It was really only a matter of time before Blockbuster
However, troublesome signs here indicate that Blockbuster isn't in tune with what consumers want. Speaking at the Reuters Media Summit yesterday, Blockbuster CEO John Antioco began to flesh out what the company's digital strategy is likely to entail.
Thinking inside the set-top box
"Conventional wisdom says consumers don't want another set-top box," he says. "I'm not sure I'm in that camp."
Please tell me that he didn't just say what I think he said? Too late. He said it. Antioco feels that consumers want one more gadget wired into their home theater systems. He points to MovieBeam as "an interesting model" that the company may be emulating, but doesn't stop to realize why MovieBeam has never gained any kind of traction.
For starters, you have a box to sell or subsidize. MovieBeam's box sells for $100 to $200. It comes preloaded with 100 movies. The service is convenient on the surface. The films start right away (as opposed to the sometimes lengthy download times through on-demand Internet delivery) and they do show up on your television without a lot of fuss. If you want to catch a film, it's $3.99 for new releases (and half as much for older titles) and you have 24 hours to watch them.
Strike one, of course, is the expense for the new box. It would cost you about a year of unlimited rentals at Netflix or Blockbuster Online just to pay for that box -- not a very compelling value proposition. Then you have the perceived value of going through just four new releases a month to equate a free month of unlimited mail-delivered rentals. Sadly, the economics don't work. If Blockbuster decides to subsidize the boxes by giving them away and clinging to the hope of making it up in rental royalties, creditors would turn in their freshly dug graves. The hurdle is too high, no matter where you place it.
The second strike comes from the limited selection: 100 preloaded titles? MovieBeam replenishes the supply by replacing as many as 10 films every week with new content, but it's still just a hundred movies. If slim pickings will satisfy your hunger, you don't need MovieBeam -- your digital cable provider's video-on-demand service will suffice.
Strike three? That happens if the first two obstacles don't sink Blockbuster's entry via pre-loaded set-top boxes. See, Blockbuster's hoping to make a difference here through its customer data. It doesn't have to feed the same films to every box. It can make sure consumers get the kind of films that they like. That's a respectable notion, but what's the name of that company that has been mining online data -- deeper and broader -- for a few years now? That's right: Netflix. If this works, Netflix will be able to offer the advantage of more user-ratings data than Blockbuster.
2007 is now just weeks away
In fact, this may be part of the Netflix strategy anyway. Two years ago, TiVo's
Either way, I can applaud Antioco for at least making a commitment to digital delivery. I just hope that he's seriously bringing more to the table than just a flawed model that's already in the marketplace. That wouldn't be Blockbuster's first mistake. Unfortunately, though, it could prove to be its last.
Netflix, TiVo, and Amazon.com have both been recommended to Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter subscribers.
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has been a Netflix subscriber -- and shareholder -- since 2002. He also owns shares in TiVo. He is part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. T he Fool has a disclosure policy.
