Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Should Investors Be Worried About Editas Medicine's Earnings Miss?

By Mark Prvulovic – Feb 27, 2020 at 1:35PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The results were worse than expected, but is it really a big deal?

Editas Medicine (EDIT 4.01%) is one of the most promising gene-editing stocks on the market, and is often compared to CRISPR Therapeutics, the original developer of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology. While optimism surrounding the company is strong, investors were surprised to see Editas report worse-than-expected fourth-quarter results after the market closed Feb. 26. Its stock was down 4% after the earnings were released.

Is this something that investors should worry about, or is it not that big of a deal? Let's do some digging and see if we can come up with an answer.

A red arrow swinging downwards suddenly.

Image source: Getty Images.

Looking at the numbers

Fourth-quarter revenue came in at $12.3 million, which looks good when compared to Q4 2018's revenue of $6.1 million. Full-year revenue for 2019, on the other hand, actually fell by 36% to $20.5 million, compared to 2018's $31.9 million.

Net losses, both for the quarter as well as for the full fiscal year, worsened as well. Editas saw a $37.8 million net loss for the fourth quarter, 50% lower than last year's $25.1 million, while net loss for 2019 was down 21.7%, sinking to a loss of $133.7 million. In terms of costs, the biggest increase for Editas was its operating and research and development expenses, which almost doubled over a three-month period from $19.2 million to $34.8 million.

One of the few positive notes, however, is Editas' cash reserves. Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities -- the lifeblood of an early-stage biotech as it funds its clinical projects -- grew by $88.1 million this quarter to $457.1 million.

Overall, the results were a little disappointing if you just look at the financials and nothing else. Analysts had expected negative earnings per share (EPS) of around $0.10 for the quarter. Editas ended up reporting an EPS loss of $0.74 instead, far worse than what was expected.

Management's insights

Editas' management team spoke to analysts in a conference call a few hours after the financial results were announced. For the most part, analysts were more focused on how the clinical trials were shaping up rather than the specifics behind the financial figures.

Steven Seedhouse, an analyst at Raymond James & Associates, asked why operating expenses rose as much as they did in just three months. The response was pretty standard, with CFO Michelle Robertson saying that operating expenses are expected to grow as they start new clinical projects and progress through their pre-existing trials.

Editas said it will provide more information about EDIT-101, the company's flagship drug candidate that treats a rare type of infant blindness known as Leber congenital amaurosis. Data about the first human patient to take the drug is expected sometime in the first quarter of 2020, probably late March. Editas will also submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for its sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia drug, EDIT-301, by the end of the year.

Is this a big deal?

I don't think so. Editas is still in such an early stage of clinical development that its revenue (which is entirely based on collaboration and research and development agreements) is expected to change dramatically as time goes on. As long as the company has enough cash to last for the next few years -- which Editas does -- I wouldn't worry too much about it.

Instead, investors should look at how Editas' pipeline is doing and pay close attention to upcoming catalysts. EDIT-101 is furthest along in clinical development out of all of Editas' drugs and has relatively little competition from other gene-editing companies. Considering that the only Leber congenital amaurosis drug out there has a price tag of $850,000 (and only treats a small portion of all patients with the disease), EDIT-101 has the potential to become a blockbuster if its clinical results are fruitful.

Overall, the long-term prognosis for Editas Medicine remains optimistic. There's a lot to look forward to in the near future, and shareholders shouldn't worry about its revenue figures at this stage.

Mark Prvulovic has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends CRISPR Therapeutics and Editas Medicine. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Editas Medicine, Inc. Stock Quote
Editas Medicine, Inc.
EDIT
$12.70 (4.01%) $0.49
CRISPR Therapeutics Stock Quote
CRISPR Therapeutics
CRSP
$63.63 (4.14%) $2.53

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
327%
 
S&P 500 Returns
105%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/27/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.