Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

The Worst News in 53 Years

By Tim Beyers – Updated Nov 10, 2016 at 7:59PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

But dividends are still your best chance for investing success.

Welcome to Purgatory, Fool. Your dividends are no longer good here.

Research from Standard & Poor's shows that 288 of the roughly 7,000 public companies that report dividend information decreased their payouts during the last three months of the year. It was the worst quarter for dividends since 1956, when S&P began collecting such data.

For the year, Capital IQ found 485 dividend reductions by companies and closed-end funds. Notable 2008 cutters included Weyerhaeuser (NYSE:WY), Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (NYSE:FCX), and Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB).

At least there's Prozac
If this sounds like a huge problem, it is. According to research from Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel, during the 132 years between 1871 and 2003, 97% of returns came from dividends on the original investment.

Big gains in 2003, 2004, and 2006 may have altered the equation some since, but for the most part, dependable dividends continue to help produce returns, especially among blue chips. The large-cap-weighted S&P 500 index yields more than 3% as of this writing.

What we don't know is whether that yield, or any yield, is sustainable. The Great Dividend Implosion of 2008 has raised doubts. Thanks, Washington Mutual. You, too, Wachovia.

Is there any hope? Not really, says S&P analyst Howard Silverblatt. Quoting from his recent interview with the Indianapolis Star:

Companies are not willing to commit to increases, but they don't want to have to cut their dividends because that's a poor sign. There's a lot of moving parts here. ... Dividends are very insecure.

And the audience replied, "How insecure are they?"
Silverblatt is probably being cautious because, as an analyst, he's paid to be. Yet the truth about 2008 is that it wasn't as bad a year for dividends as the headlines suggest.

In fact, it wasn't even close. Capital IQ spotted 1,744 dividend increases last year -- firms were 3.6 times more likely to raise their payout than lower it. History favors increases even more:


Dividend Increases

Dividend Reductions





3.6 to 1




16.7 to 1




6.4 to 1




9.4 to 1




16.9 to 1

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Notable 2008 dividend boosters included Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC), Boeing (NYSE:BA), Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD), and McCormick (NYSE:MKC), a recommendation of our Motley Fool Income Investor service.

Be a Fool for dividends
The worst year for dividends in the last half-century and hundreds of firms still raised their payouts. These are the stocks you bet on for the very long term. Stocks that, given enough time, can yield you more than 3,000%.

Sound interesting? Click here for 30 days of free access to Income Investor -- you'll get unfettered access to all of the team's research, as well as advisor James Early's top seven dividend stocks for new money. There's no obligation to subscribe.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers owns shares of Prospect Capital. McCormick is an Income Investor pick. The Fool is investors writing for investors.


Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.