It appears that Canadian copper and gold producer Northgate Minerals
Northgate had sought to expand its Kemess mine through the development of the Kemess North copper and gold deposit, which is located near its Kemess South mine. It claimed that the project would have resulted in a securing of the positions of the 475 workers at Kemess South during two years of construction and 11 years of mining.
Kemess North is located 430 kilometers northwest of Prince George, B.C. According to Northgate, it could contain in excess of four million ounces of gold.
But the apparent rub, and the reason the project was opposed actively by the indigenous Gitxsan and the Tse Keh Nay peoples, was the companies' desire to dispose of large amounts of tailings and waste rock into a local lake. Indeed, in a press release posted on the Tse Keh Nay website, Grand Chief Gordon Pierre said that the group "congratulates the panel members for their brave recommendation and calls upon both (provincial and federal) governments to follow the panel's lead to protect Amazay Lake."
The panel's recommendation is not binding, but clearly will be considered by politicians who will make the final call to allow or disallow the project. Indeed, the panel included 32 recommendations to mitigate damage in the event the project should be permitted to proceed.
All this occurs as Phoenix-based copper and gold producer Freeport McMoRan
So, the obvious message for my Foolish friends is that while mineral mining has been one of the hottest sectors around lately, unless and until it is permitted to develop Kemess North, Northgate is clearly not the way to participate in a mining sector boom.
Mine a little related Foolishness:
Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own a single share in any of the companies mentioned. He does welcome your questions or comments. The Motley Fool has an environmentally pristine disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Why A10 Networks Shares Plunged Today
The networking company's fourth-quarter revenue fell shy of guidance.
What Investors Want to See From Zoe’s Kitchen in 2018
After a terrible 2017, can the fast-casual Mediterranean chain bounce back?
Better Buy: Seaspan Corporation (SSW) vs. Navios Maritime Midstream Partners L.P. (NAP)
Both shipping companies focus on owning vessels signed to long-term contracts, providing them with a steadier stream of cash flow.