Join the Fool as we assess blame for this financial meltdown -- March Madness bracket style! Below is one of eight first matchups you can vote on … enjoy!
The case for the American consumer, by Morgan Housel
It's easy for the American consumer (a.k.a. Main Street) to blame Wall Street because, well, it should. Wall Street screwed up. They were greedy. They were irresponsible. Citigroup
But the chain of blame isn't quite that direct. Wall Street was able to go berserk over the past decade predominantly because Main Street was addicted to debt.
It's easy to forget about how overcooked American consumers were over the past decade. To bring you back to the good ol' days, I fired up LexisNexis and found some newspaper and magazine headlines from between 2001 and 2007.
Enjoy:
- Americans' Savings Rate Drops to Depression-era Low
- The Way We Live Now: Home Sweet Debt
- Borrowers We Be
- Equity Shrivels as Homeowners Borrow and Buy
- Savings Enter Negative Territory; First Time Since Great Depression
- We're Spending More Than We Earn
- Personal Savings at Lowest Level Since '30s
- Debt Rises as Personal Savings Falls to Just 1.9%
- Our Homes Are Our Piggy Banks
- Why Aren't We Saving More?
- 2006 Personal Savings Drop to 74-Yr. Low
Yes, banks like Goldman Sachs
The pain we're dealing with today is largely the American consumers' bill coming due, not just Wall Street's.
The case for Wall Street, by Horgan Mousel
Why is Wall Street to blame? That's almost too easy.
I don't think there's ever been a period in human history similar to recent years on Wall Street, where complexity exploded at the same time that risk was entirely disregarded. A simple example is to show how severely Wall Street firms leveraged their balance sheets over the years.
Have a look:
Bank |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bear Stearns |
34 times |
29 times |
27 times |
28 times |
28 times |
Lehman Bros. |
31 times |
26 times |
24 times |
24 times |
24 times |
Goldman Sachs |
17 times |
17 times |
25 times |
21 times |
19 times |
Morgan Stanley |
33 times |
32 times |
31 times |
27 times |
24 times |
Any time a bank leverages up 34-to-1 with subprime assets, bad things happen. This makes total sense in hindsight, but the amount of money Wall Street was granting itself through bonuses and stock options completely blinded rational business sense. The people who run these banks are no less talented than the geniuses at Google
How can you not blame them?
Now it is your turn to decide who is to blame by voting in our Fool Poll and commenting below.
Check out the Fool’s entire 2009 March Madness bracket here.