YouTube recently announced that it is allowing certain users to create videos longer than the previous limit of 15 minutes, while assuring copyright holders that it won't be making a bad situation worse for them.

The 15-minute limit from YouTube was previously raised for all users from 10 minutes. The additional time is available only to users who have a proven history of complying with the site's copyright rules. The company said it is ramping up the amount of users allowed to do this very slowly.

"We're raising upload limits to a limited set of users who have a proven history of complying with our copyright rules as well as our community guidelines," a YouTube spokesperson said in a statement. "Our Content ID technology, along with the rest of our content management tools, have reached a level of coverage and sophistication that made us comfortable with making this change for a small set of users. We have over 1,000 Content ID partners, including all of the major movie studios and music labels in the U.S., and participation in Content ID continues to grow."

YouTube is using ContentID to ensure that the longer video time period won't allow more copyrighted material to be illegally uploaded. Viacom (NYSE: VIA)(NYSE: VIA-B) filed a lawsuit against the Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)-owned company, alleging that it allowed Viacom's copyrighted content to be uploaded to the site. That suit is still ongoing as Viacom appealed the decision, which came down in favor of YouTube.

ContentID has a reference file of specific song and video types. If a video matches this content, it will contact the rights holder, who can either have the clip blocked, allow for tracking metrics, or monetize it. The matching technology can even track clips from home videos taping a TV screen. There are more than 3 million hours of content in the ContentID file, YouTube said.

However, some content creators aren't buying ContentID's effectiveness. Susan Cleary, vice president and general counsel of the Independent Film & Television Alliance, an association representing independent film and TV companies, says the system is limited.

"What if you don't want your film to be ad-based, you want to license it?" Cleary said. "Ad rep models aren't making anyone money. Maybe they are good for advertisers, but it's not the money stream that will finance future creations. It's not appropriate to protect; it's made to monetize clips." Major films, she said, are often not funded by ads, but by licensing revenue.

Viacom did not respond a request for comment.


 

International Business Times, The Global Business News Leader

See a stock in this story you'd like to follow? Add it to My Watchlist, which will find all of our Foolish analysis on it.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, which is a recommendation of Motley Fool Inside Value and Motley Fool Rule Breakers. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.