In this podcast, Motley Fool analysts Asit Sharma and Emily Flippen and Head of AI Donato Riccio discuss:
- What real investors are doing: Nine in 10 AI investors plan to hold or add to AI stocks.
- What changes are coming in 2026: faster, cheaper models and accelerating adoption.
- How to invest without over-indexing your portfolio to a volatile sector.
Check out The Motley Fool’s 2026 AI Investor Outlook Report for yourself.
A full transcript is below.
This podcast was recorded on Jan. 06, 2026.
Emily Flippen: Talks of an AI bubble are as prevalent as ever, but real world investors are still bullish. We're digging into the next phase of AI today on Motley Fool Money. Today is Tuesday, January 6. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm your host Emily Flippen, and today I'm joined by Fool analyst Asit Sharma and the head of AI here at The Motley Fool, Donato Riccio, to discuss the investor outlook for AI and 2026 report. So I have you both on today because the Fool recently published an interesting report around real world AI usage, of which you two were obviously integral to its creation. This report, which is called the Motley Fools 2026 AI Investor Outlook Report is available for free at fool.com\research\ai_investor_outlook for anyone who wants to read it, but don't worry. We do have that link in the show notes for easy access, so you don't have to memorize it. But for anybody who can't read it or just hasn't yet, I'm really excited to dig into some of the findings here today on the Motley Fool Money podcast. And I want to start with what the report says about real world investors and what they're doing with AI today. And then we'll move to where Donato, you think the industry is heading and then wrap with Asit's framework for investing NAI, including where the opportunities may be the most ripe. Now the Motley Fools 2026 AI Investor Outlook report did survey around 2,600 American adults in November 2025, and the headline is pretty simple. Amongst people who already own AI stocks, 36% plan to increase their holdings. 57% plan to keep it the same, and only 7% plan to reduce. Moreover, a whopping 62% of respondents said their confident AI heavy companies will deliver strong long term returns, and that number grows to 93% among those who already have exposure. So the gist of this report is there's still a lot of excitement around AI, even with the hype. Now, I know there's always going to be biases in this type of self reported data. Those who are most excited about AI are probably also the ones who are most likely to respond to a survey about it, for instance. But when you see that people are largely holding or adding to AI in a world that continues to focus on the fact that we're in a AI bubble, what does that tell you?
Asit Sharma: Emily, I think it reflects a societal learning curve. I'd argue that most people and most investors are much more knowledgeable about the components of AI, machine learning and generative AI versus a few years ago. I guess that's obvious. To evaluate businesses in this space, I've noticed that most of us have acquired a vocabulary we didn't have in, say, 2022. So we're familiar with terms like GPUs, LLMs, inference, tokens, etc. So I think investors have this broad enough understanding to evaluate what type of bubble we're in. So we should spot the average investor some credit here. I think the decision to be invested or to stay invested has more reasoning and rationale behind it than previous bubbles that come to mind. So along these lines, the mania aspect of this bubble appears comparatively smaller to me against historical bubbles. I'm thinking about, let's say, the.com bubble in 1999, go all the way back to the tulip mania in the 18th century, 17th century in Holland. That doesn't mean that this bubble isn't going to pop or at least deflate a bit. But investors seem to me like they're in this mode of evaluating the risks, the trade offs, and they're more willing to demarcate their personal lines that go between investing and speculating. All right. So here's this paradoxical question, which you sort of hinted at, Emily. This gets to the surprising results of our survey. If you understand that we could be in a bubble and you already have exposure to the upside potential of AI, and you understand that the market has appreciated for three straight years with a cumulative return of 78%, and you know that the S&P 500, which is driven by Big Tech, currently sits at all time highs, why would you be planning to add to your AI positions in 2026? And, to me, I think it says, OK, number one, you've got an inherent belief that this technology is tied to the creation of value in the global economy, i.e., you believe it's for real. And number two, you think that some companies are going to continue to realize appreciable cash flows from selling either the development or the output of this technology, and you're also researching new opportunities. You're tuned to valuation in the businesses you own and the ones you want to buy. And finally, you intend to be rational in your capital allocation, or is that a hope of mine.
Emily Flippen: No, I think that's a fair read, Asit. And one of the things that we don't get from this survey is how much exposure already exists. We talk to people who say they already have exposure, but in terms of a total portfolio, that exposure could be smaller than what somebody may want to allocate. So the intention to add may just be actually building out what would then be a full sized position to exposure to AI. How are that's defined in 2026. But I also think, and this is maybe the irrational hope of mine that anybody who answers this survey and says that they're planning on adding or maintaining their AI exposure is doing so with the awareness that I'm going to hold these companies for the extreme long term. So yeah, maybe this is a bubble. Maybe there are risks, and we do have a crash, but that's OK because the companies I'm invested in have very real appreciable cash flow, and I believe that a decade from now, even if there is a short pullback and share price of a company, they're going to be bigger, better, and more important businesses in the future. Maybe I'm giving too much credit here, but.
Asit Sharma: I'm sure that, yeah.
Emily Flippen: That's where I hope we're going. Donato, I want to pass the mic to you because obviously, you're the head of AI here at the Motley Fool. And one of the things that I really liked about the report was that the optimism that Asit just mentioned and we talked about, it wasn't totally blind in this report. When they asked about risks, the top two risks from respondents were things like data quality, security, as well as a sense of overvaluation in the sector. You're somebody who already spends all of your days living inside the world of AI, obviously. When you see this investor confidence shown in the report, is that matched by what you're seeing in terms of, like, real world adoption or is Wall Street still early to the party?
Donato Riccio: So the short answer is that I think it matches, and we are currently in a healthier place compared to just six or nine months ago because at the beginning of 2025, as many others I started worrying about, is it a bubble. But the main indicator I monitor is pretty simple. So are people's expectations connected to how the technology actually works? Because when the expectations disconnect from the fundamentals, that's when you get a bubble right. So early last year, I saw this starting to go sideways because people are getting more and more excited about agents, which are lens that are able to perform more complex actions and go beyond just answering questions such as booking your flight or creating an act or matching your calendar. So many people started calling 2025 the of agents, but they're like entry parties framing better, which is that this is a decade of agents. Because they are just getting started, and this is an emerging technology. But at the time, the expectations were running way ahead of reality, and people were imagining these autonomous entities that could do, like, everything and run your business alone. So yes, agents work, and they are at the new disruptive technology for now proved effective in very narrow scopes and controlled environments. Last year, I observed this gap between expectations, and realty. But then two things happened. So first, the sentiment cooled down a bit.
The hype around agents got more measured. I think, in fact, we are starting to get a little bit past peak hype because people are getting more realistic now about what agents can do. But who knows what's going to happen tomorrow. And the second thing is that the most important part is that the agents actually improved dramatically. The technology really caught up with some of these expectations, not all of them, but I'd say enough that this gap narrowed. So yeah, I say that we're in a healthier place. I like this direction. The market had reached new highs last year, but over the past couple of months, we've been pre-flat, and I think that's OK to give people and companies more time to play to experiment. And when we look at actual adoption data in companies, it confers in this direction. So the payday adoption across US businesses increased a lot from 2025, 2023 it was just around 5%-44% in September 2025. And if we look at revenue growth in AI companies and Tropic reported 10X on the revenue two years in a row, Cursor, the AI coding tool similar situation went for 4 million last year to hitting 1 billion analyzed revenue this year. So I said this is not hype. There is real commercial structure in these tools and real adoption companies. People are funding real value on these tools. So when you ask Emily if the investor confidence is matched by adoption, I say yes, and the data shows that companies are funding real value.
Emily Flippen: It's almost ironic that we talk about AI as a bubble today when I think the skepticism around AI is probably the highest it's ever been. Unlike bubbles in the past, I think we as investors have a new level of awareness of the things like the Hype cycle. And when to your point, when things get separate. When hype separates from reality, that's when it creates a bubble, but to your point, there is reality backing up a lot of this technology. And I love the fact that the survey shows that investors are still largely leaning in to the AI and adoption, but there's still that awareness, that cautious amount of optimism. Up next, we're going to be getting practical about 2026, including where the next wave of opportunities may show up. Stick with us.
Speaker 1: To succeed in the future of work, forward thinkers use AI to deliver measurable results. Workday is the AI platform for HR and finance that frees you from the mundane, so you can focus on more meaningful work. Workday, moving business forever forward.
Emily Flippen: Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Today, we're discussing the AI Investor Outlook Report for 2026 and where AI technology may be headed. Donato as head of AI here at The Fool, I'd love to dig in a little bit deeper to where you see AI going. Now, you said in this report that the right mental model was somewhere like three to five years in terms of the time frame for investors in the sector, and that investors shouldn't get too caught up in things like the present day cost of LLMs, since the intelligence per dollar ratio for models has been doubling roughly every six months. That goes over my head. So when I hear that coming out of your mouth, I mean, can you provide some more context as to what exactly that means? And if AI capabilities keep improving at that same pace, where you expect value to accrue in the year ahead?
Donato Riccio: Yeah, that's exactly right. So currently, there's a lot of focus on the AGI. This is the big question. Well, will AI become super intelligent? I think this is not always the right question for investors because it's really impossible to predict that. But I say that the more impactful, important question right now is that when does current level intelligence become cheap enough to be everywhere? And I think this is happening right now. So if we take a look at how costs evolved over the years, just two years ago, GPT 4, which was the flagship model by Open AI available at the time, costs 30-$60 per million tokens, 1 million token is around 3, 4 books and so you need 30-$60 to process this amount of information. But today you have available GPT 5 mini, which is a way better model just costs $2. So the models got around 15-30 times cheaper for more intelligence in just two years. That's what we call the intelligence per dollar curve and watching that curve as one of the most important indicators. If we take a look at also how many tokens the companies are processing, Google reported that they are processing quadrillion tokens per month. That's a crazy number here. So it's a 5X increase year over year. So people are deploying this escape, and so how is it possible the cost are falling so fast? It's coming from multiple directions. So first, we have algorithmic improvements. There are new reinforcement learning and training techniques like GETO by Deepseek or LDR by Open AI. You can get you better result for less compute. You have more different architectures like mixture of experts that can just turn on a portion of your model instead of paying for the whole model. And we have smarter thinking models that can say think adaptively based on the difficulty of the query. So the thing is, we don't even know how to use the intelligence we already have right now, and most companies are really still experimenting to figure out what AI can do and how to deploy it. So I say that the bottler now is not that AI is not smart enough, but really the cause is what can transform every industry.
Emily Flippen: And it's really easy for investors to forget about that cost curve, how quickly it can change. We saw it change over the past two years. You can think about how different it'll be in 2028, and we can circle back and have this conversation about the cost of models then, and I think the fundamentals and the impact that it has on a lot of the companies that are, you know, say, building data centers or using the computer will look fundamentally different. Donato, before we move on, though, I do want to also ask how we can apply your technical expertise to an investing framework for our listeners. You've helped lead the charge with AI changes here at the fool. If an investor is looking to evaluate the investments and performance of other companies as it relates to their AI ambitions and capital expenditures, what do you think they should be looking for?
Donato Riccio: Yeah, that's a great question. I think right now we're in a phase where companies are just throwing the eye at everything to see what sticks. And honestly, I think that's pretty healthy because that's how you figure out what works. You experiment, you don't have all the answers from the beginning. You have to just take risks, see how the products evolve, some fail, and some succeed. But I think this phase won't last forever. So eventually the experimentation phase ends, and you need real results in the company. So when a company ounces initiative or a significant AI spending, I'd want to ask a few questions. So first, is this solving a real problem? It sounds obvious, but you'll be surprised about how often the answer is no. And so is AI addressing an actual business problem, and I give you a simple test. Can this problem be solved without AI? And sometimes the answer is yes, so simpler is better. And if the company is having an AI announcement just to have an AI announcement, it'd be skeptical. So the second is, is this actually in production in front of users or is just a demo or pilot? Because right now companies can still get headlines for a demo.
Startups can raise lots of money on a good prototype. But I'd argue that this window is slowly closing because everyone has a demo at this point, but the hardest part is to bring the demo to production in front of real users and scaling the app and making it secure. So that's what I want to see. I add another one, which is the data advantage. So are they building on proprietary data or just plugging in generic tools? Because the models themselves are becoming more and more interchangeable. You can use GPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok. They're all great, and they all have different strengths, but we all have access to the same models. So it's not a commodity is your customer data, your years of refinement and IB testing to figure out what your customer wants, domain expertise, and so on. So I believe the companies that we get real value from AI are the ones using it on data that their competitors cannot access. Because if I can do the same thing ChatGPT, why would I pay for their product? So the differentiation lies in the data and in the specific company context. So to recap, the first is AAI solving real problems. Second, is it a prototype or is it in production? And third, does it use propietary data and assets or just generic tools that others can easily reproduce? And I believe that the best AI investment sometimes just look boring. Is the company that may be quite using AI internally to make their people 20% more productive. Those companies compound on the long term. And if you have a long term mindset, I think that's where the real value.
Emily Flippen: And I hope everybody listening does have that long term mindset. What I love about your response to Donato is it's so incredibly measured. You're the head of AI here at the fool, and it's easy for people to say, well, we're in a bubble. Anybody who operates in the space of AI is probably over enthused, over investing, over indexing, over hyping. But the reality is that the way that you speak about what you look for in an AI investment hopefully exactly the same thing that our listeners look for. It's something practical and purposeful. And to your last point there, maybe something that looks a little boring. So don't be afraid of adding boring to your portfolio and awesome, not to put you on the spot, but I think you might have maybe boring. We'll see stock ideas and proof points, I guess, ahead for what businesses may perform well in AI in the year ahead. So up next, we're going to be passing that mic to Asit, to evaluate these investment opportunities, as well as some risk management strategies for portfolios. Stick with us.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. As you wrap up today's show, centered around our AI Investing Outlook for 2026 report. I want to pull Asit into the conversation to get a better sense of specific opportunities and some risk management strategies. Asit, you made a really specific point in the report that I want to mention because it highlights something unique, other than the same big tech names that everybody already knows. You said, and I quote, "for biggest opportunities, look to smaller semiconductor and data center ecosystem players, such as data Interconnect specialists, high bandwidth memory providers, and cutting edge data storage designers." That is also a mouthful. But I think that's a really fairly unique perspective. But I kind of want you to translate that into something specific for me. Are these businesses or stocks that fit that description without fo or are those just like AI vaporware?
Asit Sharma: Yeah, such a great question, Emily. And I would argue that for all of these, they're really the concept is simple. In the first case, I'm describing companies that help sling data around faster within data centers when I talk about data center in Iterknec specialists. I'm going to name some names here, and these really aren't meant to be hey, these are my high conviction buys. Go out and load up the truck, but more types types of companies you can start researching, understand they all come with risks. So the first example is Astera Lab symbol ALAB. This is a company that simply helps different components within a server talk to one another with lower latency much more quickly. And this is the type of boring thing that Donato talks about maybe on the inference side, so how AI is helping companies. Also, for those that play in this ecosystem, they're doing really simple stuff at a high level, at a complex level. So the second thing that you mentioned, which you were referring to our survey, companies that are helping businesses like Nvidia, symbol NVDA, manage memory within GPUs. That's a persistent bottleneck at that level of computation. And so we talked about high bandwidth memory or HBM providers. An example of this is Micron Technology, symbol MU. This is a business that for a long time played in a very boring space of the memory market, but lo and behold, it has a very good technology to help sling data around a GPU faster than existing methods. So they're seeing some love in the marketplace. And thirdly, these cutting edge storage designers, these are businesses that are building specialized memory storage that are used within AI data centers. Your computer, my computer need memories to operate.
Actually, my brain needs memory to operate. That's why I try to sleep at least 7 hours a day. It's not so much different within a data center. So these information workloads that move around, you need storage drives for those. And that's a commodity business, but there are a handful of companies that are sort of at the bleeding edge. At the end of the day, what they're doing is making storage that's faster to access. It's very configurable, and it provides a lower total cost of ownership over the life of that component to the operator of the data center. So Pure Storage, symbol PSTG, Emily, that's a company you and I have both studied. It's a great example of a business of this type. So there's a common thread running through all of these. Essentially, if investors understand the inherent value of an Invidia or an advanced micro devices, chief competitor to Nvidia, to the AI story, I think in some ways, much of the value is sort of priced in. These businesses have had a great run, and investors are naturally looking now to suppliers within the spectrum of the value chain that exists between your keyboard, where you input a query and your screen, where you get the response back from ChatGPT. So what happens in between? It's not all about the GPU makers. Yes, like, valuations are elevated. They feel sort of dangerous to me right now. So let's make sure we're clear about risk here. You know, since we commented on these high bandwidth memory providers in the survey, those have been under this acute supply chain shortage. So since we mentioned, they've really run up even more. So I hesitate, even to talk about a Micron, but there you have it. Be careful out there. Anyway, overall, I think there's going to be many investable opportunities outside of the GPU Builders, or the cloud hyperscalers that make up the rest of big tech, think Amazon, AMZN, Microsoft, MSFT or Alphabet, GOOG over the next few years. And that's why we want to think in holistic terms about a whole industry that's being built up.
Emily Flippen: I think that's a wonderfully measured approach, and I love the fact that you mentioned the risk associated with a lot of these names, interesting companies across the different value proposition of AI. And the last question I want to pose to Asit before we sign off here is around that risk. Like when you're building your own AI investing framework, do you have any rules, things like position sizing, time horizon, milestones, anything like that?
Asit Sharma: Sure, I have some rules. My first personal rule is to stay invested in the AI leaders. I own many of the companies I just mentioned, but especially those bigger names like Nvidia AMD. Avoid concentrating in any single idea. Asit, you've done that before earlier in your investing career in tech companies. I didn't work out. Now, speaking of concentrations, another personal rule when I'm assessing ecosystem players, I try not to shy away from customer concentrations for very specialized suppliers. And it sounds counterintuitive. Like, why would you buy a company that only has a few businesses, even though they're gigantic businesses as customers? Well, there's an example in a business like Arista Networks, symbol ANET, which for a long time was highly concentrated in those cloud hyperscalars like Amazon and Microsoft, but it grew well over the years, and it's a little more diversified now. You're going to see this time and again in this infrastructure because supply chains are limited and specialists abound few players that have enough skill and technology to serve everyone, so their supply is getting snapped up by just a few players. But I position size accordingly because there are so many concentrations, if I enter a new position of a company that I've been interested in, it comes in somewhere a half percent or a percent of my total portfolio, even sometimes a little bit less. And then finally, personal rule for this year, drill down into sectors and industries that are outside of my own core expertise. Look at last year, Emily, construction companies with expertise in building these complex, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems for data centers. They just had a stellar year. It was outside of my wheelhouse. I really didn't pay attention until it was a bit too late, but I learned the lesson. You know, the breadth of the AI trade and the opportunity, both are very wide, but you have to be willing to turn over some new stones to benefit, I think, in 2026 and beyond.
Emily Flippen: I love that. There's a bit of curiosity, but also the all important patience for investors. I know after our conversation today, it's clear to me that investors still have an appetite for AI. I hope that's clear to everybody. But they're also naming a lot of really key risks that are worth considering when managing investments and portfolios, both for 2026, as well as obviously the many years ahead of us, of which I hope everybody is staying invested for. As a reminder, anybody who wants to read more can always access the Motley Fools 2026 AI investor Outlook reports at fool.com\research\ai_investor_outlook. Again, don't have to memorize that link, Bob in the show notes. Donato and Asit, thank you both so much for joining today. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations or or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the Motley Fool editorial standards, and it's not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For Asit Sharma, Donato Riccio, and the entire Motley Fool Money team, I'm Emily Flippen. We'll see you tomorrow.
