Ask employees or even most investors and they'll tell you the company once known as Ma Bell hasn't existed for years. They're right, of course.

If it's tough to toss away the term completely, it's because of the size of AT&T's (NYSE: T) network. The company has acquired and integrated many of the so-called Baby Bells that once existed, leaving Verizon (NYSE: VZ), Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S) -- and to a lesser extent -- the soon-to-be-completed merger of Qwest (NYSE: Q) and CenturyLink (NYSE: CTL) as its main rivals.

Originally, these networks were built to deliver voice service over wires, and AT&T for years has survived by reliably delivering calls in this way. No longer. In the third quarter completed on Sept. 30, AT&T's wireless revenue accounted for 48% of its overall total and came within $95 million of equaling wireline revenue.

Here's a closer look at what the Street expected and how AT&T performed:





Revenue $31.2 billion $31.6 billion $30.7 billion
Per-share earnings $0.55 $0.55* $0.54
Gross margin Not available 57.2% 58.2%
Free cash flow (YTD) Not available $11.6 billion $13.9 billion

Sources: AT&T press release, Yahoo! Finance, and Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. YTD = Year to date.
* Excludes $1.53 in one-time tax and other benefits.

The cost of being wireless
Wireless was the key supplier of growth. Overall wireless revenue improved 11.4% as AT&T gained 2.6 million net new accounts and activated 8 million integrated devices. Call it the benefit of opening up to new relationships; AT&T's data network now supports both Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone and a slew of devices using Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) increasingly popular Android operating system.

But these activations came at a cost. Wireless operating expense rose by more than 15% during the quarter, wiping out all but a fraction of the segment's operating income gains.

To be fair, AT&T probably had no choice but to spend to get more of its customers under the protective shield of new two-year agreements. Why? A September survey by Credit Suisse found that 23% of iPhone owners would prefer Verizon if given the chance to switch. Press reports have since confirmed a deal to put the iPhone on Verizon's network sometime early next year. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a deal with Sprint, as well.

Now it's your turn to weigh in. What will AT&T's business look like once it no longer owns the iPhone? Please vote in the poll below and then leave a comment to explain your thinking.

Interested in more info on AT&T? Add it to your watchlist here by clicking here.

True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community.

Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Google and Sprint Nextel are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers is a member of the Rule Breakers stock-picking team. He had stock and options positions in Apple and a stock position in Google at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Twitter as @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Google and is also on Twitter as @TheMotleyFool. The Fool's disclosure policy has never operated with a wire.