In my experience, government mandates typically lead to pain for someone. This time, the victims might well be the cable guys, including Comcast
It seems that the longtime practice of the cable multisystems operators (MSOs) buying set-top receiver boxes (from the likes of Motorola
In part because of this administrative prodding, the operators simultaneously are contending that since more and more boxes now possess high-definition capability, digital video recorders, and other still relatively new wrinkles -- they'll be forced to raise the rates on those boxes that they continue to rent. The order of magnitude being discussed appears to involve an additional $2 to $3 a month for some boxes.
I suppose I have two significantly different reactions to this series of events. On the one hand, the cable operators obviously became default box suppliers, in part, as a necessary inducement to subscribers to move from analog to digital feeds. But if you think about it, we don't expect our cable companies to provide us with television sets, so why should we expect them to set us up with set-top boxes?
At the same time, anything that ratchets up monthly cable charges could be negative to the operators and their investors. While telephone companies AT&T
While this situation bears scrutiny, the stronger cable operators appear to provide continued solid investment opportunities. Indeed, when it comes to management quality and franchise strength, it's difficult to improve upon Comcast and Time Warner Cable -- two companies that Foolish investors would be well advised to monitor carefully.
To tune into related Foolishness:
A free 30-day trial of Motley Fool Stock Advisor will give your computer box full access to all subscriber benefits, including past subscriptions and exclusive interviews.