Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Targeting Truly Sustainable Returns

By Alyce Lomax – Updated Apr 6, 2017 at 5:17PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

True long-haul investors must seek sustainable companies for sustainable returns.

All investors hope their stock returns will be sustainable, at least in the respect that they'll keep on making money over the long haul. However, more investors should contemplate the growing realization that investments in sustainable companies outperform the market by a long shot.

High sustainability = high performance
Researchers at Harvard Business School and London Business School recently released a study showing that a portfolio of 90 "high sustainability" organizations significantly outperformed 90 "low sustainability" peers over the long term. This outperformance includes stock performance and accounting performance.

"The Impact of a Corporate Culture of Sustainability on Corporate Behavior and Performance" study didn't define "long term" as a mere couple of years, either. It tracked the two groups' financial performance over an 18-year period. The high sustainability companies were defined as those that had implemented a significant number of environmental and social policies since the early to mid-1990s.

According to the study, a $1 investment in a value-weighted portfolio of high sustainability firms in 1993 would have burgeoned to $22.60 by the end of 2010. The same investment in a portfolio of low sustainability firms would have only grown to $15.40 in that same time frame.

The authors also found that high sustainability firms significantly outperformed low sustainability companies on metrics including return on assets and return on equity metrics.

Furthermore, an equal-weighted portfolio of high sustainability firms also outperformed a portfolio of traditional companies.

Sustainability before sustainability was cool
The authors acknowledge that widespread corporate sustainability pushes have only reached mainstream recently, although some companies have been quietly implementing such long-term policies for nearly two decades now.

Consider corporations that have forged ahead of the curve in connecting incentives to environmental factors. For example, in the mid-1990s, Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) began linking executive compensation to environmental metrics, and in 2008, it connected all employee bonuses to environmental goals.

High sustainability firms are also defined as those that take many stakeholders into account instead of focusing solely on shareholder returns. Timberland (recently acquired by VF (NYSE: VFC)) has multiple plans in place for stakeholder engagement, including social media platforms, employee and customer surveys, and initiatives like its nutritional label and green index.

The report points out a very real reason why such companies outperform, and it's common sense. The reason may be that "they are able to attract better human capital, establish more reliable supply chains, avoid conflicts and costly controversies with nearby communities (i.e., maintain their license to operate), and engage in more product and process innovations."

The authors called out Germany's Siemens (NYSE: SI) as an example, generating 20 billion euros in sales from its environmental portfolio alone.

Patience is a virtue ... and lucrative, too
Although the report didn't reveal the 90 "high sustainability" companies to admire (nor did it reveal the 90 "low sustainability" companies to revile), there are plenty of companies that emphasize sustainability and understand that recognizing the long-term interests of many stakeholders creates the best long-term businesses.

Whole Foods Market (Nasdaq: WFM) and Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) are easy examples; both provide health benefits to employees, embrace important elements like fair trade, and give back to communities both here and abroad. These companies understand the holistic relationship between customer, employee, community, environment, and shareholder.

And what about Google (Nasdaq: GOOG)? When it went public in 2004, its founders' IPO letter made it clear that "shareholder value" was hardly its only goal:

We aspire to make Google an institution that makes the world a better place. In pursuing this goal, we will always be mindful of our responsibilities to our shareholders, employees, customers and business partners. ... And now, we are in the process of establishing the Google Foundation. We intend to contribute significant resources to the foundation, including employee time and approximately 1% of Google's equity and profits in some form. We hope someday this institution may eclipse Google itself in terms of overall world impact by ambitiously applying innovation and significant resources to the largest of the world's problems.

Personally, I believe more investors should view the "sustainability" of their stock portfolios through a far wider lens than the "sustainability" of stock price appreciation. Investing in truly good companies is the smartest thing true long-term buy-and-hold investors can do.

After all, as the study's authors note: "the results suggest that this outperformance occurs only in the long term. Managers that are hoping to gain a competitive advantage in the short term are unlikely to succeed by embedding sustainability in the organization's strategy. Similarly, investors in High Sustainability firms must be patient."

The best way to build a strong portfolio for the long haul is to target the companies that are building the most solid foundations by doing good in the world. Clearly, the future dividends are comprised of real returns on investment as well as emotional ones.

Check back at Fool.com every Wednesday and Friday for Alyce Lomax's columns on environmental, social, and governance issues.

Alyce Lomax owns shares of Whole Foods and Starbucks. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, Intel, Starbucks, and Whole Foods, as well as having bought calls on Intel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Intel, Google, Whole Foods, and Starbucks, as well as creating a bull call spread position in Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Alphabet Inc. Stock Quote
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL
$98.74 (-1.40%) $-1.40
Starbucks Corporation Stock Quote
Starbucks Corporation
SBUX
$84.17 (-0.63%) $0.53
Intel Corporation Stock Quote
Intel Corporation
INTC
$27.52 (-1.96%) $0.55
Whole Foods Market, Inc. Stock Quote
Whole Foods Market, Inc.
WFM
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Stock Quote
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
SIEGY
$47.86 (-2.64%) $-1.30
V.F. Corporation Stock Quote
V.F. Corporation
VFC
$35.78 (-1.78%) $0.65

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
329%
 
S&P 500 Returns
106%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/24/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.