Most yearly corporate gatherings have descended into the realm of total yawners, but prospects have increased somewhat that New York Times'
The recommendation at least informally supports the efforts of Morgan Stanley
As was detailed in a Wall Street Journal lead story last month, during the past couple of years Elmasry has become a progressively more frequent thorn in the side of Times Chairman Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., whose family's shares elect nine of the company's directors, as opposed to four for the freely trading Class A shareholders. Elmasry has pushed to have the dual class structure eliminated, or at least put to a vote of all holders of the company's stock. But with the Sulzbergers clearly in control of Times and its properties, it appears that the requested change is unlikely. In the meantime, Times' cost structure, including its expenditures for a new Manhattan headquarters building, has also induced Elmasry's ire.
Last year, nearly 30% of the company's shareholders withheld votes on Times' slate of director nominees. A continuation of the slide in the company's share price, which has fallen nearly 35% in the past two years, along with the increasing attention being given to Elmasry's efforts and the ISS recommendation, all make it appear likely that the percentage of withheld votes will increase this year.
It also appears to be a reasonable wager that, at least in the short term, little will be changed by the demonstration. Times, like the about-to-be-restructured Tribune
Thus, while the efforts of Elmasry and ISS are commendable, they probably could be classified as so much sound and fury signifying nothing. Fools should be advised to remain mere observers of this and other newspaper-related dramas.
For related Foolishness:
New York Times is a former Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Find out why advisor James Early made the decision to sell by trying the newsletter free for 30 days.