We've established that Google
The real battlefield lies in the music business. Apple has already edged out the likes of Wal-Mart
A new day is coming
A Google Music service has been expected and hinted at for years, but it never materialized. This time is different. Respected trade rag Billboard reports that Big G is in serious talks with all of the major music labels to make it happen.
If Google gets what it wants, we'll see a combined subscription service and piecemeal download store, where all your music is stored in central servers -- a.k.a. The Cloud -- but managed and accessed from any gadget or browser that can connect to the Web. It's a very Googly idea to run it this way, and would add significant value to the Android mobile platform. Sure, Google would love to publish apps for this service on the iPhone, too, but it'll be a cold day in Miami before Apple lets Google collect golden eggs from that luscious goose.
But if you try sometimes ...
But of course, Google will not get exactly what it wants. If the Nexus One experiment taught us anything, it's that even Google can't just walk up to an established and mature business model and expect to change the world in one fell swoop. AT&T
Some of the sticking points include how much of a preview you should be able to hear before making a purchasing decision, the exact payment terms (especially in the streaming subscription world), and the length of the first contracts. Google wants a longer-term deal that gives the new service a fair chance to establish itself while the labels would prefer a shorter trial just to see how much it hurts -- or not.
The elephant in the room
But the biggest issue on the table is far more controversial. The way Google's proposed service would work is to scan your hard drive for music files, and then make those songs available in the cloud. That would include songs purchased from Google Music, Amazon, or iTunes (all OK), tunes digitally ripped from your own CD collection (still nice and legal), files you downloaded from your best friend's iPod or memory stick (Oh no! File sharing!), and even materials downloaded from online file sharing services (Run! Hide! The pirates are coming!).
A file scan is the closest thing you'll get to establishing that you have the right to listen to these particular pieces of music, but as you can see, the files may have arrived from unapproved sources. But how do you tell a downloaded file apart from a song you ripped from that dusty stack of CDs in your closet? Answer: You can't. This is a very ugly can of worms to the legacy music industry, and also a very important aspect of how Google wants its service to work. There are top-notch lawyers and negotiators on both sides, which is why I expect a knock-down, drag-out battle over finer points that will last for a long time.
Friends in unexpected places
And that brings us back to Apple, whose market Google is trying to steal here. Jobs and his gang have already done some of the groundwork that may make the Google Music thing happen, and faster than it would have otherwise. Not only has iTunes proven the viability of online music sales, but the company also bought Lala last year and is trying to put that undisclosed pile of cash to good use.
Lala's music services were a subset of what Google is working on, so the label representatives are hearing many of the same arguments from both Google and Apple now.
For these reasons, I expect Apple to launch a cloud-based update to iTunes around the same time Google goes to market with its new music service. Consumer choice is always good, and both companies will be highly motivated to beat the other with ever better services. And if Google is going to hurt Apple in any market, rather than just piggybacking on its successes, it'll be this one.