Image source: The Motley Fool.

Date

Monday, June 1, 2026 at 10 a.m. ET

Call participants

• Chief Executive Officer — James C. Reagan
• Chief Financial Officer and EVP, Enterprise Operations (and interim Civilian Business Lead) — Prabu Natarajan

Takeaways

• Revenue -- $1.9 billion, reflecting organic growth of 0.5%, exceeding prior internal expectations due to timing of materials and the RITS contract extension.
• Adjusted EBITDA -- $222 million, driven by cost efficiency initiatives, strong execution, and a $12 million gain from a venture investment IPO.
• EBITDA margin -- Record performance with a margin boost of 60 basis points from the venture investment sale; full-year margin guidance raised by 20 basis points to a range of 10.1%-10.3%.
• Adjusted diluted EPS -- $3.23, benefitting from improved margins and share count reduction.
• Free cash flow -- $118 million, supporting a full-year outlook of greater than $600 million, and guidance of at least $14 per share for this year and $13 for fiscal 2028 as tax assets wind down.
• Net leverage -- 3.1x, within targeted range and trending downward, with expectations for continued deleveraging as EBITDA rises.
• Annual guidance update -- Adjusted EPS guidance boosted by approximately 4% to a range of $9.90-$10.10; sales guidance maintained, with expectations for performance at or slightly above the midpoint.
• Book-to-bill ratio -- 1.1x for the quarter and 1.0x on a trailing 12-month basis, reflecting $2.1 billion in net bookings, including a $200 million recompete win at the Department of Homeland Security.
• Qualified pipeline -- Stated at approximately $85 billion; enterprise IT now represents a smaller component versus the previous quarter, as portfolio realignment priorities shift towards higher-value segments.
• On-contract growth (OCG) -- Anticipated at 2%-3% for fiscal 2027, down from the historical 6%-8% rates in prior years, with a substantial contribution from programs ramping up after previously delayed starts.
• Portfolio strategy -- Active portfolio and pipeline review underway, with "natural portfolio realignment this year as we digest recompete losses, primarily in the large enterprise IT market."
• Vanguard/Evolve program -- Civilian segment identified the State Department Evolve program as a "multi-award contract vehicle with a $10 billion ceiling over 7 years"; company currently delivers $250 million per year on Vanguard and expects to compete for expanded scope.
• Civil business margins -- Civil segment reported a margin of 15%, with company remarking "this business to operate consistently at 15% or so" after historical improvement from 12%-12.5%.
• RITS roll-off impact -- The unsuccessful RITS recompete is expected to become a $200 million headwind beginning in Q3, contributing roughly a 3% headwind to organic growth in Q3 and Q4.
• Buyback activity -- $188 million in share repurchases completed during the quarter, with a full-year buyback target of approximately $400 million, and continued opportunistic stance.
• Leadership change -- CEO Reagan announced the departure of Srinivas Attili as civilian business group chief; Prabu Natarajan to serve as interim lead in addition to CFO and EVP responsibilities.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected]

Risks

• CEO Reagan cited, "recompete losses, primarily in the large enterprise IT market," necessitating portfolio realignment and signaling ongoing pressure in commoditized sectors.
• The unsuccessful RITS recompete and resulting roll-off present a $200 million revenue headwind, specifically contributing to projected organic revenue contraction in the second half of the fiscal year.
• Management noted that, "RFPs and submissions are still slowed by environmental factors," and acknowledged that "unknown unknowns that could still impact the year as they did in fiscal 2026," highlighting persistent external uncertainty.
• "enterprise IT now comprising a smaller share compared to last quarter. This reflects our selectivity in this part of the market," indicating a strategic retrenchment from lower-margin opportunities, potentially reducing total addressable revenue base.

Summary

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC +16.97%) launched the year with 0.5% organic revenue growth, a record EBITDA margin, and robust free cash flow, outpacing initial expectations through disciplined execution and favorable contract timing. Management raised full-year adjusted EPS guidance by 4% and updated margin targets, benefiting from a one-time venture gain, yet maintained a measured view of organic growth due to anticipated contract roll-offs and persistent environmental unpredictability. Portfolio strategy shifted materially, with a reduced focus on commoditized enterprise IT and an emphasis on higher-value, mission-critical areas, as evidenced by pipeline realignment and a major opportunity in the Department of State's new Evolve program. Internally, a leadership transition in the civilian business and the launch of Project Orbit were disclosed to accelerate both investment and operational transformation, with a $400 million buyback plan reaffirmed as part of disciplined capital deployment.

• Management stated that half of anticipated OCG for this year derives from several programs that scaled slower than forecast last year, but are now annualizing at $400 million in the current quarter.
• The book-to-bill momentum is described as "recovering even with a smaller pipeline," indicating improved targeting and bidding discipline in business development.
• Portfolio review outcomes—including possible divestitures and acquisitions—will be outlined in more detail in the December earnings call, as part of an explicit ongoing strategy refresh.
• CEO Reagan confirmed the company is not planning "huge large scale investments in building new large plants," and will instead focus capital allocation on targeted, scalable hardware and mission engineering opportunities.
• Guidance maintains sales expectations "at or slightly above the midpoint," but incorporates "conservatism" due to remaining uncertainties and anticipated roll-offs, especially relating to RITS and customary seasonality.
• Civil segment margin improvement was attributed to fixed-price and time-and-materials contract mix, with a strategic preference for margin expansion over top-line pursuit in current market conditions.
• Management expects the full-year free cash flow outlook to remain "greater than $600 million," despite increased investment, with targeted conversion rates supported by historical performance and expected tax asset roll-off in fiscal 2028.

Industry glossary

• RITS: Recompete contract referenced as a significant U.S. government program, now a recognized revenue headwind for SAIC due to contract loss and phase-out.
• On-contract growth (OCG): Revenue generated as awarded government contracts ramp up, sometimes after implementation delays, distinct from new contract wins.
• Book-to-bill ratio: Ratio of net new business bookings to recognized revenue in a given period, capturing growth momentum and pipeline strength.
• Vanguard/Evolve: The Department of State's IT infrastructure contract where Vanguard is the legacy program (~$250 million/year for SAIC), and Evolve is its expanded multi-billion, multi-award successor vehicle.
• Project Orbit: Internal transformation initiative aimed at freeing investment capacity by reengineering cost structures and enhancing sustainable EBITDA margins.

Full Conference Call Transcript

James C. Reagan: Thank you, John, and good morning to everyone joining our call. I am pleased to say that the year is off to a good start. I want to recognize our 23 thousand employees whose relentless commitment to execution excellence made these results possible. Sustaining strong margins and industry leading cash flow reflects the team's discipline and focus in a dynamic environment. This is operational excellence in action with our strong underlying results highlighting our potential to deliver double digit margins on a sustainable basis. Since I accepted the permanent CEO job earlier this year, my focus has broadened beyond execution to include spending time with all of our stakeholders our shareholders, customers, and employees.

My shareholder meetings made it clear that we have work to do to regain trust by proving that we can grow organically on a sustained basis. This quarter's result is a step in the right direction but I know this is a multi quarter journey. My customer meetings focused on the value that we continue to bring to enable a wide variety of missions. That are increasing in their complexity and velocity. It is also clear that our industry has to invest to keep pace in a fast moving environment. Our flexible business model is well suited to these tasks and we are excited to deliver on these commitments.

And my employee meetings highlighted the distinct privilege I have to lead an exceptional group of people working to solve the nation's most critical challenges. I am grateful to our team for their patience and determination in taking on new roles, responsibilities, and mindsets to address enduring customer demand and to create value for all of our stakeholders. So please turn to slide 3 for our key messages. First, we are built on a strong foundation and operate with an enduring purpose. We deliver critical capabilities to our customers to help them address their most complex challenges. And we do this by developing solutions that enable speed, capacity, and decision making dominance.

For decades, we have evolved with our customers as we anticipate their needs and operate at the speed of mission. This evolution requires us to continuously evaluate and refine the portfolio. There is some natural portfolio realignment this year as we digest recompete losses, primarily in the large enterprise IT market. We are also actively controlling our future as we build a premier portfolio of integrated mission critical capabilities more aligned to budget priorities and more insulated against the commoditization that we have seen in certain parts of the market. We have initiated a portfolio review and look forward to sharing more information on our December earnings call.

You should expect to see a more agile SAIC built for the future underpinned by our mission depth, and capability. And as we have shared previously, we initiated a pipeline review to refine our bidding strategy to more closely align with our differentiators and where we enjoy a higher probability of winning. Our qualified pipeline sits at about 85 billion and is more focused with enterprise IT now comprising a smaller share compared to last quarter. This reflects our selectivity in this part of the market. We are also pursuing opportunities earlier and more deliberately leaning into key areas where we know we can deliver better and faster.

This includes our mission and engineering businesses, which comprise a greater share of our pipeline and are outgrowing the rest of the portfolio due to recent wins and ongoing investments. These dynamics support further organic portfolio realignment. And we continue to evaluate potential additions and subtractions to the portfolio to accelerate growth enhance margins, and further develop high value areas where we are able to bring our investments to bear.

Prabu Natarajan: As I said last quarter, I am excited by what made SA great to begin with. Delivering innovative science, technology, and engineering solutions in support of the security of The United States and its allies. And there is a lot going on in the world demanding our support. Elevated operational tempo is driving faster decision making in a variety of hardware and software platforms where we currently play a role. We continue to engage with customers to enhance capability and capacity. And we continue to leverage new tools that help us deliver more effectively and efficiently.

In recent years, we have helped defense, intelligence, and civilian agencies establish data and knowledge standards and develop multimodal AI, and build secure data layers that underpin some of the nation's most sensitive missions. Today, we are applying AI to modernize legacy code, generate operational tasking orders, enhance human machine teaming, strengthen data fusion, and harden cyber defenses. The opportunity ahead is not about delivering an AI product. it is about how quickly we can integrate and operationalize these capabilities in real world missions. I appreciate that we can only say so much about the opportunities and in some cases the risks, that accompany rapid technological shifts.

But at the end of the day, it comes down to our ability to put up continued performance as AI adoption increases. I look forward to delivering those results. And that brings me to top line improvement.

James C. Reagan: Appropriations are starting to flow from last year's legislation, albeit unevenly. And we expect another large appropriation for FY 2027. While our growth does not depend on $1 trillion plus defense budget, certainly helps. RFPs and submissions are still slowed by environmental factors, although we are on track for awards. Recompete win rates are stabilizing. As we expect them to return to the 90% range. And new business win rates continued to perform well above 30%. And I am encouraged by the modest organic growth that we saw this quarter despite our recompete headwinds from last year. We also continue to build on our margin and cash momentum.

Fiscal first quarter margin was a company record driven by strong program execution. While we could see this margin level offset through year end by key investments to support growth, these results demonstrate what we are capable of and support our full year guidance. reflecting our strong execution. And we saw another good quarter for cash, Maintaining this momentum relies partly on the enterprise transformation process we announced in February. 3.5 thousand ideas from across the company which our dedicated team is now analyzing and prioritizing for execution. We will have more information on these efforts on our next earnings call in September.

Taken together, these results and our continued efforts reflect our focus on execution controlling what we can control, and rebuilding our growth momentum. We have raised our guidance to account for some of this quarter's upside although we are mindful of remaining investments, recompete roll-offs and uncertainties that could impact the remaining quarters. And as I have said before, FY 2027 is a year of commitment. We are setting targets that we are confident that we can achieve. In closing, we see significant opportunity to drive value for our shareholders create greater opportunities for our employees, and most importantly, continue the mission of supporting our customers and our country.

Before turning the call over, I do want to address this morning's announcement that Srinivas Attili is leaving SAIC as we make a leadership change in our civilian business group to support our positive momentum. We thank Srinivas for his contributions, we wish him well. Our CFO and EVP of enterprise operations, Prabu Natarajan, will serve as interim head of the civilian business while we identify a permanent replacement. Prabu's experience running complex businesses and driving execution excellence makes him well suited for this expanded role. He has my and the board's full confidence. Our civilian business delivers industry leading capabilities to critical clients and is a strong performer in our portfolio.

We are strongly committed to our efforts in this market and focused on keeping the momentum going.

Prabu Natarajan: And with that, I will turn the call over to Prabu. Thank you, Jim. I appreciate the opportunity to support the civilian segment during this transition period while continuing my other responsibilities. There are strong teams in place in our civilian segment, in finance, and in enterprise operations. I am grateful for their dedication to the mission and to SAIC and I am confident in our ability to continue delivering for all stakeholders. As our Q1 performance reflects the civil segment is operating from a position of strength delivering leading technology solutions supporting a variety of critical missions.

This includes our enterprise IT capabilities where we operate largely under outcome based contracts that are creating value for SAIC and for our customers. I am excited about our opportunities in this business and for continued margin strength. 1 key opportunity is the Vanguard recompete which we have been closely engaged in for years, As we previously shared, Vanguard supports the Department of State's global IT infrastructure and generates roughly 250 million of annual sales at above average margins. The new program, Evolve, is a multi award contract vehicle with a $10 billion ceiling over 7 years. It is bigger, and broader than Vanguard as it consolidates work beyond our current scope.

We look forward to competing on the task orders as we incrementally derisk this recompete over the course of the next several quarters. We have delivered excellence for 15 years, we look forward to many more with Evolve supporting this highly critical mission and customer. Now let's get into the results. Turning to Slide 4. We reported first quarter revenue of $1.9 representing organic growth of 50 basis points better than expected due to timing of materials and the RITS extension. We are encouraged by this result as we see the growth environment improving, although it is still uneven.

As a result, we remain cautious around the unknown unknowns that could still impact the year as they did in FY 26. We reported robust adjusted EBITDA of $222 million in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin reflects strong program execution some benefit from our ongoing cost efficiency efforts and a $12 million gain associated with the IPO of a venture investment. Our venture strategy is to back early stage innovators that accelerate our long term growth. Although we have divested our ownership position, we continue the commercial relationship with the company in line with our objective of bringing enhanced capability to the government market.

The sale added 60 basis points to our EBITDA margin in the quarter and approximately $0.20 to EPS. Adjusted diluted earnings per share was $3.23 in the quarter, benefiting from better margins and a lower share count. Free cash flow was $118 million in the quarter, a strong result as we remain focused on maintaining our peer best cash conversion and deploying the capital to maximize long term value for all stakeholders. Net leverage, is within our target range, down to 3.1x this quarter. We expect to continue to naturally delever as EBITDA improves in the years ahead. Please turn to Slide 5 to review our forward indicators. As Jim mentioned, our pipeline is now more focused on our differentiators.

And while customer disruptions continue to pressure submissions, as was the case in FY 26, the environment is now improving and our BD teams are on target for the year as we plan to accelerate submissions. We are encouraged to see submits and awards recovering even with a smaller pipeline highlighting the benefits of our enhanced focus. Net bookings, of 2.1 billion reflected a mix of new and recompete including an important $200 million recompete win in our DHS business where we integrate our software expertise with purpose built hardware to support safer, and more efficient ports of entry. This resulted in a quarterly book to bill of 1.1x or 1.0x on a trailing 12-month basis.

We are encouraged by the momentum we are already seeing in the current quarter and we expect to achieve our annual targets. Please turn to Slide 6. This quarter's organic growth of 0.5% was better than expected. While we acknowledge that our comps get easier as the year progresses, we are maintaining our sales guidance as we continue to take a measured approach to the year appreciating that there were timing benefits this quarter and that there are still uncertainties in a dynamic environment.

James C. Reagan: A key driver of our sales trajectory this year is the unsuccessful RITS recompete which we expected would be a $200 million headwind in FY 27 as it rolled off in F2Q. However, our protest was only recently adjudicated, so RITS will likely now roll off in Q3. Partially offsetting our recompete headwinds this year is on contract growth. Or OCG, which we expect will remain at 2% to 3% in FY 2027. This is in line with what we saw in FY 2026 and is below the 6% to 8% we saw in FY 24 and FY 25. We are encouraged by the improved OCG we saw in Q1 although some of this was timing.

Roughly half of this year's planned OCG comes from a handful of programs we won over the last 2 years that ramped slower than expected last year. As I said last quarter, those programs generated $350 million last year and we are planning for $500 million this year. We are on track as these programs are currently running at an annualized rate of about $400 million through F1Q. And as we continue to position the company for long term growth, we are making targeted investments in several high priority mission areas where customer demand and strategic relevance continue to accelerate.

This includes advancing next generation command and control capabilities to enable faster, data-driven, multi-domain decision-making modernizing legacy radar capabilities to support evolving needs and expanding our work with loitering munitions and other autonomous systems by establishing domestic production lines to broaden industrial base capacity. We continue to take a disciplined approach to these efforts focused on where we can earn the most appropriate returns. Please turn to Slide 7.

Prabu Natarajan: We are maintaining our sales guidance since it is still early in the year. We also want to account for recompete headwinds and environmental uncertainties. However, we expect to finish at or slightly above the midpoint of our sales guidance due to the RITS extension. We will revisit our sales guidance on our next call but we are well positioned to meet our sales commitments. We are increasing our EBITDA guidance to account for the venture investment gain and other performance items that benefited F1Q which adds 20 basis points to the full year margin guidance which we now see at 10.1% to 10.3%.

As previously mentioned, we continue to see meaningful opportunities to improve margins in the future while also investing in growth. We also see upside on tax rate, as a few outstanding issues resolve in our favor. As a result, our adjusted EPS guidance increases by approximately 4% to a range of $9.9 to $10.10.

James C. Reagan: Our free cash flow outlook of greater than $600 million is unchanged even as we plan to invest in discrete opportunities in support of growth. We continue to see at least $14 of free cash flow per share this year and at least $13 of free cash flow per share next year in FY 2028 as historical tax assets roll off. We know that an increasingly favorable budget backdrop is only relevant if we can improve enterprise wide performance. We are off to a good start but there is more work to do. I am confident that our efforts will continue to translate into significant value creation for our stakeholders in the coming years.

With that, I will turn the call over for Q&A.

Operator: And wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press 11 again. Our first question comes from Jason Gursky with Citi.

Analyst (Jason Gursky): Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my Great quarter. I would love to just revisit and dig into the organic growth outlook a little bit. You had mentioned that there were some timing benefits in the fiscal first quarter, some business rolling off later in the year, but you were encouraged by the momentum you are already seeing. Just that chart, that great chart on Slide 6 with the positive organic growth on the toughest comp of the quarter, it just makes it hard to bridge to negative 2% to -4 for the full year.

Prabu Natarajan: There might be conservatism. it is been a choppy backdrop, so I do not think anybody would hold that against you guys. But I was hoping we could just kind of dialogue about the shape of the year, how you see it, and whether there is upside to that guide. It seems maybe a little bit obvious that there may be. John, good morning. Here, and thanks for the question. Big picture, obviously, we are pleased with the way Q1 turned out. And we also recognize that Q1 had by far the tougher comps relative to last year where we actually grew the business about 3%.

So I think really big picture as you began to allude to it, John, I think we are being I would say, cautious given what we saw last year and just the volatility we saw between the quarters.

I would say I would not probably quarrel with the math that a -2 to -4 becomes harder to comprehend given the solid start we had to the year I think we are just, firmly got our conservative hat on now on the revenue guide, recognizing that there is 9 months left in the year, and, there was enough choppiness last year that, if anything, we have learned the lessons from the last couple years and recognize that we are in a relatively solid place on guidance. And as we said in the script, we will revisit guidance on the organic growth side on the second quarter call.

John, we also added in the script as you might have noticed, the view that we expect sort of revenue to be sort of closer to the midpoint, maybe a little bit ahead of the midpoint. On the guide. So we are nudging it up, I would say, qualitatively inside of the current guide. But recognize there is probably some tailwinds here. And Q1 really benefited from strong on contract growth at 5%. And, last year's Q1, just to be clear, was about 8%, and then we saw OCG tail off over the course of the year last year.

And our view is, given, we do not have full insight into what might happen over the next 2 or 3 quarters, Let's take it slow and revisit the guide in Q2, but would not quarrel with the math that, 4% contraction certainly looks like an outlier at this point.

Analyst (Jason Gursky): Got it. Okay. that is that is super helpful color.

Prabu Natarajan: Appreciate it. And Jim, in your prepared remarks, you had mentioned portfolio review possibility of additions and subtractions to the portfolio.

Analyst (Jason Gursky): I am sort of asking the question very high level, but I would love it if you could kind of elaborate on the thoughts there.

James C. Reagan: Sure. Well, thanks for your question. You know, when I took the job back in October, I was really focused as an interim CEO on just the tactics thinking that strategy could be left for the person that came in to be permanent, and that person's now me.

Analyst (Jason Gursky): So for the past couple of months, we have been really focused on strategy.

James C. Reagan: And part of that is going to mean that we are gonna look at the opportunities where we can meet customer needs that you know, the customers are coming to us for speed. They are coming at us for agility. Both of which we are well suited to deliver on. But, you know, we have signaled already that we are probably not going to continue investing quite as heavily in the more commoditized enterprise IT areas. that is just 1 example. And we are going through the entire portfolio in a refresh of our strategy to look at the areas where customer needs probably do not show up in the fast current anymore.

And we are going to try to make sure that the emphasis that we put on where we are investing is gonna be whether it is, internal and organic growth, what we are looking at investing in our bid pipeline, but also as we think about, what M&A looks like for the next, 12 to 18 months, making sure that we are aligned with the speed that the customers are looking for areas where we can round out our capabilities as well as customer penetration. For, the coming investment cycle. Hopefully, that helps, John.

Analyst (Jason Gursky): that is great. that is great color. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it.

James C. Reagan: Sure.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jonathan Siegman with Stifel.

Analyst (Jonathan Siegman): Good morning, Jim, Prabu and John. Thanks for taking my question.

Prabu Natarajan: Morning, John.

James C. Reagan: Good morning, John.

Analyst (Jonathan Siegman): Hey, maybe just talk a little bit about appropriations starting to flow and on contract growth improving.

Prabu Natarajan: Can you talk a little bit about where you are seeing specifically the areas where that improvement occurring and are there areas where it is not-- we should note Thank you. Hey, John. Appreciate the question. Prabu here. So let me maybe paint the color here inside of the defense market. I would say really big picture, I think we are starting to see appropriations flow inside of our navy business. I think they continue to see that tailwind from appropriation. So and as you all know, we have a navy business that is, over $1 billion and continues to grow nicely for us.

I think we are actually starting to see, you know, within pockets of the army, some of that increased appropriations. I think, we are especially-- think about the next gen, you know, command and control programs, Think loitering munitions on the navy side.

James C. Reagan: Think MSHORAD increment 4 on the army side. We are seeing a handful of different areas where we are seeing that money start to flow through, recognizing we have not seen much if any, of the big, beautiful bill reconciliation yet.

Prabu Natarajan: So there is, certainly some upside there. Space and intel, I would say, I would say we are seeing a little more in the way of appropriations money coming on the I would say, you know, digital range modernization program. We are seeing some of the benefit come through our GMAS radar sustainment program where we are continuing to see some really top notch performance on our sustainment work on the legacy PARCS and UEWR radars. So we are seeing some real value creation there for the customers.

James C. Reagan: And so we are seeing in a couple of different pockets. I think part of the reason, and I recognize this is probably a little bit of a derivative of the first question we got, is you know, since we are starting to see some of that benefit, we are cautiously optimistic that we will continue to see that flow And 1 of the key goalposts that we are looking for is by, let's call it midsummer this year, where are the agencies and the departments relative to the full year monies that they need to spend.

Prabu Natarajan: And we think I am cautiously optimistic that there is probably more to come in the second half of the year. So I think the caution is we are in an election year. Heading towards, some uncertainty there, and, we just want to be appropriately thought and prudent in the way we are thinking about it. But broad based, you know, I am going to say movement on the appropriations fund and the reality is we are just taking it 1 month at a time right now, and, hopefully, we continue to see this trend sustain. Jim, would you add into that?

James C. Reagan: Noah. I think you have covered it well. Thanks.

Analyst (Jonathan Siegman): Thank you. And maybe just on capital allocation, $188 million in share repurchases. Large relative to last year's quarterly run rate. Just wondering if uses of cash is under scope of the portfolio review. Thank you.

James C. Reagan: Well, you know, I think that the buybacks we did were I think, timely and prudent. And in the in the lack in the absence of other things to invest in, the best place that we thought we could invest it in ourselves. That said, we are actively looking at some opportunities in the market that are aligned to our strategy. And, opportunities to round out capabilities where we see customer demand, but also opportunities to move into customer areas that an acquisition would accelerate our strategy, versus trying to do it organically.

Prabu Natarajan: Thank you, Jim. Hey, John. The 1 thing I would add to that is, you know, our view that we want to be, generally very disciplined about our cap deployment has not really changed. We are focused on the internal investments we are making. And the reality is I think the investments we are making in key partnerships and, you know, the tuck in M&A that Jim referred to and, not to mention, kind of the opportunities we see within certain of the domains that we are operating in I think there is probably plenty of opportunity for us to continue to invest in the business. And our buyback program has always been opportunistic.

James C. Reagan: And when we saw the kind of dislocation to the stock price, I think, it is really our fiduciary duty to do the right thing for our shareholders, which we did.

Prabu Natarajan: And we have not changed our full year buyback plan of you know, let's call it roughly $400 million. So you will see some change in the, buyback volume in the second half of the year, if the stock continues to trade up the way it has today. So again, very opportunistic, and I would say we are continuing to actively invest inside the company around digital infrastructure, and, obviously, the AI related investments we are making inside of the company.

James C. Reagan: And then the last comment I would make is, relative to project Orbit that Jim referred to in the earnings script. Part of the thesis behind project Orbit is to free up investment capacity. We recognize that running EBITDA margins at over 10%, it is hard to you know, I am going to say invest at scale out of profit. So we are creating investment capacity inside the company so we can actually improve the capabilities we can bring to the warfighter. And I think that is probably the ultimate driving force behind Project Orbit.

As we said on the call, we will provide you all a more detailed update on the second quarter call But think of that as a way that is going to allow us to invest more in the business in a way that no amount of CapEx or profit ever could.

Analyst (Jonathan Siegman): And we are managing about 7 billion of costs across the enterprise, And even if we can get a small sliver of that to go back into reinvestment for customers, I think that is probably the most bullish signal we can send because we are not waiting for funding to be available. We are creating the resources to be able fund the business. Good answer. Thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from Matt Akers with BNP.

Analyst (Matt Akers): Hey, good morning, everybody. Thanks for the question. I wanted to kind of follow-up on the portfolio questions. Are you hardware and how big that could become as a share of SAIC kind of has not been a big focus, but heard you guys talk about command and control and radars, loitering munitions, So just how big do you think you can get?

James C. Reagan: And is that more of a organic growth opportunity or something you could invest into to maybe partner with somebody else?

Analyst (Matt Akers): Sure. Thanks for the question, Matt.

James C. Reagan: You know, we have always had a very disciplined capital light approach. To how we deploy, including investments in the kinds of things that you just mentioned. And we do great work in places like Crane, Indiana where we support the production of the mark 48 torpedo. The loitering munitions work that we do in Charleston and in other places, and that is gonna continue to be, that kind of work is gonna continue to be part of what we deliver to customers and deliver on their needs.

Now that said, I do not think that you should be looking for us to make huge large scale investments in building new large plants but we are certainly ready actually have proposals in front of customers to upscale the production rates on the kinds of things that I just mentioned. And we are prepared to invest more to meet those customer demands. So I think that what you what you are really gonna see is a lot more in rapid prototyping, upscaling the kind of work that we are doing, and meeting the customer needs for a much elevated operational tempo given the conflicts that are currently ongoing.

Prabu Natarajan: Thank you, Jim. Hey, Matt. If I can add to that. I think we do a fair amount of work touching hardware I think, as Jim correctly pointed out, operating at that intersection of hardware and software is where historically the engineering strength of this company has been. And so you should expect to see us do that. I think the segue into that kind of work comes typically out of some of the sustainment work we are doing. So for example, radars, called out because we won the GMAS radar sustainment program and our engineering teams have really have delivered some phenomenal performance out of those legacy radars, with software.

So our capacity to understand hardware architecture along with I am going to say, software defined hardware, And given all the software chops, we bring and given the infusion of AI into the software, we are actually moving a little more quickly and it has given us a real opportunity to differentiate ourselves. The Mark 48 heavyweight torpedo, the work that we do there for the Navy, it began as a small sustainment contract. And has grown into a large production contract.

So we are gonna be really disciplined about where we want to touch hardware, But I think of this as a way for us to begin in services or sustainment and move up market or up the vertical stack, if you will, on hardware But as Jim said, do not expect us to become a hardware prime.

James C. Reagan: I think we know our sweet spot. We know what we are good at. And we have to stay disciplined.

Analyst (Matt Akers): So great. Great. Thank you for that. And then if I could ask on margins, guess, Q1 EBITDA margin, even if I back out $12 million gain on sale, were quite strong. So just curious how you are thinking about that? And could that maybe persist for the rest of the year?

Prabu Natarajan: Yeah. Hey, Matt. Appreciate the question. Look, I think as you pointed out, x the sale of the venture investment, margins were, I am going to say, mid to upper 10%. And what is implied in the guide is probably mid to upper 9%. You know, the teams have done a fabulous job so far just putting their heads down and executing. Our objectives have not changed. As I would point out, our incentive comp metric does reward outsized EBITDA margin rate performance.

James C. Reagan: That was 1 of the changes we made this year. So I think the incentives are aligned for the teams to continue to drive, But, again, I would say just recognizing we are still early in the year, We want the teams to have the elbow room to go execute and do the right things And the reality is, when we set aggressive targets early in the year and the teams are chasing you end up taking on some bad business. This start has allowed us to be very measured about the kinds of work we wanna do over the course of the year, and into next year.

Prabu Natarajan: But I would not argue with the math that we should do better than perhaps what is implied in the guide, but we have to go deliver. And every day, every week here, brings a level of [Inaudible] that we had not seen before. So we just have to be measured and, give the teams the room to go operate because, obviously, they are the ones delivering frontline performance, and, we want to make sure they have the room to operate.

Analyst (Matt Akers): Great. Thank you very much.

Prabu Natarajan: Sure, Matt.

Operator: Our next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan.

Analyst (Seth Seifman): Hey, thanks very much and good morning. Just maybe to follow-up with morning. Just a little bit more granularity about the margin. The benefit from the sale of the venture investment assuming that was in the corporate section, And we saw, I guess, some particularly strong results in each of the segments. Is there anything you would highlight that was particularly unique about the operational performance in either of the segments this quarter. I think this is the highest civil margin that we have seen that we have data for.

Prabu Natarajan: Yep. I appreciate the question, Seth, and I am able to start with the civil part of this. You know, really big picture, we saw broad based outperformance across the portfolio. that is including our defense intel business as well as our civil business. Maybe I will start with a civil commentary first, maybe-- or perhaps a little selfishly, but, you know, a couple of years ago, this business was, operating at about 12, 12.5%.

James C. Reagan: And what we said at the time was, expect that mid 12% to be the trough for that business that we would expect this business to operate consistently at 15% or so. And here we are at 15% in the second quarter, and I think the team continues to exceedingly well perform. As you know, the vast majority of the T and M and fixed price work in the portfolio sits in our civil business, and the team's done a fabulous job, I think, really executing.

And we are really hoping to execute to that continued margin momentum on defense and Intel, I would just say, over the last, I would say, 3, 4, maybe even 5 years, we have consistently moved the bar on margin rate performance inside the business. We constantly revisit thresholds that we want the businesses to bid at, We are always looking at the pipeline to say, the work accretive or dilutive to the enterprise? And every year, in the last 3 to 5 years, we have actually moved the thresholds for work even on cost plus programs.

In other words, we were expecting and we have talked about this in the past on prior calls around you know, just bidding to more profitable elements of the portfolio.

Prabu Natarajan: And we are starting to see some of that benefit come through. Again, I do not want to get too on a single quarter's performance.

James C. Reagan: The reality is we have to sustain this momentum. And if we do end up performing better than what is implied in our guide, as Jim said and as I have said, there are opportunities for real investment in the business that we can now have the, I am going to say, quote, unquote, luxury of investing more in the business and hopefully secure some important not just recompetes, but also new work that is out there.

Prabu Natarajan: So again, this is the benefit of giving yourself the operational levers to be able to outperform, And we have not really had that the last couple of years or so, and, what I personally love about this quarter is that we have got some more levers this year that we did not have the last couple of years. So all good, but we have work to do, Seth, and, I am never gonna get ahead of, where the reported results are.

Analyst (Seth Seifman): Great. Great. Thanks. And then maybe as a follow-up, you know, Jim, I think there is a perception that there are some competitive headwinds emerging for services across the industry that the administration, is, you know, a bit ambivalent about the role of services in for the government.

Prabu Natarajan: Can you talk a little bit about the types of feedback that you have been getting customers, you know, kind of where you see opportunities now, and also maybe to the extent that we do see strong budget growth in 2027, is there does that kind of bring [Inaudible] along with it? Is there a world where there is really robust growth in appropriations in 2027 and the company does not participate in that?

James C. Reagan: Well, you know, I think as I said during the prepared remarks, the direction that the budget's going and whether you believe a trillion 1 and a quarter trillion, or even a trillion--?

Prabu Natarajan: Any of those scenarios give us opportunity for growth. And then and where we see the opportunities is where the government is clearly not ambivalent about the role of a company like SAIC. it is in the areas where it is not just radar sustainment, but radar modernization. there is plenty of opportunity. For example, there we have talked about areas of munitions the mark 48 torpedo program as an example, loitering munitions, that we mentioned on the in the prepared remarks as well. Just by way of giving you some ideas.

And then also our intimate knowledge with how the-- how the customer operates give us the opportunities we are executing on now around data fusion, data integration, battle space management, the acceleration of decision making, in areas of I would say, battle space execution. Are a few of the examples where I do not think that the government is showing us any signs of ambivalence. I think that the areas where we want to scale back a bit, and we have talked about it on the last call, we are reiterating it. Here is anything that is commoditized on the IT side where customer loyalties are more focused on price than they are execution.

And capabilities is where we are probably going to spend a little bit less emphasis on.

James C. Reagan: I want to-- just 1 thing to add there, Jim. It was really good.

Prabu Natarajan: I think Seth you know, this business has always seen, I would say, good competition. And I you know, we would say, you know, the administration's call for companies to put more skin in the game is probably exactly the right thing to do.

James C. Reagan: There are plenty of opportunities for us to invest in the DIB, and, we are doing that. Technology into some extent AI, can be deflationary. So what we have to do is as we have done over multiple decades, is ensure that we can do more with less using technology to drive our performance. I think part of why we have always said the move to outcome based contracts is a good thing for the sector is because we have demonstrated the capacity to deliver strong margins in an outcome oriented environment. So I think all of those things on the macro side are good. I think the other thing that, Jim was alluding to is just as important.

I think we want to be at the intersection where you know, the systems are converging. And, you know, legacy distinctions between title 10 title 50, title 18, they are all starting to merge, and to be operating in the data layer where the data is not owned by individual companies, but it is fully democratized so we can bring the best of the tools that are available to get the most out of the architectures in place as well as the data that is being generated.

Prabu Natarajan: So there is a unique role companies like SAIC to operate sort of at this hybrid, I am going to say, hardware, software intersection I am going to say platform data intersection.

James C. Reagan: that is really unique and somewhat exciting. And I think that is where our focus is And, ultimately, we run these systems for the government.

Prabu Natarajan: We believe the government owns the data to these systems and delivering the best value, for these programs, it remains our topmost priority.

Analyst (Seth Seifman): Great. Thank you very much.

Operator: Our next question comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Was feeling lucky.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): 6 questions in, and no 1 asked about civil margins crushing it, but Seth killed it. So Prabu, I appreciate how you talked about a few years ago.

Prabu Natarajan: They were at trough levels 12%, and now they are at 15%. If you could give a little bit more detail I know you are great at cost and controlling everything. How are you thinking about that in terms of Civil and these margins? What customers are driving it? Maybe if you could talk about the specific contracts.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): Yeah. Sheila, I appreciate the question. And you know, look really big picture.

Prabu Natarajan: I would say the civil portfolio has had, you know, I would say broad based improvement on the margin front over the last few years. And I really want to acknowledge the hard work that the team's done to put us in this position.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): I would say, you know, because that portfolio is almost a 100% fixed price in T and M work, The reality is they have more levers that our defense and intel business simply does not have given their preponderance of cost plus work. So I would probably start there at the biggest level. You know, the civil business, you know, the DOJ, was hard in the industry. But the civil business has actually held their own the last couple of years on top line. And they have not seen the contraction we saw in the rest of the market. But it is not what I would call a growth supportive environment right now.

Now we are hopeful that changes, and our message to the teams internally is at this point, you could go chase a dollar of revenue where the p win or the p get, if you will, is not very high.

Prabu Natarajan: Or you can put your energy to work at delivering a margin of a dollar of EBITDA. And the teams have actually done a really nice job, and it is that focus that we wanna continue to drive inside the business and position ourselves for when that growth starts to inflect in the portfolio. The work we do at Department of State, the work that we do at DHS, patents, Department of Commerce, interior, they all tend to be you know, good contracts that are delivering good sized EBITDA growth for us.

And that is what the team's focused on and not chasing top line And the message internally has also been that to the extent top line starts to inflect up, and we are delivering more growth out of the civil business, then let that growth drive margins down, and that is an okay trade to make over time.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): Because you are ultimately growing EBITDA dollars there. So that is how we have approached it. Again, it is come together really well this quarter. But I do not want to get too far ahead of what the rest of the year brings. The rest of the year brings.

Prabu Natarajan: Okay. Noah. that is super helpful. And then if I could ask maybe 1 more big picture 1 as you thought about setting your fiscal 27 guidance. You talked about the low margin enterprise IT work kind of you know, removing that from your, you know, kind of from your pipeline and submits. And then your revenue, how do we think about it impacting those 3 as we think about it progressing through the quarters this year? You know, do we how do we think about that impact Do we think about it impacting your pipeline and submits at all as well?

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): Yeah. Big picture, Sheila. I think our pipelines come down I would say, from this time last year by about 25%. The vast majority of that con contraction has been in our enterprise IT portfolio. And I wanna be really crisp about how we say this. I think we are not saying that market is not an important market. For us. I think we simply wanna say that we are gonna be very calibrated and selective Yeah.

Prabu Natarajan: On the-- we chase inside of that market.

James C. Reagan: And our civil business is predominantly an IT work. So we know how to do that work well, but chasing enterprise IT work in the more commoditized parts of the market where it is cost plus and not outcome oriented, is not the right Venn diagram that we are trying to strike here. So that is where the focus is. As we cycle through the remainder of the year, I think, our expectation would be that, you know, enterprise IT will always be an important part of it.

Analyst: But probably not the predominant driver of the quality of the portfolio in this company.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): Exactly. It just to reiterate, the enterprise IT work done for our civilian customers because the contract formats are more outcome based They give us opportunity to drive better results for our customers lower cost for our customers, but also higher margins for us. And that would be a great model if we could have it everywhere, but we cannot, at least not in the short run.

James C. Reagan: And so we are gonna be, again, emphasizing the parts of the enterprise IT market where we have an opportunity to perform well get rewarded by our customers, and see higher recompete win rates, quite honestly. Where, you know, in some parts of it, because it is so commoditized, that gets really hard.

Analyst (Sheila Kahyaoglu): Great. Thank you so much.

James C. Reagan: Sure.

Operator: Our next question comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities.

Analyst (Tobey Sommer): Thank you. I was hoping you could comment on what you are hearing and seeing from your NASA customer amid some news of potential insourcing? And then over the medium term for civil, do you anticipate significant Department of War spending increases as pressuring the civil side?

Prabu Natarajan: Gavin that we are already in a relatively stretched finance, fiscal condition? Hey, Tobey. Let me maybe take a first crack at this. I think you know, really big picture, I would say, you know, civil, you know, funding right now is at a trough.

James C. Reagan: I would say if we had to bet we would say it is probably not gonna materially deteriorate from here. I think we are gonna see some modest changes here and there, but not a our view, at least, is that it is gonna have a material reduction at the funding levels for the civilian agencies. So the question on does DOD funding pressure civil?

Prabu Natarajan: I mean, look. I think that is always a trade that gets made sometimes. But I do think that these critical systems, this critical infrastructure has to be maintained has to be robust, and, you know, especially with the threats posed by AI, to have the right architectures in place and the right of, I am gonna say, cyber hygiene. They are all critical to the national security. So I think it would be our expectation that, you know, funding remains relatively flat. At some point, it will inflect up, when, you know, when the threat actors recognize where the vulnerabilities are and we have to work to counteract that.

But, big picture, that is our view on where the budgets are right now.

James C. Reagan: Yeah. And, again, I think we are fortunate to be placed in the civilian market.

Prabu Natarajan: We are we are well placed with the things that have enduring need. We have great positions in the in homeland security. With customs and border protection, providing critical infrastructure for supporting the mission of people that are keeping the bad guys out at the border. We also have great positions and work that we do with the FAA and just ended the, for example, Department of Treasury. So the these are the kinds of areas, as Prabu said, have enduring need And probably, we are fortunate that we are not in the places that are gonna see the lion's share of any kind of budgetary pressure on civilian agencies.

Analyst (Tobey Sommer): Thank you. And then as a follow-up, I would love to ask a question on the great margin performance in Civil.

Prabu Natarajan: Do you think that, that kind of profitability is sustainable over time? Hey, Tobey. Appreciate the question. Look. I think is 11.6% sustainable for this business where it sits today?

James C. Reagan: No. You know, could we consistently be at the-- and we have said that our expectation is that over time, we will drive this business to mid to upper tens ordering 11%. That is where we wanna take this portfolio. Couple of years ago, 3 years ago, to be precise, we were mid to upper 8%. And that kind of organic change takes time. And it does not and if you took the time to get this right, it will not require you to do irrational things starving the business development capture machine. So we are trying to do it the right way. But I do think that this portfolio, there is no reason.

If I look at the fee we earn on the labor component of our business, That would imply that our margin should get to mid to upper tens it is gonna be a multiyear journey.

Prabu Natarajan: And we wanna balance that against the investments we are making in the business. And, Tobey, I realized I did not answer the first question on NASA. I think reality is we have a very little of an NASA business that is left. For better or for worse. And so, obviously, you know, could that happen in other agencies? Sure. I think it is a possibility. But, we are gonna have to navigate it. And, take it agency by agency. And, again, historically, the government's not been effective in sourcing critical capabilities. And but that is a pendulum that swings back and forth.

So we are gonna have to see where that plays out in certain agencies and, obviously, we are committed to doing the right thing for our government.

James C. Reagan: And we will work with our customers to figure out the right solution for them and for us. Thank you. Yep.

Analyst (Tobey Sommer): Goodbye.

Operator: As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question at this time, please In the interest of time, we ask that you limit yourself to 1 question. Our next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen.

Analyst (Gautam Khanna): I was wondering if you could characterize the bookings environment since the quarter end.

Prabu Natarajan: So in the last month? And also, if you could help us quantify the sequential headwind on Ritz in the third quarter relative to the second and in the fourth quarter relative to the third. Thank you.

Analyst (Gautam Khanna): Hey, Gautam. Maybe I will try to take the first part of the question and on the know, if you think about the bookings environment, I mean, I would say, you know, there is a good amount of proposal activity going on right now. So I would say there is probably increased uptempo and I just have to go down to the 4th Floor of our building and our teams are incredibly busy working on proposals. So we do expect a very healthy level of submissions both in the second quarter and the third quarter this year. Before perhaps starting to tail off, which is a typical pattern we see just given the seasonality of this business.

So that feels like it is the right tempo for us to get to our submissions number of 25 to 28 billion for the full year. So that is sort of how we are seeing it. In terms of the decisions, we are I think for the larger awards, we are seeing maybe those take a little bit longer as those awards go through multiple levels of review inside of the government. But they are starting to break through in the system, and we are hoping to see that volume stabilize in terms of decisions. Which is why we feel good about the 1 book to bill in the first quarter.

And we do expect to complete the year comfortably over 1.0 I would say, on net book to bill. I think on the risk impact and the seasonality impact, I would say we start to see some impacts from the RITS Recompete tailing off starting, I would say, Q3.

Prabu Natarajan: Maybe towards the end of Q2 into Q3. And, you know, think of the headwind as sort of being in the circa 3% range For organic growth in each of Q3 and Q4. So think of it as roughly level loaded in the second half of the year at about 3%. And we contracted about 6% in the second half of this year. So think of Ritz as being approximately half of that, so we should, apples to apples, contract about 3%.

James C. Reagan: And then given on contract growth performance, ramp on new, those become the, I would say, the inputs. To determine what organic growth looks like in the second half of the Hope that helps.

Operator: Our next question comes from Max Miller with UBS.

Analyst (Max Miller): Morning. This is Max Miller on for, Gavin Parsons. I was hoping to get a little bit more information about the new state department of all vehicles. Obviously, a lot of competitors across a few different buckets there, but also more than just Vanguard rolled up into that contract.

Prabu Natarajan: I was hoping you could talk about how much of the increased scope is addressable relative to the previous run rate Maybe once assumed the guidance and, I guess, timing around when you expect task orders to start rolling through on that vehicle? Hey, Max. Prabu here. Appreciate the question. On Vanguard, the run rate's about 250 million a year. And we said above average margins right now on that program. If you took the you know, total value of the ceiling of that EVOLVE program, that is about 10 billion over 7 years, that would imply if the funding is there, that the run rate on the new Evolve program is over 1 billion a year.

James C. Reagan: Safe math. And I think for us, you know, there are 5 work streams in Evolve. We have bid and won a seat at the table on 4 of the 5 work streams. We did not bid 1 of the 5 because of, you know, certain organization conflict of interest issues. And so we have been selected, you have seen some of our peers talk about it. I think we are very much in the same boat as them. With the capacity to bid and win new work.

To be clear, as the interim head of the civil business, I would say my expectation and that of my leadership team is we would love to hold on to the work we have on Vanguard in terms of volume, but there is a real opportunity for us to improve on that capacity.

Prabu Natarajan: But, again, we will take this, 1 task order at a time. And there is, some upside as well as some downside on that program. And the way we have calibrated our guidance is it is probably unlikely to have any material impacts to guidance this year, it is more of a next year, which is why in the script, we said we would like to de-risk Vanguard, Evolve, over the course of the next several quarters. So that is our approach to it.

James C. Reagan: Again, there is some downside. there is also some upside. We just have to see how all of this plays out, but it does open up some areas that we are not current in.

Prabu Natarajan: And, hopefully, they represent some side. But, right now, I think, heads down and, keeping as much of the work we have is our number 1 priority.

Operator: That concludes today's Q&A session. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.