Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

For Blockbuster Cancer Drugs, Approvals Are the Easy Part

By Brian Orelli, PhD – Updated Apr 6, 2017 at 2:02PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Don't get too excited.

Here's a rather astounding fact: According to a review recently published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration approved 53 of the 60 cancer drugs that were submitted for review from mid-2005 through 2007.

That's an insane 88% approval rate.

Before you load up on cancer-drug makers ...
Realize that's not the same as saying the FDA approved 88% of drugs developed to treat cancer. We're only looking at drugs that were submitted to the FDA; for every drug that's submitted, there are many that died in clinical trials.

Also, the review included drugs submitted for approval to be used in additional cancer types, which had a perfect 100% approval rate. While that kind of expansion can happen in other indications -- Pfizer's (NYSE:PFE) Lyrica is approved for a couple of pain conditions as well as seizures -- I would guess it's more common for cancer drugs. Most -- 35 of the 53 cancer approvals -- were for expanded indications, including sanofi-aventis' (NYSE:SNY) Taxotere, Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE:JNJ) Doxil, and Novartis' (NYSE:NVS) Gleevec.

With a drug already in use, the FDA is likely more comfortable with the drug's side-effect profile. Because manufacturing was covered in the first approval, an expanded approval also has less risk of regulators coming up with manufacturing issues, although it's not completely removed if the drug is made in multiple places. Last year, for instance, Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE:BMY) and Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) pulled back their FDA application to expand Erbitux into lung cancer because the drug used in the clinical trials didn't come from the plant that supplies the U.S.

What it does mean ...
Drug companies are pretty good at figuring out what drugs are up to snuff. Sure, there were two that were withdrawn and five more that got flat-out rejections, but by and large, cancer-drug companies seem to be able to satisfy the FDA.

Buy why?
The short answer is that cancer is deadly. When there aren't many other treatment options, the FDA will be more lenient there than for a drug that doesn't have an immediate need to save lives. For instance, nine of the approvals were of the accelerated variety, which allows a drug company to market the drug, but requires the company to conduct clinical trials to confirm the initial finding. Also, the FDA generally requires two phase 3 trials before it'll approve a drug, but 44 of the 53 approvals were based on a single phase 3 clinical trial.

Part of the reason companies are able to correctly predict how the FDA will decide may be because drug companies often enter Special Protocol Assessments (SPAs) with the FDA. With an SPA, the FDA is essentially signing off on the clinical trial design, including the endpoints that are used to measure the success of the trial. If the drug hits its SPA-defined goals and nothing else pops up -- like a side effect -- an approval is extremely likely. That's one of the reasons that investors have such high hopes that Dendreon's (NASDAQ:DNDN) Provenge, for prostate cancer, will get past the FDA this time.

Careful what you wish for
Keep in mind that the reduced risk of no approval means investors will drive up the price before the FDA decision. With drugs that seem likely to get an approval, you can't expect as large a pop on FDA approval as you would get with a company like Vanda Pharmaceuticals last May, when everyone thought another rejection was coming. In extreme cases, like Onyx Pharmaceuticals' Nexavar, you might even see selling on the news because the approval was fully priced into the stock.

As an investor, you can lower your risk by investing in cancer drug companies after a clinical trial success but before an FDA approval, but you'll also reduce your reward.

Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection and Novartis is a Global Gains recommendation. Johnson & Johnson is an Income Investor pick, and Motley Fool Options has recommended buying calls on the stock. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days

Fool contributor Brian Orelli, Ph.D., doesn't own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Eli Lilly and Company Stock Quote
Eli Lilly and Company
LLY
$311.46 (0.19%) $0.59
Sanofi Stock Quote
Sanofi
SNY
$38.40 (-1.87%) $0.73
Pfizer Inc. Stock Quote
Pfizer Inc.
PFE
$44.08 (-1.10%) $0.49
Bristol Myers Squibb Company Stock Quote
Bristol Myers Squibb Company
BMY
$70.71 (-0.81%) $0.58
Novartis AG Stock Quote
Novartis AG
NVS
$76.01 (-1.47%) $-1.13
Johnson & Johnson Stock Quote
Johnson & Johnson
JNJ
$166.72 (0.33%) $0.54

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
339%
 
S&P 500 Returns
109%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/24/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.