Your next local beat reporter might be an algorithm.
This week, General Electric's
Nine markets will host the service initially, including New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. And that's likely to be troubling for ink-stained old media such as New York Times
"Their valuations are incredibly low and it's because they're moving in the wrong direction, in terms of strategy," Josephson said in an interview earlier this week.
The rise of the curators
So what's the right direction? "I talk with a lot of newspapers and they know that they need to get more local," Josephson said. He's talking about news breaking hundreds of feet away from you, in your neighborhood.
I can see the merit to that. But is sourcing via blogs and social media really a good idea? Sure. Twitter is a terrific tool and could even become a crude wire service. And user-generated content makes news all the time. NBC's first shots of the recent "Miracle on the Hudson," in which a pilot safely guided a US Airways jet to an emergency water landing off of Manhattan, were supplied by a viewer, said Brian Buchwald, NBC's senior vice president of local integrated media, in a recent interview.
Outside.in's emergence comes at an interesting time. Earlier today, Gannett
Josephson is quick to point out that his firm is partnering with newspapers. He believes they can use technology to improve profits but, as a writer and former reporter, I find his plan chilling. Josephson envisions papers keeping a skeleton staff of, say, three to be feed "curators," as he calls them, because Outside.in aggregates by locale rather importance. Adding a human element would insure that the most important hyperlocal news led each feed.
I can't argue with the logic, though. We know from The Huffington Post that content aggregation works. And we know from Google
Prepare yourself, Fool. The local media revolution will be automated.
Get your clicks with related Foolishness: