – Jul 28, 2021 at 2:30PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

SF earnings call for the period ending June 30, 2021.

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Stifel Financial Corp (SF -2.83%)
Q2 2021 Earnings Call
Jul 28, 2021, 9:00 a.m. ET


  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:


Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to Stifel Financial Corporation's Q2 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All lines are currently in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]

It is now my pleasure to hand the conference over to Mr. Joel Jeffrey.

10 stocks we like better than Stifel Financial
When our award-winning analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.* 

They just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Stifel Financial wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 7, 2021

Joel Jeffrey -- Head of Investor Relations

Thank you, operator. I'd like to welcome everyone to Stifel Financial's second quarter 2021 financial results conference call. I'm joined on the call today by our Chairman and CEO, Ron Kruszewski; our Co-Presidents, Victor Nesi and Jim Zemlyak; and our CFO, Jim Marischen.

Earlier this morning, we issued our earnings release and posted a slide deck to our website, which may be found on our Investor Relations page at I would note that some of the numbers that we state throughout our presentation are presented on a non-GAAP basis and I would refer to our reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP as disclosed in our press release. I would also remind listeners to refer to our earnings release, financial supplement and our slide presentation for information on forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures. This audio cast is copyrighted material of Stifel Financial. It may not be duplicated, reproduced or rebroadcast without the consent of Stifel Financial Corp.

I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Ron Kruszewski.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Joel. To our guests, good morning and thank you for taking the time to listen to our Second Quarter 2021 Results. I'll start the call with some highlights from our quarterly and first half results, then I'll discuss our revised outlook for the full year. Jim Marischen will review our balance sheet expenses and then I'll wrap up with some concluding thoughts.

Before I get into the specifics of our quarterly results, let me start by saying that overall, Stifel business in the first half of 2021 has surpassed any six-months stretch by a wide margin and rivals some of our most recent full-year results. Our record six-month net revenue was the result of records in both of our major operating segments. The strength of our top line and our continued focus on operating efficiency resulted in record quarterly and six months revenue, as well as record-earnings per share.

As we head into the back half of this year, we are well-positioned to continue our strong performance, which is illustrated by our increased full year guidance, which I'll discuss in greater detail in a few minutes. So, looking at our quarterly and year-to-date snapshot, the numbers really speak for themselves and are the result of the investments over the last several years and a strong operating environment, especially for our Investment Bank.

Revenue in the second quarter was a record of more than $1.5 billion, an increase of 29%. For the six-month period, revenue was nearly $2.3 billion, up 27% and further illustrating our growth was roughly as much as our 2015 full year revenue. The growth in revenue and lower expense ratios resulted in record non-GAAP EPS of $1.70, which was up 65% year-on-year and $3.20 year-to-date, which is up 75% and when compared to our past full year results would rank as the fourth best in our history. I'm also pleased with our operating leverage as we generated record pre-tax margin of 24% and our annualized return on tangible common equity was nearly 31%. Tangible book value per share increased 29% in the last year.

Turning to the next slide. Our record second quarter net revenue was driven by global wealth management and increased 26% in our institutional business, which posted a 31% improvement. Compensation as a percentage of net revenue declined sequentially to 59.5%, which was in-line with our guidance on last quarter's call. Our operating expense ratio of 17% and excluding credit provision in investment banking grow subs, our operating ratio totaled 16%. This was again well below our full year guidance due to the strength of our revenue and expense management.

As the economic outlook improves, we, like other banks have updated our economic models. This, coupled with strong credit performance in our loan portfolio resulted in a reversal of more than $9 million of credit provisions during the quarter. I would note that this was comprised of a $4 million release of credit provisions due to improving economic outlook and approximately $5 million relating to loan sales. As it relates to the loan sales, Jim Marischen will provide more color in his remarks.

Neutralizing the impact of credit provisions, Stifel's pre-tax, pre-provision income totaled $270 million, which increased 31% year-on-year and 13% sequentially. While the strength of the operating environment, particularly in investment banking has been a primary driver of our results, I do not want to understate the importance of the investments we've made in our business as a meaningful contributor to our performance. Stifel is and will continue to be a growth company. Our focus on investing in our business and making us more relevant to our clients has resulted in not only impressive topline growth, but significant operating leverage.

As you can see from the numbers on the slide, our total net revenue on an annualized basis in 2021 has doubled since 2015 and was driven by both our wealth management and institutional businesses, essentially doubling in that timeframe. What is particularly interesting is not only as our revenue growth doubled, but our growth rate has accelerated. To illustrate some of the numbers, at the end of 2015, our net revenue total approximately $2.3 billion, with nearly $1.4 billion from Wealth Management and roughly $1 billion from our institutional group.

Since that time, we've grown our Wealth Management business by hiring experienced financial advisors and more than doubling our balance sheet. This has led to a more than 70% increase in total client assets and annualized global wealth revenue that would surpass 2015 results by 84%. Our institutional business, we've made six acquisitions and our total Managing Directors have increased 67% and our investment banking business contributing an 111% increase in our institutional revenue since 2015.

While our revenues are on an impressive trajectory, our ability to generate operating leverage, I think is even more outstanding. In the first half of 2021, our pre-tax margin increased to 23% from 10% in 2015, while our return on tangible common equity improved to 30% from 10% in that same time period. Looking at our operating leverage another way, our EPS has quadrupled on a doubling of revenue since 2015. This increase in our scale and the fact that we continue to be more relevant to our clients are the primary drivers behind my optimism for the back half of this year.

Now before I go into details of our updated guidance, I want to note that our revised outlook is based on continued favorable market conditions. There are always risks such as market corrections or geopolitical crisis that could negatively impact the operating environment and particularly our investment banking business. But given the strength of our results in the first half of the year, the current strength of our pipelines and my visibility into the beginning of this quarter, we believe that it is appropriate to increase our full year guidance at this time.

We now expect net revenue to be in the range of $4.5 billion to $7 billion, up 13% to 18% from the high end of our prior guidance. This is a reflection of the strength of our investment banking and Wealth Management businesses. We are tightening our net interest income guidance to $465 million to $485 million as the benefits of the growth in our balance sheet has helped to offset the decline in short-term rate. In the second half of 2021, we anticipate an additional $2 billion of asset growth at our bank. As a result of our increased revenue expectations, we are lowering our expense ratio guidance.

Our comp ratio is lowered to 58% to 60%, given our expected NII results and strong investment banking. Our operating non-comp expense ratio expectations has declined to 16.5% to 18.5% as we continue to see improved operating leverage in our business. I would note that the midpoint of our revenue guidance would suggest that Stifel achieve second half revenue essentially equal to our first six months of revenue, the current market environment, our pipelines clearly support this guidance and further historically the second half of the year, especially the fourth quarter are strong seasonal periods for Stifel. I would also note that not only is our updated guidance, significantly above our original expectations, but also well above the current 2021 Street expectations of $4.3 billion in revenue and $5.57 of earnings per share.

And with that, let me move on to the results of our operating segments, starting with Global Wealth Management. Second quarter revenue totaled a record of $638 million, up 26% year-on-year and with six-month revenue of $1.3 billion, also a record and up 17%. Our growth was driven by increased asset management, revenue and net interest income. The continued growth in our asset management revenue was driven by higher market valuations and increased client assets, which finished the quarter at record level. Total assets under administration were $402 billion and fee-based assets of $149 billion rose 8% sequentially. These asset levels should drive further growth in asset management revenue in the current quarter.

Net interest income increased 3% year-over-year, primarily, given our continued ability to grow loans and produce a stable net interest margin. Jim will touch on this further later in the presentation. The next slide highlights the strength of recruiting in the growth drivers of our platform. We added 26 advisors, including 14 experienced advisors with total trailing 12-month production of $12 million. The gross number of recruits is down compared to last year as the return of advises to their offices have slowed recruiting. In addition, there was increased competition from larger firms offering, what is in our opinion very high transition packages. That said, as our inflation experts in Washington like to say, we view the situation as transitory as our pipeline remains robust. Additionally, we definitely are seeing activity within Stifel independent advisors and look forward to recruiting to pick up in this channel.

Moving onto our institutional group. We posted our third consecutive record quarter in our institutional business as we continue to benefit from increased activity levels and the scale of our business. Our quarterly net revenues total a record $521 million, which was up 31% from the prior year. Six-month revenue increased 41% over $1 billion. Quarterly advisory revenues more than doubled to $207 million while capital raising posted revenue of $158 million, which was up 42%. These results more than offset a 17% decline in our trading revenue. While the decline in trading revenue was expected as compared to the robust activity in the second quarter of 2020, I am pleased with our results relative to The Street, at least to the reported numbers that I have seen.

As noted on previous earnings calls, we've been investing in our institutional business with the objective of becoming more relevant to our clients and the market as a whole. The leverage in these investments was on display this quarter as our pre-tax margins improved by 630 basis points to 27%. Looking at the revenue components of our institutional business, our equities business posted record first half results of $391 million, up 52% while our second quarter revenue totaled $163 million, up 29% year-on-year. Our fixed income business posted quarterly revenue of $147 million, while down 13% year-over-year was up sequentially.

On this slide, our focus on the trading businesses of these segments and discuss capital raising on the next slide when I talk about investment banking. With respect to our trading businesses, equity quarterly revenue totaled $61 million, down 22% from record levels in the first quarter, which was slightly better than the overall market volume declines which we witnessed. Six-month revenue was $141 million, which was up 5% from 2020. Fixed income trading revenue of $92 million was down 7% sequentially. Similar to my comments regarding Institutional Equities, our fixed income trading was impacted by lower industry volumes. While an industrywide slowdown in credit trading was the primary driver of our revenue decline, I want to say that our rates of muni revenue experienced solid improvement.

On slide 9, investment banking revenue of $376 million was our third consecutive quarterly record, an increase of 73%, driven primarily by record advisory revenue. First half revenue of $716 million increased 81% as we generated record capital raising in the first quarter and record advisory revenue in the second quarter of this year. I noted on last quarter's call that we expected a strong second quarter for our advisory business and that is exactly what we got. Record revenue of $207 million surpassed our prior quarterly record by 19%. In terms of verticals, financials was a standout as KBW had its best quarter since our merger back in 2013.

Since the beginning of 2020, KBW has advised on 8 of the 10 largest bank mergers and has the highest market share in the firm's illustrious history. Additionally, we saw strong contributions from technology, consumer and diversified services as well as in the fund placement business from Eaton partners. Looking at our third quarter, borrowing [Phonetic] a substantial change in the market or economy, we expect to see continued strength in advisory revenue.

Moving on to capital raising. Our equity underwriting business posted revenue of $112 million, up 61% and our second best quarter in history, trailing only the first quarter of this year. Strongest verticals were consumer, healthcare, technology and financials. In addition to the strength of our equity business, we generated record results in our fixed income underwriting business of $57 million, which was up 16%. Our municipal finance business posted another great quarter, as we lead managed 244 municipal issues. For the first 6 months, our market share in terms of number of transactions increased to 12.5% from 10.9% in the first half of 2020. I think it is noteworthy that in the first half of 2021, non-public finance revenue which was minimal just a few years ago now accounts for nearly 20% of our fixed income underwriting. This is a result of our efforts to diversify both domestically and internationally.

In terms of our overall pipelines, they continue to build and remain at record levels, we expect strong performance from all of our major verticals and as our updated guidance indicates, I am very optimistic for our investment banking business in 2021.

With that let me turn off the call over to our CFO, Jim Marischen.

Jim Marischen -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Ron, and good morning, everyone. Before getting into our net interest income and balance sheet, I want to make a few comments on our GAAP earnings and non-GAAP charges. I the quarter, we saw a $0.10 differential between our GAAP and non-GAAP results. To add some color to these items, the differential is almost entirely related to three basic deal-related expenses including stock-based compensation, intangible amortization expense, and an additional true up on an earn out from an acquisition has performed better than our original projections.

And now let's turn to net interest income. For the quarter, net interest income totaled $190 million, which was up $6 million sequentially. Our firmwide and bank debt interest margins remained at 200 basis points and 240 basis points respectively. As expected, our NIM did not change from the prior quarter. While net interest income, benefited from a 6% increase in interest earning assets. I'll touch at this growth in more detail on the next slide.

In terms of our third quarter expectations, we see a net interest income in a range of $115 million to $125 million and with a similar NIM to the second quarter. We noted last quarter the significant improvement in our asset sensitivity when compared to just a few years ago. We are maintaining our prior guidance of $150 million to $175 million of incremental pre-tax income as a result of 100 basis point increase in rates. This assumes the same set of assumptions discussed last quarter applied to our quarter end balance sheet. Further, the additional balance sheet growth guidance that Ron described earlier in the presentation would be additive to this rate sensitivity guidance.

Moving on the next slide. I'll go into more detail on the bank's loan and investment portfolios. We ended the quarter with total net loans of $12.9 billion, which is up approximately $700 million from the prior quarter and was primarily driven by growth in our consumer channel. Our mortgage portfolio increased by $400 million sequentially as we continue to see demand for residential loans from our Wealth Management clients. Our securities based loan portfolio increased by approximately $240 million. Growth in these loans continues to be strong as FA recruiting momentum continues to drive increased loan balances.

Our commercial portfolio accounts for 37% of our total loan portfolio, it is primarily comprised of C&I loans, which were up slightly from the prior quarter. Our portfolio is well-diversified with our highest sector exposure in Fund Banking, which increased outstanding balances by $325 million during the quarter. We believe these loans continue to represent an attractive risk-adjusted return and we expect to continue to be active in this space. I also want to note that we had a nearly $200 million reduction in our PPP loans during the quarter. This is expected as a good portion of these loans were originated as part of a third party origination platform. We also expect to see further reduction of PPP loans in the third quarter.

Moving to the investment portfolio, which increased by $300 million sequentially. About two-thirds of this increase was seen within CLOs, while the remainder of the growth was primarily and shorter duration corporate bonds. Turning to the allowance. For the second straight quarter, we recorded a reserve release. In the second quarter, we had a $9 million reversal of our allowance through a negative provision expense as additional reserves tied to loan growth we're more than offset by the improved economic scenario in our CECL model. I would also highlight that approximately $5 million of the negative provision expense was tied to $200 million of loans that are being sold at a premium. As we entered into agreement to sell these loans at a premium, the accounting guidance dictates that these loans be reclassified to held for sale and the allowance tied to these loans reversed.

We continually look at our retained loan portfolio and determine this specific pool of loans was not a core area of growth for the bank. And as such, we made the decision to sell. As a result of the reserve release in the composition of our loan growth during the quarter, our ratio of allowance to total loans declined to 99 basis points, excluding PPP loans. As I've stated last quarter, it's important to look at the level of reserves between our consumer and commercial portfolios given the relative levels of inherent risk. At quarter end, the consumer allowance to total loans was 35 basis points, while the commercial portfolio was 142 basis points. We also continue to see strong credit metrics with non-performing assets and non-performing loans declining to 5 basis points.

Moving on to capital and liquidity. Our risk-base and leverage capital ratios came in at 18.9% from 11.7% respectively. The increase in the leverage ratio was driven by the strength of our retained earnings and was offset by loan growth in the quarter. During July, we also closed on a $300 million, 4.5% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock offering and announced the redemption of our 6.25% percent Series A preferred. We continued our share repurchase program in the second quarter by buying back 440,000 shares at an average price of $65.85.

We continue to feel good about our financial position as our liquidity remains strong. In addition to the $6 billion available on our sweep program, the bank has access to off-balance sheet funding of more than $4 billion. Within our primary broker dealer and holding company, we have access to nearly $2 billion of liquidity from cash, credit facilities that are committed and unsecured, as well as secured funding sources. I would also highlight that Fitch recently affirmed our credit rating and improved outlook to positive based on our strong operating results and overall financial position.

On the next slide, we go through expenses. In the second quarter, our pre-tax margin improved 650 basis points year-on-year to a record 24%. The increase was a result of strong revenue growth, lower compensation accruals and our continued expense discipline. Our comp-to-revenue ratio of 59.5% was down 50 basis points from the prior year. The ratio came in at the midpoint of our previous full year guidance range. For the first six months of this year, our comp ratio was 60.2% and given our updated guidance, it is safe to assume that we expect the comp ratio in the second half of the year to be below the first.

Non-comp operating expenses excluding the credit-loss provision and expenses related to investment banking transactions totaled approximately $185 million that represented approximately 16% of net revenue. This is also below our prior guidance primarily due to stronger-than-expected revenue. We expect the travel and entertainment-related expenses will pick up in the second half of the year, but will likely have a larger impact from the fourth quarter than the third. The effective tax rate during the quarter came in at 25%, which is at the lower end of the range and in-line with our commentary on last quarter's call.

Absent any other discrete items, we'd expect to see an effective rate to be between 24% and 26% in the second half of the year. In terms of our share count, our average fully diluted share count was up 1% primarily as a result of normal stock-based compensation, offset by share repurchases. Absent any assumption for additional share repurchases and assuming a stable stock price we'd expect the third quarter, fully diluted share count to total 118.5 million shares.

So with that, I will turn the call back over to Ron.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jim. As you can see from our record first half results and the significant increase in our guidance 2021 is shaping up to be a far better year than we had originally forecast. Given our performance to date and our outlook for the second half of the year, we should again generate significant levels of excess capital. In addition to the excess capital we generate from operations as Jim noted, we raised an additional $300 million in preferred shares during July after redeeming our Series A preferred, we added an incremental $150 million in capital. I mentioned this to illustrate just how well positioned we are to take advantage of opportunities that come our way. I think it's pretty clear from our results and my comments about the benefits of our increased scale that reinvestment into our business is my preferred use of capital.

As our updated guidance illustrates, we believe that we can grow our balance sheet by an additional $2 billion in the second half of the year. Many bolt-backed [Phonetic] firms and smaller regional banks have had muted loan growth rates given their sheer size or geographic limitations. By contrast, our loan portfolio is relatively small compared to the national footprint of our wealth management and institutional businesses. Security-based and mortgage loans have grown primarily through retail demand and new advisor recruiting and in recent years, we have expanded our capabilities and new commercial lending businesses. The combination of these growth channels has enabled us to generate and the average annual loan growth rate of 30% in the last seven years, while maintaining a strong credit profile.

In terms of growth in our other business lines, we continue to focus on both hiring and acquisitions while we haven't done an acquisition in 18 months. We continue to believe that this is an attractive use of capital and a key element to our growth strategy. That said, we will always focus on deploying capital based on where we can generate the best risk adjusted returns and we'll continue to deploy capital through dividends and share repurchases. However, as a growth company, I believe that Stifel and our shareholders have and will continue to see the greatest upside from growth in our franchise.

And with that, operator, let's open the line for questions.

Questions and Answers:


[Operator Instructions] The first question will come from the line of Steven Chubak with Wolfe Research.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Hi. Good morning, Ron. Good morning, Jim. So I wanted to start off with question on capital. Have a very high-class problem you're running with far too much access at the moment, especially after the preferred issuance that you cited or does it feel like you're struggling to make a dent in those ratios given the current pace of capital return, really strong earnings. I was hoping you could speak Ron, just to your appetite to accelerate buybacks to more than offset some of that continued capital build and whether there is any appetite to deploy some of the $6 billion of third-party cash given very tepid demand for deposits from third party banks at the moment.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

As I said, we're always going to look to deploy our capital in the best where we see the best returns for our shareholders. Dividends, share repurchases, acquisitions, our growth in our balance sheet and all four of those are on the table as we continue to grow. I see a lot of opportunity to grow our franchise. I have found that is the highest return to our shareholders, and we'll continue to do that, we're mindful of our capital build of course and don't intend to just sit idly by and let capital accumulate, we will address it in appropriate manner and again what as a shareholder, myself, of the best returns to our shareholders.

Jim Marischen -- Chief Financial Officer

And maybe just to add to that. In regards to the $6 billion of additional sweep balances and we were essentially two quarters in the year and doubled our balance sheet growth projections. So I think we have been able to deploy deposits in that manner and utilize some of that excess. And then in terms of the buyback, we have also talked about trying to offset dilution and to put some numbers to that. For the full year that be about 2.5 million shares.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Right. But is there any appetite to accelerate that 6 billion of migration, if you will away from third party banks, just given that those actions would be very NII accretive, especially given some willingness to have these deployed into credit sensitive securities where the yield pickup would be pretty substantial.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Look, I think the growth on any bank and in our bank. As I said, we've grown 30% a year. I think we need to have balanced growth. So if we flip a switch and try to both through loans and investments increased the size of the balance sheet significantly, of course, we could, but we believe in balanced growth that it unlevered layers and some of the market in a measured manner. And again, we said that we would grow our balance sheet at the beginning of the year by $2 billion. We're projecting $4 billion now. And we see, as I said in my prepared remarks that we see the ability to grow our loans as a real asset of this company are our bank is undersized relative to our footprint and other businesses. So we're going to continue to grow. Not looking at just flipping us switch and taking NIM compression for the benefit of NIII. I think there's risk in that we want to be more measured on.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Fair enough, Ron. And maybe just switching gears to the institutional side, you talked about the fact that you weren't getting enough respect for the share gains that you were posting. I mean it's certainly evident this quarter in the results and you mentioned the record backlog as well. At the same time we do have the executive order that was issued by Biden, which specifically highlighted greater scrutiny of financial services. I mean where you do have heavier gearing, do you expect any direct impact on financial services M&A or bank M&A specifically in the coming months and quarters and what are you hearing from the bankers incorporates that are on the ground.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I know, we announced a deal this morning, we saw that which also speaks to what we've been doing the investments deal where we advise them, and that was a nice transaction. I think certainly the sentiment coming out of Washington is an increase sort of antitrust sentiment if you will, I believe that from what I'm hearing, we haven't seen anything as it relates to the mid-size banks. I think that primarily would focus on the big banks where I would see it, but haven't seen anything yet that doesn't mean it won't happen, but I believe that for the health of the industry consolidation is going to continue to occur, especially where we are most and have the greatest market share as I figure today. I don't see that being impacted.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Thanks. And just one final one from me just on the independent platform on the wealth side in your efforts the scale that, I was hoping you could speak Ron, just to some of the early feedback you've gotten from advisors on the offering, how are you going to differentiate the value prop versus peers and whether it makes strategic sense for you to scale that inorganically. Just given the strength of your capital position?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I think that I'm pleased with our initial feedback, we're starting from frankly debt stop, we weren't recruiting in that area. We just announced that in the last effectively three months but our initial feedback is that we have a very competitive offering as I've said when we did it. We weren't starting this business from scratch. This business for almost three decades and we have all the tools and the foundation to build this business and I would say that we expect to show increased recruiting as this channel picks up and my initial feedback is very positive on this not only the platform, but our competitive positioning.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Thanks, Ron. Thanks so much for taking my questions.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

The next question will come from the line of Devin Ryan with JMP Securities.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Devin.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Good morning. Maybe to hit the question Steven asked on this two-fold [Phonetic] business slightly differently. So obviously heading into 2021, I think some people felt like the bar was pretty high after a great 2020 in the institutional side and so it might be tough to grow revenues in that business. Clearly based on what you've done in the first half and the outlook your revenue should be up quite a bit on the institutional side. So, what to maybe kind of trying to strip through if we can, how the business is scaling in terms of people, obviously you're gaining market share and businesses. And so just trying to understand how much of the momentum feels like it's just the cycle benefiting versus Stifel is actually expanding the footprint over the past year and then expectations for that heading into next year kind of where the bar maybe feels little high and where you still feel like there's really good growth momentum because of the cycle or because of where you've added to the footprint?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I mean you know it's, that seems like the never-ending question, right. And let me just give some, some numbers to talk about what we've built. And then again we're all benefiting from increased market activity. So myself and all of our peers, whether you're the large bulk curve of middle market or independent advisory firms we're all benefiting from a favorable market environment. I feel that when I talk about not having understanding, it's that we need to do a better job of explaining how much investment than what we've done to our footprint. So for example, we've doubled the business in terms of revenue since 2015. We've also doubled our Managing Directors. So we have 205 to 210 Managing Directors today which is double what it was. We participate in much broader swath of the economy in terms of verticals, and we do it across much greater array of product offerings than we did, even a few years ago. So we're in the fund placement business.

We are in financing business from a corporate debt side and our M&A, you can say so. The question always there, as I hear that is the path of sustainability, is sustainable and so not only the sustainable its growing and what I sometimes take not exception but [Indecipherable] it's how the street and the analysts will look at our peers and say that banking revenues will be up, but if Stifel are not sustainable. They might be down because the bar is too high and I think we've proven and we will continue to prove that we're a growth business and that business is going to grow with the same cyclical ups and downs that our peers will experience. But for me, it's been higher highs and higher lows and I been listening to the sustainability for 25 years, and we've had 25 consecutive years of record revenue. So as the business is sustainable, because our platform is so much greater than it was even a few years ago and we'll just keep putting up the numbers and keep answering the sustainability question every quarter.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

You will probably keep getting it but I appreciate [Indecipherable].

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I just hope you don't keep under estimating it but OK.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay, so maybe to switch gears to acquisitions for Stifel. Obviously 18 months without a deal is quite some time, but I also understand and appreciate that acquisitions remains an important part of the growth strategy over the long term. Maybe just thinking about the market right now is the fact that we haven't seen anything, is that a function of just the expectations in the market are as high is kind of broad valuations and so there's just not a lot of compelling things to do or is it just the areas of where there is opportunities in the market just aren't as interesting or obviously you guys have added so many capabilities that there is not maybe quite as much whitespace in certain parts of the business. What that maybe just think about why there hasn't been anything. And then just what may be the backlog today of how active our conversations, how much is out there that maybe is interesting but wanted to see if something happens?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Well, first of all, we have spent 18 months and for us that's a while we are, we have been affirmed that's growing both organically and acquisition. I would point that out that our growth in the last 18 months has been significant that you can say that's organic. If you really think about it, we haven't layered any acquisitions into that. I think it's hard to say that your disciplined in the marketplace when the way you prove that is by not doing deals and so if you don't know about what we haven't done because our number one criteria for doing an acquisition is that it makes us more relevant, but importantly it's accretive and it adds to our returns. So you know with our return on equity and tangible equity, it's a high bar and you measure acquisitions against building the balance sheet or frankly buying back stock and yet that has a level of discipline. So we haven't had anything that has met our return objectives in this time. But you also have to couple that with the fact that it's one thing to announce an acquisition, it's another thing to integrate and execute and bring everyone on board, which has been one of our real successes. And so during the pandemic and working remotely and all the technology challenges that come with that, we raised our owned bar, the risk of execution. When we can even -- for a while couldn't even see people, that would be -- that would raise our risk of doing deals because culturally that's been out, getting to know the people is a very important part of what we do. So you put all that together, it's been slow. But as I sit here today, we're very well capitalized. We see opportunities. And if we can continue to grow as we have for 20 plus years we will do so.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Yes. Okay, great. And maybe just last one here on the recruiting environment in wealth management. Just want to make sure I have kind of the right messaging. So obviously, it sounds like competition is very high right now very high UTA [Phonetic] packages. How should we thinking about kind of the push pull between you said there is a good pipeline. So there are just still sounds like quite a bit to do on the other side is quite expensive. So is the expectation that recruiting may slow a bit or that is prices or costs go up more than maybe you would pull back or is it just more a function of it is expensive, but it's still very economical to do. And so just getting that additional context, I'm trying to just make sure I understand what the bottom line of the messages?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I think, look recruiting is somewhat cyclical. I think you have to look at recruiting over us longer period than just quarter-to-quarter. I've always said that just what we are a strong recruiter. We have proven that over, not just the last few quarters, but the last few decades, and so we're going to adjust to the marketplace. It's in the business, always gets competitive what I see. And this is somewhat instinctive when I talk to people. We were surprised that we were able to maintain recruiting going into the pandemic for people that were in the pipeline and it was, I was surprised as our ability to on board and even open offices during that time. What I'm really seeing beside competition is that the fact that many people don't get too there office, it's slowed the recruiting on the employee channel [Phonetic], they just have -- we have a number of people in the pipeline, but getting through that in this environment has now extended. That's really what we're saying. But as I look at it and talk to people, see what's coming, I am very optimistic about our recruiting.

And then, the other thing, as I said earlier, when you talk, at least compared to peers we're recruiting and just one channel historically, which is the employee channel and now we're going to be adding the independent channel. And that will show a ramp and our just recruited numbers growth. So I think the recruiting business is fine. I think it's always cyclical and we adjust accordingly. I generally probably on balance were accrued last one markets are really crazy, they've been that way. Same with acquisitions and we recruit more when we think the returns are higher but no change.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay, terrific. That's very clear. Thanks, Ron. I will leave it.


The next question will come from the line of Chris Allen with Compass Point.

Chris Allen -- Compass -- Analyst

Good morning, guys. Maybe just a couple of quick follow-ups on Devon's question. I guess, first you mentioned you raised your own bar on the risk of execution for deals, because you can see people. Has that been removed now that the economy is reopening you able to kind of travel and get out and see companies right now?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I think so, I mean I think based on the last couple of days. We might be seeing on the maths [Phonetic] again, but I think that for sure, this economy has been opening up. People are planning on having return to the office as are we. We think that's important. But you know, we'll look for all ever diligent tends to be the updates as it relates to the pandemic and the virus and the delta and all things COVID-19 related. But in general, we believe that people are going back to the office, and that on balance will help our recruiting.

Chris Allen -- Compass -- Analyst

Got it. And then, just on the advisor recruiting environment, you mentioned you've got more competitive. Is it broad based across kind of the larger firms of warehouses or just maybe one or two players that are kind of really pushing the envelope here?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

I think both, it's broad-based; there is always -- you know, you always have leaders and then who is doing what and ever, always the same, but I would say in general, it's very competitive but it does also track as you might expect tracks, the perception or at least the short-term rates and with rates near zero. There might be some models that are discounting that longer than we might be. And so that just results in different IRR type numbers, which might be causing higher transition that's a gap. Again, I can't speak for what other people are doing. But again, I feel very good about where we are in our value proposition. The most important thing is not necessarily are we competing on the money front that's a very short term saying it's important. Most important thing is, do we have a competitive platform and the right culture and are we attracting that's the most important. And on that front, I am very pleased with the improvements we've made in our platform, the technology, this is a great place to come and people know that. So I feel really good about that.

Chris Allen -- Compass -- Analyst

Got it. And then, just on the increased asset growth outlook; I wonder if you provide granularity in terms of where you see the biggest opportunities that continue to be mortgages and set baseline thing is that being driven by your advisors client base or is it more balanced between C&I right now or there other opportunities to grow balances from here?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Yes, let me have Jim take that.

Jim Marischen -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, I mean, I think if you look back over the last two or three quarters. The vast majority of the growth that you've seen has been in fund banking, mortgage lending and securities based lending. I think those all provide an attractive risk-adjusted return today in terms of balance of credit risk and yield. And I think going forward. Those are going to be your main areas of growth.

Chris Allen -- Compass -- Analyst

Understood. That was it from me guys. Appreciate the time.


Next question will come from the line of Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Alex.

Alex Blostein -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Hey, guys. Good morning, thanks for the question. Just another maybe follow up on the independent advisor channel. I heard your comments around pickup in TA packages on the employee side, but as you reenter the independent channel, are you seeing similar pressures there as well? And then, just curious to get your updated thoughts on sort of Stifel's relative value proposition versus some of the larger independent players like our [Indecipherable] that have been doing that for a while?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Yes, well, I must say, in some cases, if you're asking about the cost of recruiting on the independent side, I would say that's even gotten to be the more competitive on the employee side. Everything is relative to expected cash flows. So, that is a competitive also channel, for sure. Yes, we believe that our model allows us to compete. We can do that and get adequate returns. I would say that the independent model is more dependent upon rates than the employee channel in terms of achieving returns, so does rate environment doesn't necessarily support some of the things. But that's least what I see going on. So yes, we can, we have to get our message out and our platform out. As it relates to the platform, which I think is the most relevant in your question, we've brought our independent channel in many ways, and it's almost a branch or a couple of branches within our employee channel. So, what that means is that all the integration, the ability to transact, to provide support is in place and I think that the people have come to see our platform, have been very surprised as to our capabilities to provide a foundation for independent advisors.

Alex Blostein -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Great. And then, just another one around M&A. I think in the past, Ron, you talked about adding maybe some of the asset management capabilities as well, particularly around private markets. Is that still a priority as you guys obviously have significant amount of excess capital to deploy or as we think about the opportunity set for M&A for Stifel, it will largely be centered around kind of the core channels, whether it's the wealth or the institutional channel?

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think that I've said and we'll continue to say that on the asset management side, the asset management in terms of alternative space versus, say, index space broadly speaking, that's where we would have interest. I'm not sure that an acquisition is our priority here. It does the right situation come along that we believe is not something that will be added to our relevance in the marketplace and to our earnings. So, we don't have anything prioritized. I think the firm house has developed to the point where we have a pretty broad-based offering set. That's where a lot of our acquisition in the last five years, system has built our institutional offering. But I think that we see opportunity and we will add to our products appropriately. It's about being relevant and accretive.

Alex Blostein -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks very much.


With that we are showing no further audio questions at this time. I will now hand the conference back over for closing remarks.

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Well, I would like to thank our shareholders and our analyst community for participating on calls -- some very good questions and I will end by saying as I did in my call that the investments that we've made over the number of years is certainly paying dividends in this marketplace. I am optimistic about not only the rest of this year, but frankly into 2022 based on what I'm seeing today and look forward to reporting to our shareholders after our third quarter, which ends in September. So with that, everyone have a great day and stay well. Thank you. [Operator Closing Remarks]

Duration: 55 minutes

Call participants:

Joel Jeffrey -- Head of Investor Relations

Ron Kruszewski -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Jim Marischen -- Chief Financial Officer

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Chris Allen -- Compass -- Analyst

Alex Blostein -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

More SF analysis

All earnings call transcripts

AlphaStreet Logo

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Stifel Financial Stock Quote
Stifel Financial
$62.89 (-2.83%) $-1.83

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 11/28/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.