Props to you, Fools.
Not even a week after you voted Adobe
Adobe yesterday rolled out a new media player that, boldly, hopes to challenge everyone offering similar technology, Apple included. I'm not at all sure the company will succeed, but I love the idea.
Why? Adobe media player is, in many ways, a self-contained application. No browser is needed to download content from the Web. Think of it as a TV on your computer with the remote being the control menus in the software.
Of course, if the history of software proves anything, it's that "better" doesn't always mean "winner." Here, Adobe has to face down entrenched competitors such as Microsoft
Open-source media players also exist. VLC Media Player and Miro, for example. Neither has the footprint of Windows Media Player or iTunes, but their very existence is a reminder that competition is everywhere.
If Adobe has an advantage here, it's with Flash, a popular technology that Adobe acquired from Macromedia in 2005 and that helps create animations and other digital doo-dads that enliven today's top websites. Having Flash deeply embedded into a media player could make delivering ads side by side slicker and more relevant, something that's likely to interest both Google
Still, iTunes is iTunes, and Windows Media Player is Windows Media Player. Together, they're responsible for more than 100 million user accounts, according to Nielsen Online. But, interestingly, it's iTunes that is the junior partner in that tandem, with some 35.6 million user accounts vs. more than 75 million for Windows Media Player.
Could Adobe help Apple close the gap? An $18.4 billion war chest gives you the opportunity to find out, Steve.
Get your clicks with related Foolishness:
Apple is a Stock Advisor selection. Microsoft is an Inside Value pick. Get free, unfettered access to the research and recommendations behind these market-beating services for 30 days. There's no obligation to subscribe.
Fool.com and Rule Breakers contributor Tim Beyers can't believe it's still snowing in Denver. Really. He didn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article at the time of publication. You can find Tim's portfolio here and his latest blog entry here. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is sooooo ready for spring.