Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Why I'm Not Interested in E-Scooter Start-Up Bird

By Evan Niu, CFA - May 14, 2021 at 10:00AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Bird is merging with blank-check company Switchback II.

A few years ago, e-scooter rentals were all the rage. Start-ups like Lime and Bird were taking the micro-mobility market by storm, and the boom was enough to attract the attention of ridesharing platforms Uber and Lyft. Both established companies dabbled in e-scooters to varying degrees, including acquiring smaller e-scooter start-ups and/or creating new segments. Uber scooped up Jump and quickly sold it, while Lyft bailed on e-scooter rentals in 2019.

Meanwhile, scrutiny around the economic viability of e-scooter rentals quickly intensified as critics argued that the business of renting e-scooters suffered from horrendous unit economics. That brings us back to Bird, which announced this week that it is going public by merging with special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Switchback II (SWBK.U).

Man riding an e-scooter in a city

Image source: Getty Images.

Pivoting during the pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic expectedly took a toll on Bird's business as people stopped commuting and stayed home. Bird's platform facilitated 40 million rides in 2019, generating $162 million in gross transaction value and $151 million in revenue, and resulting in negative $226 million in adjusted EBITDA for the year. Rides plummeted to 18 million in 2020 due to the virus crisis, and revenue dipped to $95 million. The lingering question is where Bird goes from here as the world recovers.

Bird wants investors to consider it an electric vehicle (EV) play, as scooters that run on batteries instead of gas sounds great for the environment. But what's not good for the planet is how people tend to trash rented e-scooters. Videos of users vandalizing the vehicles regularly went viral a few years ago due to how incredibly cheap they are to rent (typically just a couple dollars).

The company previously used to employ gig workers called Bird Chargers, whose task was to collect e-scooters and plug them in to charge. Bird has rebranded those workers as Bird Flyers, and also launched a program last year called Fleet Managers where local entrepreneurs sign up to manage and maintain a fleet of e-scooters on Bird's behalf. Bird suggests that the Fleet Managers model improves unit economics while aligning incentives through revenue-sharing.

However, critics argue that the Fleet Manager program has the potential to saddle contract workers with debt. While the offering doesn't have up-front costs, Bird encourages Fleet Managers to purchase fleets of e-scooters from Bird, with the company providing financing. The fine print of the contracts show that Bird still actually retains ownership of the vehicles, according to a scathing OneZero report, and there are various other fees. It's worth noting that many Fleet Managers are satisfied with their income.

Not interested

I purchased units of Switchback II earlier this year based on confidence in the management team. Switchback's first SPAC deal brought Chargepoint public, which I'm extremely bullish on for the long term as the dominant EV charging network in the U.S. (I subsequently separated the units into common stock and warrants.)

Ambitious forecasts have become a mainstay of many SPAC mergers, and this one is no different. Bird is projecting that rides will soar to 170 million in 2023, bringing in $815 million in revenue that year. E-scooter sharing and renting bears many similarities to ridesharing, another industry that suffers from poor unit economics. Bird is effectively outsourcing fleet management using a model that resembles franchises, transferring all sorts of risk -- operational, financial, regulatory, etc. -- from the company to a network of contractors.

That's not a business that I'm interested in owning, so I plan to either sell or redeem my Switchback II shares.

Evan Niu, CFA owns shares and warrants of Switchback II and shares of Chargepoint Holdings Inc. The Motley Fool recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Switchback II Corporation Stock Quote
Switchback II Corporation
SWBK.U
Uber Technologies, Inc. Stock Quote
Uber Technologies, Inc.
UBER
$32.24 (-1.71%) $0.56
Lyft, Inc. Stock Quote
Lyft, Inc.
LYFT
$18.90 (-2.58%) $0.50
Chargepoint Holdings Inc. Stock Quote
Chargepoint Holdings Inc.
CHPT
$16.69 (1.52%) $0.25

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
390%
 
S&P 500 Returns
125%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/12/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.