Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
The package delivery giants are being forced to invest more to service e-commerce growth. Has this changed the way investors should value the stocks?
Alert: Top Cash Back Card Now Offers 0% Intro APR Until Nearly 2027
Enjoy 0% intro APR on purchases and balance transfers for 15 months—plus up to 5% cash back in popular categories.
*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.
Motley Fool Returns
Market-beating stocks from our flagship service.
Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 2025-08-28 23:30:29.485449.
Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.
Calculated by Time-Weighted Return since 2002. Volatility profiles based on trailing-three-year calculations of the standard deviation of service investment returns.
Image source:United Parcel Service corporate website
The rules of the game are slowly changing for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS 0.01%) and FedEx Corporation (FDX +0.00%). Whereas before the last recession the two companies were known for being correlated plays on global growth and trade, now they're increasingly relying on e-commerce growth. Meanwhile, another long term trend has also changed the nature of their earnings; customers that prefer slower, less expensive, and less time-sensitive delivery options.
In this context, let's look at what it all means to their businesses. Has it changed the way investors should look at the stocks?
UPS and FedEx have faced two challenging long-term trends since the recession. First, in previous decades, global trade tended to grow faster than global GDP -- a good thing for package delivery companies -- but since the recession, the trend has reversed. One way to see this reversal is to compare worldwide airline passenger revenue, which grows in line with the economy, and cargo revenue:
DATA SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION.
The second trend is also generally unfavorable. In short, customers have tended to favor slower, less expensive delivery options since the last recession. This trend is best seen in a long-term chart of FedEx's segment revenues. Ground has become much more important relative to express in recent years:
DATA SOURCE: FEDEX CORPORATION PRESENTATIONS.
This is an issue for both companies, because faster, more time-sensitive deliveries generate more revenue per package.
So, with global trade disappointing and customers shifting to slower delivery options, both companies are increasingly relying on the third trend, e-commerce, to generate profit growth. The following chart shows how e-commerce continues to grow at mid-teens rates and is an increasing percentage of retail sales -- good news for delivery companies:
US E-Commerce Sales as Percent of Retail Sales data by YCharts
However, burgeoning e-commerce demand has also brought complications:
Putting all of this together, the key question is whether the changes in end markets -- global trade, delivery options, and e-commerce -- combined with the need for more capital spending have fundamentally changed the operating metrics for both businesses.
The best way to look at the matter is to measure long-term free cash flow (FCF) conversion. The following chart shows the two companies' FCF from sales in the past decade. UPS's conversion remains constantly higher than FedEx's, although both companies' rates have dipped in recent years:
DATA SOURCE: COMPANY PRESENTATION.
The increase in capital expenditures is not so pronounced at UPS, but then again the problems the company had in the winters of 2013 and 2014 in dealing with peak demand from e-commerce suggest that UPS may need to invest more in its network in the future. UPS plans to keep capital spending to a range of 4.5% to 5% in the next few years -- is this too optimistic?
With regard to FedEx, a breakout of its capital-spending plans shows how capital expenditures have increased in its ground segment in recent years. Excluding any TNT-related activities, FedEx plans to increase capital expenditures to $5 billion in its fiscal 2017, from $4.8 billion in fiscal 2016, with $2 billion planned for ground.
DATA SOURCE: FEDEX CORPORATION PRESENTATIONS. ALL DATA IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS.
Similarly, spending on facilities and sort equipment -- largely to expand capacity for e-commerce deliveries -- increased substantially, too.
DATA SOURCE: FEDEX CORPORATION PRESENTATIONS. ALL DATA IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS.
All told, it's clear that if conditions continue as they are now, then it's probably a good idea to assume that UPS and FedEx's FCF conversion could fall a bit in future years. In other words, when you look at FCF-based valuations for the two companies, it's best to factor in a margin of safety into any valuation. On this basis, both stocks are starting to look overvalued.
E-commerce brings benefits, but it also creates spending requirements -- something investors need to keep an eye out for, particularly with regard to FCF conversion assumptions.