The online video-rental expert just authorized another $300 million of share buybacks. The last $300 million authorization came in August 2009, only seven months after a $150 million buyback notice. After starting its buyback actions in 2007, Netflix has now spent more than $732 million buying back its own shares. And I hate the very idea.
Typically, share buybacks are widely used, shareholder-friendly exercises of dilution control and share-price support. For example, Microsoft
For Netflix, however, the situation is very different. Imagine, if you will, if Apple
And that's not even all; Netflix has even less reason for buybacks than Apple does. You see, Apple has so much cash on hand that Steve Jobs can't figure out what to do with it all. Jobs could be forgiven for overspending on buyback programs, because his company can afford the strategy.
For Netflix, every dollar spent on buybacks could have been spent on buying the digital streaming rights to more movies. That's not just conjecture, either: Hastings has already taken extraordinary measures to shovel more cash into those vital content licenses. Diverting today's $300 million buyback provision into the pockets of Sony
Share buybacks are great in theory, Reed. They're even awesome in practice for most firms. In your case, however, I would love to see them stop. You don't take your foot off the accelerator at the start of the race.
Would you prefer buybacks or more content licenses? The comment box below is wide open for your input.