In this podcast, Motley Fool contributors Tyler Crowe, Matt Frankel, and Jon Quast discuss:
- Earnings results from Walmart, Booking Holdings, Etsy, and Ebay.
- Ebay's acquisition of Etsy's Depop business.
- The bull and bear case on Lemonade.
- Klarna's big stock drop.
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
A full transcript is below.
This podcast was recorded on Feb. 19, 2026.
Tyler Crowe: It's an earnings extravaganza this time on Motley Fool Money. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Tyler Crowe, and today I'm joined by longtime Fool contributors Matt Frankel and Jon Quast. We're deep into earning season with really far too many companies to cover in our 20 or so minutes that we do these daily podcasts. But we're going to do our best today with a pretty quick round robin look at a lot of companies. We'll get into Lemonade and Klarna, who both reported today. But before we do that, we're going to do a quick lightning round with a group of companies that I'm penning here on the pulse of the consumer. We're going to look at Walmart, Booking Holdings, Etsy, and eBay. We're going to go as quick as we can. Let's start with Walmart. As the companies want to do, it beat earnings expectations with earnings at $0.74 a share. That doesn't include some equity investment stuff that always makes the bottom line a little wonky. The company offered what most of the time is tepid guidance for the upcoming year. But that's pretty par for the course. It's done conservative guidance, if you will, for many years in the past, and then just raised it over the years and, typically, exceeds it. Did I miss anything? Was there anything interesting that you guys saw on this one?
Matt Frankel: I have a few things to add. Walmart, they've really become a master of omnichannel commerce, and it's really exceeded even my expectations, and I like the company a lot. The CFO, specifically, called out the speed of the delivery platform as a big driver of their growth. I can tell you firsthand, Walmart's delivery is fantastic, and it surprises me how efficient it is. But one particular point from the earnings call, that I found interesting, is that the fastest-growing part of Walmart's market share is households with annual income above $100,000, which is a bit of a concern to me that inflation and tariff pressures are really weighing on Americans. We're seeing those with higher incomes really start to have to cut back. That was one of the signs we saw before the Great Recession in 2008, and it was why Walmart was the top-performing stock out of the 500 in the S&P during that year. It could be a sign of a weakening economy. That's something that I'm keeping a close eye on.
Jon Quast: One thing that I want to add here is that, don't look now, but e-commerce penetration for Walmart just hit 23%. That is an all-time high. It's a record for the company. When we think of these huge marketplaces, these huge platforms with large user bases, I don't think Walmart usually comes to mind, but it is this huge platform with an enormous user base, and this digital business is quite strong. The big takeaway here is that it's leading to operating income growth that is outpacing revenue growth. It's subtle. It's small, but at the scale that Walmart is, it matters.
Tyler Crowe: Moving on, shares of Booking Holdings are down about 7.5% as we tape. It beat earnings, it raised its dividend, and it guided for 15% revenue growth for the upcoming quarter. Surely, the market isn't responding negatively to the announcement that it plans to split its stock. Like, what am I missing here?
Jon Quast: That would be a head-scratcher on all counts, Tyler, if the stock was selling off because it split its stock. Normally, that gets investors excited these days. Well, it's a head-scratcher that they're splitting their stock because CEO has gone on record before saying that it's not really something he was interested in doing but announced a 25-for-1 stock split. The sell-off for the stock is a head-scratcher for me based on the financials. You look at Booking and its growth, really incredibly strong for a business of this size. I thought that guidance was even better than the results that it posted. It's growing where it wants to grow. You look at how the revenue shakes out across the various segments. Agency revenue was down about 7% for the year. This is, basically, where it kicks out the users to its partners so that they can book their travel over there. Merchant revenue for the year was up 25%. That's what Booking really does want. It wants to keep more of its users right there on its platform. It wants to handle more of the transaction. This is exactly the quarter that Booking wants to see. It was good growth. It's a head-scratcher that the market didn't like.
Tyler Crowe: Then the last one, we got Etsy and eBay, and I'm bundling these together because in addition to both of the companies reporting earnings earlier, either today or at the end of the close yesterday, eBay announced that it was acquiring Etsy's Depop business. Now, I don't know if the market liked the deal or if the earnings numbers were so good that the Depop handover didn't really matter that much, but both stocks are up considerably as we're taping. Which one do you think it was that is leading to the market rally?
Jon Quast: That's a really good question, Tyler, as I have read the headlines, it seems everyone is calling this a win-win. It's a win for eBay because eBay is thriving, and it's going to acquire this higher growth platform in Depop, whereas Etsy's struggling, but it gets to shed a distraction and get some cash. It's a win-win. But I think that Etsy is the much bigger winner here, and I'll explain why. eBay is acquiring Depop for a little bit more than its trailing gross merchandise sales. This isn't Depop's revenue, rather, this is sales on its platform. Depop takes a cut of that. But Depop around a billion in gross merchandise sales. eBay is acquiring it for a little more than that. For perspective, both eBay and Etsy trade for less than half of their own merchandise sales. Basically, the deal values Depop at double the price of eBay and Etsy, if we're valuing it from that perspective. Now, to be fair, Depop is growing really fast. The adoption numbers are good here. But if you look at eBay, its stock has gone up in recent years in a big part because of all the capital it's returning to shareholders. In fact, it returned more than a billion over what its profit was last year. That's actually unsustainable. It had two billion in profits. I returned three billion to shareholders. Now, you add on a $1.2 billion acquisition. I think eBay is going to have less money to give back to shareholders here for the near future. Etsy, on the other hand, gets this huge cash infusion, so I say it's the bigger winner.
Matt Frankel: I agree with most of what Jon said, but I'm a little more toward the win-win idea. In most cases, and you guys know this just from following the stock market. In 90% of the time, the company doing the acquiring falls, their stock price, and the company selling an asset or selling themselves gains. But the market reacting positively for both of these companies tells me that this is a good deal for both. In short, investors are happy that eBay is getting Depop, and they're happy that Etsy's getting rid of it. eBay has the financial and business strength to, let's say, nurture a platform that's growing at 60% year-over-year like Depop is but is not yet profitable. Etsy really doesn't. I do think it is a win-win in a lot of ways for both of these platforms.
Tyler Crowe: Let's see. We got consumer durable spending with Walmart, travel spending, so much more discretionary with booking. We'll call it eclectic spending, or if you can think of a better way to classify Etsy and eBay spending, go for it. If you guys wanted to read the tea leaves of all the things that we saw in the earnings releases, guidance, things like that, were there any takeaways from these results that said anything to you in terms of the pulse of the consumer or what we can expect in the coming weeks or year when it comes to consumer spending?
Jon Quast: Well, not necessarily on the consumer spending front, but how about on the business priority front? If you rewind the clock five years, Adtech stocks were something that I was extremely bullish on. I saw the whole thesis being that advertising was transitioning from linear advertising to programmatic, that seemed to favor these pure-play Adtech companies. Really, they've struggled, most of them. But you look at digital advertising as a whole, and it's absolutely red hot. You just have to know where to look for it. Look at Walmart's advertising business grew 46% in its Fiscal 2026. Now, some of that was because it acquired Visio, but still it's growing fast in its own right. eBay ad revenue is now 18% of its total revenue. Booking saw 11% advertising revenue growth in 2025. These are digital platforms with large user bases. They have scale, and they are enjoying this advertising revenue boom. Amazon, you could throw this in here as well. I think this trend is something that is going to continue. Businesses have these bases of users that it can sell this advertising slot to.
Matt Frankel: I think one key takeaway, from all three of these, is that consumers are a little under pressure. I already mentioned with Walmart that Walmart's gaining market share, not just in the higher income brackets, but throughout the spectrum. That's a little bit concerning that consumers are having to cut back. I know I didn't weigh in with Booking, but even with strong guidance, they're predicting travel demand to fall a little bit year-over-year. Whether or not it was great guidance for Booking, it shows that people are a little squeezed and being a little more discretionary about that spending. Then with Etsy and eBay, the fact that they use a clothing retail platform is such a desirable asset, it's growing so fast. It shows that consumers are looking for ways to maybe save a little money. Both of these, eBay especially is where people go to save some money compared to buying full retail. I think that's a big takeaway. Is that consumers are feeling under pressure right now.
Tyler Crowe: I think the consumer under pressure is some foreshadowing when we get into the Klarna's discussion later. But after the break, we're going to do a deeper dive into Lemonade.
Lemonade. It is, perhaps, the most polarizing insurance company to ever be traded on the public market. It reported earnings before the opening bell, and look, I'm not going to hide anything here. I struggle with this company, specifically struggle with the optimistic view of it. I'm probably going a little mask off here and admit that I'm not very bullish on this company to start. I want maybe one or both of you guys to chime in to, as you see it, walk me through the quarter and convince me why the story is working.
Matt Frankel: I get it, Tyler. To be fair, I'm going to use words like stock-based compensation and adjusted metrics that are probably going to trigger you a little bit. But I'm a shareholder, and I struggle with Lemonade's business model from time to time and its long-term viability. It does things differently than other insurance companies. Targeting a specific loss ratio instead of worrying about investment income and things like that. But the numbers are rapidly moving in the right direction. Growth is accelerating. In-force premiums grew by 31% every year. That's something that legacy insurers would love to have. The company is just shy of three million customers, and I remember it crossed the one million threshold just a few years ago. This was the ninth consecutive quarter of an accelerating growth rate, and the ninth consecutive quarter of improving loss ratios. All the major business areas, specifically, Lemonade Car. That's the one I was looking at, posted loss ratios well below the company's 75% target. Here's where it gets a little more fun. Lemonade is now profitable on an adjusted free cash flow basis. It's moving toward profitability, and some metrics Tyler, actually, has some faith in. It is rolling out some innovative products. I love the idea of 50% lower insurance rates when your car is in full self-driving mode. That's just one example. I'd love to see them get their stock-based comp under control, 75 million expected in 2026 is high. That's up from 60 million a year ago. There's at least a little bit more justification for it now than when the company was really losing money hand over fist, but it's still a problem.
Tyler Crowe: I'm not the most optimistic on this company, and there's some incongruencies I see with some of the things you're talking about. Top-line growth, great. In force premium growth, great. Declining loss ratios, meaning that it's doing a better job of underwriting premiums. Great. But all of that said, overhead costs continue to decline. I know it says operating expenses are flat, but that excludes customer acquisition costs. It seems all this fabulous growth that they're talking about doesn't come from organic growth or anything like that. It comes because they're spending a boatload of money to acquire their customers. Much of all that is still leading to GAAP losses and needs to continually sell stock to offset retained losses. Insurance, no matter if it's AI-powered or some new digital native platform that takes out all of the legacy stuff, it's still a balance sheet game. Today, it has less equity in the business than it did when it IPOed. I've yet to see a quarterly earnings report where it showed a sign to GAAP profitability, taking out all those expenses that are adjusted. How does that correct itself? What am I missing? Why am I wrong here?
Matt Frankel: Well, there you go using terms like GAAP profitability. Lemonade doesn't like to mention that too much in its earnings reports. You're right. It hasn't really talked about profitability yet. Where I would push back a little bit is what you said about acquisition costs. Right now, Lemonade has clearly shifted its focus to Lemonade Car, the auto insurance, which is a much higher-priced in form of insurance than what it's traditionally pushed, which is renter's insurance. Higher acquisition costs are natural. The average auto insurance policy is roughly 10 times what the average renter's insurance policy is. If you're going to acquire a customer that's 10 times more valuable to you, it makes sense that you would spend a little bit of money. But yes, if you wanted to have a consistently profitable insurance company, Lemonade could get there in 2-3 years. It could happen, but for the time being, a company like Progressive might be a better fit if that's what you're looking for.
Jon Quast: When it comes to the debate of the financials of an insurance company, I will trust Matt and Tyler to provide much more important commentary than I. But let me put this out there from just a layperson's perspective. I think that if you're listening to this and you say, I'm not sure about Lemonade's financials, one thing that I would look at is its net promoter score, and I don't know how recent this is, but at one point, it was 70. If you know how the net promoter score works, that is incredibly high. The insurance industry as a whole averages in the negative when it comes to net promoter score. I don't think that this is a company. Maybe you look at it today and you're like, the numbers don't attract me so much. GAAP profits do make a difference to me. I'm more interested in progressive. But I don't think this is a company that you should take off of your watchlist entirely because it does seem its customers really do love it. It has three million now almost, and it's growing fast. I think that at the very least, you keep it on the watchlist and keep an eye on Lemonade, because it seems to be doing something that its customers actually love.
Tyler Crowe: I just may be the grumpy guy in the corner who just complains about Lemonade for the rest of time, but I do appreciate Matt going a little Ronald Reagan on me and being like, there you go with that GAAP profitability again. Speaking of profitability, and somewhat lack of it, after the break, we're going to talk about Klarna's earnings.
ADVERTISEMENT: Introducing Fidelity Trader Plus, the next generation of advanced trading from Fidelity. Customize your tools and charts and access them seamlessly across desktop, web, and mobile. For faster trades, anywhere you go. Try the all-new Fidelity Trader Plus. Learn more about our most powerful trading platform yet at fidelity.com/traderplus. Investing involves risk, including risk of loss. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, member NYSE, SIPC.
Tyler Crowe: With so many earnings stories coming out this week, and actually, all of these things happen today. We're going to, actually, forego our normal stocks on our radar so we can keep going with a lot of the market news today. We're left with Klarna as the last one because the market did not like what it saw this quarter. Shares are down 26% as we tape. Top-line numbers look good. But one thing that can't make 38% revenue growth look good is when transaction costs rise by 53%. For the full year, it ended up posting a 0.79 per-share loss after a profit in 2024. The thing that popped out, to me, was the rising reserves for credit losses. I'm going to see if there was anything else from you guys in a second here. But just to keep that in perspective, this is not credit losses on its revenue. This is on its gross merchandise volume, which is considerably higher than total revenue, so it can actually take out a pretty big bite. Aside from that, was there anything else that popped out to you guys that might be contributing to the sell-off?
Matt Frankel: The short version is that the market hates higher risk, and there's higher perceived risk with Klarna than there was before. But there were a few concerning items, just to name a couple. The average revenue per customer was flat year-over-year. Despite the company really leaning into deepening relationships and getting repeat customers and engaging its customers more, you would expect that number to be going up. The rising reserves for credit losses are a concern. They come with the shifting loan mix. I'm a Klarna shareholder, and the reason I own shares is for Buy Now, Pay Later. I love the business dynamics of that part of the business. They're shifting more toward a banking product focus. Their long-term financing product is called Fair Financing, their debit card product versus Traditional Buy Now, Pay Later. In a way, it's a good problem to have. Fair financing is growing fast, but it does add an element of risk. Their CEO said, in their earnings release, that banking products, including that fair financing in the Klarna, will be the key drivers of growth going forward, which might be concerning investors. Buy Now, Pay Later has generally better economics. It has much lower loss requirements to really short-term loans and things like that, and greater predictability. Their gross merchandise volume increased by 165% every year in the quarter. Their number of banking customers has more than doubled, and it could be that the banking side of the business is simply growing too fast for comfort.
Jon Quast: When it comes to Buy Now, Pay Later, I'm not a user myself, and it's tempting to just wave my hands at a company like Klarna. But the more I think about it, the more I do think that the world is headed in this direction. I think it is headed in the direction of Klarna's services that it offers. You look at three-year revenue has doubled for Klarna, and its operating expenses have dropped by 8% during that time. It is so hard for me to dismiss blindly and just say, I don't like this business. That is so huge. I can't dismiss a business that has doubled over the last three years. Even though I do struggle with the financials a little bit, but it reminds me a little bit of the delivery platforms just a few years ago. There was a time that I just didn't see a path to free cash flow positivity for platforms like DoorDash or Lyft. Yet, they were the ones that were building a big platforms. The adoption trends were in its favor, and then even they eventually did turn the corner with the cash flow and everything else. They flipped a switch one day. If you're a Buy Now, Pay Later investor, perhaps a Klarna's investor, you're feeling the pain a little bit today. But I think that if you're invested in this space, you have to be quite encouraged with the long-term investment trends. The adoption trends, they do appear to be in your favor.
Tyler Crowe: The idea of flooding the zone with a slightly less profitable product, so everybody adopts it and then turn on the profitability through changes in fee structures. It is a compelling idea. Certainly, you look at companies like DoorDash, Uber, and things like that, and it has worked out so far. Certainly an interesting way to think about this Buy Now, Pay Later space as we go on, and hopefully they just don't become banks, eventually, over time. That is all the time we have for today. Matt, Jon, thanks for sharing your thoughts.
As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks to producer Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motley Fool team for Matt, Jon and myself. Thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.
