If buying Tesla (TSLA 2.51%) is indeed going to set an investor up for life, then its robotaxi business will have to be successful, and CEO Elon Musk will have to achieve his aim of making unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software publicly available. While it's uncertain if those things will happen, there's one trend in the electric vehicle (EV) industry that significantly strengthens the case for Tesla. But to understand it, it's important to start by addressing one key issue.

What's going wrong with Tesla's electric vehicle sales?

Musk is a divisive figure, but he's not the only CEO to attract controversy or take positions that some find disagreeable and others find enlightened. This isn't the place to enter that debate, but it is the place to look at matters rationally. A standard narrative has it that Tesla's declining electric vehicle sales in 2025 are a consequence of Musk's political involvement. If this were the case, Tesla would, indeed, have a major structural issue that definitely wouldn't make it a stock to buy in hopes of it putting you on easy street. 

My opinion is that the evidence for this argument is weak. Tesla doesn't have a sales problem because of Musk. It has a Model Y problem, and it has an interest rate problem. Let's put it this way: According to Cox Automotive's Kelley Blue Book report, sales of Tesla's Model Y (its best-selling sport utility vehicle, or SUV) were down more than 24% in 2025 year to date through mid-July compared to the same period in 2024. In contrast, sales of its second best-selling car, the Tesla Model 3 (a mid-size sedan), rose almost 38% on the same basis.

If anti-Musk sentiment were behind the sales drop, that would show up for both models. Something else is going on. 

Competition is coming for Tesla

More likely, it's the fact that other automakers have developed SUVs at price points that are highly competitive to the Tesla Model Y, even though many of them continue to lose significant amounts of money on EVs. Examples of SUV EVs gaining market share in the U.S. are Chevrolet's Blazer and Equinox, Nissan's Ariya, Hyundai's Ionic 5, and Honda's Prologue.

An electric vehicle charging.

Image source: Getty Images.

General Motors' (NYSE: GM) Chevrolet is a case in point. Earlier in the year, GM Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson said, "We achieved variable profit positive on our EVs in the fourth quarter." This is a good step, but it only means that revenue from its EVs covers the cost of labor and materials to build them. That's fine if GM is going to make the same model in perpetuity. It's not fine if GM is going to spend on research and development, factories, and other capital investments to develop a new car.

In reality, what's happening to Tesla is a textbook example of new entrants driving down the sales and margins of an established industry leader by building loss-making vehicles with the intent to build the scale and market presence to turn profitable at some point.

As such, Tesla's margins are being squeezed by a combination of competitors entering the SUV EV market and by ongoing relatively high interest rates -- it's not a coincidence that its well-performing Model 3 is its cheapest model.

Metric

Q2 2022

Q2 2023

Q2 2024

Q2 2025

Automotive revenue growth (decrease)

43%

46%

(7%)

(16%)

Operating margin

14.6%

9.6%

6.3%

4.1%

Data source: Tesla.

It's also not a coincidence that Tesla's response to these conditions is to create a long-awaited, low-cost model, which is "just a Model Y" according to Musk.

What it means for Tesla investors

The key to Tesla's future is the robotaxi and unsupervised FSD. Both are subject to debate, and Tesla remains a high-risk/high-reward stock that won't suit most investors.

But here's the thing. The profitability challenges inherent in EVs, combined with the difficulty of producing low-cost, affordable EV models at a profit for all automakers, strengthen the idea that robotaxis and ride-sharing have a big future as a solution to the problem.

EVs tend to have high upfront costs, but low operating and maintenance costs. Therefore, their most economically productive use could turn out to be as robotaxis, where they are heavily utilized to take advantage of their low running costs and justify their upfront price tags.

As such, if the future is EVs, whether by personally owned cars or robotaxis, then Tesla's approach is the right one, and it has the potential to generate significant returns for investors if it gets robotaxis and unsupervised FSD right. Whether it will set investors up for life is an unknown -- and planning on any one stock to do that would be foolish -- but it's got lots of promise.